Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB (i5-8250U, UHD620)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A (Toshiba Exceria Pro M510 microSD) | |
Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A (Toshiba Exceria Pro M510 microSD) | |
Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=32, last 2 years) | |
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A |
|
iluminação: 75 %
iluminação com acumulador: 283 cd/m²
Contraste: 449:1 (Preto: 0.63 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 4.03
ΔE Greyscale 0.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
58% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.17% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
58.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.85% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE BOE0700, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW BOE NV156FHM-N49, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 LG Philips LP156WF9-SPK2, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ Chi Mei CMN15D6, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A Chi Mei (CMN15D5), , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -0% | -0% | 95% | ||
Display P3 Coverage | 39.85 | 39.83 0% | 39.35 -1% | 85.4 114% | |
sRGB Coverage | 58.8 | 58.5 -1% | 59.2 1% | 99.6 69% | |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.17 | 41.15 0% | 40.65 -1% | 82.9 101% | |
Response Times | -35% | 29% | -15% | -4% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 48.4 ? -10% | 27.2 ? 38% | 44 ? -0% | 43.3 ? 2% |
Response Time Black / White * | 31 ? | 37.6 ? -21% | 24.8 ? 20% | 14 ? 55% | 13.8 ? 55% |
PWM Frequency | 86000 ? | 22030 ? -74% | 250 ? -100% | 25970 ? -70% | |
Screen | -20% | -40% | -159% | -200% | |
Brightness middle | 283 | 292 3% | 257 -9% | 227 -20% | 246 -13% |
Brightness | 252 | 272 8% | 246 -2% | 200 -21% | 225 -11% |
Brightness Distribution | 75 | 84 12% | 89 19% | 82 9% | 81 8% |
Black Level * | 0.63 | 0.3 52% | 0.34 46% | 0.46 27% | 0.51 19% |
Contrast | 449 | 973 117% | 756 68% | 493 10% | 482 7% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.02 | 5.8 -44% | 4.54 -13% | 10.88 -171% | 11 -174% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.77 | 22.4 -155% | 16 -82% | 18.36 -109% | 32.4 -269% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.03 | 3.61 10% | 4.6 -14% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 0.8 | 2.3 -188% | 4.6 -475% | 12.18 -1423% | 11.6 -1350% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.12 104% | 2.44 90% | 2.58 85% | 1.91 115% |
CCT | 6552 99% | 6223 104% | 7096 92% | 14446 45% | 11807 55% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 37.6 -1% | 37.5 -1% | 74 95% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 58 | 58 0% | 59.2 2% | 63 9% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -18% /
-19% | -4% /
-24% | -26% /
-85% | -102% /
-151% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
31 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise | |
↘ 14 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 82 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 23 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 86000 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 86000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 86000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3621 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4783 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3609 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G | MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Global Average -3 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -15% | -79% | 11% | 21% | ||
Read Seq | 886 | 916 3% | 118.7 -87% | 499.5 -44% | 628 ? -29% | |
Write Seq | 158.2 | 135 -15% | 109.6 -31% | 265.8 68% | 485 ? 207% | |
Read 512 | 857 | 787 -8% | 43.73 -95% | 314.3 -63% | 398 ? -54% | |
Write 512 | 156.6 | 134.3 -14% | 107.4 -31% | 266.3 70% | 389 ? 148% | |
Read 4k | 109.3 | 33.34 -69% | 0.437 -100% | 29.24 -73% | 27.2 ? -75% | |
Write 4k | 66.6 | 92.4 39% | 8.23 -88% | 78.4 18% | 60.5 ? -9% | |
Read 4k QD32 | 269.3 | 199.2 -26% | 0.575 -100% | 402.5 49% | 211 ? -22% | |
Write 4k QD32 | 162.4 | 118.8 -27% | 6.135 -96% | 264.9 63% | 165.3 ? 2% |
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=94, last 2 years) | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | |
Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A | |
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1990 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8327 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 538 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | |
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4.5 - 17, n=176) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW | |
1366x768 High Preset | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | |
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8.1 - 35.9, n=187) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | |
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (11.5 - 45.5, n=187) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ | |
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (18.3 - 90.2, n=187) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW |
Thief | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6 - 7.1, n=2) | |
1366x768 High Preset AA:FXAA & Low SS AF:4x | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8.5 - 15.1, n=5) | |
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (10.4 - 19.7, n=10) | |
1024x768 Very Low Preset | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (16.3 - 34.3, n=10) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3 - 14.5, n=11) | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4.9 - 32, n=42) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6.5 - 49.3, n=62) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW | |
1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (10.4 - 110.7, n=82) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 24.3 | 14.7 | 7.6 | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 66.4 | 34.2 | 29.9 | 10 |
Thief (2014) | 22.9 | 15.2 | 15.1 | 7.1 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 24.3 | 14.7 | 7.6 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.9 / 30.9 / 31.3 dB |
HDD |
| 31.9 dB |
DVD |
| 0 / dB |
Carga |
| 34.1 / 36.5 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.7 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.5 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.4 °C / 84.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-1.7 °C / -3 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (67.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.1% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (17% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 57% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.3 / 0.47 Watt |
Ocioso | 5 / 7.6 / 8.6 Watt |
Carga |
25.6 / 34 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, , IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 i5-8550U, GeForce MX130, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ i5-7300HQ, GeForce MX150, , TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 1% | -37% | -109% | -38% | -9% | -28% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5 | 3.4 32% | 5.9 -18% | 9.2 -84% | 5.1 -2% | 3.81 ? 24% | 4.51 ? 10% |
Idle Average * | 7.6 | 6.7 12% | 7 8% | 13.6 -79% | 7.6 -0% | 6.94 ? 9% | 7.47 ? 2% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.6 | 7.7 10% | 8.5 1% | 14.7 -71% | 8.2 5% | 8.75 ? -2% | 9.11 ? -6% |
Load Average * | 25.6 | 31.1 -21% | 54.5 -113% | 64 -150% | 49.4 -93% | 35 ? -37% | 42.4 ? -66% |
Load Maximum * | 34 | 42.9 -26% | 55.7 -64% | 89.2 -162% | 68 -100% | 47.5 ? -40% | 60.5 ? -78% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50.6 | 42.1 |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E580-20KSCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Asus VivoBook 15 F510UF-ES71 i5-8550U, GeForce MX130, 42 Wh | MSI PL62 MX150 7300HQ i5-7300HQ, GeForce MX150, 41.4 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-51G-509A i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 48 Wh | Average of class Office | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 7% | -34% | -25% | 19% | 49% | |
Reader / Idle | 754 | 864 15% | 867 15% | 1300 ? 72% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 350 | 421 20% | 232 -34% | 262 -25% | 350 0% | 598 ? 71% |
Load | 113 | 96 -15% | 162 43% | 117.1 ? 4% | ||
H.264 | 435 | 525 | 703 ? |
Pro
Contra
Em nossa análise, o IdeaPad 330S prova ser um polivalente sólido que pode realizar a maioria das tarefas comuns de computação. A CPU Intel fornece energia suficiente para o bom funcionamento do Windows 10 e muitos outros aplicativos. Além disso, os usuários podem substituir a unidade Optane com um SSD. No entanto, isso exigirá alguma destreza com a mão. Dito isto, o HD acelerado por Optane no IdeaPad 330S tem um desempenho muito melhor do que os discos rígidos tradicionais. O 330S não consegue rodar jogos exigentes.
O IdeaPad 330S impressiona com uma boa quantidade de desempenho e recebe uma recomendação, em grande parte graças ao seu baixo preço.
O IdeaPad 330S de 600 euros ($698) recebe uma clara recomendação de nossa parte. Nosso dispositivo de avaliação não demonstra falhas em termos de qualidade de construção, e tanto o teclado quanto o ClickPad se encaixam firmemente em suas posições. A má seleção de portas pode ser facilmente superada com a ajuda da porta USB Type-C. Temos dois pontos principais de crítica: 1) O lento leitor de cartões SD e 2) o baixo brilho da tela. Além disso, a CPU se desempenha um pouco pior do que o esperado.
Lenovo IdeaPad 330S-15IKB-81F500N5GE
-
09/14/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker