Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad E14: O design fino derrota a capacidade de atualização
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.5 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.9 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.8 kg | 19.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 80.9 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250 | 1.2 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83 % v7 (old) | Dell Latitude 3400 i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.7 kg | 18.65 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 87.9 % v7 (old) | 06/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE | |
| Dell Latitude 3400 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE | |
| Dell Latitude 3400 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 308 cd/m²
Contraste: 1794:1 (Preto: 0.17 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.6
ΔE Greyscale 4.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.65% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.31% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.05
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE NV140FHM-N48, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE Lenovo NV140FHM-N49, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Chi Mei N140HCE-EN2, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 3400 BOE NV14N4H, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE NE140FHM-N61, IGZO IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 58% | 0% | 63% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.31 | 39.85 -1% | 64.2 59% | 40.68 1% | 69.2 72% |
| sRGB Coverage | 60 | 58.6 -2% | 94.8 58% | 59.3 -1% | 92.3 54% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.65 | 41.18 -1% | 65.4 57% | 42.03 1% | 67.6 62% |
| Response Times | 3% | 645% | -4% | 14% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 52 ? | 48.4 ? 7% | 39.2 ? 25% | 44 ? 15% | 71.2 ? -37% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 39.2 ? | 38.4 ? 2% | 35.6 ? 9% | 42 ? -7% | 44.8 ? -14% |
| PWM Frequency | 1250 ? | 1250 ? 0% | 25000 ? 1900% | 1000 ? -20% | 2427 ? 94% |
| Screen | -1% | 31% | -16% | 20% | |
| Brightness middle | 305 | 305 0% | 324.1 6% | 240 -21% | 428 40% |
| Brightness | 292 | 295 1% | 301 3% | 227 -22% | 409 40% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 90 1% | 87 -2% | 79 -11% | 91 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.17 | 0.23 -35% | 0.22 -29% | 0.48 -182% | 0.29 -71% |
| Contrast | 1794 | 1326 -26% | 1473 -18% | 500 -72% | 1476 -18% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.9 | 5.3 10% | 1.63 72% | 4.2 29% | 4.6 22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.4 | 18.9 -3% | 4.25 77% | 7.16 61% | 8.2 55% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.6 | 5 -9% | 1.42 69% | 2 57% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.4 | 2.3 48% | 2.2 50% | 1.75 60% | 5.4 -23% |
| Gamma | 2.05 107% | 2.09 105% | 2.26 97% | 2.36 93% | 2.09 105% |
| CCT | 6921 94% | 6246 104% | 6887 94% | 6387 102% | 7562 86% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38.2 | 37.7 -1% | 60.2 58% | 38 -1% | 60 57% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59.6 | 58.2 -2% | 95 59% | 59 -1% | 92.2 55% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
-1% | 245% /
144% | -7% /
-11% | 32% /
26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 39.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 96 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 52 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1250 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1250 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3402 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5001 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3901 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Dell Latitude 3400 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G | Average SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -9% | -2% | 9% | 24% | -9% | |
| Write 4K | 121.9 | 110.7 -9% | 107.7 -12% | 107.9 -11% | 119.9 -2% | 110 ? -10% |
| Read 4K | 42.66 | 41.02 -4% | 39.73 -7% | 40.27 -6% | 39.94 -6% | 40.6 ? -5% |
| Write Seq | 628 | 757 21% | 926 47% | 1253 100% | 1334 112% | 677 ? 8% |
| Read Seq | 1193 | 1037 -13% | 1014 -15% | 1298 9% | 1357 14% | 1104 ? -7% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 590 | 359 -39% | 343.6 -42% | 415 -30% | 311.2 -47% | 438 ? -26% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 414.5 | 402.4 -3% | 499.1 20% | 313.3 -24% | 400.6 -3% | 338 ? -18% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 866 | 833 -4% | 1033 19% | 1297 50% | 1642 90% | 860 ? -1% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 2078 | 1635 -21% | 1604 -23% | 1728 -17% | 2778 34% | 1786 ? -14% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE | |
| Dell Latitude 3400 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (7982 - 58068, n=65, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE | |
| Dell Latitude 3400 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (1089 - 9375, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE | |
| Dell Latitude 3400 | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (313 - 4109, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (299 - 797, n=88) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE | |
| Dell Latitude 3400 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1938 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8057 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1072 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 59.8 | 33.23 | 27.38 | 8.74 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 68.7 | 40.7 | 19.3 | 17.1 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20.6 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 10.6 | 9.02 | 8.8 | |
| Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 23.4 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.2 / 29.2 / 29.2 dB |
| Carga |
| 29.5 / 29.9 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.2 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.7 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.8 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-2.3 °C / -4.1 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (26.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 13% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 79% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.47 / 0.77 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.01 / 6.32 / 8.78 Watt |
| Carga |
32.5 / 45.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDHTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 3400 i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KXG5AZNV256G, IGZO IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 11% | -32% | 12% | 5% | -10% | -28% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.01 | 2.76 8% | 4.2 -40% | 2.4 20% | 2.34 22% | 3.81 ? -27% | 4.54 ? -51% |
| Idle Average * | 6.32 | 5.96 6% | 5.9 7% | 4.9 22% | 5.22 17% | 6.94 ? -10% | 7.49 ? -19% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.78 | 6.57 25% | 7.2 18% | 7.4 16% | 8.82 -0% | 8.75 ? -0% | 9.14 ? -4% |
| Load Average * | 32.5 | 28.2 13% | 63.4 -95% | 31 5% | 35.8 -10% | 35 ? -8% | 42.8 ? -32% |
| Load Maximum * | 45.5 | 43.6 4% | 67.4 -48% | 47 -3% | 47.3 -4% | 47.5 ? -4% | 61.3 ? -35% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 53.5 |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E490-20N8000RGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | MSI Modern 14 A10RB-459US i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 50 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T490-20N2004EGE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell Latitude 3400 i3-8145U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 8% | 4% | 28% | 15% | 17% | |
| H.264 | 617 | 687 11% | 677 10% | 704 ? 14% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 507 | 485 -4% | 515 2% | 572 13% | 584 15% | 600 ? 18% |
| Load | 100 | 117 17% | 105 5% | 161 61% | 118.1 ? 18% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1063 | 986 | 1300 ? |
Pro
Contra
A Lenovo continua a evoluir a série E com o novo ThinkPad E14: O chassi mais fino recebe muitas dicas de design do ThinkPad E490 mais antigo e, portanto, possui muitos de seus pontos fortes. Um deles: Os ótimos dispositivos de entrada ThinkPad Outros incluem a boa duração da bateria e o baixo nível de calor/ruído, mesmo sob carga. O ThinkPad E14 ainda também pode ser atualizado, principalmente quando se trata de armazenamento. Além disso, graças ao aumento do uso de alumínio, a qualidade háptica melhorou.
Infelizmente, também há alguns passos para trás. O slot para cartão microSD foi eliminado sem substituição. A capacidade de atualização da RAM também foi restrita: Em vez de dois slots SO-DIMM e memória de canal duplo de até 64 GB, o E14 oferece apenas um único slot de RAM com memória de canal único de até 32 GB. Outros pontos negativos incluem os curtos 12 meses de garantia e a tela, que possui uma cobertura de cores ruim. Um pouco preocupante é ruído da área da dobradiça ao fechar a tela - o acabamento definitivamente não é perfeito aqui.
Não é realmente melhor que o antecessor: O Lenovo ThinkPad E14 elimina desnecessariamente alguns recursos.
No geral, ainda podemos recomendar o Lenovo ThinkPad E14 como um portátil ThinkPad sólido por um orçamento menor, apesar das desvantagens - apesar de acharmos que não é tão atraente quanto o antecessor ThinkPad E490, devido à perda de recursos.
Lenovo ThinkPad E14 20RA001MGE
- 03/03/2020 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
