Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad E15: Muito desempenho com muito pouco resfriamento
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.1 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE i7-10510U, Radeon RX 640 | 1.8 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
87.6 % v6 (old) | 04/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE i7-8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop) | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.6 % v7 (old) | 07/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.9 kg | 19.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
81.1 % v6 (old) | 06/2019 | Dell Vostro 15-5581 i5-8265U, GeForce MX130 | 2 kg | 18.04 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
80.1 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 1.6 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size & weight comparison
|
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 284 cd/m²
Contraste: 1286:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 5.8
ΔE Greyscale 6.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.25% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.18
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE NV156FHM-N48, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE Lenovo B156HAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE LP156WFC-SPD1, aSi IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Vostro 15-5581 156CL04 1G2XW, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Modern 15 A10RB Chi Mei N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 1% | -2% | -2% | 61% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.25 | 39.88 -1% | 38.79 -4% | 38.86 -3% | 66 64% |
sRGB Coverage | 57.7 | 59.9 4% | 58.3 1% | 58.5 1% | 92.1 60% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.59 | 41.21 -1% | 40.11 -4% | 40.15 -3% | 66.5 60% |
Response Times | 7% | 25% | -10% | 667% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49.6 ? | 47.2 ? 5% | 37.2 ? 25% | 36 ? 27% | 43.2 ? 13% |
Response Time Black / White * | 36 ? | 32.8 ? 9% | 27.2 ? 24% | 27 ? 25% | 34.4 ? 4% |
PWM Frequency | 1250 ? | 208 ? -83% | 26040 ? 1983% | ||
Screen | 15% | 12% | 19% | 32% | |
Brightness middle | 283 | 284 0% | 276 -2% | 231 -18% | 289.4 2% |
Brightness | 258 | 272 5% | 262 2% | 213 -17% | 273 6% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 92 14% | 88 9% | 87 7% | 82 1% |
Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.21 5% | 0.23 -5% | 0.13 41% | 0.27 -23% |
Contrast | 1286 | 1352 5% | 1200 -7% | 1777 38% | 1072 -17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.9 | 5.3 33% | 5.6 29% | 4.81 39% | 2.32 71% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 23.6 | 18.9 20% | 16.4 31% | 8.33 65% | 5.76 76% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.8 | 4.4 24% | 4.7 19% | 4.2 28% | 2.49 57% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.6 | 3.2 52% | 3 55% | 5.19 21% | 3 55% |
Gamma | 2.18 101% | 2.41 91% | 2.18 101% | 2.33 94% | 2.22 99% |
CCT | 5735 113% | 6736 96% | 7075 92% | 7088 92% | 6867 95% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 37.9 2% | 36.9 0% | 37 0% | 59.8 62% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57.1 | 59.7 5% | 58.1 2% | 58 2% | 92 61% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 8% /
11% | 12% /
11% | 2% /
10% | 253% /
149% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise | |
↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1250 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 1250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1250 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4045 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5142 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 5023 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Dell Vostro 15-5581 SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831 | MSI Modern 15 A10RB WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Average Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -28% | 17% | -48% | 55% | -3% | |
Write 4K | 144.4 | 111.2 -23% | 126.2 -13% | 129.3 -10% | 208.4 44% | 129.5 ? -10% |
Read 4K | 52.3 | 49.01 -6% | 48.93 -6% | 41.02 -22% | 51 -2% | 45.1 ? -14% |
Write Seq | 946 | 586 -38% | 1345 42% | 203.4 -78% | 2687 184% | 1172 ? 24% |
Read Seq | 1608 | 783 -51% | 1373 -15% | 271.2 -83% | 2168 35% | 1496 ? -7% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 592 | 263 -56% | 383.8 -35% | 252.3 -57% | 489.2 -17% | 448 ? -24% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 397.7 | 481.5 21% | 434.8 9% | 281.4 -29% | 600 51% | 415 ? 4% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1364 | 784 -43% | 2966 117% | 319.8 -77% | 2699 98% | 1397 ? 2% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 2301 | 1602 -30% | 3230 40% | 1589 -31% | 3374 47% | 2307 ? 0% |
3DMark 06 Standard Score | 20261 pontos | |
3DMark Vantage P Result | 14141 pontos | |
3DMark 11 Performance | 5243 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 61367 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13593 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3049 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1100 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
Average of class Office (3.49 - 59.1, n=83, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
Average AMD Radeon RX 640 (19.7 - 19.9, n=2) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 150.5 | 94.1 | 74.4 | 27.3 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 63.2 | 38.4 | 19.7 | 11.3 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 110 | 95.5 | 51.7 | 48.2 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 64.7 | 28.6 | 19.8 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 48 | 21 | ||
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 42 | 22 | ||
Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 39 | 20 | ||
Battlefield V (2018) | 61.8 | 29.8 | 23.2 | |
Apex Legends (2019) | 72 | 27 | 20 | |
Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 37 | 17 | ||
The Division 2 (2019) | 52 | 18 | ||
Anno 1800 (2019) | 61.8 | 20.5 | ||
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 51.4 | 16.9 | ||
F1 2019 (2019) | 55 | 23 | ||
FIFA 20 (2019) | 112.6 | |||
Ghost Recon Breakpoint (2019) | 29 | |||
GRID 2019 (2019) | 60.6 | 20.4 | ||
Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 31.7 | 14.3 | ||
Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 25.9 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.2 / 29.2 / 31.7 dB |
Carga |
| 34.8 / 34.8 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.2 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46.1 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 67.8 °C / 154 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.9 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.9 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.1 °C / -0.1 F).
desligado | 0.47 / 0.71 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.2 / 6.8 / 9.5 Watt |
Carga |
44 / 66.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE i7-10510U, Radeon RX 640, Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE i7-8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), Toshiba KBG30ZMT256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, aSi IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Vostro 15-5581 i5-8265U, GeForce MX130, SK hynix BC501 HFM128GDJTNG-831, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average AMD Radeon RX 640 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -11% | -24% | -9% | -72% | -2% | -7% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.2 | 3.48 -9% | 4.1 -28% | 5 -56% | 6.6 -106% | 3.25 ? -2% | 4.51 ? -41% |
Idle Average * | 6.8 | 7.2 -6% | 8.3 -22% | 7.9 -16% | 9.9 -46% | 6.5 ? 4% | 7.47 ? -10% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.5 | 10.2 -7% | 11.8 -24% | 11.2 -18% | 14.7 -55% | 8.95 ? 6% | 9.11 ? 4% |
Load Average * | 44 | 59.6 -35% | 61.6 -40% | 34 23% | 82.9 -88% | 51.6 ? -17% | 42.4 ? 4% |
Load Maximum * | 66.4 | 65.1 2% | 69.4 -5% | 50.2 24% | 109.3 -65% | 66.5 ? -0% | 60.5 ? 9% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49 | 54.4 | 59.4 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE i7-10510U, Radeon RX 640, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE i7-8565U, Radeon RX 550X (Laptop), 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T590-20N4002VGE i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 57 Wh | Dell Vostro 15-5581 i5-8265U, GeForce MX130, 42 Wh | MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 52 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -8% | 48% | -19% | -12% | 17% | |
H.264 | 625 | 541 -13% | 725 16% | 394 -37% | 703 ? 12% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 447 | 423 -5% | 628 40% | 410 -8% | 388 -13% | 598 ? 34% |
Load | 112 | 105 -6% | 209 87% | 97 -13% | 101 -10% | 117.1 ? 5% |
Reader / Idle | 1133 | 747 | 924 | 1300 ? |
Pro
Contra
Embora o Lenovo ThinkPad E15 pareça um enorme avanço em comparação com o Lenovo ThinkPad E590 baseado somente no seu nome: O ThinkPad E15 é muito parecido com o seu antecessor. O conceito básico do produto não mudou, mas a Lenovo trabalhou nos detalhes. Ainda está o muito bom teclado ThinkPad, bem como o TrackPoint, um recurso raro nessa faixa de preços. O chassi feito de alumínio e plástico é robusto e a capacidade de atualização é exemplar - pelo menos em termos de armazenamento massivo.
Como o ThinkPad E14 menor, o uso de um chassi mais fino significa que alguns recursos são perdidos. Um deles é o slot microSD. O segundo slot de RAM também faz muita falta. Onde o E15 difere de seu parente menor está no fato de que os recursos ausentes não são o maior problema aqui. Para o ThinkPad E15, é o sistema de refrigeração, que é simplesmente sobrecarregado. No teste de estresse, o ThinkPad precisa afogar muito a CPU e a GPU. A aceleração também pode ocorrer no uso diário e durante os jogos. Além disso, o chassi fica extremamente quente, com mais de 65 °C. É verdade que isso acontece apenas no teste de estresse, mas no teste menos exigente de The Witcher 3, o chassi esquenta quase assim.
Muito quente: Uma GPU dedicada só deve ser incorporada se puder ser resfriada adequadamente sob uso intenso. Infelizmente, esse não é o caso do Lenovo ThinkPad E15.
No geral, não podemos recomendar o Lenovo ThinkPad E15 com a dGPU. O chip da AMD está simplesmente extraviado aqui, se não puder ser resfriado o suficiente. Enquanto isso, a versão iGPU pode valer a pena - como uma versão maior do ThinkPad E14 e um bom portátil para o escritório em casa.
Lenovo ThinkPad E15 20RD0011GE
-
03/17/2020 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig