Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo Ideapad 120s (14 polegadas, HD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 | |
HP Stream 13-c102ng | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
HP Stream 13-c102ng |
|
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 257.4 cd/m²
Contraste: 477:1 (Preto: 0.54 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 13.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
62% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
41.32% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.2
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP Chi Mei N140BGA-EA3, TN LED, 14", 1366x768 | Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR Chi Mei CMN1132, TN LED, 11.6", 1366x768 | Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 SDC8353, IPS, 12.3", 2736x1824 | Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 Name: BOE06A8, IPS, 14.1", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM Chi Mei N140BGE-EA3, TN LED, 14", 1366x768 | HP Stream 13-c102ng AU Optronics B133XW03, TN, 13.3", 1366x768 | Jumper EZbook 3 MS_9003, TN LED, 14.1", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 4% | 62% | 3% | -2% | -2% | 25% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 41.32 | 42.77 4% | 68 65% | 42.53 3% | 40.68 -2% | 40.68 -2% | 51.6 25% |
sRGB Coverage | 62 | 64.2 4% | 98.4 59% | 63.6 3% | 60.6 -2% | 59.8 -4% | 77.3 25% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.7 | 44.2 4% | 69.5 63% | 43.93 3% | 42.08 -1% | 42.32 -1% | 53 24% |
Response Times | 1667% | -59% | -41% | -42% | -44% | -19% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.2 ? | 46 ? -31% | 48.4 ? -38% | 32.8 ? 7% | 49.6 ? -41% | 45 ? -28% | 46 ? -31% |
Response Time Black / White * | 17.2 ? | 30 ? -74% | 30.8 ? -79% | 29.2 ? -70% | 21.6 ? -26% | 25 ? -45% | 11.6 ? 33% |
PWM Frequency | 495 ? | 25770 ? 5106% | 200 ? -60% | 200 ? -60% | 201 ? -59% | 200 ? -60% | |
Screen | 9% | 68% | 24% | 9% | 4% | -2% | |
Brightness middle | 257.4 | 243 -6% | 224 -13% | 247.7 -4% | 231 -10% | 190 -26% | 384 49% |
Brightness | 239 | 230 -4% | 219 -8% | 243 2% | 213 -11% | 179 -25% | 341 43% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 91 5% | 81 -7% | 92 6% | 87 0% | 85 -2% | 76 -13% |
Black Level * | 0.54 | 0.4 26% | 0.13 76% | 0.32 41% | 0.47 13% | 0.33 39% | 1.28 -137% |
Contrast | 477 | 608 27% | 1723 261% | 774 62% | 491 3% | 576 21% | 300 -37% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11.8 | 11.24 5% | 2.4 80% | 6.4 46% | 9.1 23% | 9.84 17% | 8.7 26% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 28 | 19.82 29% | 3.7 87% | 24.3 13% | 14.88 47% | 16.7 40% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13.3 | 12.78 4% | 2.5 81% | 4.5 66% | 9.55 28% | 10.32 22% | 11.1 17% |
Gamma | 2.2 100% | 2.33 94% | 2.31 95% | 2.33 94% | 2.47 89% | 2.48 89% | 2.2 100% |
CCT | 16811 39% | 15436 42% | 6869 95% | 7318 89% | 11384 57% | 11884 55% | 12445 52% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39 | 41 5% | 63.4 63% | 39.8 2% | 38.84 0% | 38 -3% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62 | 64 3% | 98.3 59% | 62.9 1% | 60.59 -2% | 60 -3% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 560% /
319% | 24% /
50% | -5% /
8% | -12% /
-3% | -14% /
-7% | 1% /
0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
17.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise | |
↘ 5.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 35 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 17.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 495 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 495 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 495 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
HP 15-bw075ax | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
HP Stream 13-c102ng | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
HP 15-bw075ax | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
HP Stream 13-c102ng |
Cinebench R11.5 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
HP 15-bw075ax | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR | |
HP Stream 13-c102ng | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
HP 15-bw075ax | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR | |
HP Stream 13-c102ng |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
HP 15-bw075ax | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
HP Stream 13-c102ng | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
HP 15-bw075ax | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
HP Stream 13-c102ng |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
HP 15-bw075ax | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
HP 15-bw075ax | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
HP 15-bw075ax | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 1788 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 1935 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2558 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 1220 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP 64 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR SanDisk DF4032 | Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 64 GB eMMC Flash | Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 SanDisk DF4128 | HP 15-bw077ax WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-60JC3T1 | Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 Toshiba SG5 THNSNK128GVN8 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 5% | -49% | 18% | -57% | 321% | |
Write 4K | 12.44 | 13.87 11% | 3.23 -74% | 11.87 -5% | 0.92 -93% | 79.9 542% |
Read 4K | 9.59 | 12.23 28% | 5.37 -44% | 11.45 19% | 0.3 -97% | 22.68 136% |
Write Seq | 104.9 | 101.7 -3% | 49.49 -53% | 106.1 1% | 97.3 -7% | 139.4 33% |
Read Seq | 169.9 | 165.1 -3% | 153.3 -10% | 293.6 73% | 99.6 -41% | 472.7 178% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 15.3 | 13.63 -11% | 3.6 -76% | 15.22 -1% | 0.94 -94% | 122.6 701% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 32.1 | 36.23 13% | 17.4 -46% | 33.91 6% | 0.84 -97% | 234.6 631% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 98.1 | 94.8 -3% | 24 -76% | 110.3 12% | 97.7 0% | 139.3 42% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 134.9 | 147.5 9% | 113.2 -16% | 183 36% | 98.6 -27% | 549 307% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
HP 15-bw075ax | |
Jumper EZbook 3 | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
HP Stream 13-c102ng | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Toshiba Portege A30-D-139 | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
HP 15-bw075ax | |
HP 15-bw077ax | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 | |
Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Cube Thinker m3 | |
Lenovo Thinkpad 13-20J1001BUS | |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP | |
Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 17286 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 2306 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 358 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 21 |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.1 °C / 0.1 F).
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), N3060, SanDisk DF4032 | Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3450, 64 GB eMMC Flash | Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3450, SanDisk DF4128 | Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, 32 GB eMMC Flash | HP Stream 13-c102ng HD Graphics (Braswell), N3050, 32 GB eMMC Flash | Jumper EZbook 3 HD Graphics 500, Celeron N3350, Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | 2% | 7% | -3% | -9% | -2% | 5% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 41.2 | 40.7 1% | 39.2 5% | 42.4 -3% | 39.9 3% | 36.5 11% | 41 -0% |
Maximum Bottom * | 47.2 | 41 13% | 39.4 17% | 45 5% | 44.7 5% | 51.6 -9% | 42 11% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.8 | 28.2 -5% | 27.7 -3% | 28.6 -7% | 33 -23% | 26.5 1% | 27 -1% |
Idle Bottom * | 29.2 | 29.6 -1% | 26.8 8% | 31.4 -8% | 35 -20% | 32 -10% | 27 8% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.5% higher than median
(-) | mids are not linear (20.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 10.9% higher than median
(-) | highs are not linear (22.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (52.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 95% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 4% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (31.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 92% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 6% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 89% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Jumper EZbook 3 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 87% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 10% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.28 / 0.27 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.7 / 5.3 / 5.7 Watt |
Carga |
12.9 / 13.1 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, 64 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), SanDisk DF4032, TN LED, 1366x768, 11.6" | Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 Celeron N3450, HD Graphics 500, 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 2736x1824, 12.3" | Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 Celeron N3450, HD Graphics 500, SanDisk DF4128, IPS, 1920x1080, 14.1" | Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 32 GB eMMC Flash, TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | HP Stream 13-c102ng N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 32 GB eMMC Flash, TN, 1366x768, 13.3" | Jumper EZbook 3 Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, Toshiba 064G93 64 GB eMMC, TN LED, 1920x1080, 14.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -51% | -67% | -16% | -24% | -22% | -11% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.7 | 7 -159% | 5.9 -119% | 3.6 -33% | 4.2 -56% | 4.6 -70% | 3.18 -18% |
Idle Average * | 5.3 | 8.2 -55% | 7.7 -45% | 6.2 -17% | 6.3 -19% | 6.8 -28% | 6.14 -16% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.7 | 8.5 -49% | 8.6 -51% | 6.5 -14% | 7.3 -28% | 6.5 -14% | 6.4 -12% |
Load Average * | 12.9 | 12.5 3% | 18.2 -41% | 13.5 -5% | 12.5 3% | 12.7 2% | 13.3 -3% |
Load Maximum * | 13.1 | 12.3 6% | 23.6 -80% | 14.3 -9% | 15.9 -21% | 13.2 -1% | 13.6 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, 32 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 110S-11IBR N3060, HD Graphics 400 (Braswell), 39.1 Wh | Chuwi Lapbook 12.3 Celeron N3450, HD Graphics 500, 36.48 Wh | Chuwi LapBook 14 inch 2017 Celeron N3450, HD Graphics 500, 38 Wh | Acer Aspire One Cloudbook 14 AO1-431-C6QM N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 55 Wh | HP Stream 13-c102ng N3050, HD Graphics (Braswell), 37 Wh | Jumper EZbook 3 Celeron N3350, HD Graphics 500, 38 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -8% | -6% | 10% | 51% | -12% | 0% | |
Reader / Idle | 957 | 696 -27% | |||||
WiFi v1.3 | 419 | 384 -8% | 395 -6% | 372 -11% | 631 51% | 370 -12% | 420 0% |
Load | 118 | 199 69% |
Pro
Contra
O Lenovo Ideapad é uma máquina lenta. Mesmo tarefas simples, como abrir o gerenciador de arquivos ou carregar uma página da web leve, podem se tornar um exercício de paciência. A tela também é muito imprecisa com as cores e os ângulos de visão são fracos. Embora seja suficientemente competente para tarefas básicas de escritório e navegação na web, os usuários precisarão diminuir suas expectativas ou se frustrarão.
Dito isto, há várias áreas onde o 120s supera sua concorrência. Em termos de design, estabilidade da carcaça, teclado e duração da bateria, há poucos portáteis de orçamento que podem vencer o 120s em $250. O design sem ventilador cria uma experiência silenciosa, e a duração da bateria e sua construção leve tornam-na uma máquina facilmente portátil. Embora o desempenho seja lento, o Ideapad 120s rotineiramente derrota outros portáteis Celeron de núcleo duplo por uma margem notável em benchmarks.
Para potenciais compradores com um orçamento incrivelmente apertado, o Ideapad 120s é difícil de derrotar.
Lenovo Ideapad 120S-14IAP
- 11/25/2017 v6 (old)
Sam Medley