Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkPad 25 Edição de Aniversário
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 84 %
iluminação com acumulador: 240.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 1091:1 (Preto: 0.22 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
63% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.07% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.57% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 ID: LEN40A9, Name: R140NWF5 R1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US LEN40A9 (R140NWF5 R1), IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE N140HCA-EAB, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 LEN40AA, B140QAN01.5, IPS, 14", 2560x1440 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 APPA033, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600 | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US ID: BOE06E8, Name: BOE HF NV150FHB-N31, IPS, 15", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | -2% | 57% | 96% | 53% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 42.57 | 40.35 -5% | 41.6 -2% | 69.3 63% | 99.2 133% | 65.2 53% |
| sRGB Coverage | 63.3 | 60.3 -5% | 61.9 -2% | 94.9 50% | 99.9 58% | 97.7 54% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.07 | 41.72 -5% | 43.06 -2% | 69.5 58% | 87.1 98% | 67.2 52% |
| Response Times | -15% | 10% | 7% | 15% | -18% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.6 ? | 40.8 ? 11% | 41.6 ? 9% | 52.8 ? -16% | 42.8 ? 6% | 40.8 ? 11% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 37.6 ? | 28.8 ? 23% | 34 ? 10% | 26.8 ? 29% | 28.8 ? 23% | 32.4 ? 14% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 219.3 ? -78% | 208.3 ? -79% | |||
| Screen | 2% | -1% | -1% | 57% | 44% | |
| Brightness middle | 240.1 | 271.6 13% | 306 27% | 271 13% | 588 145% | 565.6 136% |
| Brightness | 227 | 264 16% | 287 26% | 266 17% | 561 147% | 524 131% |
| Brightness Distribution | 84 | 88 5% | 88 5% | 87 4% | 92 10% | 88 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.22 | 0.24 -9% | 0.3 -36% | 0.25 -14% | 0.45 -105% | 0.49 -123% |
| Contrast | 1091 | 1132 4% | 1020 -7% | 1084 -1% | 1307 20% | 1154 6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.3 | 6.1 3% | 6.2 2% | 6.68 -6% | 1.7 73% | 2 68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 28.9 | 28.6 1% | 13.6 53% | 12.96 55% | 3.5 88% | 5 83% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.3 | 3.4 -3% | 5.8 -76% | 9.21 -179% | 1.9 42% | 2.5 24% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.12 104% | 2.04 108% | 2.42 91% | 2.33 94% | 2.21 100% |
| CCT | 6081 107% | 6077 107% | 6277 104% | 6018 108% | 6738 96% | 6896 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40.6 | 38 -6% | 39.62 -2% | 61.49 51% | 77.92 92% | 61.2 51% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 63 | 60 -5% | 61.44 -2% | 94.72 50% | 99.94 59% | 97.5 55% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-3% | 2% /
0% | 21% /
12% | 56% /
59% | 26% /
34% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Acer Swift 3 Pre-Sample Intel | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
| Lenovo Y40-59423035 | |
| Asus FX550IU-WSFX | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
| Acer Swift 3 Pre-Sample Intel | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UQ-GL011T | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| Asus FX550IU-WSFX | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E550-20DF00CNGE | |
| Lenovo Y40-59423035 | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Lenovo Y40-59423035 | |
| Lenovo Thinkpad T420 4236-NGG | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Asus FX550IU-WSFX | |
| Eurocom Q5 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3764 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4693 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4894 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3035 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 11% | 17% | -46% | 7% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 598 | 309.9 -48% | 586 -2% | 229 -62% | 540 -10% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 400.6 | 291 -27% | 347.7 -13% | 172.4 -57% | 411.5 3% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1272 | 797 -37% | 673 -47% | 623 -51% | 1272 0% |
| Score Total | 2811 | 3875 38% | 3606 28% | 1398 -50% | 2810 0% |
| Score Write | 837 | 803 -4% | 1272 52% | 337 -60% | 1022 22% |
| Score Read | 1317 | 2083 58% | 1546 17% | 726 -45% | 1206 -8% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.031 | 0.025 19% | 0.024 23% | 0.034 -10% | 0.034 -10% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.04 | 0.06 -50% | 0.035 12% | 0.102 -155% | 0.034 15% |
| 4K-64 Write | 640 | 538 -16% | 1007 57% | 149.6 -77% | 789 23% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1130 | 1765 56% | 1344 19% | 526 -53% | 962 -15% |
| 4K Write | 113 | 147.9 31% | 147.3 30% | 109.4 -3% | 112.2 -1% |
| 4K Read | 50.4 | 48.84 -3% | 56.4 12% | 34.34 -32% | 41.34 -18% |
| Seq Write | 840 | 1170 39% | 1176 40% | 775 -8% | 1207 44% |
| Seq Read | 1369 | 2691 97% | 1455 6% | 1649 20% | 2026 48% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3063 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 47070 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8889 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2129 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 1071 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 126.1 | 72.1 | 61.7 | 23.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 45.4 | 26 | 15.1 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 52.8 | 30 | 16.4 | 13.3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 27.9 / 27.9 / 30 dB |
| Carga |
| 37.6 / 37.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 27.9 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US HD Graphics 620, i5-7300U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 GeForce 940MX, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | -2% | -3% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 27.9 | 27.8 -0% | 29 -4% | 30.2 -8% | 28 -0% |
| Idle Minimum * | 27.9 | 27.8 -0% | 29 -4% | 30.2 -8% | 28 -0% |
| Idle Average * | 27.9 | 27.8 -0% | 29 -4% | 30.2 -8% | 28 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30 | 27.8 7% | 29 3% | 30.2 -1% | 29.4 2% |
| Load Average * | 37.6 | 34.8 7% | 35.6 5% | 32.9 12% | 31.4 16% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.6 | 42 -12% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 37.6 | 42 -12% | 39.7 -6% | 39.3 -5% | 34.6 8% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 57.2 °C / 135 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.2 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.6 °C / 92 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36.6 °C / 97.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-9 °C / -16.2 F).
