Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKBR (i5-8250U, MX150)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 328 cd/m²
Contraste: 1320:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.3% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
68.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.11
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB InfoVision M133NWF4R0, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U ID: Sharp SHP144A, Name: LQ133Z1, , 3200x1800, 13.3" | Dell Inspiron 13 7370 BOE071A / NV13FHM / Dell G64PY, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-ad006ng BOE070E, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP AU Optronics AUO272D, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | -6% | -6% | -13% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.3 | 63.9 -4% | 66.7 1% | 66.8 1% | 64.2 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.4 | 91.7 -6% | 86.2 -11% | 86.3 -11% | 65.3 -33% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 68.1 | 65.7 -4% | 63 -7% | 63.1 -7% | 65.3 -4% |
| Response Times | 3261% | 5% | 139% | 20% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 56.8 ? | 29 ? 49% | 46 ? 19% | 48 ? 15% | 40 ? 30% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31.6 ? | 30 ? 5% | 33 ? -4% | 32 ? -1% | 22 ? 30% |
| PWM Frequency | 198.4 ? | 19500 ? 9729% | 201 ? 1% | 1000 ? 404% | 200 ? 1% |
| Screen | -47% | -53% | -49% | -46% | |
| Brightness middle | 330 | 361 9% | 301 -9% | 281 -15% | 358 8% |
| Brightness | 304 | 303 0% | 291 -4% | 264 -13% | 347 14% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 72 -18% | 87 -1% | 83 -6% | 87 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.33 -32% | 0.33 -32% | 0.23 8% | 0.26 -4% |
| Contrast | 1320 | 1094 -17% | 912 -31% | 1222 -7% | 1377 4% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.8 | 5.26 -192% | 5.39 -199% | 4.83 -168% | 5.22 -190% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.3 | 7.79 -81% | 8.56 -99% | 8.89 -107% | 9.19 -114% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 5.69 -128% | 5.93 -137% | 6.63 -165% | 6.69 -168% |
| Gamma | 2.11 104% | 1.63 135% | 2.6 85% | 1.85 119% | 2.35 94% |
| CCT | 6588 99% | 6499 100% | 6358 102% | 6794 96% | 6745 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.8 | 59 -5% | 56 -9% | 56 -9% | 59 -5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.3 | 92 -5% | 86 -12% | 86 -12% | 91 -6% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 1070% /
581% | -18% /
-33% | 28% /
-6% | -13% /
-28% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 198.4 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 56.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 27.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 29.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 93 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U | |
| PCMark 10 | |
| Productivity | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Score | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3796 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4826 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3191 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Dell Inspiron 13 7370 Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN | HP Envy 13-ad006ng Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -41% | -60% | -41% | -51% | |
| Write 4k QD32 | 475 | 345.8 -27% | 160.3 -66% | 161.3 -66% | 251.5 -47% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 537 | 365.5 -32% | 172.8 -68% | 494.6 -8% | 246.3 -54% |
| Write 4k | 142.6 | 115.6 -19% | 65.8 -54% | 109.4 -23% | 88.7 -38% |
| Read 4k | 56.8 | 26.67 -53% | 20.79 -63% | 34.5 -39% | 26.68 -53% |
| Write 512 | 636 | 265.7 -58% | 298.2 -53% | 172.3 -73% | 389.1 -39% |
| Read 512 | 821 | 443.9 -46% | 351 -57% | 735 -10% | 356.7 -57% |
| Write Seq | 1010 | 337.4 -67% | 458.3 -55% | 195.4 -81% | 431.6 -57% |
| Read Seq | 1372 | 1046 -24% | 476.8 -65% | 1019 -26% | 489.4 -64% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
| Dell Inspiron 13 7370 | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3028 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8464 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2100 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Acer Aspire F5-771G-50RD | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 45.92 | 35.16 | 20.32 | 7.87 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 44.73 | 24.44 | 13.31 | 6.5 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 47.33 | 28.15 | 14.83 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 30 / 30 dB |
| Carga |
| 32.2 / 38.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.4 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45 °C / 113 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.5 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 32.9 °C / 91 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.6 °C / 81.7 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.7 °C / 1.2 F).
