Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 500s-14ISK
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK (Ideapad 500S Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-6500U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce 940M - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 1072 MHz, Memoría: 2000 MHz, DDR3, 10.18.13.5354 (ForceWare 353.54), Optimus
Memória
8 GB
, DDR3L-1600 MHz, single channel, 1 de 2 slots de RAM ocupado, máx. 32 GB
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, Chi Mei CMN14A7, TN, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP, 256 GB
peso
1.562 kg, Suprimento de energia: 344 g
Preço
999 Euro
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chi Mei CMN14A7 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 251 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 234.8 cd/m²iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 249 cd/m²
Contraste: 566:1 (Preto: 0.44 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.47 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 10.22 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.15% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.74% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK TN, 14", 1920x1080 | Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 IPS, 13.5", 3000x2000 | HP EliteBook 745 G3 IPS-Panel, 14", 2560x1440 | Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD IGZO , 13.3", 3200x1800 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 59% | 61% | 74% | 55% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.74 | 66.9 64% | 66.3 63% | 75.7 86% | 63.6 56% |
| sRGB Coverage | 60.6 | 92.3 52% | 96 58% | 95.8 58% | 93.6 54% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.15 | 67.6 60% | 68 61% | 74.5 77% | 65.5 55% |
| Response Times | -55% | -20% | -10% | -12% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 ? | 68 ? -58% | 39 ? 9% | 46.8 ? -9% | 40 ? 7% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 23 ? | 35 ? -52% | 34 ? -48% | 25.2 ? -10% | 30 ? -30% |
| PWM Frequency | 178 ? | 4900 ? | |||
| Screen | 48% | 76% | 41% | 54% | |
| Brightness middle | 249 | 385 55% | 438 76% | 319 28% | 285 14% |
| Brightness | 235 | 394 68% | 414 76% | 301 28% | 281 20% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 89 2% | 88 1% | 74 -15% | 90 3% |
| Black Level * | 0.44 | 0.41 7% | 0.25 43% | 0.29 34% | 0.18 59% |
| Contrast | 566 | 939 66% | 1752 210% | 1100 94% | 1583 180% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.47 | 3.84 59% | 2.06 78% | 7.23 24% | 4.89 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 15.41 | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 10.22 | 3.79 63% | 2.87 72% | 6 41% | 5.16 50% |
| Gamma | 2.34 94% | 2.23 99% | 2.44 90% | 2.14 103% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 11451 57% | 6499 100% | 6820 95% | 6904 94% | 7106 91% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39 | 60 54% | 64 64% | 65.8 69% | 59 51% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57 | 92 61% | 96 68% | 95.3 67% | 93 63% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 17% /
36% | 39% /
59% | 35% /
41% | 32% /
45% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 23 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | ||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK 6500U, GeForce 940M, Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP | Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T 6500U, GeForce 940M, Micron M600 MTFDDAK512MBF | Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 6600U, Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5), Samsung MZFLV512 NVMe | HP EliteBook 745 G3 Pro A12-8800B, Radeon R7 (Carrizo), Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD 6500U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZ-VLV256D | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCMark 7 | |||||
| Score | 4811 | 5162 7% | 5178 8% | 3407 -29% | 4977 3% |
| PCMark 8 | 10% | -1% | -20% | -7% | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3006 | 3320 10% | 2947 -2% | 2445 -19% | 2822 -6% |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3592 | 4042 13% | 3755 5% | 2652 -26% | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4064 | 4353 7% | 3782 -7% | 3424 -16% | 3735 -8% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 9% /
9% | 4% /
1% | -25% /
-23% | -2% /
-4% |
| PCMark 7 Score | 4811 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3006 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3592 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4064 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Samsung PM871 MZYLN256HCHP
Sequential Read:
507 MB/s
Sequential Write:
309.5 MB/s
512K Read:
409.5 MB/s
512K Write:
308.3 MB/s
4K Read:
36.24 MB/s
4K Write:
93.3 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
394.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
241.6 MB/s
| 3DMark | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK | |
| Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T | |
| Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G3 | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2423 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 41492 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5816 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1376 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 31.4 | 18.8 | 10.2 | |
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 36.2 | 22.4 | 11.9 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 25.6 | 19.2 | 11.3 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.3 / 31.7 / 31.8 dB |
| Carga |
| 36.7 / 39.4 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Voltcraft sl-320 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31.3 dB(A) | ||
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK 6500U, GeForce 940M | Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T 6500U, GeForce 940M | Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 6600U, Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5) | HP EliteBook 745 G3 Pro A12-8800B, Radeon R7 (Carrizo) | Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 1% | -1% | 6% | 1% | |
| off / environment * | 31.3 | 31.3 -0% | |||
| Idle Minimum * | 31.3 | 31.5 -1% | 31.3 -0% | 29 7% | 31.8 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 31.7 | 31.5 1% | 31.3 1% | 29 9% | 31.8 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.8 | 31.5 1% | 31.3 2% | 31.1 2% | 34.8 -9% |
| Load Average * | 36.7 | 35.9 2% | 38 -4% | 35.6 3% | 34.8 5% |
| Load Maximum * | 39.4 | 38.2 3% | 40.5 -3% | 35.6 10% | 34.8 12% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 32.6 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.1 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.6 °C / -1.1 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 51.1 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-0.6 °C / -1.1 F).
