Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkBook 15: Um dispositivo de escritório acessível com um processador Comet Lake
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81.8 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Lenovo ThinkBook 15 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.9 kg | 18.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
88.4 % v6 (old) | 10/2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE R7 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.2 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 2 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.1 % v7 (old) | SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.6 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
84.6 % v6 (old) | 03/2019 | HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA i7-8565U, GeForce MX130 | 2 kg | 20 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
79.6 % v6 (old) | Dell Latitude 15 3590 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | 2.1 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=34, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE | |
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 |
|
iluminação: 82 %
iluminação com acumulador: 245 cd/m²
Contraste: 980:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.8
ΔE Greyscale 3.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.67% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.38% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.3
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE NV156FHM-N49, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE N156HCE-EAA, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 BOE CQ NV156FHM-N61, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA Chi Mei CMN15FE, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 15 3590 BOE0802 / NT15N41 / Dell: M9P74, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 3% | 13% | 62% | 12% | 3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.38 | 39.88 4% | 43.3 13% | 66.8 74% | 42.83 12% | 39.67 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 57.7 | 58.6 2% | 64.4 12% | 87.1 51% | 64.2 11% | 59.7 3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.67 | 41.2 4% | 44.81 13% | 63.7 61% | 44.29 12% | 40.99 3% |
Response Times | -14% | -12% | -16% | 11% | 24% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.6 ? | 41.2 ? -10% | 42.8 ? -14% | 45 ? -20% | 34.4 ? 9% | 41 ? -9% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 32.8 ? -17% | 30.8 ? -10% | 31 ? -11% | 24.4 ? 13% | 12 ? 57% |
PWM Frequency | 1220 ? | 24510 ? | 250 ? | 26040 ? | 250 ? | |
Screen | 18% | -1% | 13% | 8% | -40% | |
Brightness middle | 245 | 318 30% | 247 1% | 315 29% | 242 -1% | 215 -12% |
Brightness | 239 | 297 24% | 228 -5% | 294 23% | 226 -5% | 214 -10% |
Brightness Distribution | 82 | 89 9% | 81 -1% | 83 1% | 88 7% | 91 11% |
Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.17 32% | 0.18 28% | 0.29 -16% | 0.21 16% | 0.385 -54% |
Contrast | 980 | 1871 91% | 1372 40% | 1086 11% | 1152 18% | 558 -43% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.6 | 5.5 2% | 5.9 -5% | 6 -7% | 4.7 16% | 10.31 -84% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.6 | 21 -35% | 22.9 -47% | 10.2 35% | 18.5 -19% | 20.44 -31% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.8 | 5.1 -6% | 4.7 2% | 3.1 35% | 4 17% | 3.88 19% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 1.8 47% | 5.1 -50% | 6 -76% | 2.7 21% | 11.84 -248% |
Gamma | 2.3 96% | 2.12 104% | 2.21 100% | 2.16 102% | 2.26 97% | 2.67 82% |
CCT | 7156 91% | 6257 104% | 6398 102% | 8038 81% | 6442 101% | 13398 49% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36.5 | 37.6 3% | 41.2 13% | 57 56% | 40.8 12% | 39 7% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57.5 | 58.2 1% | 64.1 11% | 87 51% | 64 11% | 61 6% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 2% /
11% | 0% /
0% | 20% /
19% | 10% /
9% | -4% /
-24% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8702 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=91, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (134 - 174, n=35) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE | |
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=92, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U (320 - 790, n=35) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Average of class Office (4252 - 4830, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3182 - 4284, n=21) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA | |
Average Intel Core i5-10210U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4286 - 5114, n=21) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE | |
Average of class Office (2900 - 5526, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4227 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5312 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5102 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4248 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G | SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 15 3590 Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ | Average Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -38% | -27% | 1% | -12% | -60% | -12% | |
Write 4K | 176.3 | 129.5 -27% | 115.3 -35% | 188.7 7% | 126.1 -28% | 79.5 -55% | 126.7 ? -28% |
Read 4K | 48.98 | 41.23 -16% | 43.34 -12% | 51.9 6% | 43.92 -10% | 32.72 -33% | 44 ? -10% |
Write Seq | 1789 | 811 -55% | 1014 -43% | 1566 -12% | 1669 -7% | 472.5 -74% | 1617 ? -10% |
Read Seq | 1671 | 1145 -31% | 1481 -11% | 1452 -13% | 2224 33% | 504 -70% | 1716 ? 3% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 433.5 | 314.1 -28% | 495.4 14% | 444 2% | 410.4 -5% | 322.6 -26% | 413 ? -5% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 526 | 356.2 -32% | 332.6 -37% | 566 8% | 338.1 -36% | 249.9 -52% | 420 ? -20% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2983 | 839 -72% | 1654 -45% | 3279 10% | 1979 -34% | 531 -82% | 2076 ? -30% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3555 | 2042 -43% | 1746 -51% | 3558 0% | 3368 -5% | 544 -85% | 3130 ? -12% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 1688 | 1033 -39% | 1264 ? -25% | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1036 | 892 -14% | 1193 ? 15% | ||||
AS SSD | -43% | -33% | -66% | -71% | -31% | ||
Seq Read | 2564 | 1698 -34% | 1383 -46% | 2063 -20% | 498.7 -81% | 1976 ? -23% | |
Seq Write | 2268 | 740 -67% | 852 -62% | 1163 -49% | 361.7 -84% | 1637 ? -28% | |
4K Read | 57 | 39.18 -31% | 45.72 -20% | 50.6 -11% | 34.65 -39% | 50.5 ? -11% | |
4K Write | 141.4 | 87.7 -38% | 120.2 -15% | 125.4 -11% | 79.8 -44% | 112 ? -21% | |
4K-64 Read | 1175 | 764 -35% | 1344 14% | 1352 15% | 372.5 -68% | 1203 ? 2% | |
4K-64 Write | 1665 | 669 -60% | 926 -44% | 1023 -39% | 247.7 -85% | 1504 ? -10% | |
Access Time Read * | 0.032 | 0.04 -25% | 0.063 -97% | 0.044 -38% | 0.06 -88% | 0.05092 ? -59% | |
Access Time Write * | 0.025 | 0.036 -44% | 0.036 -44% | 0.182 -628% | 0.042 -68% | 0.08337 ? -233% | |
Score Read | 1488 | 973 -35% | 1528 3% | 1608 8% | 457 -69% | 1451 ? -2% | |
Score Write | 2033 | 831 -59% | 1132 -44% | 1265 -38% | 364 -82% | 1780 ? -12% | |
Score Total | 4279 | 2261 -47% | 3420 -20% | 3658 -15% | 1060 -75% | 3966 ? -7% | |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2118 | 1147 -46% | 1382 -35% | 1755 ? -17% | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 495.6 | 419.8 -15% | 414.3 -16% | 454 ? -8% | |||
Copy Game MB/s | 1174 | 928 -21% | 660 -44% | 1057 ? -10% | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -41% /
-41% | -30% /
-30% | 1% /
1% | -39% /
-46% | -66% /
-66% | -22% /
-23% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=86, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE | |
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Average of class Office (7982 - 58068, n=61, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE | |
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Office (736 - 9375, n=88, last 2 years) | |
HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
Average of class Office (313 - 4109, n=87, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (299 - 797, n=88) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2165 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 68444 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8887 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1182 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 528 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 484 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 81.9 | 40.3 | 33.2 | 10.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 84.6 | 53.7 | 21.9 | 19.6 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 23.6 | 15.6 | 8.03 | |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 11.5 | 13.4 | 12.4 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.2 / 29.2 / 29.9 dB |
Carga |
| 30.6 / 33.8 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.2 dB(A) |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G | SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA GeForce MX130, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 15 3590 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | 2% | -13% | -3% | -12% | |
off / environment * | 29.2 | 29.3 -0% | 29 1% | 30.6 -5% | 29 1% | 30.6 -5% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.2 | 29.3 -0% | 29 1% | 30.6 -5% | 29 1% | 30.6 -5% |
Idle Average * | 29.2 | 29.3 -0% | 29 1% | 30.6 -5% | 29 1% | 31.9 -9% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.9 | 30.1 -1% | 29 3% | 30.6 -2% | 29 3% | 31.9 -7% |
Load Average * | 30.6 | 30.9 -1% | 29 5% | 40.5 -32% | 34.2 -12% | 39 -27% |
Load Maximum * | 33.8 | 35.2 -4% | 33.8 -0% | 42.7 -26% | 38.4 -14% | 39.1 -16% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 34.2 |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.9 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-0.2 °C / -0.3 F).
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G | SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA GeForce MX130, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Dell Latitude 15 3590 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -20% | -11% | 1% | -2% | 1% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 38 | 48.8 -28% | 42.7 -12% | 37 3% | 39.4 -4% | 40.6 -7% |
Maximum Bottom * | 43.9 | 48.4 -10% | 51 -16% | 43.1 2% | 50.2 -14% | 37.5 15% |
Idle Upper Side * | 24.5 | 29.1 -19% | 25.9 -6% | 25.1 -2% | 22.9 7% | 26.3 -7% |
Idle Bottom * | 25.4 | 31 -22% | 28.3 -11% | 25.1 1% | 24.1 5% | 25.2 1% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.1% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (38.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 98% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 1% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 94% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 5% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 30.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (32.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 94% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 90% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.38 / 0.68 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.5 / 7.1 / 7.8 Watt |
Carga |
38.9 / 65.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA i7-8565U, GeForce MX130, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 15 3590 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 5% | 3% | -23% | -11% | 3% | 4% | -10% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 4.2 -20% | 3.96 -13% | 5.5 -57% | 3.12 11% | 4.3 -23% | 3.81 ? -9% | 4.48 ? -28% |
Idle Average * | 7.1 | 7.92 -12% | 6.9 3% | 8.9 -25% | 6.3 11% | 7.2 -1% | 6.94 ? 2% | 7.41 ? -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.8 | 8.16 -5% | 9.8 -26% | 9.1 -17% | 9.78 -25% | 9.8 -26% | 8.75 ? -12% | 8.86 ? -14% |
Load Average * | 38.9 | 29 25% | 31.4 19% | 47 -21% | 57.6 -48% | 38 2% | 35 ? 10% | 41.9 ? -8% |
Load Maximum * | 65.4 | 42.2 35% | 45.4 31% | 61.2 6% | 67.3 -3% | 24 63% | 47.5 ? 27% | 61.7 ? 6% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE R7 3700U, Vega 10, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | SCHENKER Slim 15 L19 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Wh | HP ProBook 450 G6-5TJ93EA i7-8565U, GeForce MX130, 45 Wh | Dell Latitude 15 3590 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 8% | 32% | -9% | 22% | 36% | 44% | |
Reader / Idle | 1074 | 941 -12% | 1044 -3% | 876 -18% | 1209 13% | 1290 ? 20% | |
H.264 | 418 | 514 23% | 542 30% | 462 11% | 618 48% | 721 ? 72% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 406 | 460 13% | 429 6% | 370 -9% | 583 44% | 544 34% | 611 ? 50% |
Load | 87 | 92 6% | 168 93% | 131 51% | 129 48% | 115.6 ? 33% |
Pro
Contra
Verdict - A solid work tool in a modern guise
O ThinkBook 15 é um portátil de escritório simples, com boa pontuação pelo seu design moderno e bons dispositivos de entrada. Seu processador Comet Lake também oferece um pequeno aumento no desempenho em relação aos antecessores Kaby Lake e Whiskey Lake, com o Core i5-10210U em nossa unidade de teste sempre disponível para executar tarefas gerais. Em resumo, a CPU torna o ThinkBook 15 adequado para uso como portátil de escritório doméstico, por exemplo. Os abundantes 16 GB de RAM e o rápido SSD NVMe de 512 GB também mantêm as coisas funcionando.
A tela dividirá a opinião, no entanto. Embora classifiquemos seu acabamento mate e bons ângulos de visão, sua baixa cobertura de espaço de cores torna o ThinkBook 15 pouco atraente para edição de fotos ou vídeos.
O Lenovo ThinkBook 15 é um portátil de escritório de baixo custo que não apresenta deficiências sérias.
No geral, o ThinkBook 15 tem um bom preço em torno de 810 Euros (~ $ 889). No entanto, sua bateria de 45 Wh não aguenta uma jornada de trabalho completa. Esperávamos pelo menos oito horas ou mais, aqui.
O ThinkBook 15 é um portátil de escritório simples, com boa pontuação pelo seu design moderno e bons dispositivos de entrada. Seu processador Comet Lake também oferece um pequeno aumento no desempenho em relação aos antecessores Kaby Lake e Whiskey Lake, com o Core i5-10210U em nossa unidade de teste sempre disponível para executar tarefas gerais. Em resumo, a CPU torna o ThinkBook 15 adequado para uso como portátil de escritório doméstico, por exemplo. Os abundantes 16 GB de RAM e o rápido SSD NVMe de 512 GB também mantêm as coisas funcionando.
A tela dividirá a opinião, no entanto. Embora classifiquemos seu acabamento mate e bons ângulos de visão, sua baixa cobertura de espaço de cores torna o ThinkBook 15 pouco atraente para edição de fotos ou vídeos.
O Lenovo ThinkBook 15 é um portátil de escritório de baixo custo que não apresenta deficiências sérias.
No geral, o ThinkBook 15 tem um bom preço em torno de 810 Euros (~ $ 889). No entanto, sua bateria de 45 Wh não aguenta uma jornada de trabalho completa. Esperávamos pelo menos oito horas ou mais, aqui.
Lenovo ThinkBook 15
- 02/06/2020 v7 (old)
Sebastian Bade