Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA (seb) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK (Seb) | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
Acer Aspire E5-774G-78NA (seb) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK (Seb) |
|
iluminação: 80 %
iluminação com acumulador: 284 cd/m²
Contraste: 861:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 7.21 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.86 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.26% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK | Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | Asus N552VX-FY103T | HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 96% | 60% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 39.26 | 84.2 114% | 67.9 73% | |
sRGB Coverage | 58.7 | 99.7 70% | 87.7 49% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.59 | 82.7 104% | 64 58% | |
Response Times | 631% | -7% | 2% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 44 ? -10% | 42 ? -5% | 36.4 ? 9% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24 ? | 23 ? 4% | 26 ? -8% | 25.2 ? -5% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 1000 ? 1900% | ||
Screen | -15% | 25% | 8% | |
Brightness middle | 284 | 234 -18% | 336 18% | 220 -23% |
Brightness | 276 | 219 -21% | 304 10% | 209 -24% |
Brightness Distribution | 80 | 80 0% | 85 6% | 88 10% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.48 -45% | 0.34 -3% | 0.28 15% |
Contrast | 861 | 488 -43% | 988 15% | 786 -9% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 7.21 | 11.8 -64% | 5.26 27% | 4.58 36% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.12 | 20.69 -37% | 10.49 31% | 11.47 24% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.86 | 13.3 -94% | 4.26 38% | 2.34 66% |
Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.47 89% | 2.35 94% | 2.26 97% |
CCT | 6726 97% | 17098 38% | 6758 96% | 6661 98% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37 | 74 100% | 57 54% | 34.6 -6% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 100 72% | 88 52% | 54.2 -7% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 237% /
127% | 26% /
28% | 5% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise | |
↘ 15 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19 ms rise | |
↘ 21 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 50 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3294 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3907 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0 | Asus N552VX-FY103T Toshiba MQ02ABD100H | HP Pavilion 14-al003ng SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 42% | 12563% | ||
Read Seq | 84.5 | 108.1 28% | 469.3 455% | |
Write Seq | 69.9 | 105.6 51% | 309.1 342% | |
Read 512 | 28.87 | 35.32 22% | ||
Write 512 | 28.08 | 46.13 64% | ||
Read 4k | 0.326 | 0.413 27% | 14 4194% | |
Write 4k | 0.595 | 0.9 51% | 73.9 12320% | |
Read 4k QD32 | 0.602 | 0.895 49% | 149.5 24734% | |
Write 4k QD32 | 0.612 | 0.884 44% | 204.6 33331% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng | |
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 | |
Asus N552VX-FY103T | |
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2424 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5765 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1381 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 85.2 | 45 | 39.3 | 13.6 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 30.1 | 17.6 | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 30.8 | 18.1 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 33.6 / 33.6 / 33.9 dB |
Carga |
| 37.5 / 38.3 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31.2 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34.1 °C / 93.4 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-5.3 °C / -9.6 F).
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 55% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
Asus N552VX-FY103T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high
HP Pavilion 14-al003ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (84.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.3 / 0.2 Watt |
Ocioso | 7.7 / 11.7 / 13.6 Watt |
Carga |
48.3 / 41 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPVX-22JC3T0, TN WLED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus N552VX-FY103T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H, AH-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 14-al003ng 6200U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk Z400s 256 GB M.2 2280, LED IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -22% | -39% | 19% | |
Idle Minimum * | 7.7 | 8.3 -8% | 7 9% | 4 48% |
Idle Average * | 11.7 | 12.1 -3% | 10.9 7% | 6.4 45% |
Idle Maximum * | 13.6 | 15.4 -13% | 12.9 5% | 7 49% |
Load Average * | 48.3 | 56 -16% | 72 -49% | 45.5 6% |
Load Maximum * | 41 | 70 -71% | 109 -166% | 62.2 -52% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh | Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 6200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 62 Wh | Asus N552VX-FY103T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 44 Wh | HP Pavilion 14-al003ng 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 41 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 77% | -2% | 46% | |
Reader / Idle | 443 | 667 51% | 357 -19% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 225 | 386 72% | 268 19% | 329 46% |
Load | 73 | 152 108% | 68 -7% | |
H.264 | 335 |
Pro
Contra
O Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15ISK é um aparelho atraente.
Os compradores recebem um portátil multimídia relativamente leve e fino com bons dispositivos de entrada, um painel IPS, e uma GeForce 940MX dedicada por menos de 800 Euros (~$894). Embora o preço não inclua um SSD, o portátil dificilmente exibe qualquer desvantagem técnica.
No entanto, a mediocridade é apresentada em muitos lugares. Isso é verdade para a tela IPS que pelo menos é bastante brilhante e de alto contraste, cuja precisão das cores poderia ser melhorada, a potências apenas média, e para od dispositivos de entrada não muito bons. A falta de um SSD em conjunto com a escolha de um disco rígido tradicional bastante lento, é realmente agravante. A bateria frustra a realmente boa mobilidade e o sistema de som dificilmente cumpre com a alegação multimídia.
No entanto, ambas as escotilhas de manutenção, o módulo TPM, o sistema frio e silencioso, e a boa utilização do Turbo em condições realistas adicionam pontos positivos. Em nossa opinião, uma recomendação de compra pode ser dada, embora a razão de preço-desempenho seria melhor se o preço fosse reduzido em 100 Euros (~$111). A experiência mostra que não passará muito tempo até que os preços abaixem para este nível.
Lenovo Ideapad 510-15ISK
- 09/29/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn