Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB (i5-8250U, FHD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 285.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 1018:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.38 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 3.95
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
43.32% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.84% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.24
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB N156HCA-EAB, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl AU Optronics B156XW02 V0, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD AU Optronics B156HAN06.1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 AUO, B156HW01, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM Chi Mei CMN15D5, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Sharp SHP149A LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -8% | -8% | -12% | -4% | 56% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.84 | 38.37 -8% | 38.66 -8% | 37 -12% | 40.09 -4% | 66 58% |
sRGB Coverage | 62.4 | 57.7 -8% | 57.9 -7% | 55.6 -11% | 59.7 -4% | 96.5 55% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 43.32 | 39.65 -8% | 39.94 -8% | 38.23 -12% | 41.47 -4% | 66.7 54% |
Response Times | 18% | 12% | 0% | 12% | -40% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.2 ? | 43.6 ? -17% | 32 ? 14% | 41 ? -10% | 44 ? -18% | 49 ? -32% |
Response Time Black / White * | 32.4 ? | 15.2 ? 53% | 29.2 ? 10% | 29 ? 10% | 14 ? 57% | 30 ? 7% |
PWM Frequency | 25770 ? | 25000 ? -3% | 961 ? -96% | |||
Screen | -49% | 2% | 3% | -56% | 37% | |
Brightness middle | 285.1 | 220.1 -23% | 240.1 -16% | 251 -12% | 234 -18% | 413 45% |
Brightness | 271 | 210 -23% | 233 -14% | 240 -11% | 211 -22% | 378 39% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 93 6% | 91 3% | 84 -5% | 83 -6% | 86 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.29 -4% | 0.23 18% | 0.2 29% | 0.43 -54% | 0.29 -4% |
Contrast | 1018 | 759 -25% | 1044 3% | 1255 23% | 544 -47% | 1424 40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.38 | 11.4 -160% | 4.25 3% | 5.25 -20% | 11.27 -157% | 2.44 44% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 24.07 | 25.96 -8% | 17.84 26% | 10.04 58% | 18.03 25% | 4.46 81% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.95 | 4.09 -4% | 4 -1% | 2.48 37% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 12 -287% | 2.8 10% | 3.28 -6% | 11.54 -272% | 2.48 20% |
Gamma | 2.24 98% | 2.09 105% | 2.3 96% | 2.15 102% | 2.09 105% | 2.43 91% |
CCT | 6705 97% | 12625 51% | 6503 100% | 6502 100% | 11607 56% | 7006 93% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40 | 36.5 -9% | 36.8 -8% | 35 -12% | 38 -5% | 62 55% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62 | 57.5 -7% | 57.8 -7% | 55 -11% | 60 -3% | 96 55% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-33% | 2% /
1% | -3% /
-0% | -16% /
-33% | 18% /
27% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 17.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 25770 Hz | ≤ 67 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 25770 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 67 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 25770 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Average of class Multimedia (4484 - 5583, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2986 - 4458, n=69) | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
Average of class Multimedia (3115 - 6078, n=10, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2699 - 5106, n=58) | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3585 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4762 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3643 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD SK hynix PC300 HFS512GD9MND | Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 SK hynix SC311 SATA | Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11 | Average SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 38% | -45% | -83% | -155% | -7% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 301.1 | 792 163% | 231.6 -23% | 145.4 -52% | 465.9 55% | 423 ? 40% |
Copy Program MB/s | 233.5 | 334.3 43% | 166.4 -29% | 94 -60% | 117.2 -50% | 358 ? 53% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 868 | 1265 46% | 301.3 -65% | 199.8 -77% | 632 -27% | 748 ? -14% |
Score Total | 1387 | 2249 62% | 910 -34% | 594 -57% | 750 -46% | 1423 ? 3% |
Score Write | 415 | 836 101% | 330 -20% | 210 -49% | 58 -86% | 450 ? 8% |
Score Read | 690 | 968 40% | 383 -44% | 256 -63% | 492 -29% | 679 ? -2% |
Access Time Write * | 0.051 | 0.127 -149% | 0.075 -47% | 0.225 -341% | 0.889 -1643% | 0.1111 ? -118% |
Access Time Read * | 0.06 | 0.059 2% | 0.142 -137% | 0.136 -127% | 0.086 -43% | 0.1118 ? -86% |
4K-64 Write | 271.6 | 677 149% | 247 -9% | 145 -47% | 19.19 -93% | 290 ? 7% |
4K-64 Read | 431.3 | 756 75% | 309.7 -28% | 187.9 -56% | 301.8 -30% | 452 ? 5% |
4K Write | 88.4 | 85.8 -3% | 47.64 -46% | 40.46 -54% | 5.12 -94% | 100.2 ? 13% |
4K Read | 38.69 | 30.78 -20% | 23.71 -39% | 22.24 -43% | 32.5 -16% | 38.9 ? 1% |
Seq Write | 550 | 735 34% | 356.2 -35% | 241.8 -56% | 340.3 -38% | 593 ? 8% |
Seq Read | 2205 | 1817 -18% | 497.5 -77% | 457.6 -79% | 1574 -29% | 1882 ? -15% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Average of class Multimedia (2018 - 24900, n=78, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (927 - 2505, n=244) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Average of class Multimedia (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=81, last 2 years) | |
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Average of class Multimedia (66941 - 354020, n=7, last 2 years) | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (26409 - 59483, n=71) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1690 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6844 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 936 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4.5 - 17, n=176) | |
1366x768 High Preset (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8.1 - 35.9, n=187) | |
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (11.5 - 45.5, n=187) | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (18.3 - 90.2, n=187) |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3 - 14.5, n=11) | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4.9 - 32, n=42) | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6.5 - 49.3, n=62) | |
1024x768 Lowest Preset (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 | |
Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (10.4 - 110.7, n=82) |
Metro: Last Light | |
1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6 - 8, n=3) | |
1366x768 High (DX11) AF:16x (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (13 - 16, n=3) | |
1366x768 Medium (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (16.4 - 28, n=4) | |
1024x768 Low (DX10) AF:4x (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (23.3 - 41, n=5) |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 47 | 21 | 19 | 7 |
Metro: Last Light (2013) | 25 | 22 | 13 | 6 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 17 | 11 | 6 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 28 / 28 / 30.1 dB |
Carga |
| 30.2 / 33.2 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28 dB(A) |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG | HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100 | Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8550U, SK hynix PC300 HFS512GD9MND | Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK hynix SC311 SATA | Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM Vega 3, R3 2200U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -8% | -16% | -5% | -12% | -13% | |
off / environment * | 28 | 28.2 -1% | 29.2 -4% | 30.4 -9% | 30.3 -8% | 30.3 -8% |
Idle Minimum * | 28 | 31.7 -13% | 29.3 -5% | 30.4 -9% | 30.3 -8% | 30.3 -8% |
Idle Average * | 28 | 31.7 -13% | 29.5 -5% | 30.4 -9% | 30.3 -8% | 30.3 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.1 | 32 -6% | 30.5 -1% | 31.2 -4% | 30.9 -3% | 30.3 -1% |
Load Average * | 30.2 | 32.8 -9% | 41.2 -36% | 31.5 -4% | 37.8 -25% | 37.1 -23% |
Load Maximum * | 33.2 | 35 -5% | 47.2 -42% | 31.5 5% | 40.6 -22% | 43 -30% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 44 | 34.3 | 43.3 |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+0.6 °C / 1 F).
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 83% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 75% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 20% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.24 / 0.37 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.5 / 5.6 / 10.3 Watt |
Carga |
30.5 / 33.8 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix PC401 HFS256GD9TNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba MQ04ABF100, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, SK hynix PC300 HFS512GD9MND, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK hynix SC311 SATA, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM R3 2200U, Vega 3, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -12% | -87% | -3% | -32% | -66% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 5.6 -60% | 5.1 -46% | 3.9 -11% | 5.6 -60% | 2.9 17% |
Idle Average * | 5.6 | 7.1 -27% | 6.3 -13% | 6.6 -18% | 8.5 -52% | 5.8 -4% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.3 | 7.9 23% | 10.5 -2% | 9.3 10% | 8.4 18% | 7.5 27% |
Load Average * | 30.5 | 32.8 -8% | 82.2 -170% | 30.2 1% | 41 -34% | 77.5 -154% |
Load Maximum * | 33.8 | 30.5 10% | 103.2 -205% | 33.2 2% | 44.2 -31% | 107 -217% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 85.9 | 32 | 84 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | Asus VivoBook 15 X570UD i5-8550U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 48 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5579-9672 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Acer Aspire 3 A315-41-R7BM R3 2200U, Vega 3, 37 Wh | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 7% | -19% | 11% | -12% | 141% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 391 | 419 7% | 318 -19% | 435 11% | 344 -12% | 942 141% |
Reader / Idle | 722 | 671 | 536 | |||
Load | 134 | 110 | 83 | 114 | ||
Witcher 3 ultra | 62 |
Pro
Contra
Para quem estiver interessado em um portátil de entretenimento atraente, relativamente robusto e muito versátil, que não esvazie a carteira, vale a pena dar uma olhada no IdeaPad 530S de $699. Graças à sua capaz CPU quad-core i5-8250U, muita memória RAM e rápido armazenamento NVMe, nossa unidade de análise gerenciou um desempenho geral muito bom em nossos testes. Embora nossos benchmarks de CPU tenham ficado aquém dos concorrentes equipados de forma similar, as margens eram pequenas, e os baixos níveis de ruído do ventilador e o desenvolvimento de temperatura provavelmente compensariam a discrepância nos olhos da maioria dos usuários.
A qualidade da construção também é de alto nível, aproveitando superfícies de alumínio usinadas CNC e marcos super finos para evocar os pensamentos dos portáteis HP Spectre e Dell XPS - a uma fração do custo. Os dispositivos de entrada também são bastante bons no geral, embora os líderes da categoria estejam acima do IdeaPad aqui.
O que o IdeaPad 530S realiza é bastante valioso. Se nada mais, representa um passo perfeitamente adequado da linha de máquinas ultra-premium de hoje para um lugar um pouco mais humilde onde a perfeição é trocada cuidadosamente por valor.
É claro que a cortina não pode ficar esticada para sempre e, eventualmente, a fachada de uma máquina de $ 1K+ começa a se desgastar um pouco. Embora construídas em metal, as superfícies são visivelmente mais finas do que as que adornam o XPS 15, por exemplo, e isso é mais evidente na flexão presente em toda a unidade base. Os dispositivos de entrada são bons, mas não excelentes O desempenho gráfico obviamente não é uma ênfase da unidade de teste de hoje, mas o áudio também não tem o equilíbrio e o impacto do XPS 15, e a tela (apesar de boa no geral) não pode competir. Não há opção para armazenamento duplo ou RAM de canal duplo, e o leitor de cartões está entre os mais lentos que vimos. Nenhuma dessas deficiências é algo fatal e, de fato, a maioria pode ser considerada relativamente pequena, especialmente no contexto do preço. Mas, tomados em conjunto, eles de certa forma comprovam a economia de preços, servindo como um lembrete de que há recortes em algum lugar. Tendo isso em mente (e as expectativas sob controle), o que o IdeaPad 530S realiza aqui é, no entanto, bastante valioso.
Lenovo Ideapad 530S-15IKB
-
08/27/2018 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein