Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IML: Excelente duração da bateria
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.4 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250 | 1.9 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.2 % v7 (old) | 04/2019 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.8 kg | 17.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83 % v6 (old) | 04/2019 | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250 | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.6 % v6 (old) | 07/2019 | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | 1.8 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F (Toshiba Exceria Pro UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 299 cd/m²
Contraste: 1196:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2.58
ΔE Greyscale 4.21 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE06FB), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L BOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng BOE080D, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F LG Philips LP156WFC-SPD1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -36% | 2% | -39% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.8 | 40.02 -40% | 67.2 1% | 37.12 -44% |
| sRGB Coverage | 86.5 | 58.5 -32% | 88.1 2% | 55.9 -35% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.2 | 41.34 -35% | 64.4 2% | 38.35 -39% |
| Response Times | 13% | 11% | 41% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49.6 ? | 45 ? 9% | 43 ? 13% | 24.8 ? 50% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 34.8 ? | 33 ? 5% | 29 ? 17% | 24 ? 31% |
| PWM Frequency | 202 ? | 250 ? 24% | 208 ? 3% | |
| Screen | -14% | 0% | -35% | |
| Brightness middle | 299 | 278 -7% | 320 7% | 262.3 -12% |
| Brightness | 278 | 271 -3% | 293 5% | 250 -10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 89 2% | 86 -1% | 89 2% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.26 -4% | 0.26 -4% | 0.43 -72% |
| Contrast | 1196 | 1069 -11% | 1231 3% | 610 -49% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.32 | 4.73 -9% | 4.5 -4% | 5.81 -34% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.3 | 8.38 10% | 8.81 5% | 14.7 -58% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2.58 | 5.17 -100% | 5.36 -108% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.21 | 2.59 38% | 4.71 -12% | 2.8 33% |
| Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.38 92% | 2.45 90% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 6799 96% | 6160 106% | 7085 92% | 7016 93% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 57 | 36 -37% | 58 2% | 35.2 -38% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86 | 58 -33% | 88 2% | 55.6 -35% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-13% | 4% /
3% | -11% /
-26% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 34.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 91 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 27.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 202 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 202 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 202 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8706 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -23% | -29% | -23% | |
| Write 4K | 170.7 | 130.1 -24% | 149.3 -13% | 149.9 -12% |
| Read 4K | 49.51 | 27.64 -44% | 52.7 6% | 46.13 -7% |
| Write Seq | 1156 | 1438 24% | 667 -42% | 970 -16% |
| Read Seq | 1136 | 1319 16% | 818 -28% | 1085 -4% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 420.5 | 323.3 -23% | 332.1 -21% | 460.8 10% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 527 | 359.9 -32% | 467.1 -11% | 410.3 -22% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2984 | 1454 -51% | 985 -67% | 662 -78% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3550 | 1740 -51% | 1454 -59% | 1728 -51% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5081 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14567 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3501 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 1292 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23 - 327, n=39, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S532F | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 62.3 | 35.9 | 20.6 | 11 |
| Assassin´s Creed Odyssey (2018) | 40 | 20 | 12 | |
| Farming Simulator 19 (2018) | 163 | 63.4 | 38.6 | |
| Darksiders III (2018) | 110 | 32.1 | 21.8 | |
| Just Cause 4 (2018) | 45.3 | 28.9 | 19.4 | |
| Metro Exodus (2019) | 29.2 | 8.1 | 6.8 | |
| Control (2019) | 42.1 | 13.7 | 9.4 | |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 50.2 | 17.9 | 11.8 | |
| FIFA 20 (2019) | 123 | 88.2 | 85.7 | |
| GRID 2019 (2019) | 66.6 | 23.4 | 14 | |
| Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2019 (2019) | 43.9 | 23.8 | 18.4 | |
| Need for Speed Heat (2019) | 35.7 | 16.7 | 14 | |
| Star Wars Jedi Fallen Order (2019) | 25.6 | 20.2 | ||
| Red Dead Redemption 2 (2019) | 21.6 | 13 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 32 / 37 dB |
| Carga |
| 41 / 42 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250 | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 4% | 1% | 6% | 14% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 29.9 -0% | 30.5 -2% | 28 7% | 24 ? 20% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 29.9 -0% | 31.5 -5% | 28 7% | 24.4 ? 19% |
| Idle Average * | 32 | 29.9 7% | 31.5 2% | 28 12% | 24.9 ? 22% |
| Idle Maximum * | 37 | 29.9 19% | 31.5 15% | 30 19% | 26.4 ? 29% |
| Load Average * | 41 | 41.7 -2% | 42.5 -4% | 41.4 -1% | 38.5 ? 6% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 39 | 41.5 -6% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 42 | 41.7 1% | 42.5 -1% | 41.5 1% | 46.8 ? -11% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 34 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30 °C / 86 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-1.2 °C / -2.2 F).
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250 | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -19% | -5% | -9% | -8% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 53.7 -28% | 46 -10% | 45.4 -8% | 43.2 ? -3% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 45 | 56 -24% | 44.6 1% | 40.8 9% | 46.2 ? -3% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25 | 28.4 -14% | 26.6 -6% | 29.6 -18% | 28.2 ? -13% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26 | 28.9 -11% | 27.4 -5% | 31.2 -20% | 28.9 ? -11% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 26% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.3 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5 / 7 / 10 Watt |
| Carga |
64 / 67 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250 | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250 | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 7% | 7% | -24% | -46% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5 | 4.4 12% | 4.9 2% | 6 -20% | 6.83 ? -37% |
| Idle Average * | 7 | 6.9 1% | 7.9 -13% | 10.3 -47% | 11.6 ? -66% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10 | 9.9 1% | 10.1 -1% | 10.5 -5% | 13.7 ? -37% |
| Load Average * | 64 | 55 14% | 60 6% | 69.1 -8% | 71.9 ? -12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 44 | 57.8 -31% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 67 | 63.4 5% | 38 43% | 88 -31% | 118.5 ? -77% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 70 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh | Asus VivoBook S15 S532F i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 42 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -19% | -45% | -39% | -9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1810 | 773 -57% | 480 -73% | 655 -64% | 1168 ? -35% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 724 | 414 -43% | 297 -59% | 306 -58% | 638 ? -12% |
| Load | 81 | 117 44% | 79 -2% | 86 6% | 97.1 ? 20% |
| H.264 | 388 | 847 ? |
Pro
Contra
Um campeão de resistência com uma elegante carcaça de metal por 800 Euros (~$882)? O que parece improvável a princípio é uma realidade com o Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IML.
Dificilmente qualquer outro portátil versátil se comporta tão bem sem uma fonte de alimentação. Juntamente com o baixo peso (1,9 kg) e a construção plana (1,7 cm), o equipamento de 15 polegadas é predestinado para uso móvel.
Se apenas a tela refletiva que frustra as atividades ao ar livre, e até muitas atividades internas, não estivesse ai. Um painel mate seria muito mais adequado para o dispositivo e, acima de tudo, mais adequado ao conceito geral.
Se você pode aceitar essa falha, no entanto, receberá um portátil multimídia recomendável e muito bem-sucedido.
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML
- 05/14/2020 v7 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
