Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Lenovo ThinkBook 13s: Um portátil empresarial, mas sem TrackPoint
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 317 cd/m²
Contraste: 1139:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 0.6
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
99.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.16
| Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE N133HCE-EN2, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE LP133WF2-SPL8, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 LP133WF7-SPB1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA CMN1375, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga S730-13IWL B133HAN05.1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -40% | -3% | -37% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67 | 40.42 -40% | 65.3 -3% | 41.87 -38% | 66.3 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 99.1 | 60.4 -39% | 95.9 -3% | 62.6 -37% | 98.2 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.2 | 41.8 -40% | 66.6 -4% | 43.3 -37% | 67.8 -2% |
| Response Times | 4% | -31% | -1% | -20% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.4 ? | 42.8 ? -6% | 57.6 ? -43% | 40.8 ? -1% | 53 ? -31% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 30 ? -4% | 34 ? -18% | 30.4 ? -6% | 31 ? -8% |
| PWM Frequency | 25000 ? | 30490 ? 22% | 26040 ? 4% | ||
| Screen | -124% | 0% | -89% | 4% | |
| Brightness middle | 319 | 298 -7% | 356 12% | 255 -20% | 343 8% |
| Brightness | 309 | 278 -10% | 336 9% | 238 -23% | 323 5% |
| Brightness Distribution | 92 | 81 -12% | 88 -4% | 88 -4% | 85 -8% |
| Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.33 -18% | 0.16 43% | 0.18 36% | 0.33 -18% |
| Contrast | 1139 | 903 -21% | 2225 95% | 1417 24% | 1039 -9% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 6.5 -171% | 3.6 -50% | 5.4 -125% | 2.38 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.3 | 23.9 -279% | 5.5 13% | 19.5 -210% | 3.55 44% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.6 | 4.9 -717% | 1.1 -83% | 4.1 -583% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 5.6 -47% | 4.7 -24% | 3.8 -0% | 3.01 21% |
| Gamma | 2.16 102% | 2.08 106% | 2.48 89% | 2.41 91% | 2.44 90% |
| CCT | 7335 89% | 6669 97% | 6374 102% | 7100 92% | 7198 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63.5 | 38.4 -40% | 61.3 -3% | 39.4 -38% | 62 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 99.1 | 60.1 -39% | 95.7 -3% | 62.5 -37% | 98 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -53% /
-86% | -11% /
-4% | -42% /
-64% | -6% /
-0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25000 Hz | ≤ 20 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 25000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 20 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3467 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4841 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3630 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | Lenovo Yoga S730-13IWL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR | Average SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 52% | 68% | 20% | 62% | 9% | |
| Write 4K | 89.3 | 99.6 12% | 120.7 35% | 101.8 14% | 139.6 56% | 110 ? 23% |
| Read 4K | 37.4 | 37.22 0% | 58.5 56% | 41.35 11% | 36.97 -1% | 40.6 ? 9% |
| Write Seq | 608 | 1432 136% | 1491 145% | 929 53% | 1490 145% | 677 ? 11% |
| Read Seq | 1019 | 2072 103% | 2760 171% | 1388 36% | 1321 30% | 1104 ? 8% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 487.9 | 439.7 -10% | 237.5 -51% | 453.5 -7% | 302.4 -38% | 438 ? -10% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 284.8 | 264.8 -7% | 336.1 18% | 286.2 0% | 375.4 32% | 338 ? 19% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 872 | 1549 78% | 1512 73% | 1302 49% | 2391 174% | 860 ? -1% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1635 | 3318 103% | 3154 93% | 1751 7% | 3272 100% | 1786 ? 9% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1937 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8233 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1018 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 59.1 | 30.9 | 25.2 | 8 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 15.9 | |||
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 72 | 42.9 | 19.2 | 16.9 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 23.1 | |||
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 25.4 | 17.6 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.8 / 28.8 / 29.7 dB |
| Carga |
| 30.7 / 38.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.3 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.4 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-1.9 °C / -3.5 F).
