Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad S340-15: O barato Core i7 Ice Lake vem com um custo pelo desempenho
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL (Ideapad S340 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-1065G7 4 x 1.3 - 3.9 GHz, Ice Lake-U
Placa gráfica
Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Análises do: 300 MHz, Memoría: 1000 MHz, DDR4, 26.20.100.7463
Memória
8 GB
, 4 GB soldados, 1x SODIMM, 1866 MHz, 19-19-19-43, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, 10-point capacitive, BOE CQ NV156FHM-T03, IPS, BOE82F, Brilhante: não, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, 512 GB
peso
1.751 kg, Suprimento de energia: 158 g
Preço
700 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79.4 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.8 kg | 17.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 86.3 % v7 (old) | 09/2019 | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630 | 1.9 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83 % v6 (old) | 04/2019 | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250 | 1.9 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 80.7 % v6 (old) | Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T i5-8250U, GeForce MX130 | 2.3 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 84.1 % v6 (old) | 06/2019 | Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE R7 2700U, Vega 10 | 1.7 kg | 17.6 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US | |
| Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL | |
| Lenovo Yoga C740-14IML | |
| Alienware m17 R2 P41E | |
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1127 (1037-1164)
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1195 (922-1315)
6.8 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
6.5 ∆E
9.1 ∆E
7 ∆E
5.6 ∆E
8.4 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
7.4 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
4.6 ∆E
9.6 ∆E
10.7 ∆E
7.2 ∆E
6.1 ∆E
8.5 ∆E
9.9 ∆E
14 ∆E
11.6 ∆E
11.5 ∆E
10.6 ∆E
9.4 ∆E
7.5 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE CQ NV156FHM-T03 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 326.7 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 308.8 cd/m² Minimum: 3.3 cd/m²iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 320.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 1188:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.65
ΔE Greyscale 7.3 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.77% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.43% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.12
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL BOE CQ NV156FHM-T03, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD LQ156M1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 LG Philips 156WFC, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE06FB), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng BOE080D, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T BOE CQ NT156FHM-N41, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 65% | -7% | 54% | 57% | -6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.43 | 66.5 64% | 37.31 -8% | 66.8 65% | 67.2 66% | 37.47 -7% |
| sRGB Coverage | 58.8 | 98 67% | 56.2 -4% | 86.5 47% | 88.1 50% | 56.4 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.77 | 68.4 64% | 38.55 -8% | 63.2 51% | 64.4 54% | 38.71 -7% |
| Response Times | -3% | 31% | -3% | 13% | 29% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46.4 ? | 52.8 ? -14% | 28.4 ? 39% | 49.6 ? -7% | 43 ? 7% | 41 ? 12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 35.2 ? | 32 ? 9% | 27.2 ? 23% | 34.8 ? 1% | 29 ? 18% | 19 ? 46% |
| PWM Frequency | 1020 ? | 202 ? | 208 ? | 7000 ? | ||
| Screen | 49% | 2% | 25% | 24% | 0% | |
| Brightness middle | 320.8 | 588 83% | 253.6 -21% | 299 -7% | 320 0% | 230 -28% |
| Brightness | 309 | 555 80% | 227 -27% | 278 -10% | 293 -5% | 221 -28% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 89 2% | 84 -3% | 87 0% | 86 -1% | 91 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.4 -48% | 0.27 -0% | 0.25 7% | 0.26 4% | 0.45 -67% |
| Contrast | 1188 | 1470 24% | 939 -21% | 1196 1% | 1231 4% | 511 -57% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.68 | 2.5 67% | 6.05 21% | 4.32 44% | 4.5 41% | 3.6 53% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 21.97 | 6.3 71% | 14.03 36% | 9.3 58% | 8.81 60% | 5.59 75% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.65 | 0.6 87% | 4.97 -7% | 2.58 45% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 7.3 | 4.5 38% | 3.2 56% | 4.21 42% | 4.71 35% | 3.13 57% |
| Gamma | 2.12 104% | 2.2 100% | 2 110% | 2.39 92% | 2.45 90% | 2.45 90% |
| CCT | 6213 105% | 6836 95% | 6820 95% | 6799 96% | 7085 92% | 7244 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.8 | 63.2 67% | 35.5 -6% | 57 51% | 58 53% | 36 -5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58.3 | 98 68% | 55.6 -5% | 86 48% | 88 51% | 56 -4% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 37% /
46% | 9% /
4% | 25% /
27% | 31% /
29% | 8% /
3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 92 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 26 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8710 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø517 (460.32-737.44)
Dell XPS 13 7390 2-in-1 Core i7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Toshiba BG4 KBG40ZPZ512G; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø672 (632.81-836.68)
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Quadro P520, i7-8565U, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW256G8; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø624 (521.26-694.16)
Lenovo ThinkPad T490 20RY0002US UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Sabrent Rocket Q 1TB RKT30Q.1; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø650 (621.2-684.29)
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (16551 - 26481, n=4) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (7083 - 7390, n=4) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dynabook Portege A30-E-174 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 530-14ARR-81H9000VGE | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (233 - 354, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3305 - 4275, n=17) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cw1212ng | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL | |
| Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD | |
| Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cw1212ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-1065G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2460 - 5291, n=17) | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3791 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5291 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4679 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus VivoBook 15 X512FL-EJ205T Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 71% | 9% | -31% | 128% | |
| Seq Read | 1447 | 2357 63% | 398.9 -72% | 1348 -7% | 2642 83% |
| Seq Write | 926 | 1235 33% | 884 -5% | 685 -26% | 2433 163% |
| 4K Read | 40.06 | 43.29 8% | 34.54 -14% | 29.15 -27% | 58 45% |
| 4K Write | 97.9 | 99.7 2% | 82.1 -16% | 90.3 -8% | 145.3 48% |
| 4K-64 Read | 323.7 | 1020 215% | 647 100% | 650 101% | 1431 342% |
| 4K-64 Write | 791 | 1502 90% | 985 25% | 514 -35% | 1753 122% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.06 | 0.07 -17% | 0.072 -20% | 0.31 -417% | 0.072 -20% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.144 | 0.039 73% | 0.047 67% | 0.044 69% | 0.027 81% |
| Score Read | 508 | 1299 156% | 721 42% | 814 60% | 1753 245% |
| Score Write | 982 | 1726 76% | 1155 18% | 673 -31% | 2142 118% |
| Score Total | 1738 | 3640 109% | 2279 31% | 1876 8% | 4790 176% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 943 | 2145 127% | 862 -9% | 763 -19% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 612 | 565 -8% | 457 -25% | 350.3 -43% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 826 | 1320 60% | 902 9% | 310 -62% | |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 35% | -24% | -34% | 44% | |
| Write 4K | 130.8 | 93.6 -28% | 105.9 -19% | 63.6 -51% | 170.7 31% |
| Read 4K | 54.8 | 41.87 -24% | 36.56 -33% | 28.58 -48% | 49.51 -10% |
| Write Seq | 978 | 1698 74% | 1165 19% | 688 -30% | 1156 18% |
| Read Seq | 1627 | 1978 22% | 423.2 -74% | 1032 -37% | 1136 -30% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 450.1 | 383.1 -15% | 332.1 -26% | 266.7 -41% | 420.5 -7% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 345.9 | 326.9 -5% | 229.3 -34% | 321.5 -7% | 527 52% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 982 | 2778 183% | 1460 49% | 606 -38% | 2984 204% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1842 | 3119 69% | 472.5 -74% | 1508 -18% | 3550 93% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 410.8 | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 331.4 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 53% /
57% | -8% /
-3% | -33% /
-32% | 86% /
92% |
* ... smaller is better
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
1842 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
982 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
345.9 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
450.1 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1627 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
978 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
54.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
130.8 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3762 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 65852 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9962 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2171 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 701 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Huawei MateBook 13 i7 | |
| MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (28.2 - 58, n=20) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL | |
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø36.7 (25-47)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 81.9 | 48.9 | 39.9 | 13.5 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 29.9 | 20.8 | 10.9 | 5.9 |
| Rocket League (2017) | 45.5 | 30 | 21.1 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 19 |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD UHD Graphics 630, i5-9300H, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 Vega 10, R7 3700U, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML GeForce MX250, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng GeForce MX250, i5-8265U, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T GeForce MX130, i5-8250U, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -4% | -3% | -18% | -17% | -11% | |
| off / environment * | 28.5 | 29.3 -3% | 28.3 1% | 30 -5% | 30.5 -7% | 30 -5% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.5 | 29.3 -3% | 28.3 1% | 30 -5% | 31.5 -11% | 30.9 -8% |
| Idle Average * | 28.5 | 29.3 -3% | 28.3 1% | 32 -12% | 31.5 -11% | 30.9 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.5 | 29.8 -5% | 28.3 1% | 37 -30% | 31.5 -11% | 30.9 -8% |
| Load Average * | 30.3 | 32.4 -7% | 31.4 -4% | 41 -35% | 42.5 -40% | 39 -29% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.5 | 37.2 -5% | 41.4 -17% | 42 -18% | 42.5 -20% | 38 -7% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 41.4 | 39 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.5 / 28.5 / 28.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 30.3 / 35.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.5 dB(A) | ||
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25 °C / 77 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.8 °C / 6.8 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.3 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25 °C / 77 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.8 °C / 6.8 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.14 / 0.76 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.8 / 6.9 / 7.7 Watt |
| Carga |
43.3 / 47.5 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -38% | 5% | -27% | -19% | -15% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 3.79 -0% | 4.2 -11% | 5 -32% | 4.9 -29% | 4.75 -25% |
| Idle Average * | 6.9 | 6.9 -0% | 6.8 1% | 7 -1% | 7.9 -14% | 6.9 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 9.2 -19% | 7 9% | 10 -30% | 10.1 -31% | 7 9% |
| Load Average * | 43.3 | 62 -43% | 36.5 16% | 64 -48% | 60 -39% | 53 -22% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.4 | 37.9 6% | 44 -9% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 47.5 | 108 -127% | 44 7% | 67 -41% | 38 20% | 65.3 -37% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 36 Wh | Dell XPS 15 7590 i5 iGPU FHD i5-9300H, UHD Graphics 630, 97 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10, 42 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad S540-15IML i5-10210U, GeForce MX250, 70 Wh | HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh | Asus VivoBook 15 X542UF-DM143T i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 38 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 140% | 43% | 135% | 5% | 58% | |
| Reader / Idle | 599 | 856 43% | 1810 202% | 480 -20% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 258 | 844 227% | 421 63% | 724 181% | 297 15% | 407 58% |
| Load | 66 | 100 52% | 81 23% | 81 23% | 79 20% |
Pro
+ 2 baias de armazenamento e RAM atualizável
+ Temperaturas da superfície respeitáveis
+ Design com marcos finos
+ Razão alta de contraste
+ Fácil de fazer manutenção
+ Obturador de privacidade na webcam
Contra
- Desempenho inconsistente da CPU ao jogar ou sob uso intenso
- Duração curta da bateria; capacidade baixa da bateria
- Não é possível carregar via USB Tipo C
- Resposta fraca das teclas
- Espaço de cor estreito
- Clickpad esponjoso
Algumas semanas atrás, publicamos sobre o Lenovo IdeaPad S340-15 como um dos portáteis mais baratos que você pode encontrar com a mais recente CPU Intel Core i7-1065G7, de 10a geração. Este é o mesmo processador encontrado em alternativas muito mais caras, como o Dell XPS 13 2-em-1 ou o Razer Blade Stealth, que podem custar facilmente duas vezes mais que o nosso Lenovo. Embora isso pareça bom para a Lenovo no papel, a realidade é que o IdeaPad S340-15 exibe desempenho da CPU abaixo da média do que as alternativas acima mencionadas, especialmente ao jogar ou executar outras cargas exigentes. Se você quer o melhor que Ice Lake tem a oferecer, terá que olhar além da série IdeaPad.
Quanto ao portátil, ele é mais moderno e visualmente atraente do que os concorrentes Dell Inspiron, Asus VivoBook ou HP Pavilion. A tela táctil mate e as baias de armazenamento duplo acessíveis também são uma boa surpresa, pois esses recursos são incomuns em portáteis econômicos. Caso contrário, quase tudo no sistema é adequado, se não mediano. O espaço estreito de cores, as teclas leves e a duração medíocre da bateria são comuns para sua faixa de preço. Recomendamos que você opte pelos SKUs Whisky Lake-U Core i5 ou Core i7 ou U7 mais baratos, pois o Ice Lake traz muito pouco para a mesa do IdeaPad S340.
O Lenovo IdeaPad S340-15 está no seu melhor para uso multimídia doméstico e viagens ocasionais devido ao seu peso leve. Não espere um bom desempenho do Core i7 Ice Lake ao executar cargas mais pesadas, como jogos.
Lenovo Ideapad S340-15IIL
- 03/14/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