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK 6500U, GeForce 940M | Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T 6500U, GeForce 940M | Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 6600U, Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5) | HP EliteBook 745 G3 Pro A12-8800B, Radeon R7 (Carrizo) | Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -5% | -6% | -7% | -24% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 42 | 56.6 -35% | 47.4 -13% | 39.5 6% | 57 -36% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 51.1 | 54.3 -6% | 50.2 2% | 43 16% | 56 -10% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 26.2 | 24 8% | 30.4 -16% | 32.9 -26% | 34.1 -30% |
| Idle Bottom * | 28.5 | 24.2 15% | 27.4 4% | 35 -23% | 34.3 -20% |
* ... smaller is better
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.37 / 0.7 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.8 / 7.2 / 7.6 Watt |
| Carga |
40 / 52 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK 6500U, GeForce 940M | Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T 6500U, GeForce 940M | Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 6600U, Maxwell GPU (940M, GDDR5) | HP EliteBook 745 G3 Pro A12-8800B, Radeon R7 (Carrizo) | Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD 6500U, HD Graphics 520 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -4% | -28% | -38% | -19% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 3.2 16% | 4.5 -18% | 6.2 -63% | 6.8 -79% |
| Idle Average * | 7.2 | 7.6 -6% | 9.8 -36% | 9.4 -31% | 10 -39% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.6 | 8 -5% | 12.2 -61% | 14.8 -95% | 10.5 -38% |
| Load Average * | 40 | 47 -18% | 46 -15% | 44.8 -12% | 30.2 24% |
| Load Maximum * | 52 | 55 -6% | 56 -8% | 45.2 13% | 33.6 35% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK 30 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX303UB-R4100T 50 Wh | Microsoft Surface Book Core i7 78 Wh | HP EliteBook 745 G3 46 Wh | Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD 56 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 100% | 152% | 2% | 85% | |
| Reader / Idle | 346 | 997 188% | 442 28% | 784 127% | |
| H.264 | 246 | 413 68% | 211 -14% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 257 | 410 60% | 648 152% | 187 -27% | 432 68% |
| Load | 64 | 118 84% | 76 19% | 103 61% |
Algumas vezes certas decisões de design dos fabricantes de portáteis são simplesmente estranhas. Com o IdeaPad 500s-14ISK, a Lenovo fez muitas coisas bem.
Desde a qualidade de construção, até os dispositivos de entrada e emissões e o muito bom desempenho do sistema e jogos, o IdeaPad parece ser um poli funcional sólido e compacto, que pode competir facilmente com o ZenBook, XPS 13, etc. em muitos aspectos.
No entanto, a Lenovo aparentemente recortou custos em dois aspectos muito importantes e desperdiça descuidadamente uma avaliação melhor. A tela TN está bem abaixo da média. Ao mesmo tempo temos examinado vários aparelhos econômicos, que não são mesquinhos na qualidade da tela, apesar do preço baixo. Além disso, o potencial para uma longa duração da bateria devido ao baixo consumo de energia não foi utilizado com a pequena bateria de 30 Wh.
O preço do IdeaPad 500s-14ISK é de cerca de 1000 Euros (~$1116) e, portanto, mais de 250 Euros (~$279) a menos que o do Asus ZenBook UX303UB-R4100Tcom hardware similar, que está mais ou menos no mesmo nível do nosso modelo de teste em nossas subavaliações. Se a Lenovo tivesse feito um pouco mais de esforço na tela e na bateria, eles teriam criado um excelente sistema por um preço ainda muito razoável.
Como é, é todo o contrário: Quem não tiver problema com o custo deveria dar uma olhada na concorrência. Uma boa tela e uma duração de bateria duradoura certamente são muito importantes, especialmente para o uso móvel (provavelmente até mesmo em exteriores). E você pode obter ambos por custos aceitavelmente superiores.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
Lenovo Ideapad 500s-14ISK
- 03/08/2016 v5 (old)
Oliver Moebel
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
