Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK

Uma visão de branco. Embora o testador não queira se casar com o aparelho multimídia leve e compacto de 15 polegadas da Lenovo, ele não tem nada em contra uma relação de negócios. O novo aparelho com uma GeForce 940MX dedicada não apresente maiores desvantagens no teste. O recurso mais destacado, no entanto, continua sendo a cor pouco comum que certamente também atrairá usuários do sexo feminino.
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK (Ideapad 510 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-6200U 2 x 2.3 - 2.8 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1242 MHz, Memoría: 1800 MHz, DDR3, ForceWare 359.23
Memória
8 GB 
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, dual-channel, 1 soldada + 1 insertada, 1 de 2 bancos de memória ocupado
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LGD04A7 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPK2 , IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, 1000 GB 
, 5400 rpm
Placa de Som
Intel Skylake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 VGA, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector de áudio combinado de entrada/sáida de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: SD, SDHC, SDXC, MMC, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1
Unidade ótica
HL-DT-ST DVDRAM GUE0N
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 22.9 x 379 x 260
Bateria
30 Wh Lítio-Ion
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 1 MP
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Estéreo / Harman, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
2.2 kg, Suprimento de energia: 209 g
Preço
799 EUR
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK

Size Comparison

383 mm 260 mm 29.9 mm 2.5 kg381.6 mm 259 mm 28.45 mm 2.4 kg379 mm 260 mm 22.9 mm 2.2 kg338.6 mm 224.3 mm 19.5 mm 1.5 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Left: power-in, Ethernet (fold-out), HDMI, USB 3.0, audio in/out, SD card
Left: power-in, Ethernet (fold-out), HDMI, USB 3.0, audio in/out, SD card
Right: LED, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, DVD drive, Kensington
Right: LED, USB 3.0, USB 2.0, DVD drive, Kensington
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
 
73.7 MB/s +341%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
 
57.4 MB/s +244%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
 
55 MB/s +229%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
 
16.7 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Asus N552VX-FY103T
 
84.7 MB/s +222%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
 
80.8 MB/s +207%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
 
26.3 MB/s
Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)
331 MBit/s +26%
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
276 MBit/s +5%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (Seb)
263 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter
334 MBit/s +27%
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (seb)
327 MBit/s +25%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
Qualcomm Atheros QCA9377 Wireless Network Adapter (Seb)
262 MBit/s
295
cd/m²
305
cd/m²
308
cd/m²
249
cd/m²
284
cd/m²
275
cd/m²
246
cd/m²
260
cd/m²
261
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LG Philips LGD04A7 / LG Display LP156WF6-SPK2 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 308 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 275.9 cd/m² Minimum: 5 cd/m²
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 284 cd/m²
Contraste: 861:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.86 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.26% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKAcer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1Asus N552VX-FY103THP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Display
96%
60%
Display P3 Coverage
39.26
84.2
114%
67.9
73%
sRGB Coverage
58.7
99.7
70%
87.7
49%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
40.59
82.7
104%
64
58%
Response Times
631%
-7%
2%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
40 ?(19, 21)
44 ?(24, 20, starke Schwankungen mit/ohne PSU)
-10%
42 ?(18, 24)
-5%
36.4 ?(18, 18.4)
9%
Response Time Black / White *
24 ?(9, 15)
23 ?(7, 16, Plateau)
4%
26 ?(5, 21)
-8%
25.2 ?(14, 11.2)
-5%
PWM Frequency
50 ?(90)
1000 ?(80)
1900%
Screen
-15%
25%
8%
Brightness middle
284
234
-18%
336
18%
220
-23%
Brightness
276
219
-21%
304
10%
209
-24%
Brightness Distribution
80
80
0%
85
6%
88
10%
Black Level *
0.33
0.48
-45%
0.34
-3%
0.28
15%
Contrast
861
488
-43%
988
15%
786
-9%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
7.21
11.8
-64%
5.26
27%
4.58
36%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
15.12
20.69
-37%
10.49
31%
11.47
24%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
6.86
13.3
-94%
4.26
38%
2.34
66%
Gamma
2.46 89%
2.47 89%
2.35 94%
2.26 97%
CCT
6726 97%
17098 38%
6758 96%
6661 98%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
37
74
100%
57
54%
34.6
-6%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
58
100
72%
88
52%
54.2
-7%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
237% / 127%
26% / 28%
5% / 7%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 9 ms rise
↘ 15 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 19 ms rise
↘ 21 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 50 Hz ≤ 90 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Asus N552VX-FY103T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
146 Points +34%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
119 Points +9%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U
115 Points +6%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
109 Points
CPU Multi 64Bit
Asus N552VX-FY103T
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
673 Points +130%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
Intel Core i5-6200U
295 Points +1%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
Intel Core i5-6200U
293 Points
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Intel Core i5-6200U
270 Points -8%
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
109 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
293 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Asus N552VX-FY103T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
3452 Points +5%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3390 Points +3%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
3294 Points
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
3238 Points -2%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Asus N552VX-FY103T
GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
4503 Points +15%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
GeForce GTX 950M, 6200U, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
3970 Points +2%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
3907 Points
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3294 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
3907 pontos
Ajuda
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0
Asus N552VX-FY103T
Toshiba MQ02ABD100H
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280
CrystalDiskMark 3.0
42%
12563%
Read Seq
84.5
108.1
28%
469.3
455%
Write Seq
69.9
105.6
51%
309.1
342%
Read 512
28.87
35.32
22%
Write 512
28.08
46.13
64%
Read 4k
0.326
0.413
27%
14
4194%
Write 4k
0.595
0.9
51%
73.9
12320%
Read 4k QD32
0.602
0.895
49%
149.5
24734%
Write 4k QD32
0.612
0.884
44%
204.6
33331%
Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB
Velocidade de Transferência Mínima: 36.4 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Máxima: 101.3 MB/s
Velocidade de Transferência Média: 78.4 MB/s
Tempo de Acesso: 18.2 ms
Índice de Explosão: 185 MB/s
Uso da CPU: 5.9 %
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Asus N552VX-FY103T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
4416 Points +88%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
4239 Points +81%
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2508 Points +7%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
2343 Points
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Asus N552VX-FY103T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
21794 Points +155%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
21635 Points +153%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
8541 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i5-6200U
3555 Points +125%
Asus N552VX-FY103T
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, Intel Core i7-6700HQ
3233 Points +105%
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, Intel Core i5-6200U
1580 Points
3DMark 11 Performance
2424 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5765 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1381 pontos
Ajuda
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 85.2 45 39.3 13.6
The Witcher 3 (2015) 30.1 17.6
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 30.8 18.1

Barulho

Ocioso
33.6 / 33.6 / 33.9 dB
Carga
37.5 / 38.3 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 31.2 dB(A)
Carga Máxima
 37.2 °C35 °C26.9 °C 
 36.5 °C34.6 °C26.8 °C 
 33.8 °C34.1 °C27.2 °C 
Máximo: 37.2 °C
Médio: 32.5 °C
25.1 °C36.3 °C37.2 °C
24.6 °C31 °C39 °C
27.1 °C29 °C34 °C
Máximo: 39 °C
Médio: 31.5 °C
alimentação elétrica  39.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.6 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.5 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.1 °C / 93.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.3 °C / -9.6 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2029.5312533.630.33134.338.74030.631.35032.430.66328.928.88028.427.610026.427.612526.529.416024.534.320024.43825023.146.831522.656.740021.261.250020.460.763019.666.680019.464.810001962.1125018.562.5160018.261.4200018.666.8250018.568.2315018.667.3400018.867.3500018.870.7630018.867.7800018.965.31000018.863.51250018.762.51600018.657.8SPL31.278.4N1.642.3median 18.9median 62.5Delta1.48.837.73238.537.73532.938.7353432.941.43433.131.533.333.132.733.135.432.729.829.33429.830.729.829.230.731.330.331.531.327.727.129.827.729.932.134.929.932.437.340.732.444.34852.244.349.154.157.349.153.357.562.253.351.956.360.751.955.960.965.555.961.566.570.761.556.561.46656.551.757.26151.745.450.354.445.453.558.662.853.554.659.363.554.659.764.769.159.760.765.868.960.760.665.970.160.655.860.96555.853.258.562.753.261.666.871.561.665.770.87565.757.963.267.457.970.175.279.370.125.334.444.425.3median 53.5median 58.6median 62.8median 53.56.98.28.46.934.245.132.934.233.543.639.533.536.437.542.436.431.933.130.331.933.530.531.833.530.831.831.830.828.228.628.328.227.427.728.127.427.730.633.427.729.334.437.829.332.737.441.632.73237.541.93240.445.850.840.452.458.163.352.452.458.16352.454.159.463.954.150.955.960.550.950.155.460.150.153.959.363.953.948.953.858.448.945.55155.645.550.555.660.350.551.656.961.451.651.356.36151.351.857.161.551.855.160.264.555.153.558.462.753.547.752.75747.741.947.151.241.94246.850.94263.668.873.363.616.723.230.816.7median 50.1median 55.4median 60.1median 50.17.48.18.77.437.735.939.137.736.835.139.236.235.234.735.33534.835.837.136.839.439.432.135.530.646.330.952.730.16029.662.828.565.127.869.527.772.928.373.326.671.826.671.626.57025.974.725.473.925.270.625.47424.77624.773.624.967.124.457.524.260.438.884.63.562.2median 26.6median 69.52.68.9hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseLenovo Ideapad 510-15ISKAcer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1Asus N552VX-FY103THP Pavilion 14-al003ng
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Asus N552VX-FY103T audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

HP Pavilion 14-al003ng audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.3 / 0.2 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 7.7 / 11.7 / 13.6 Watt
Carga midlight 48.3 / 41 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
6200U, GeForce 940MX, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Asus N552VX-FY103T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, AH-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
6200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280, LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14"
Power Consumption
-22%
-39%
19%
Idle Minimum *
7.7
8.3
-8%
7
9%
4
48%
Idle Average *
11.7
12.1
-3%
10.9
7%
6.4
45%
Idle Maximum *
13.6
15.4
-13%
12.9
5%
7
49%
Load Average *
48.3
56
-16%
72
-49%
45.5
6%
Load Maximum *
41
70
-71%
109
-166%
62.2
-52%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
7h 23min
WiFi Websurfing
3h 45min
DVD
2h 17min
Carga (máximo brilho)
1h 13min
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1
6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh
Asus N552VX-FY103T
6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 44 Wh
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng
6200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh
Battery Runtime
77%
-2%
46%
Reader / Idle
443
667
51%
357
-19%
WiFi v1.3
225
386
72%
268
19%
329
46%
Load
73
152
108%
68
-7%
H.264
335

Pro

+ Leve e fino
+ Carcaça fina com muito branco
+ Boa construção
+ TPM 2.0
+ Duas escotilhas de manutenção
+ Boa utilização do Turbo
+ Silencioso e frio

Contra

- Leitor de cartões SD
- A ventoinha somente pode ser acessada após a desmontagem
- Espaço de cores muito apertado
- PWM proeminente
- A ausência de SSD às vezes resulta em uma operação lenta
- HD muito lento
- Bateria fraca com durações de bateria curtas
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de
In review: Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK. Test model courtesy of Notebooksbilliger.de

O Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK é um aparelho atraente.

Os compradores recebem um portátil multimídia relativamente leve e fino com bons dispositivos de entrada, um painel IPS, e uma GeForce 940MX dedicada por menos de 800 Euros (~$894). Embora o preço não inclua um SSD, o portátil dificilmente exibe qualquer desvantagem técnica.

No entanto, a mediocridade é apresentada em muitos lugares. Isso é verdade para a tela IPS que pelo menos é bastante brilhante e de alto contraste, cuja precisão das cores poderia ser melhorada, a potências apenas média, e para od dispositivos de entrada não muito bons. A falta de um SSD em conjunto com a escolha de um disco rígido tradicional bastante lento, é realmente agravante. A bateria frustra a realmente boa mobilidade e o sistema de som dificilmente cumpre com a alegação multimídia.

No entanto, ambas as escotilhas de manutenção, o módulo TPM, o sistema frio e silencioso, e a boa utilização do Turbo em condições realistas adicionam pontos positivos. Em nossa opinião, uma recomendação de compra pode ser dada, embora a razão de preço-desempenho seria melhor se o preço fosse reduzido em 100 Euros (~$111). A experiência mostra que não passará muito tempo até que os preços abaixem para este nível.

Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK - 09/29/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn

Acabamento
81 / 98 → 83%
Teclado
79%
Mouse
92%
Conectividade
45 / 81 → 56%
Peso
62 / 20-67 → 89%
Bateria
74%
Pantalha
83%
Desempenho do jogos
64 / 85 → 75%
Desempenho da aplicação
72 / 92 → 78%
Temperatura
93%
Ruído
81 / 95 → 85%
Audio
64%
Camera
58 / 85 → 68%
Médio
73%
79%
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
Mail Logo
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Sven Kloevekorn, 2016-10-15 (Update: 2016-10-28)