Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad E470 (Core i5, GeForce 940MX)

Pequena atualização, grande impacto? O ThinkPad E470 é a mais recente adição à popular série empresarial da Lenovo. Este modelo de nível de entrada da série-E utiliza um processador de 7ma geração da Intel Core e promete mais desempenho e duração de bateria. Tudo isto por um preço atraente. Será que a qualidade ainda está no nível?
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 (ThinkPad E470 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 1122 MHz, Memoría: 2000 MHz, DDR3, ForceWare 369.32, Optimus
Memória
8 GB 
, 1x 8 GB DDR4-2133, 1 de 2 slots ocupados
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 157 PPI, N140HCA-EAB, IPS, Iluminação LED, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G), 256 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones (conector de 3,5 mm), Card Reader: SD, MMC
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 23.7 x 339 x 242
Bateria
45 Wh Lítio-Ion, integrado
Camera
Webcam: 0,9 MP
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, Adaptador de força de 65 W, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.87 kg, Suprimento de energia: 330 g
Preço
680 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Size Comparison

346 mm 248 mm 30.4 mm 2.1 kg343.2 mm 239 mm 20.3 mm 1.7 kg339 mm 239 mm 24 mm 1.8 kg339 mm 242 mm 23.7 mm 1.9 kg331 mm 227 mm 18.8 mm 1.3 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Power outlet, Gbit-LAN, HDMI, USB 3.0
Power outlet, Gbit-LAN, HDMI, USB 3.0
SD/MMC reader, Headset jack, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, Kensington Lock
SD/MMC reader, Headset jack, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, Kensington Lock
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
 
74.3 MB/s +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
 
73.2 MB/s +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
 
67.3 MB/s
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
 
17.3 MB/s -74%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
 
85.9 MB/s +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
 
85.1 MB/s +5%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
 
81 MB/s
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
597 MBit/s
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
536 MBit/s -10%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
92 MBit/s -85%
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
447 MBit/s +19%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174
377 MBit/s
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
91 MBit/s -76%
231
cd/m²
218
cd/m²
225
cd/m²
238
cd/m²
244
cd/m²
235
cd/m²
236
cd/m²
224
cd/m²
229
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
N140HCA-EAB tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 244 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 231.1 cd/m² Minimum: 3 cd/m²
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 242 cd/m²
Contraste: 659:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.23% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
LG LP140WF6-SPB2, , 1920x1080, 14"
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
AUO1E3D, , 1920x1080, 14"
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Chi Mei N140HGE-EAA, , 1920x1080, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
VVX14T058J02, , 2560x1440, 14"
Display
-5%
-9%
-7%
64%
Display P3 Coverage
41.23
39.1
-5%
37.6
-9%
38.15
-7%
68.7
67%
sRGB Coverage
61.4
58.8
-4%
56.6
-8%
56.7
-8%
98.1
60%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
42.67
40.41
-5%
38.85
-9%
39.48
-7%
70.4
65%
Response Times
13%
7%
20%
9%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40.8 ?(22, 18.8)
40 ?(17, 23)
2%
43.2 ?(21.2, 22)
-6%
44 ?(23, 21)
-8%
35.6 ?(17.2, 18.4)
13%
Response Time Black / White *
30.4 ?(8.4, 22)
23.2 ?(6.8, 16.4)
24%
24.4 ?(7.2, 17.2)
20%
16 ?(10, 6)
47%
29.2 ?(14.4, 14.8)
4%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(10)
220 ?(90)
Screen
9%
-21%
-15%
27%
Brightness middle
244
233
-5%
216
-11%
249
2%
257
5%
Brightness
231
221
-4%
203
-12%
238
3%
248
7%
Brightness Distribution
89
88
-1%
83
-7%
87
-2%
94
6%
Black Level *
0.37
0.3
19%
0.47
-27%
0.41
-11%
0.26
30%
Contrast
659
777
18%
460
-30%
607
-8%
988
50%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
6.41
4.43
31%
8.98
-40%
9.09
-42%
4.59
28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
13.4
14.07
-5%
14.64
-9%
9.72
27%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
5.94
3.78
36%
9.61
-62%
9.92
-67%
6.38
-7%
Gamma
2.28 96%
2.31 95%
2.63 84%
2.42 91%
2.51 88%
CCT
6101 107%
7171 91%
11265 58%
11177 58%
6238 104%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
39.3
37.3
-5%
35.9
-9%
36.5
-7%
65
65%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
61.1
58.7
-4%
56.7
-7%
56.7
-7%
98
60%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
6% / 7%
-8% / -15%
-1% / -9%
33% / 32%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 8.4 ms rise
↘ 22 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 22 ms rise
↘ 18.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
Intel Core i7-7500U
146 Points +13%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
Intel Core i7-7500U
145 Points +12%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
141 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB
Intel Core i7-6500U
132 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
117 Points -9%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
Intel Core i5-6200U
114 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
Intel Core i7-7500U
355 Points +7%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Intel Core i7-6600U
347 Points +5%
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
Intel Core i7-7500U
335 Points +1%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
Intel Core i5-7200U
331 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB
Intel Core i7-6500U
305 Points -8%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel Core i5-6200U
294 Points -11%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
Intel Core i5-6200U
290 Points -12%
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.7 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.48 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
46.75 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
129 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
331 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
50.3 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.6 %
Ajuda
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
-45%
-12%
8%
187%
Read Seq
476.5
497.6
4%
491.2
3%
510
7%
1778
273%
Write Seq
458.7
180
-61%
322.2
-30%
267.2
-42%
1530
234%
Read 512
346.4
297.1
-14%
310.1
-10%
347.6
0%
1339
287%
Write 512
291.1
169.1
-42%
276
-5%
267.5
-8%
1506
417%
Read 4k
35.15
18.91
-46%
19.57
-44%
33.12
-6%
51.3
46%
Write 4k
78.8
37.13
-53%
77.8
-1%
95.9
22%
139.3
77%
Read 4k QD32
276
95.7
-65%
146.3
-47%
392.8
42%
561
103%
Write 4k QD32
178.3
37.26
-79%
241.4
35%
266.4
49%
277
55%
SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
Sequential Read: 476.5 MB/s
Sequential Write: 458.7 MB/s
512K Read: 346.4 MB/s
512K Write: 291.1 MB/s
4K Read: 35.15 MB/s
4K Write: 78.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read: 276 MB/s
4K QD32 Write: 178.3 MB/s
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
3614 Points +2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
3546 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
3542 Points 0%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
3472 Points -2%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
Radeon R7 M360, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS
3415 Points -4%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
GeForce 930MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002
4837 Points +4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
GeForce 940MX, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G)
4642 Points
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A
4463 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512)
4442 Points -4%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
Radeon R7 M360, 6200U, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS
4415 Points -5%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3546 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4389 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4642 pontos
Ajuda
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
2556 Points
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
2206 Points -14%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
AMD Radeon R7 M360, Intel Core i5-6200U
1989 Points -22%
Intel Kaby Lake i7-7500U / HD Graphics 620
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1663 Points -35%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
1343 Points -47%
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-7200U
1752 Points
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX, Intel Core i7-7500U
1621 Points -7%
Intel Kaby Lake i7-7500U / HD Graphics 620
Intel HD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-7500U
1128 Points -36%
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
AMD Radeon R7 M360, Intel Core i5-6200U
1109 Points -37%
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
Intel HD Graphics 520, Intel Core i5-6200U
786 Points -55%
3DMark 11 Performance
2642 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
42449 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
6759 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1528 pontos
Ajuda
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 92.4 53.1 43.1 15.1
Battlefield 4 (2013) 65.8 46.7 31.2 12.1
Sims 4 (2014) 150.6 68.9 41.4 29.9
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) 24 16.5 8.5

Barulho

Ocioso
29 / 29 / 29 dB
Carga
35.6 / 38.5 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 29 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 33.9 °C43.8 °C38.7 °C 
 32.6 °C42.3 °C30.5 °C 
 25.5 °C23.9 °C25.2 °C 
Máximo: 43.8 °C
Médio: 32.9 °C
44.8 °C53 °C32.2 °C
30.5 °C45.6 °C28.8 °C
25.3 °C25.3 °C25 °C
Máximo: 53 °C
Médio: 34.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  41.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 19.9 °C | Fluke 62 Max
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.5 °C / 77.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+2.1 °C / 3.8 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.134.42544.444.73138.340.14049.746.85042.139.76331.734.78028.931.11003433.112532.534.316024.944.220026.552.625025.658.331528.357.240023.66150021.564.163020.762.38002080100019.476.2125019.577.6160019.172.9200018.973.7250018.671.931501968.3400020.263500021.368.2630019.470.7800019.761.11000020.858.41250020.454.71600020.149.5SPL32.884.9N1.957.6median 20.4median 62.3Delta2.68.735.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.32 / 0.7 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.7 / 5.5 / 6.5 Watt
Carga midlight 44.2 / 65.2 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G), IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
6200U, Radeon R7 M360, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS, IPS-Panel, 1920x1080, 14"
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN, 1920x1080, 14"
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
6200U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14"
Dell Latitude 3470 N2P7L347014EMEA
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB, , 1366x768, 14"
Power Consumption
-21%
3%
-4%
-13%
Idle Minimum *
2.7
4.1
-52%
3
-11%
3.8
-41%
4.3
-59%
Idle Average *
5.5
8
-45%
5.4
2%
7.6
-38%
8
-45%
Idle Maximum *
6.5
8.9
-37%
6.3
3%
8
-23%
10.3
-58%
Load Average *
44.2
39.3
11%
37.5
15%
30.5
31%
26.4
40%
Load Maximum *
65.2
52.2
20%
61.1
6%
32.5
50%
28.3
57%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
17h 23min
WiFi Websurfing
5h 26min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p
8h 23min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 04min
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 45 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000
6200U, Radeon R7 M360, 47 Wh
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA
i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 48 Wh
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE
6600U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh
Battery Runtime
-16%
17%
-15%
-22%
Reader / Idle
1043
736
-29%
1083
4%
791
-24%
833
-20%
H.264
503
425
-16%
571
14%
361
-28%
397
-21%
WiFi v1.3
326
292
-10%
414
27%
400
23%
340
4%
Load
124
112
-10%
151
22%
87
-30%
62
-50%

Pro

+ Boa qualidade de acabamento
+ Ótimo teclado
+ Trackpoint adicional
+ Tela IPS com ângulos de visão estáveis
+ Alto desempenho de aplicativos
+ Conexão WLAN veloz
+ Silencioso e frio para o uso diário
+ Boa duração da bateria
+ Preço atraente

Contra

- Relativamente grosso e pesado
- Conectividade limitada
- Opções de atualização limitadas
- Apenas 12 meses de garantia
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad E470. Test model provided by Campuspoint.de
In review: Lenovo ThinkPad E470. Test model provided by Campuspoint.de

Este ano, a Lenovo ficou com o design anterior da série E400 e atualizou alguns aspectos. O portátil tem ótimo acabamento, dispositivos de entrada e ruídos e temperaturas bem controlados. Além disso, nossa configuração de teste incluía um processador Core i5, um SSD, uma tela IPS e uma GPU GeForce dedicada - tudo por um preço de 700 Euros (~$745). Infelizmente, o portátil somente está disponível para estudantes neste preço e configuração.

Alta qualidade, bom hardware e bem construído: o Lenovo ThinkPad E470 é um ótimo exemplo de preço/ desempenho com excelentes qualidades.

Também devemos considerar as desvantagens deste modelo: a carcaça pesada com poucas opções de atualização e portas modernas limitadas. Teríamos apreciado ter um slot M.2 ou uma porta USB Type-C. Os concorrentes, como o HP ProBook 440 G4, conseguiram incluir tais recursos. Estrategicamente, esta decisão faz sentido: estes recursos reduziriam a atratividade dos portáteis ThinkPad mais caros. Os compradores devem escolher: o ThinkPad E470 é um belo portátil de trabalho com várias configurações, o que é bom para o trabalho de escritório e multimídia.

Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 - 12/27/2016 v6 (old)
Till Schönborn

Acabamento
81 / 98 → 83%
Teclado
87%
Mouse
84%
Conectividade
52 / 80 → 64%
Peso
65 / 20-67 → 95%
Bateria
87%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
64 / 68 → 94%
Desempenho da aplicação
86 / 92 → 93%
Temperatura
90%
Ruído
94%
Audio
69%
Camera
55 / 85 → 65%
Médio
77%
85%
Office - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad E470 (Core i5, GeForce 940MX)
Till Schönborn, 2017-01-18 (Update: 2024-11- 4)