Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
Acer TravelMate X3 X349-M-7261 | |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB |
Networking | |
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ (jseb) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB | |
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ (jseb) | |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB |
|
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 185 cd/m²
Contraste: 661:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 8.07 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 8.83 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
57% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.34% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
57.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.07% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.47
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB BOE NT156FHM-N31, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE BOE HF NV156FHM-N42, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ AU Optronics B173HTN01.1, , 1920x1080, 17.3" | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA AU Optronics AUO38ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Medion Akoya P6670 LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK LG Philips LP156WHU-TPG1, , 1366x768, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 12% | 73% | -4% | 0% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 38.07 | 42.66 12% | 71.3 87% | 36.51 -4% | 38.14 0% | 37.06 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 57.3 | 64.1 12% | 91.7 60% | 55 -4% | 57.2 0% | 55.8 -3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.34 | 44.08 12% | 67.1 71% | 37.72 -4% | 39.43 0% | 38.29 -3% |
Response Times | -50% | -4% | 1% | -2% | 16% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 ? | 51 ? -19% | 42 ? 2% | 40 ? 7% | 42 ? 2% | 27 ? 37% |
Response Time Black / White * | 21 ? | 38 ? -81% | 23 ? -10% | 22 ? -5% | 22 ? -5% | 22 ? -5% |
PWM Frequency | 50 ? | 1000 ? | 50 | 50 ? | ||
Screen | 36% | 30% | -19% | 2% | -6% | |
Brightness middle | 185 | 291 57% | 353 91% | 219 18% | 287 55% | 200 8% |
Brightness | 184 | 265 44% | 320 74% | 222 21% | 269 46% | 198 8% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 86 -9% | 82 -14% | 85 -11% | 74 -22% | 83 -13% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.23 18% | 0.38 -36% | 0.39 -39% | 0.65 -132% | 0.28 -0% |
Contrast | 661 | 1265 91% | 929 41% | 562 -15% | 442 -33% | 714 8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 8.07 | 4.78 41% | 5.07 37% | 12.67 -57% | 5.42 33% | 10.63 -32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 14.83 | 9.51 36% | 10.12 32% | 20.99 -42% | 9.54 36% | 15.69 -6% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 8.83 | 3.49 60% | 13.38 -52% | 13.82 -57% | 5.14 42% | 11.19 -27% |
Gamma | 2.47 89% | 2.58 85% | 2.69 82% | 2.63 84% | 2.48 89% | 1.78 124% |
CCT | 10628 61% | 6013 108% | 15991 41% | 15633 42% | 6952 93% | 11258 58% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36.2 | 40 10% | 60.1 66% | 35 -3% | 36 -1% | 35 -3% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 57 | 64 12% | 91.6 61% | 55 -4% | 57 0% | 56 -2% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -1% /
20% | 33% /
34% | -7% /
-13% | 0% /
1% | 2% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
21 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 5 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 43 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise | |
↘ 22 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15 | |
CPU Single 64Bit | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE | |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB | |
Medion Akoya P6670 | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE | |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB | |
Medion Akoya P6670 | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA |
PCMark 8 - Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE | |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB | |
Medion Akoya P6670 | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA | |
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3457 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB Hynix HFS128G3MND | Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE Liteonit CV3-DE256 | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G | Medion Akoya P6670 Phison S11-128G | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 24% | -1% | 15% | 75% | |
Seq Read | 511 | 479.8 -6% | 495.8 -3% | 492.2 -4% | 1179 131% |
Seq Write | 200.6 | 377.8 88% | 316.9 58% | 385.2 92% | 372.8 86% |
4K Read | 24.49 | 32.4 32% | 19.37 -21% | 40.83 67% | 29.52 21% |
4K Write | 63.6 | 59.7 -6% | 75.3 18% | 77.2 21% | 92 45% |
4K-64 Read | 302.9 | 345.5 14% | 137.4 -55% | 371.3 23% | 723 139% |
4K-64 Write | 145.4 | 203.7 40% | 198.8 37% | 271.9 87% | 197.7 36% |
Access Time Read * | 0.117 | 0.127 -9% | 0.111 5% | 0.174 -49% | 0.055 53% |
Access Time Write * | 0.116 | 0.066 43% | 0.157 -35% | 0.321 -177% | 0.035 70% |
Score Read | 378 | 426 13% | 206 -46% | 461 22% | 870 130% |
Score Write | 229 | 301 31% | 306 34% | 388 69% | 327 43% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Medion Akoya P6670 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE | |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK | |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB | |
HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1621 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5728 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 825 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 54.1 | 31.21 | 25.79 | |
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 24.62 | 18.7 | ||
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 19.8 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.6 / 30.6 / 30.6 dB |
Carga |
| 36.8 / 38.2 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 34.1 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 35.6 °C / 96 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.2 °C / 86.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-2.6 °C / -4.7 F).
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 11% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 85% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 18% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.32 / 0.46 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.5 / 6.1 / 7 Watt |
Carga |
31.2 / 42.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Hynix HFS128G3MND, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Liteonit CV3-DE256, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, TN, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Medion Akoya P6670 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Phison S11-128G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX, WDC Scorpio Blue WD10JPCX-24UE4T0, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -22% | 12% | -49% | -40% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 3.9 -11% | 3.6 -3% | 6.7 -91% | 7 -100% |
Idle Average * | 6.1 | 7.4 -21% | 6 2% | 9.2 -51% | 8 -31% |
Idle Maximum * | 7 | 9.5 -36% | 6.4 9% | 9.7 -39% | 8.4 -20% |
Load Average * | 31.2 | 41 -31% | 26 17% | 40.6 -30% | 38.8 -24% |
Load Maximum * | 42.9 | 48 -12% | 28.1 34% | 58 -35% | 52.8 -23% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 510-15IKB 80SV0087GE i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 30 Wh | HP 250 G5 SP X0N33EA 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh | Medion Akoya P6670 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 44 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 310-15ISK 6500U, GeForce 920MX, 31 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 20% | 30% | 22% | 44% | |
Reader / Idle | 612 | 634 4% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 230 | 275 20% | 347 51% | 280 22% | 332 44% |
Load | 81 | 109 35% | |||
H.264 | 313 |
Pro
Contra
O Lenovo IdeaPad 310-15IKB tem como objetivo ser um poli funcional de escritório e multimídia. No entanto, para ser um verdadeiro portátil multimídia, ele precisa ter uma tela melhor e possivelmente uma GPU mais potente. Por outro lado, o portátil definitivamente é um bom portátil de escritório com certas fraquezas. Se você gosta de trabalhar em paz, então este modelo pode não ser para você, dado que o HD do IdeaPad é um companheiro barulhento constante. Este problema pode ser resolvido trocando o HD por um SSD. As barras/teclas do mouse também são bastante irritantes de usar, mas o teclado é confiável. Trabalhar durante uma viagem não é possível devido á tela pobre e à bateria pequena.
No final do dia, não conseguimos reunir suficientes motivos para recomendar o IdeaPad. Definitivamente é médio e não consegue se destacar entre a multidão.
Por que você deveria comprar o IdeaPad 310-15IKB? A principal motivo é o preço. Este portátil é mais barato que alguns de seus concorrentes. No entanto, por outro lado, você verá que pagando um pouco mais pode obter um painel IPS muito melhor. Este é um ponto especialmente importante, dado que a tela de qualidade pobre do nosso modelo de teste é uma de suas maiores fraquezas.
Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB
- 11/29/2016 v5.1 (old)
Benjamin Herzig