Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad E470 (Core i5, GeForce 940MX)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 |
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 242 cd/m²
Contraste: 659:1 (Preto: 0.37 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.41 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.94 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
61.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
61.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.23% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 LG LP140WF6-SPB2, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA AUO1E3D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 Chi Mei N140HGE-EAA, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE VVX14T058J02, , 2560x1440, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -5% | -9% | -7% | 64% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.23 | 39.1 -5% | 37.6 -9% | 38.15 -7% | 68.7 67% |
sRGB Coverage | 61.4 | 58.8 -4% | 56.6 -8% | 56.7 -8% | 98.1 60% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.67 | 40.41 -5% | 38.85 -9% | 39.48 -7% | 70.4 65% |
Response Times | 13% | 7% | 20% | 9% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.8 ? | 40 ? 2% | 43.2 ? -6% | 44 ? -8% | 35.6 ? 13% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30.4 ? | 23.2 ? 24% | 24.4 ? 20% | 16 ? 47% | 29.2 ? 4% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 220 ? | |||
Screen | 9% | -21% | -15% | 27% | |
Brightness middle | 244 | 233 -5% | 216 -11% | 249 2% | 257 5% |
Brightness | 231 | 221 -4% | 203 -12% | 238 3% | 248 7% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 88 -1% | 83 -7% | 87 -2% | 94 6% |
Black Level * | 0.37 | 0.3 19% | 0.47 -27% | 0.41 -11% | 0.26 30% |
Contrast | 659 | 777 18% | 460 -30% | 607 -8% | 988 50% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.41 | 4.43 31% | 8.98 -40% | 9.09 -42% | 4.59 28% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 13.4 | 14.07 -5% | 14.64 -9% | 9.72 27% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.94 | 3.78 36% | 9.61 -62% | 9.92 -67% | 6.38 -7% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.31 95% | 2.63 84% | 2.42 91% | 2.51 88% |
CCT | 6101 107% | 7171 91% | 11265 58% | 11177 58% | 6238 104% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39.3 | 37.3 -5% | 35.9 -9% | 36.5 -7% | 65 65% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 61.1 | 58.7 -4% | 56.7 -7% | 56.7 -7% | 98 60% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
7% | -8% /
-15% | -1% /
-9% | 33% /
32% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8.4 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise | |
↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E560 20EV000XPB | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G) | Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -45% | -12% | 8% | 187% | |
Read Seq | 476.5 | 497.6 4% | 491.2 3% | 510 7% | 1778 273% |
Write Seq | 458.7 | 180 -61% | 322.2 -30% | 267.2 -42% | 1530 234% |
Read 512 | 346.4 | 297.1 -14% | 310.1 -10% | 347.6 0% | 1339 287% |
Write 512 | 291.1 | 169.1 -42% | 276 -5% | 267.5 -8% | 1506 417% |
Read 4k | 35.15 | 18.91 -46% | 19.57 -44% | 33.12 -6% | 51.3 46% |
Write 4k | 78.8 | 37.13 -53% | 77.8 -1% | 95.9 22% | 139.3 77% |
Read 4k QD32 | 276 | 95.7 -65% | 146.3 -47% | 392.8 42% | 561 103% |
Write 4k QD32 | 178.3 | 37.26 -79% | 241.4 35% | 266.4 49% | 277 55% |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3546 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4389 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4642 pontos | |
Ajuda |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
Intel Kaby Lake i7-7500U / HD Graphics 620 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 |
3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 | |
HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
Intel Kaby Lake i7-7500U / HD Graphics 620 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 | |
Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2642 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 42449 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6759 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1528 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 92.4 | 53.1 | 43.1 | 15.1 |
Battlefield 4 (2013) | 65.8 | 46.7 | 31.2 | 12.1 |
Sims 4 (2014) | 150.6 | 68.9 | 41.4 | 29.9 |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 24 | 16.5 | 8.5 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29 / 29 / 29 dB |
Carga |
| 35.6 / 38.5 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: ECM8000 + Voltcraft SL-451 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 53 °C / 127 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.5 °C / 77.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+2.1 °C / 3.8 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 65% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.32 / 0.7 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.7 / 5.5 / 6.5 Watt |
Carga |
44.2 / 65.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 6200U, Radeon R7 M360, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS, IPS-Panel, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 6200U, HD Graphics 520, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 3470 N2P7L347014EMEA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB, , 1366x768, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -21% | 3% | -4% | -13% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 4.1 -52% | 3 -11% | 3.8 -41% | 4.3 -59% |
Idle Average * | 5.5 | 8 -45% | 5.4 2% | 7.6 -38% | 8 -45% |
Idle Maximum * | 6.5 | 8.9 -37% | 6.3 3% | 8 -23% | 10.3 -58% |
Load Average * | 44.2 | 39.3 11% | 37.5 15% | 30.5 31% | 26.4 40% |
Load Maximum * | 65.2 | 52.2 20% | 61.1 6% | 32.5 50% | 28.3 57% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400 i5-7200U, GeForce 940MX, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E460-20EUS00000 6200U, Radeon R7 M360, 47 Wh | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 48 Wh | Acer TravelMate P249-M-5452 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE 6600U, HD Graphics 520, 49 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -16% | 17% | -15% | -22% | |
Reader / Idle | 1043 | 736 -29% | 1083 4% | 791 -24% | 833 -20% |
H.264 | 503 | 425 -16% | 571 14% | 361 -28% | 397 -21% |
WiFi v1.3 | 326 | 292 -10% | 414 27% | 400 23% | 340 4% |
Load | 124 | 112 -10% | 151 22% | 87 -30% | 62 -50% |
Pro
Contra
Este ano, a Lenovo ficou com o design anterior da série E400 e atualizou alguns aspectos. O portátil tem ótimo acabamento, dispositivos de entrada e ruídos e temperaturas bem controlados. Além disso, nossa configuração de teste incluía um processador Core i5, um SSD, uma tela IPS e uma GPU GeForce dedicada - tudo por um preço de 700 Euros (~$745). Infelizmente, o portátil somente está disponível para estudantes neste preço e configuração.
Alta qualidade, bom hardware e bem construído: o Lenovo ThinkPad E470 é um ótimo exemplo de preço/ desempenho com excelentes qualidades.
Também devemos considerar as desvantagens deste modelo: a carcaça pesada com poucas opções de atualização e portas modernas limitadas. Teríamos apreciado ter um slot M.2 ou uma porta USB Type-C. Os concorrentes, como o HP ProBook 440 G4, conseguiram incluir tais recursos. Estrategicamente, esta decisão faz sentido: estes recursos reduziriam a atratividade dos portáteis ThinkPad mais caros. Os compradores devem escolher: o ThinkPad E470 é um belo portátil de trabalho com várias configurações, o que é bom para o trabalho de escritório e multimídia.
Lenovo ThinkPad E470-20H2S00400
- 12/27/2016 v6 (old)
Till Schönborn