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 37% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 63% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 50% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.29 / 5.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.1 / 5.87 / 6.6 Watt |
| Carga |
35.3 / 46.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, a-Si IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga S730-13IWL i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -18% | -20% | -7% | -16% | -15% | -41% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.1 | 3.8 -23% | 3.4 -10% | 3.5 -13% | 3 3% | 3.81 ? -23% | 4.54 ? -46% |
| Idle Average * | 5.87 | 6.8 -16% | 5.6 5% | 5.76 2% | 5.6 5% | 6.94 ? -18% | 7.75 ? -32% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.6 | 9.8 -48% | 8.7 -32% | 8.3 -26% | 11 -67% | 8.75 ? -33% | 9.65 ? -46% |
| Load Average * | 35.3 | 32.4 8% | 43.6 -24% | 34.8 1% | 38 -8% | 35 ? 1% | 46.7 ? -32% |
| Load Maximum * | 46.5 | 52 -12% | 65 -40% | 45.7 2% | 53 -14% | 47.5 ? -2% | 68.8 ? -48% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X390-20Q1S02M00 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Lenovo Yoga S730-13IWL i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -12% | 8% | 21% | -7% | 36% | |
| H.264 | 647 | 566 -13% | 764 18% | 546 -16% | 532 -18% | 896 ? 38% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 545 | 419 -23% | 499 -8% | 569 4% | 414 -24% | 710 ? 30% |
| Load | 83 | 83 0% | 94 13% | 145 75% | 100 20% | 116 ? 40% |
| Reader / Idle | 974 | 969 | 954 | 1599 ? |
Pro
Contra
A série ThinkBook não substituirá a linha estabelecida do ThinkPad, isto ficou claro depois de testar o ThinkBook 13s. Em vez disso, a série ThinkBook é uma adição à oferta de portáteis da Lenovo, que deve agradar àqueles que não são dos ThinkPads. Especificamente, os ThinkBook 13s podem ser de maior interesse para aqueles que gostam do design do MacBook Pro do que de um ThinkPad convencional.
Uma das diferenças mais notáveis entre o ThinkBook 13s e seus pares ThinkPad, é o design da carcaça. O chassi de alumínio cinza-prateado parece premium, além de ser compacto e leve, embora não se pareça a um ThinkPad moderno. Não temos certeza se o ThinkPad será tão robusto e resistente quanto um ThinkPad a longo prazo, mas um ThinkPad similarmente compacto e leve é significativamente mais caro que o ThinkBook 13s. No entanto, gostamos do que a Lenovo fez com a tela, com seu painel mate mais brilhante do que o do ThinkPad L390, além de ter uma melhor cobertura de espaço de cores. O suporte para HDR também é um ótimo toque. A duração da bateria e as temperaturas baixas da nossa unidade de análise também são louváveis, assim como a capacidade de atualizar a memória RAM, caso seja necessário.
O maior problema que temos com o ThinkBook 13s é sua conectividade ou falta dela. Especificamente, nos referimos a seus recursos de segurança e comunicação junto com sua seleção de portas, com o ThinkBook 13s incapaz de competir com portáteis corporativos do mundo real em qualquer uma dessas três categorias. Embora não esperássemos que a Lenovo equipasse o dispositivo com uma porta Thunderbolt 3, não podemos entender por que a empresa decidiu não incluir suporte para o carregamento Type-C. Em vez disso, deve-se sempre usar o conector de alimentação de ponta fina proprietário, que é desnecessariamente inconveniente. A garantia de um ano é outra mancha na ficha do ThinkBook 13s, assim como o enorme marco inferior da tela.
IdeaPad Deluxe: O ThinkBook 13s combina alguns recursos do ThinkPad como uma tela mate e o ThinkShutter com o hardware do IdeaPad. O ThinkBook 13s pode ser um prospecto atraente para compradores domésticos, mas não é um substituto do ThinkPad.
No geral, o Lenovo ThinkBook 13s não é um portátil ruim, mas é mais IdeaPad do que ThinkPad. Seu teclado e trackpad são a prova disso, com o ThinkBook sem um TrackPoint e também a experiência de digitação de qualidade que esperamos dos portáteis ThinkPad. Em suma, o ThinkBook 13s pode ser uma alternativa interessante para marcas estabelecidas para o público em geral ou estudantes, mas não é uma opção adequada se você precisa de um portátil empresarial. Com isso dito, há portáteis de 13,3 polegadas melhores do que os ThinkBook 13s se você estiver disposto a abrir mão dos recursos do ThinkPad que ele não possui.
Lenovo ThinkBook 13s-20R90071GE
-
09/26/2019 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
