Breve Análise do Portátil Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader - average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 Chromebook | |
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR | |
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook |
|
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 275.1 cd/m²
Contraste: 887:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
Gamma: 2.28
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook IPS, 11.6", 1366x768 | Asus Transformer Book T100HA-C4-GR AUO20D4, IPS, 10.1", 1280x800 | Lenovo ThinkPad 13 Chromebook IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR IPS, 10.1", 1280x800 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | |||||
Display P3 Coverage | 52.8 | 51.1 | |||
sRGB Coverage | 73 | 75.2 | |||
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 53.3 | 52.7 | |||
Response Times | -21% | 3% | -28% | ||
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 33.6 ? | 37.6 ? -12% | 38 ? -13% | 31.6 ? 6% | |
Response Time Black / White * | 28 ? | 36 ? -29% | 23 ? 18% | 24.8 ? 11% | |
PWM Frequency | 20830 ? | 69.4 -100% | |||
Screen | 36% | -15% | -12% | -22% | |
Brightness middle | 275.1 | 480.2 75% | 262.9 -4% | 192 -30% | 251.9 -8% |
Brightness | 255 | 455 78% | 261 2% | 204 -20% | 233 -9% |
Brightness Distribution | 85 | 85 0% | 92 8% | 88 4% | 83 -2% |
Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.324 -5% | 0.601 -94% | 0.23 26% | 0.348 -12% |
Contrast | 887 | 1482 67% | 437 -51% | 835 -6% | 724 -18% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 3.45 34% | 4.87 6% | 6.35 -22% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20.3 | 12.18 40% | 11.15 45% | ||
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 2.67 5% | 3.51 -25% | 3.99 -43% | 7.09 -153% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.34 94% | 2.17 101% | 2.45 90% | 2.02 109% |
CCT | 6861 95% | 6164 105% | 6476 100% | 6380 102% | 8590 76% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 47.28 | 52.69 | |||
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 84.38 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 36% /
36% | -18% /
-16% | -5% /
-8% | -25% /
-24% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
33.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 42 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 20830 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 20830 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 20830 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Sunspider - 1.0 Total Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook | |
Asus Transformer Book T100HA-C4-GR | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 Chromebook | |
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK |
JetStream 1.1 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 Chromebook | |
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK |
Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook | |
Asus Transformer Book T100HA-C4-GR | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 Chromebook | |
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK | |
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR |
Octane V2 - Total Score (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 Chromebook | |
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK | |
Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR |
WebXPRT 2015 - Overall (sort by value) | |
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook | |
Lenovo ThinkPad 13 Chromebook | |
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 33 °C / 91 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 36 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.2 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.4 °C / 83.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-0.1 °C / -0.2 F).
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 29.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 81% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 71% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(+) | bass is linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 86% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 83% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.3 / 1.3 Watt |
Ocioso | 1.5 / 5.4 / 5.5 Watt |
Carga |
6.3 / 7.9 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook MT8173C, PowerVR GX6250, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1366x768, 11.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad 13 Chromebook 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK MT8173C, PowerVR GX6250, 32 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 64 GB eMMC Flash, IPS, 1280x800, 10.1" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -11% | -65% | -102% | |
Idle Minimum * | 1.5 | 0.77 49% | 3.8 -153% | 5.14 -243% |
Idle Average * | 5.4 | 5.11 5% | 6.2 -15% | 7.6 -41% |
Idle Maximum * | 5.5 | 5.88 -7% | 6.6 -20% | 8.28 -51% |
Load Average * | 6.3 | 7.43 -18% | 11 -75% | 11.33 -80% |
Load Maximum * | 7.9 | 14.73 -86% | 12.7 -61% | 15.36 -94% |
* ... smaller is better
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook MT8173C, PowerVR GX6250, 45 Wh | Asus Transformer Book T100HA-C4-GR Z8500, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 30 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad 13 Chromebook 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 42 Wh | Acer Chromebook R13 CB5-312T-K0YK MT8173C, PowerVR GX6250, 53.9 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad MIIX 310-10ICR Z8350, HD Graphics (Cherry Trail), 33 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -29% | -30% | 1% | -16% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 764 | 541 -29% | 536 -30% | 773 1% | 643 -16% |
Reader / Idle | 1460 | 1249 | |||
Load | 246 | 170 |
Pro
Contra
A Lenovo tirou as luvas na luta pelo mercado educacional com a introdução do Chromebook Flex 11. Sob seu preço ultra acessível de $279, estão quase todas as principais características esperadas de um concorrente para essa coroa sedutora. É construído a partir de um plástico ABS/policarbonato barato (e absolutamente não elegante) que promete de durabilidade e está envolvido com um para-choques de borracha que o ajuda a resistir ao dano causado por pequenas gotas. Tem um teclado antideslizante e touchpad com um design especial para canalizar água longe dos equipamentos internos do dispositivo. É relativamente rápido graças aos requisitos leves do Chrome OS, mas gerencia simultaneamente longas durações da bateria graças à eficiência do grandePEQUENO SoC e sua grande bateria. Além disso, a tela é realmente bastante decente (apesar de sua resolução lamentável) e também é táctil.
O Chromebook Flex 11 não lança nenhum soco na sua tentativa de assumir o mercado educacional, cobrindo quase todas as bases: desempenho ágil e confiável, construção durável, longas durações de bateria e um preço acessível. No entanto, seus dispositivos de entrada e conectividade deixam muito a desejar, e sua aparência não é o seu forte.
É claro que com menos de $300, inevitavelmente ainda há compromissos sérios em jogo. Para começar- e sabemos que você está ficando cansado de ouvir isso, mas deve ser apontado - o Chrome OS está longe de ser o sistema operacional altamente compatível e altamente capaz que o Windows é. O suporte para aplicativos Android está quase aqui, mas mesmo considerando isso, este não é um PC completo. Além disso, os dispositivos de entrada são medíocres na melhor das hipóteses, com o teclado com deslocamentos curtos e resposta inarticulada, e os botões integrados do touchpad, perto do final da lista dos que avaliamos recentemente. É também uma máquina bastante pesada e volumosa para o seu tamanho de tela de 11,6 polegadas, mas supomos que a maioria das crianças poderia viver com essa limitação. Finalmente, a conectividade é incrivelmente básica, com apenas duas portas USB (uma das quais - a porta Type-C - também funciona como a porta de carregamento) e uma porta HDMI para conexões de acessórios e vídeo.
Em geral, no contexto do seu preço, o Flex 11 é uma recomendação fácil para quem pode lidar com a pequena lista de inconvenientes. Não há nada extravagante nem impressionante sobre isso, mas é difícil de zombar do pacote total, dado o valor do dinheiro.
Lenovo Flex 11 Chromebook
- 06/26/2017 v6 (old)
Steve Schardein