Lenovo ThinkPad 25 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 58% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.45 / 0.64 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.2 / 7.3 / 7.7 Watt |
| Carga |
55.4 / 64.4 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung SM961 MZVKW512HMJP m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Apple SSD AP0128, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 13% | -8% | 18% | 29% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 4.8 -14% | 3.8 10% | 3.7 12% | 3.21 24% |
| Idle Average * | 7.3 | 6.6 10% | 6.5 11% | 5.2 29% | 6.15 16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 7 9% | 7.2 6% | 7.6 1% | 6.82 11% |
| Load Average * | 55.4 | 39.2 29% | 62.5 -13% | 41.6 25% | 28.5 49% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.1 | ||||
| Load Maximum * | 64.4 | 44.8 30% | 99.6 -55% | 50.5 22% | 34.5 46% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HF0012US i5-7300U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p-20J7S00000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce 940MX, 72 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HR0021GE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 38% | 15% | 22% | 16% | 11% | |
| Reader / Idle | 919 | 1062 16% | 1059 15% | 819 -11% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 426 | 487 14% | 602 41% | 681 60% | 547 28% | 438 3% |
| Load | 93 | 172 85% | 82 -12% | 78 -16% | 122 31% | 110 18% |
Pro
Contra
O ThinkPad 25 atende àqueles que sentem saudade do clássico teclado ThinkPad ou são super fanáticos de série. Os usuários que de outra forma estejam satisfeitos com o teclado AccuType em ThinkPads mais recentes terão alguns motivos para escolher o ThinkPad 25 em relação ao T470 padrão.
Curiosamente, configurar o T470 o mais próximo possível do ThinkPad 25 será vendido por aproximadamente o mesmo preço de $ 1900 USD. O T470 não terá GPU GeForce 940MX e teclado clássico, mas ganhará um leitor de cartão inteligente, um trackpad ligeiramente mais alto e uma luz de fundo mais brilhante da tela. Como tal, o ThinkPad 25 mais parece um passo para o lado para a série ThinkPad, em vez de uma atualização completa da próxima geração. Sua existência é apenas para comemorar o 25º aniversário do ThinkPad, em vez de competir diretamente com os últimos e melhores portáteis, como é evidente pela sua última geração de CPU e GPU. Os usuários empresariais que podem estar clamando por mais desempenho de hardware terão que aguardar mais tempo para a inevitável atualização de Kaby Lake-R e Pascal ou saltar para o Yoga 920, Spectre 13 2017, ou XPS 13. O desempenho do Turbo Boost, o desempenho da GPU, o ruído da ventoinha e, claro, o teclado são de outra forma excelentes, com pouco para reclamar.
Apesar de ser um dos melhores portáteis empresariais de 14 polegadas atualmente, não há como ignorar a pequena decepção desde uma perspectiva de aniversário. O ThinkPad 25 parece um T470 refeito em vez de algo realmente único. Novamente, isso não é necessariamente ruim porque o T470 é excelente para começar, mas o teclado como tal pode não ser especial o suficiente para satisfazer os entusiastas do ThinkPad, pois os modelos clássicos eram muito mais do que apenas o teclado.
A Edição de Aniversário se sente mais como um ThinkPad T470 flexível do que o singular ThinkPad que a Lenovo esta anunciando. A menos que o teclado clássico seja imprescindível, os usuários existentes do ThinkPad devem esperar até a próxima atualização principal da série T4x0, especialmente porque a Edição de Aniversário está com um preço muito alto.
Lenovo ThinkPad 25
- 10/05/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
