Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH (i7-8750H, RTX 2080 Max-Q)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 81 %
iluminação com acumulador: 299.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 1108:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 3.31
ΔE Greyscale 6.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
89.9% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH AU Optronics B173HAN03.2, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW B173HAN04.0 (AUO409D), AHVA, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 Sharp LQ173D1JW33 (SHP145A), IGZO, 17.3", 3840x2160 | MSI GE75 8SG Raider CMN N173HCE-G33 (CMN175C), AHVA, 17.3", 1920x1080 | Alienware 17 R5 JYWWF_B173QTN (AUO1496), TN, 17.3", 2560x1440 | Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H LP173WF4-SPF6, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -3% | 35% | -2% | -3% | -2% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 64 | 62.9 -2% | 88.9 39% | 60.6 -5% | 63.4 -1% | 66.4 4% |
sRGB Coverage | 90.4 | 87.1 -4% | 100 11% | 91.2 1% | 86.1 -5% | 84.9 -6% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.8 | 63.7 -2% | 99.7 54% | 62.6 -3% | 62.9 -3% | 62.1 -4% |
Response Times | -1% | -245% | 39% | 10% | -112% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 15.6 ? | 17.6 ? -13% | 60.8 ? -290% | 8 ? 49% | 20.8 ? -33% | 36.8 ? -136% |
Response Time Black / White * | 12.8 ? | 11.2 ? 12% | 38.4 ? -200% | 9.2 ? 28% | 6 ? 53% | 24 ? -88% |
PWM Frequency | 204.9 ? | 26040 ? | ||||
Screen | 19% | 7% | 24% | -1% | -8% | |
Brightness middle | 299.1 | 295 -1% | 230 -23% | 363 21% | 398 33% | 328.7 10% |
Brightness | 273 | 291 7% | 207 -24% | 342 25% | 367 34% | 318 16% |
Brightness Distribution | 81 | 96 19% | 83 2% | 86 6% | 86 6% | 91 12% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.24 11% | 0.2 26% | 0.27 -0% | 0.51 -89% | 0.51 -89% |
Contrast | 1108 | 1229 11% | 1150 4% | 1344 21% | 780 -30% | 645 -42% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.07 | 3.2 37% | 5.62 -11% | 2.29 55% | 5.45 -7% | 4.91 3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.55 | 6.64 37% | 10.24 3% | 4.54 57% | 10.36 2% | 10.15 4% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.31 | 2.52 24% | 2.45 26% | 2.56 23% | 4.27 -29% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.8 | 2.16 68% | 4.54 33% | 3.02 56% | 5.4 21% | 3.9 43% |
Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.46 89% | 2.36 93% | 2.38 92% | 2.4 92% | 2.13 103% |
CCT | 7805 83% | 6872 95% | 6625 98% | 7048 92% | 7453 87% | 6911 94% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58.5 | 57 -3% | 88 50% | 58 -1% | 56 -4% | 55.6 -5% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 89.9 | 87 -3% | 100 11% | 91 1% | 86 -4% | 84.7 -6% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 5% /
12% | -68% /
-21% | 20% /
21% | 2% /
-0% | -41% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
12.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 7.6 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 29 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
15.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise | |
↘ 7.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Intel Core i7-9700K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (163 - 177, n=86) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS5DU00 | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H | |
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Intel Core i7-9700K, AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H | |
Dell XPS 15 9570 Core i9 UHD | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (863 - 1251, n=93) | |
Lenovo Legion Y730-15ICH i5-8300H | |
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-15IKB 81AC001AGE | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2018-20KGS5DU00 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 5107 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5882 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 6053 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | Alienware 17 R5 SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | HP Omen X 17-ap0xx Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -21% | 11% | -29% | 13% | |
Seq Read | 1153 | 1315 14% | 2599 125% | 2203 91% | 2352 104% |
Seq Write | 1328 | 927 -30% | 588 -56% | 559 -58% | 1145 -14% |
4K Read | 35.05 | 52.4 50% | 37.57 7% | 38.74 11% | 44.81 28% |
4K Write | 96 | 122.8 28% | 104.4 9% | 92.7 -3% | 116.2 21% |
4K-64 Read | 727 | 326.5 -55% | 1116 54% | 447.2 -38% | 967 33% |
4K-64 Write | 1212 | 727 -40% | 513 -58% | 279.1 -77% | 798 -34% |
Access Time Read * | 0.063 | 0.11 -75% | 0.051 19% | 0.091 -44% | 0.05 21% |
Access Time Write * | 0.04 | 0.045 -13% | 0.036 10% | 0.065 -63% | 0.032 20% |
Score Read | 878 | 510 -42% | 1414 61% | 706 -20% | 1248 42% |
Score Write | 1441 | 942 -35% | 676 -53% | 428 -70% | 1029 -29% |
Score Total | 2784 | 1715 -38% | 2715 -2% | 1424 -49% | 2862 3% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1487 | 1834 23% | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 608 | 492.1 -19% | |||
Copy Game MB/s | 1162 | 983 -15% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 20177 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 37537 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 16302 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 8104 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 7153 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
Asus ROG G703GX | |
MSI GS75 8SG Stealth | |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH | |
Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW | |
Razer Blade 15 RTX 2070 Max-Q | |
HP Omen X 17-ap0xx | |
Alienware 17 R5 | |
Alienware m15 GTX 1070 Max-Q | |
Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H | |
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-42-R6V0 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 316.8 | 283.4 | 239.6 | 161.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 305.4 | 222.4 | 144.2 | 73.1 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 253.4 | 182.8 | 138.8 | 109 |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Razer Blade Pro 2017 GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, i7-7820HK, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0) | MSI GE75 8SG Raider GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Alienware 17 R5 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-8750H, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -14% | -13% | -18% | -12% | 3% | |
off / environment * | 28.3 | 29 -2% | 30 -6% | 30 -6% | 30 -6% | 28 1% |
Idle Minimum * | 31.5 | 29 8% | 30 5% | 30 5% | 32 -2% | 28 11% |
Idle Average * | 31.6 | 32 -1% | 31 2% | 34 -8% | 33 -4% | 28 11% |
Idle Maximum * | 31.6 | 40 -27% | 33 -4% | 37 -17% | 34 -8% | 31.3 1% |
Load Average * | 32.3 | 46 -42% | 43 -33% | 52 -61% | 43 -33% | 33.4 -3% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 43 | 51 -19% | 55 -28% | 53 -23% | 51 -19% | 42.8 -0% |
Load Maximum * | 45.5 | 52 -14% | 58 -27% | 54 -19% | 51 -12% | 46.2 -2% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 31.5 / 31.6 / 31.6 dB |
HDD |
| 31.6 dB |
Carga |
| 32.3 / 45.5 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.6 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.6 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27 °C / 80.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+1.9 °C / 3.4 F).
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 27% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.48 / 0.88 Watt |
Ocioso | 20.2 / 27.2 / 28.7 Watt |
Carga |
90.8 / 165.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 2x Samsung SSD PM951 MZVLV256HCHP (RAID 0), IGZO, 3840x2160, 17.3" | MSI GE75 8SG Raider i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ, AHVA, 1920x1080, 17.3" | Alienware 17 R5 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, TN, 2560x1440, 17.3" | Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -9% | -42% | 7% | -29% | 41% | |
Idle Minimum * | 20.2 | 19 6% | 31 -53% | 7 65% | 28 -39% | 6.3 69% |
Idle Average * | 27.2 | 22 19% | 36 -32% | 15 45% | 32 -18% | 11 60% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.7 | 29 -1% | 44 -53% | 22 23% | 37 -29% | 11.5 60% |
Load Average * | 90.8 | 102 -12% | 107 -18% | 92 -1% | 112 -23% | 89.8 1% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 152.1 | 190 -25% | 212 -39% | 207 -36% | 192 -26% | 102 33% |
Load Maximum * | 165.4 | 231 -40% | 258 -56% | 254 -54% | 231 -40% | 130.7 21% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Max-Q, 76 Wh | Asus ROG Strix Scar II GL704GW i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2070 Mobile, 66 Wh | Razer Blade Pro 2017 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile, 99 Wh | MSI GE75 8SG Raider i7-8750H, GeForce RTX 2080 Mobile, 65 Wh | Alienware 17 R5 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 99 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y730-17ICH, i7-8750H i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 76 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 24% | 4% | 48% | 15% | 112% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 190 | 235 24% | 197 4% | 281 48% | 218 15% | 402 112% |
Reader / Idle | 372 | 253 | 468 | 268 | 789 | |
Witcher 3 ultra | 52 | 50 | ||||
Load | 67 | 81 | 53 | 64 | 52 |
Pro
Contra
A maioria dos OEMs normalmente reserva as GPUs GeForce 80 de gama alta para seus modelos carro-chefe entusiastas. Isto costumava ser a família Legion Y900 para a Lenovo, mas o fabricante desde então deixou essa série em espera deixando a série Legion Y700 de gama média como a oferte de maior gama. O resultado é um portátil de jogos de gama média com uma GPU GeForce de gama alta a preços muito mais acessíveis do que "super” portáteis de jogos concorrentes como o Alienware m17, Asus ROG G703, MSI GT75, ou Acer Triton 700. O portátil da Lenovo oferece o mesmo desempenho de jogo que essas alternativas de entusiastas por centenas de dólares a menos, em grande parte porque seu design de chassi é mais simples e menos excêntrico.
O desempenho da CPU é mais rápido do que a média do Core i7-8750H devido à excelente sustentabilidade do Turbo Boost. Tanto as temperaturas do núcleo como o ruído do ventilador são menores do que o esperado, considerando também o formato fino e o alto desempenho.
Como o Legion Y740 carrega um chassi de médio alcance, no entanto, as primeiras impressões não são tão fortes quanto as alternativas de gama alta já mencionadas. O dispositivo da Lenovo é mais propenso a se flexionar e balançar do que o mais rígido (e mais caro) MSI GT75 ou Asus ROG G703. Nossa unidade específica também sofre de bleeding da iluminação de fundo moderada-pesada e cores imprecisas. Suas teclas são mais suaves e geralmente mais fracas para jogos também. Os jogadores não perderão desempenho, mas o chassi e as teclas mais fracos afetarão a experiência geral de jogo.
O Legion Y740 de gama média é vendido por muito menos do que um portátil de jogos de 17,3 polegadas, entusiasta da concorrência, enquanto ostenta a mesma CPU e GPU de gama alta. Ele tem excelente valor em termos de desempenho, desde que você esteja conforme com seu design modesto e chassi mais flexível.
Lenovo Legion Y740-17ICH
-
03/01/2019 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo