Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 17ISK

Name: Lenovo IdeaPad Y900
Brand: Lenovo

Um Y700 melhorado. O Y900 de gama superior se sente único com mais recursos e melhor acabamento que o seu predecessor Y700. Infelizmente, o seu teclado mecânico chiclet, ventoinhas barulhentas, e preço inicial alto, deixam muito a desejar.

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 10/04/2016 🇺🇸 🇮🇹 ...

Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Skylake Windows

Test device courtesy of Lenovo US

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 (IdeaPad Y900 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-6820HK 4 x 2.7 - 3.6 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1038 MHz, Memoría: 5010 MHz, GDDR5, 372.54

Memória

16 GB

, DDR4, PC4-17000, 1300 MHz, 15-15-15-36, Dual-Channel

Pantalha

17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, Name: LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF1, ID: LGD0469, Brilhante: sim

placa mãe

Intel CM236 (Skylake PCH-H)

Disco rígido

Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, 256 GB

, Sekundär: 1 TB Western Digital WDC WD10SPCX-24HWST1

Placa de Som

Nvidia GM204 - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 4 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm Kopfhörer, 3.5 mm Mikrofon, Card Reader: SD-Leser

Funcionamento em rede

Qualcomm/Atheros e2400 PCI-E Gigabit Ethernet Controller (10/100/1000MBit/s), Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter (b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.0

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 36 x 427 x 318

Bateria

90 Wh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo + Subwoofer, Teclado: Chiclet mechanisch, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Lenovo Nerve Center, Magic Y Key, Training Manual Software, Lenovo Solution Center, Dolby Audio, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

4.4 kg, Suprimento de energia: 965 g

Preço

2400 USD

Links

Lenovo página inicial
Lenovo Seção de notebook

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Asus G752VS-XB78K MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG Lenovo Ideapad Y700-17 80QK7709PB EVGA SC17 DIN A4 ❌

Right: Novo Recovery button, SD reader, 3.5 mm microphone, 3.5 mm headset, 2x USB 2.0, Kensington Lock

Left: AC adapter, DisplayPort ???, HDMI 2.0, Gigabit Ethernet, USB Type-C w/ Thunderbolt 3, 2x USB 3.0

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US	135.3 MB/s +80%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900	75.3 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF	23.8 MB/s -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US	186.3 MB/s +99%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900	93.8 MB/s
MSI GS73VR 6RF	27.6 MB/s -71%

Networking
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m 512KB
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	544 MBit/s +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	532 MBit/s
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m 512KB
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	518 MBit/s
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US Atheros/Qualcomm QCA6174	467.9 MBit/s -10%


334.3 cd/m²	346 cd/m²	342.1 cd/m²
338.3 cd/m²	344.9 cd/m²	326.4 cd/m²
315 cd/m²	315.7 cd/m²	298.7 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Máximo: 346 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 329 cd/m² Minimum: 2.69 cd/m²
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 344.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 988:1 (Preto: 0.349 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.49 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 4.63 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.4% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2)

	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 17.3", 1920x1080	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US LG Philips LGD046E, IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG AU Optronics B173ZAN01.0 (AUO109B), IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160	EVGA SC17 IPS, 17.3", 3840x2160	Asus G752VS-XB78K LG Philips LP173WF4-SPF3 (LGD04E8), IPS, 17.3", 1920x1080
Display		-1%	0%	34%	34%	-1%
Display P3 Coverage	67.4	67.4 0%	68.3 1%	86.9 29%	87.6 30%	66.9 -1%
sRGB Coverage	86.3	84.8 -2%	86.7 0%	100 16%	100 16%	85.2 -1%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	63.2	62 -2%	63.4 0%	99.4 57%	99 57%	62.3 -1%
Response Times		-41%	2%	0%	-78%	3%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	34.8 ?(14, 20.8)	51.6 ?(20, 31.6) -48%	34.4 ?(15.6, 18.8) 1%	37 ?(13, 24) -6%	69.6 ?(28.4, 41.2) -100%	38 ?(14, 24) -9%
Response Time Black / White *	25.6 ?(4.8, 20.8)	34.4 ?(5.2, 29.2) -34%	25.2 ?(4.8, 20.4) 2%	24 ?(5, 19) 6%	40 ?(10, 30) -56%	22 ?(4, 18) 14%
PWM Frequency					1000 ?(29)
Screen		7%	8%	18%	4%	7%
Brightness middle	344.9	349.7 1%	348.7 1%	336 -3%	394.1 14%	328 -5%
Brightness	329	332 1%	327 -1%	320 -3%	368 12%	317 -4%
Brightness Distribution	86	90 5%	89 3%	88 2%	83 -3%	88 2%
Black Level *	0.349	0.304 13%	0.323 7%	0.25 28%	0.439 -26%	0.3 14%
Contrast	988	1150 16%	1080 9%	1344 36%	898 -9%	1093 11%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	4.49	3.99 11%	4.09 9%	3.61 20%	5.79 -29%	3.74 17%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	8.72	8.74 -0%	9.02 -3%	6.02 31%	8.44 3%	8.97 -3%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	4.63	3.34 28%	2.14 54%	4.78 -3%	4.23 9%	2.67 42%
Gamma	2.11 ^104%	2.23 ^99%	2.25 ^98%	2.32 ^95%	2.11 ^104%	2.41 ^91%
CCT	6905 ^94%	6111 ^106%	6885 ^94%	6185 ^105%	7479 ^87%	6861 ^95%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	56.7	55.8 -2%	56.9 0%	88 55%	86.6 53%	56 -1%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	86.4	84.8 -2%	86.5 0%	100 16%	100 16%	85 -2%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-12% / -1%	3% / 6%	17% / 19%	-13% / -1%	3% / 5%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 4.8 ms rise
25.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 14 ms rise
34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20.8 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	166 Points +9%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 Intel Core i7-6820HK	158 Points +4%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	152 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	143 Points -6%
Asus G750JS-T4064H Intel Core i7-4700HQ	131 Points -14%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	865 Points +22%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 Intel Core i7-6820HK	860 Points +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	707 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	682 Points -4%
Asus G750JS-T4064H Intel Core i7-4700HQ	641 Points -9%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	1.91 Points +14%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.78 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.67 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	1.66 Points -1%
Asus G750JS-T4064H Intel Core i7-4700HQ	1.49 Points -11%
Asus G750JS-T4064H Intel Core i7-4700HQ	1.49 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	9.56 Points +24%
MSI GT73VR-6RE16SR451 Intel Core i7-6820HK	9.53 Points +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	7.73 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	7.53 Points -3%
Asus G750JS-T4064H Intel Core i7-4700HQ	6.94 Points -10%
Asus G750JS-T4064H Intel Core i7-4700HQ	6.94 Points -10%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	26150 Points +25%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	20910 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	18785 Points -10%
Rendering Single 32Bit
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	6487 Points +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	5559 Points
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	5449 Points -2%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	229.2 s *
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	210.1 s * +8%
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	178.5 s * +22%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M
MSI GP62-2QEi781FD Intel Core i7-5700HQ	562 s * -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Intel Core i7-6820HK	556 s *
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	498.3 s * +10%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

10260

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20910

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5559

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.73 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

71.3 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.67 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

152 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

109.6 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

707 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	4952 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	4620 Points -7%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	4060 Points -18%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	3848 Points -22%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	5533 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	5095 Points -8%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	5044 Points -9%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	7636 Points +16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	6609 Points
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	4762 Points -28%
Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7	2303 Points -65%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		4952 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		6609 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5533 pontos
Ajuda

	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	EVGA SC17 Samsung SSD 950 Pro 512GB m.2 NVMe	Asus G752VS-XB78K Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-55%	-58%	21%	23%
Read Seq	1559	513 -67%	529 -66%	2247 44%	1718 10%
Write Seq	1254	156.3 -88%	338.5 -73%	1534 22%	1305 4%
Read 512	850	435.6 -49%	288.9 -66%	1113 31%	1250 47%
Write 512	1228	156.5 -87%	319.2 -74%	1490 21%	1438 17%
Read 4k	49.32	36.89 -25%	23.1 -53%	52.1 6%	44.42 -10%
Write 4k	140.3	96.9 -31%	99.4 -29%	149.2 6%	154.4 10%
Read 4k QD32	539	358.8 -33%	147.5 -73%	635 18%	744 38%
Write 4k QD32	345.3	138.9 -60%	236.9 -31%	422 22%	578 67%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2

Sequential Read: 1559 MB/s

Sequential Write: 1254 MB/s

512K Read: 850 MB/s

512K Write: 1228 MB/s

4K Read: 49.32 MB/s

4K Write: 140.3 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 539 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 345.3 MB/s

3DMark | 3DMark 11

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	13018 Points +32%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	11957 Points +21%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9888 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	9608 Points -3%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	4318 Points -56%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	3009 Points +29%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	2592 Points +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	2326 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	2299 Points -1%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	974 Points -58%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	6123 Points +32%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	5541 Points +19%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	4650 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	4623 Points -1%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	2012 Points -57%

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	16946 Points +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	13168 Points
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	12731 Points -3%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	12472 Points -5%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5237 Points -60%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK	9842 Points
Asus G701VO-CS74K NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK	9017 Points -8%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	8343 Points -15%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ	8338 Points -15%
Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5474 Points -44%

3DMark 11 Performance		12267 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		134877 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		26493 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		8653 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		4478 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	75.2 fps +29%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	58.1 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	57.5 fps -1%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	44.9 fps -23%

Guild Wars 2 - 1920x1080 All Maximum / On AA:FX
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	58.2 fps
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	52.9 fps -9%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	106.2 fps +18%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	105.5 fps +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	90.2 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	86.4 fps -4%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	69.5 fps -23%

Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	88.3 fps +32%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	82.1 fps +23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	66.8 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	50.5 fps -24%

Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	72.4 fps +17%
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	67.9 fps +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	62.1 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	58.6 fps -6%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	47.5 fps -24%

Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	63 fps +24%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	62 fps +22%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	51 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	36 fps -29%

Metal Gear Solid V - 1920x1080 Extra High / On
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	60 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	60 fps 0%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	60 fps 0%
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	60 fps 0%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	60 fps 0%

Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	79.3 fps +38%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	71.6 fps +25%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	57.9 fps +1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	57.4 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	43.5 fps -24%

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	63.5 fps +25%
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	60.4 fps +19%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	55 fps +9%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	50.6 fps
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	42.8 fps -15%

Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	96.5 fps +17%
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	84.3 fps +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	82.3 fps
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	56 fps -32%

Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Asus G701VO-CS74K GeForce GTX 980 (Laptop), 6820HK, 2x Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL (RAID 0)	118.2 fps +38%
MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	106.3 fps +24%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	87.3 fps +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	85.7 fps

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
Sleeping Dogs (2012)				58.1
Guild Wars 2 (2012)				58.2
BioShock Infinite (2013)				90.2
Metro: Last Light (2013)				66.8
Thief (2014)				62.1
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)				51
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)				60
Fallout 4 (2015)				57.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)				50.6
Doom (2016)				82.3
Overwatch (2016)				85.7

Barulho

Ocioso		29.4 / 32.4 / 48 dB
Carga		42.5 / 48.5 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A)

	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 GeForce GTX 980M, 6820HK, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung MZNLN128HCGR-000L2	MSI GT72VR 6RE-015US GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1122	Asus G752VS-XB78K GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5512GPU7	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 6700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7
Noise		10%	4%	5%	-3%
off / environment *	28.8		28.9 -0%	30 -4%	31 -8%
Idle Minimum *	29.4	28 5%	32.4 -10%	31 -5%	33 -12%
Idle Average *	32.4	28.1 13%	32.4 -0%	32 1%	34 -5%
Idle Maximum *	48	31.5 34%	32.4 32%	33 31%	40 17%
Load Average *	42.5	40.6 4%	39.4 7%	40 6%	44 -4%
Load Maximum *	48.5	51 -5%	52 -7%	47 3%	50 -3%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.6 °C	49 °C	36.8 °C
32.8 °C	40 °C	36.2 °C
24.4 °C	23.8 °C	28.8 °C

Máximo: 49 °C
Médio: 34.4 °C


38.6 °C	39.2 °C	38.8 °C
32.2 °C	36.4 °C	32.4 °C
30.2 °C	30 °C	31.2 °C

Máximo: 39.2 °C
Médio: 34.3 °C

alimentação elétrica 41.4 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.8 °C / 83.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (+0.1 °C / 0.2 F).

Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (87.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 87.1% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(-) | nearly no mids - on average 87.1% lower than median
(+) | mids are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(-) | nearly no highs - on average 87.1% lower than median
(+) | highs are linear (0% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(-) | overall sound is not linear (132% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 100% of all tested devices in this class were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 100% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 0% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.35 / 0.88 Watt
Ocioso	24.3 / 29.6 / 29.9 Watt
Carga	110.1 / 171.4 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256 m.2, , 1920x1080, 17.3"	Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Predator 17 G9-793-77LG 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 17.3"	MSI GS73VR 6RF 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3"	HP Pavilion 17 FHD V3A33AV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3"
Power Consumption		9%	-20%	-3%	54%
Idle Minimum *	24.3	20.6 15%	25 -3%	22.6 7%	5.3 78%
Idle Average *	29.6	22.1 25%	35 -18%	32.7 -10%	10.6 64%
Idle Maximum *	29.9	22.5 25%	46 -54%	32.8 -10%	11.8 61%
Load Average *	110.1	130.6 -19%	103 6%	114.7 -4%	70.9 36%
Load Maximum *	171.4	177.2 -3%	223 -30%	167.9 2%	119.8 30%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		5h 49min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 08min
Carga (máximo brilho)		2h 16min

	Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 6820HK, GeForce GTX 980M, 90 Wh	Lenovo Ideapad Y700 17ISK 80Q0 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 60 Wh	Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 980M, 64 Wh	Asus G752VS-XB78K 6820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 90 Wh	MSI GT72VR 6RD-063US 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 83 Wh
Battery Runtime		33%	-30%	-21%	-17%
Reader / Idle	349	688 97%	273 -22%	311 -11%	323 -7%
WiFi v1.3	248	334 35%	187 -25%	210 -15%	221 -11%
Load	136	91 -33%	76 -44%	84 -38%	93 -32%

Pro

+ Temperaturas da superfície e do núcleo relativamente baixas

+ Grandes teclas com teclas Macro dedicadas

+ Compatibilidade RAID 0; 3 baias de armazenamento

+ Design exclusivo; qualidade de construção forte

+ Amplas opções da iluminação de fundo do teclado

+ USB Tipo-C c/ Thunderbolt 3

+ Alto falantes internos muito fortes

+ Teclas mecânicas removíveis

+ Sem afogamento da CPU ou GPU

+ G-Sync

Contra

- Modo Turbo decepcionante; altas temperaturas da CPU sob cargas extremas

- O teclado não oferece teclas com iluminação RGB individual "de verdade"

- Comportamento pulsante da ventoinha durante cargas baixas

- A reprodução do som poderia ser mais balanceada

- Sem opções de tela de 120 Hz/5 ms ou 4K UHD

- Forte ruído da ventoinha durante os jogos

- Sem controles da ventoinha personalizáveis

- GPU não atualizáveis

- Acessibilidade difícil

- Duração média da bateria

- Resposta suave do teclado

- Caro

In review: Lenovo Ideapad Y900-17ISK. Test model provided by Lenovo US.

A Lenovo está pisando em terreno mais profundo com o seu novo Y900 e o preço de $2000+ USD é a prova disso. Enquanto o design e o acabamento são sólidos, o novo teclado mecânico e Modo Turbo são um pacote misturado. As teclas se sentem suaves e irregulares e alguns usuários podem não gostar da resposta táctil. Enquanto isso, o modo Turbo oferece poucos benefícios para os jogos e recomendamos deixa-lo ligado o tempo todo durante os jogos, dado que não existem verdadeiras desvantagens em deixa-lo desligado durante o uso intenso.

Outra grande desvantagem é a estranha pulsação da ventoinha do sistema e a falta de controles da ventoinha personalizáveis no momento da análise. Isto eventualmente poderia ser resolvido, mas os usuários devem evitar utilizar o portátil em ambientes sensíveis ao ruído, inclusive quando ajustado nas configurações de economia de energia. O ruído da ventoinha ao jogar é um pouco mais forte que a maioria dos outros portáteis de 17-polegadas salvo pelo mais fino MSI GS73VR ou alternativas Gigabyte Aorus X7 Pro v5.

Em seu núcleo, o Y900 oferece forte desempenho com temperaturas relativamente baixas sem afogamento da CPU ou GPU. Apesar de tudo, tivemos dificuldade para encontrar suficiente valor no sistema para recomenda-lo sobre algo menos caro como o GT72VR com sua fácil manutenção e capacidade de atualização da GPU MXM 3.0b.

O mais recente portátil de jogos carro chefe da Lenovo é um grande passo para frente em termos de qualidade e design, mas no final fica para trás por causa de suas irritantes ventoinhas pulsantes, falta de opções de configuração da tela, teclas chiclet mecânicas, e baixo valor pelo alto preço, especialmente agora que os portáteis concorrentes estão sendo entregues com a mais eficiente GPU GTX 1060.

Lenovo IdeaPad Y900 - 10/10/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento

82 / 98 → 83%

Teclado

73%

Mouse

75%

Conectividade

64 / 81 → 79%

Peso

45 / 10-66 → 63%

Bateria