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.5 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.3% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.7% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 91% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 8% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 87% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Envy 13-ad006ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 49% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.36 / 0.38 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.4 / 6.1 / 7.7 Watt |
| Carga |
44.2 / 60.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IGZO IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | Dell Inspiron 13 7370 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Micron 1100 MTFDDAV256TBN, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-ad006ng i7-7500U, GeForce MX150, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -3% | 5% | 7% | 9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.4 | 3.6 -6% | 3.6 -6% | 2.8 18% | 3.5 -3% |
| Idle Average * | 6.1 | 7.9 -30% | 6.8 -11% | 5.8 5% | 6.6 -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 8.5 -10% | 8.9 -16% | 7.7 -0% | 7.5 3% |
| Load Average * | 44.2 | 43 3% | 36 19% | 48 -9% | 34.7 21% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.6 | 35 7% | |||
| Load Maximum * | 60.3 | 43 29% | 36.5 39% | 48 20% | 39.6 34% |
* ... smaller is better
| Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 36 Wh | Dell XPS 13 i5-8250U i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Dell Inspiron 13 7370 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | HP Envy 13-ad006ng i7-7500U, GeForce MX150, 51 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 83% | 4% | 47% | 43% | |
| Reader / Idle | 736 | 1092 48% | 772 5% | 1198 63% | 966 31% |
| H.264 | 346 | 476 38% | 416 20% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 344 | 689 100% | 345 0% | 425 24% | 577 68% |
| Load | 73 | 146 100% | 78 7% | 118 62% | 112 53% |
Pro
Contra
O IdeaPad 320s-13IKBR é uma oferta tentadora, mas a Lenovo fez alguns recortes significantes.
Com o Intel Core i5-8250U e a Nvidia GeForce MX150 em um parelho tão compacto é fácil anunciá-lo, especialmente porque atualmente é o portátil mais barato com essa combinação de componentes. O problema: Tanto o processador quanto o chip gráfico ficam muito aquém das expectativas. O Core i5-8250U está longe de ser o máximo e pode até cair para o nível de um processador dual-core de última geração enquanto estiver sob carga. É ainda pior com a GPU GeForce, que funciona completamente no nível do antecessor de desatualizado 940MX Maxwell. Além desta limitação de desempenho, a bateria excessivamente pequena é um problema, porque o que é bom é um portátil ultra-móvel se você não pode usá-lo por muito tempo quando estiver em movimento. O fabricante também anuncia o processador rápido e a GPU relativamente boa, mas eles não oferecem o desempenho esperado.
É uma pena, porque o IdeaPad 320s-13IKBR também tem seus aspectos positivos. Isso inclui, acima de tudo, a muito boa tela, que apresenta PWM, mas que fora isso também está bem: brilho de mais de 300 cd / m², bons valores de contraste e gama de cores de 97% do espaço de cores sRGB. Graças à sua superfície mate, a tela é fácil de enxergar em exteriores, bem como em interiores. Além da tela, também se deve se mencionar que o SSD rápido e o bom TouchPad, não apresentaram pontos fracos no teste. As dimensões compactas também são bonitas devido aos marcos mínimos da tela e ao ventilador silencioso. No entanto, menos bom é o fato do Lenovo ter apenas uma porta USB-C mal mutilada, e igual de incompreensível é a porta USB 2.0. Embora a placa 1x1 WLAN não seja lenta na vida cotidiana, limita consideravelmente as taxas de transferência.
Baixa duração da bateria e mau desempenho: O IdeaPad 320s-13IKBR possui muitos pontos fracos em áreas cruciais.
Lenovo IdeaPad 320S-13IKB
- 12/04/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
