Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad S340-15: O barato Core i7 Ice Lake vem com um custo pelo desempenho
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
79.4 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.8 kg | 17.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630 | 1.9 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83 % v6 (old) | 04/2019 | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250 | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
80.7 % v6 (old) | Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T i5-8250U, GeForce MX130 | 2.3 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
84.1 % v6 (old) | 06/2019 | Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE R7 2700U, Vega 10 | 1.7 kg | 17.6 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML | |
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL | |
Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US | |
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL | |
Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML | |
Alienware m17 R2 P41E |
|
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 320.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 1188:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.65
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.77% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.43% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL BOE CQ NV156FHM-T03, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 LG Philips 156WFC, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE06FB), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng BOE080D, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T BOE CQ NT156FHM-N41, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 65% | -7% | 54% | 57% | -6% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 40.43 | 66.5 64% | 37.31 -8% | 66.8 65% | 67.2 66% | 37.47 -7% |
sRGB Coverage | 58.8 | 98 67% | 56.2 -4% | 86.5 47% | 88.1 50% | 56.4 -4% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.77 | 68.4 64% | 38.55 -8% | 63.2 51% | 64.4 54% | 38.71 -7% |
Response Times | -3% | 31% | -3% | 13% | 29% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46.4 ? | 52.8 ? -14% | 28.4 ? 39% | 49.6 ? -7% | 43 ? 7% | 41 ? 12% |
Response Time Black / White * | 35.2 ? | 32 ? 9% | 27.2 ? 23% | 34.8 ? 1% | 29 ? 18% | 19 ? 46% |
PWM Frequency | 1020 ? | 202 ? | 208 ? | 7000 ? | ||
Screen | 49% | 2% | 25% | 24% | 0% | |
Brightness middle | 320.8 | 588 83% | 253.6 -21% | 299 -7% | 320 0% | 230 -28% |
Brightness | 309 | 555 80% | 227 -27% | 278 -10% | 293 -5% | 221 -28% |
Brightness Distribution | 87 | 89 2% | 84 -3% | 87 0% | 86 -1% | 91 5% |
Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.4 -48% | 0.27 -0% | 0.25 7% | 0.26 4% | 0.45 -67% |
Contrast | 1188 | 1470 24% | 939 -21% | 1196 1% | 1231 4% | 511 -57% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.68 | 2.5 67% | 6.05 21% | 4.32 44% | 4.5 41% | 3.6 53% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.97 | 6.3 71% | 14.03 36% | 9.3 58% | 8.81 60% | 5.59 75% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.65 | 0.6 87% | 4.97 -7% | 2.58 45% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.3 | 4.5 38% | 3.2 56% | 4.21 42% | 4.71 35% | 3.13 57% |
Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.2 100% | 2 110% | 2.39 92% | 2.45 90% | 2.45 90% |
CCT | 6213 105% | 6836 95% | 6820 95% | 6799 96% | 7085 92% | 7244 90% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.8 | 63.2 67% | 35.5 -6% | 57 51% | 58 53% | 36 -5% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58.3 | 98 68% | 55.6 -5% | 86 48% | 88 51% | 56 -4% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 37% /
46% | 9% /
4% | 25% /
27% | 31% /
29% | 8% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise | |
↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (16551 - 26481, n=4) | |
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (7083 - 7390, n=4) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (233 - 354, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T | |
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3305 - 4275, n=17) | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw1212ng | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL | |
Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD | |
Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T | |
HP Pavilion 15-cw1212ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2460 - 5291, n=17) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3791 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5291 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4679 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 71% | 9% | -31% | 128% | |
Seq Read | 1447 | 2357 63% | 398.9 -72% | 1348 -7% | 2642 83% |
Seq Write | 926 | 1235 33% | 884 -5% | 685 -26% | 2433 163% |
4K Read | 40.06 | 43.29 8% | 34.54 -14% | 29.15 -27% | 58 45% |
4K Write | 97.9 | 99.7 2% | 82.1 -16% | 90.3 -8% | 145.3 48% |
4K-64 Read | 323.7 | 1020 215% | 647 100% | 650 101% | 1431 342% |
4K-64 Write | 791 | 1502 90% | 985 25% | 514 -35% | 1753 122% |
Access Time Read * | 0.06 | 0.07 -17% | 0.072 -20% | 0.31 -417% | 0.072 -20% |
Access Time Write * | 0.144 | 0.039 73% | 0.047 67% | 0.044 69% | 0.027 81% |
Score Read | 508 | 1299 156% | 721 42% | 814 60% | 1753 245% |
Score Write | 982 | 1726 76% | 1155 18% | 673 -31% | 2142 118% |
Score Total | 1738 | 3640 109% | 2279 31% | 1876 8% | 4790 176% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 943 | 2145 127% | 862 -9% | 763 -19% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 612 | 565 -8% | 457 -25% | 350.3 -43% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 826 | 1320 60% | 902 9% | 310 -62% | |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 35% | -24% | -34% | 44% | |
Write 4K | 130.8 | 93.6 -28% | 105.9 -19% | 63.6 -51% | 170.7 31% |
Read 4K | 54.8 | 41.87 -24% | 36.56 -33% | 28.58 -48% | 49.51 -10% |
Write Seq | 978 | 1698 74% | 1165 19% | 688 -30% | 1156 18% |
Read Seq | 1627 | 1978 22% | 423.2 -74% | 1032 -37% | 1136 -30% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 450.1 | 383.1 -15% | 332.1 -26% | 266.7 -41% | 420.5 -7% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 345.9 | 326.9 -5% | 229.3 -34% | 321.5 -7% | 527 52% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 982 | 2778 183% | 1460 49% | 606 -38% | 2984 204% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1842 | 3119 69% | 472.5 -74% | 1508 -18% | 3550 93% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 410.8 | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 331.4 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 53% /
57% | -8% /
-3% | -33% /
-32% | 86% /
92% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 3762 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 65852 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9962 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2171 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 701 pontos | |
Ajuda |
The Witcher 3 - 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
Huawei MateBook 13 i7 | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (28.2 - 58, n=20) | |
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 81.9 | 48.9 | 39.9 | 13.5 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 29.9 | 20.8 | 10.9 | 5.9 |
Rocket League (2017) | 45.5 | 30 | 21.1 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 19 |
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng GeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -4% | -3% | -18% | -17% | -11% | |
off / environment * | 28.5 | 29.3 -3% | 28.3 1% | 30 -5% | 30.5 -7% | 30 -5% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.5 | 29.3 -3% | 28.3 1% | 30 -5% | 31.5 -11% | 30.9 -8% |
Idle Average * | 28.5 | 29.3 -3% | 28.3 1% | 32 -12% | 31.5 -11% | 30.9 -8% |
Idle Maximum * | 28.5 | 29.8 -5% | 28.3 1% | 37 -30% | 31.5 -11% | 30.9 -8% |
Load Average * | 30.3 | 32.4 -7% | 31.4 -4% | 41 -35% | 42.5 -40% | 39 -29% |
Load Maximum * | 35.5 | 37.2 -5% | 41.4 -17% | 42 -18% | 42.5 -20% | 38 -7% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.4 | 39 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 28.5 / 28.5 / 28.5 dB |
Carga |
| 30.3 / 35.5 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.5 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25 °C / 77 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.8 °C / 6.8 F).
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.14 / 0.76 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.8 / 6.9 / 7.7 Watt |
Carga |
43.3 / 47.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -38% | 5% | -27% | -19% | -15% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 3.79 -0% | 4.2 -11% | 5 -32% | 4.9 -29% | 4.75 -25% |
Idle Average * | 6.9 | 6.9 -0% | 6.8 1% | 7 -1% | 7.9 -14% | 6.9 -0% |
Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 9.2 -19% | 7 9% | 10 -30% | 10.1 -31% | 7 9% |
Load Average * | 43.3 | 62 -43% | 36.5 16% | 64 -48% | 60 -39% | 53 -22% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.4 | 37.9 6% | 44 -9% | |||
Load Maximum * | 47.5 | 108 -127% | 44 7% | 67 -41% | 38 20% | 65.3 -37% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 36 Wh | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, 97 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10, 42 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 70 Wh | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh | Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 38 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 140% | 43% | 135% | 5% | 58% | |
Reader / Idle | 599 | 856 43% | 1810 202% | 480 -20% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 258 | 844 227% | 421 63% | 724 181% | 297 15% | 407 58% |
Load | 66 | 100 52% | 81 23% | 81 23% | 79 20% |
Pro
Contra
Algumas semanas atrás, publicamos sobre o Lenovo IdeaPad S340-15 como um dos portáteis mais baratos que você pode encontrar com a mais recente CPU Intel Core i7-1065G7, de 10a geração. Este é o mesmo processador encontrado em alternativas muito mais caras, como o Dell XPS 13 2-em-1 ou o Razer Blade Stealth, que podem custar facilmente duas vezes mais que o nosso Lenovo. Embora isso pareça bom para a Lenovo no papel, a realidade é que o IdeaPad S340-15 exibe desempenho da CPU abaixo da média do que as alternativas acima mencionadas, especialmente ao jogar ou executar outras cargas exigentes. Se você quer o melhor que Ice Lake tem a oferecer, terá que olhar além da série IdeaPad.
Quanto ao portátil, ele é mais moderno e visualmente atraente do que os concorrentes Dell Inspiron, Asus VivoBook ou HP Pavilion. A tela táctil mate e as baias de armazenamento duplo acessíveis também são uma boa surpresa, pois esses recursos são incomuns em portáteis econômicos. Caso contrário, quase tudo no sistema é adequado, se não mediano. O espaço estreito de cores, as teclas leves e a duração medíocre da bateria são comuns para sua faixa de preço. Recomendamos que você opte pelos SKUs Whisky Lake-U Core i5 ou Core i7 ou U7 mais baratos, pois o Ice Lake traz muito pouco para a mesa do IdeaPad S340.
O Lenovo IdeaPad S340-15 está no seu melhor para uso multimídia doméstico e viagens ocasionais devido ao seu peso leve. Não espere um bom desempenho do Core i7 Ice Lake ao executar cargas mais pesadas, como jogos.
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL
- 03/14/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo