Breve Análise do Portátil LG Gram 15: Portátil peso pena de 15 polegadas com uma excelente tela

Name: LG Gram 15Z90N
Brand: LG

Extremamente leve!

Enquanto muitos fabricantes estão tentando tornar seus portáteis extremamente finos, a LG está atrás de um objetivo diferente. O dispositivo de 15 polegadas pesa um pouco mais de um quilograma. Leia nossa análise para aprender sobre as vantagens e desvantagens que surgem disso.

Sebastian Bade, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch, ✓ Felicitas Krohn (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 07/14/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Laptop / Notebook Ultrabook Windows Ice Lake

Test device courtesy of LG Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

LG Gram 15Z90N (gram 15 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i5-1035G7 4 x 1.2 - 3.7 GHz, Ice Lake-U

Placa gráfica

Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Análises do: 1050 MHz, Memoría: 1200 MHz, 26.20.100.7463 DCH

Memória

8 GB

, DDR4-3200 single-Channel

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LP156WF9-SPN1, .2 IPS LED, Brilhante: sim, 60 Hz

placa mãe

Intel 495 (Ice Lake-U PCH-LP Premium)

Disco rígido

SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), 512 GB

, M.2, NVMe, 410 GB livre

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: Conector para fones de 3,5 mm, Card Reader: MicroSD, 1 Leitor de Impressões Digitais

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 16.8 x 357.6 x 225.3

Bateria

80 Wh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD web camera

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Dois alto-falantes estéreo a 1,5 W , Teclado: chiclet-style, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, 24 Meses Garantia

peso

1.093 kg, Suprimento de energia: 237 g

Preço

1399 EUR

Links

LG página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
84.8 % v7 ^(old)	07/2020	LG Gram 15Z90N i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	1.1 kg	16.8 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
86.4 % v6 ^(old)	08/2018	LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620	1.1 kg	17 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
80.1 % v7 ^(old)	02/2020	MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250	1.6 kg	15.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
83.8 % v6 ^(old)		SCHENKER Work 15 i7-8750H, UHD Graphics 630	2.2 kg	24.9 mm	15.60"	1920x1080
82.9 % v7 ^(old)	11/2019	Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U R5 3580U, Vega 9	1.5 kg	14.7 mm	15.00"	2496x1664
82.6 % v6 ^(old)		SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620	1.5 kg	19.9 mm	15.60"	2x1

Size Comparison

SCHENKER Work 15 SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B LG Gram 15Z90N MSI Modern 15 A10RB Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U DIN A4 ❌

Left side: Power socket, one USB 2.0 port, HDMI output, one USB 3.1 Gen1 Type-C port (DisplayPort over USB-C)

Right side: Kensington lock, two USB 3.1 Gen1 ports, combination headphone and microphone jack, SD card reader

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
LG Gram 15Z90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	84.1 MB/s
SCHENKER Work 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	76.8 MB/s -9%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64BG)	75.9 MB/s -10%
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	67.7 MB/s -20%
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=13, last 2 years)	52.8 MB/s -37%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)	26.8 MB/s -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
LG Gram 15Z90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB)	88.8 MB/s
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64BG)	86.5 MB/s -3%
SCHENKER Work 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	84.2 MB/s -5%
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	81.5 MB/s -8%
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=13, last 2 years)	64.3 MB/s -28%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II)	29.1 MB/s -67%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
MSI Modern 15 A10RB Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1244 (889^min - 1355^max) MBit/s +102%
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324)	1161 MBit/s +89%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	680 MBit/s +11%
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	650 (520^min - 667^max) MBit/s +6%
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	615 (571^min - 655^max) MBit/s
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	540 MBit/s -12%
iperf3 receive AX12
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324)	1261 MBit/s +44%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB Intel Wireless-AC 9560	1128 (1084^min - 1146^max) MBit/s +29%
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201	876 (819^min - 901^max) MBit/s
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	649 MBit/s -26%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	606 MBit/s -31%
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	580 (528^min - 648^max) MBit/s -34%

LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø875 (819-901)

MSI Modern 15 A10RB Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1128 (1084-1146)

SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø580 (528-648)

LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø615 (571-655)

MSI Modern 15 A10RB Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1244 (889-1355)

SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (520-667)

ColorChecker LG Gram 15Z90N: 20.85 ∆E min: 2.33 - max: 30.73 ∆E


365 cd/m²	341 cd/m²	343 cd/m²
345 cd/m²	366 cd/m²	330 cd/m²
335 cd/m²	323 cd/m²	326 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LP156WF9-SPN1 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 366 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 341.6 cd/m² Minimum: 23 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 316 cd/m²
Contraste: 1307:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.08
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	LG Gram 15Z90N LP156WF9-SPN1, .2 IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B LP156WF9-SPN1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI Modern 15 A10RB Chi Mei N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	SCHENKER Work 15 LP156WFC-SPP1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U Sharp LQ150P1JX51, IPS, 2496x1664, 15"	SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 Chi Mei CMN15E8, IPS, 2x1, 15.6"
Display		-1%	-1%	-41%	-0%	-5%
Display P3 Coverage	66	65.3 -1%	66 0%	38.12 -42%	66.9 1%	63.7 -3%
sRGB Coverage	96.4	96.2 0%	92.1 -4%	57.4 -40%	99.3 3%	87.7 -9%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	66.8	66.3 -1%	66.5 0%	39.39 -41%	63.7 -5%	63.9 -4%
Response Times		-2%	-38%	-14%	-49%	-6%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36 ?(18, 18)	34.3 ?(16.4, 17.9) 5%	43.2 ?(22.8, 20.4) -20%	37.2 ?(19.2, 18) -3%	47.2 ?(23.2, 24) -31%	37 ?(18, 19) -3%
Response Time Black / White *	22 ?(12, 10)	23.7 ?(13.1, 10.6) -8%	34.4 ?(20.4, 14) -56%	27.2 ?(17.2, 10) -24%	36.8 ?(20.4, 16.4) -67%	24 ?(14, 10) -9%
PWM Frequency			26040 ?(13)		21370 ?(51)	25000 ?(20)
Screen		-15%	-20%	-72%	0%	-26%
Brightness middle	366	349 -5%	289.4 -21%	238 -35%	416.9 14%	289 -21%
Brightness	342	331 -3%	273 -20%	235 -31%	389 14%	280 -18%
Brightness Distribution	88	84 -5%	82 -7%	87 -1%	86 -2%	87 -1%
Black Level *	0.28	0.32 -14%	0.27 4%	0.14 50%	0.4 -43%	0.36 -29%
Contrast	1307	1091 -17%	1072 -18%	1700 30%	1042 -20%	803 -39%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.68	3.1 -16%	2.32 13%	6.1 -128%	2.75 -3%	3.93 -47%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.25	6.6 -26%	5.76 -10%	14.2 -170%	6.64 -26%	6.98 -33%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	1.08	1.5 -39%	2.49 -131%	4.4 -307%	0.71 34%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.4	3.3 -38%	3 -25%	5.2 -117%	1.8 25%	3.73 -55%
Gamma	2.25 ^98%	2.16 ^102%	2.22 ^99%	2.45 ^90%	2.09 ^105%	2.42 ^91%
CCT	6474 ^100%	6973 ^93%	6867 ^95%	7469 ^87%	6646 ^98%	6802 ^96%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	61	61.46 1%	59.8 -2%	36.3 -40%	63.4 4%	57 -7%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	96	96.05 0%	92 -4%	57.2 -40%	99.4 4%	87 -9%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-6% / -10%	-20% / -19%	-42% / -59%	-16% / -6%	-12% / -19%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 12 ms rise
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18 ms rise
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Core i5-1035G7: Ø414 (401.76-534.64)

LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø475 (461.37-506.44)

MSI Modern 15 A10RB Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel Core i7-10510U: Ø795 (785.64-858.83)

SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø935 (922.83-971.04)

Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U, AMD Ryzen 5 3580U: Ø662 (563.52-691.26)

SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø495 (488.96-585.22)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=57, last 2 years)	636 Points +67%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB Intel Core i7-10510U	497 Points +31%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (380 - 439, n=3)	415 Points +9%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	409 Points +8%
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Core i5-1035G7	380 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	352 Points -7%

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years)	4548 Points +336%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	2272 Points +118%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB Intel Core i7-10510U	1897 Points +82%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	1549 Points +49%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (1043 - 1630, n=3)	1302 Points +25%
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Core i5-1035G7	1043 Points

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years)	249 Points +63%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB Intel Core i7-10510U	202 Points +32%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	174 Points +14%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (153 - 172, n=3)	165 Points +8%
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 Intel Core i5-8265U	163 Points +7%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B Intel Core i7-8550U	158 Points +3%
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Core i5-1035G7	153 Points
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	139 Points -9%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years)	1987 Points +269%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	971 (541.45^min - 977.59^max) Points +80%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB Intel Core i7-10510U	813 Points +51%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	693 Points +29%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (539 - 736, n=3)	662 Points +23%
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 Intel Core i5-8265U	585 Points +9%
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Core i5-1035G7	539 Points
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B Intel Core i7-8550U	506 Points -6%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Core i5-1035G7	1075 Seconds *
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B Intel Core i7-8550U	937 Seconds * +13%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (771 - 1075, n=3)	880 Seconds * +18%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	710 Seconds * +34%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	473 Seconds * +56%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	473 Seconds * +56%
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=61, last 2 years)	359 Seconds * +67%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=56, last 2 years)	5486 MIPS +34%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	4629 MIPS +13%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	4629 MIPS +13%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (4091 - 4252, n=3)	4183 MIPS +2%
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Core i5-1035G7	4091 MIPS
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	3572 MIPS -13%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=54, last 2 years)	48778 MIPS +250%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	28826 MIPS +107%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	28826 MIPS +107%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (13921 - 19168, n=3)	17144 MIPS +23%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	15209 MIPS +9%
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Core i5-1035G7	13921 MIPS

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=57, last 2 years)	1783 Points +53%
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Core i5-1035G7	1163 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 ()	1163 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	900 Points -23%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=57, last 2 years)	10113 Points +273%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	2990 Points +10%
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Core i5-1035G7	2713 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 ()	2713 Points 0%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years)	13 fps
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	7.8 fps
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	7.76 fps
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (4.63 - 4.71, n=2)	4.67 fps
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	4.091 fps
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B Intel Core i7-8550U	3.88 fps

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=56, last 2 years)	54.7 s * -70%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 ()	32.3 s * -0%
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Core i5-1035G7	32.26 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Core i5-1035G7	0.811 sec *
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 ()	0.811 sec * -0%
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=56, last 2 years)	0.518 sec * +36%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6044

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

15373

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

9591

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single CPUs 64Bit

8073 Points

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 64Bit

20535 Points

Cinebench R10 Shading 64Bit

10006 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

34.72 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.77 Points

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 32Bit

33.61 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 32Bit

4.35 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 32Bit

1.54 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

4.87 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

153 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

539 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

43.01 fps

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

1043 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

380 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Subnotebook (4993 - 7788, n=49, last 2 years)	6427 Points +65%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	5409 Points +38%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3906 - 4421, n=2)	4164 Points +7%
SCHENKER Work 15 UHD Graphics 630, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	4154 Points +6%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U Vega 9, R5 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG	4056 Points +4%
LG Gram 15Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	3906 Points
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	3790 Points -3%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)	2733 Points -30%
Essentials
Average of class Subnotebook (9476 - 11331, n=49, last 2 years)	10486 Points +27%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	9711 Points +17%
SCHENKER Work 15 UHD Graphics 630, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	8719 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (8272 - 9086, n=2)	8679 Points +5%
LG Gram 15Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	8272 Points
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	7963 Points -4%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U Vega 9, R5 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG	7861 Points -5%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)	6628 Points -20%
Productivity
Average of class Subnotebook (6440 - 10623, n=49, last 2 years)	8627 Points +34%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	7972 Points +24%
SCHENKER Work 15 UHD Graphics 630, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	6682 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (6417 - 6765, n=2)	6591 Points +3%
LG Gram 15Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	6417 Points
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	6202 Points -3%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U Vega 9, R5 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG	6102 Points -5%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)	5553 Points -13%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Subnotebook (5305 - 10983, n=49, last 2 years)	8048 Points +164%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	5547 Points +82%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U Vega 9, R5 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG	3778 Points +24%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3047 - 3817, n=2)	3432 Points +13%
SCHENKER Work 15 UHD Graphics 630, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	3340 Points +10%
LG Gram 15Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	3047 Points
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	2992 Points -2%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)	1506 Points -51%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
SCHENKER Work 15 UHD Graphics 630, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	4326 Points +24%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	3958 Points +13%
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3497 - 3725, n=2)	3611 Points +3%
LG Gram 15Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	3497 Points
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	3449 Points -1%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U Vega 9, R5 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG	3348 Points -4%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)	3255 Points -7%
Average of class Subnotebook (1739 - 4730, n=2, last 2 years)	3235 Points -7%
Work Score Accelerated v2
MSI Modern 15 A10RB GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	5443 Points +14%
SCHENKER Work 15 UHD Graphics 630, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	5164 Points +8%
LG Gram 15Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	4772 Points
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (4755 - 4772, n=2)	4764 Points 0%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U Vega 9, R5 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG	4246 Points -11%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)	3518 Points -26%
Average of class Subnotebook (1609 - 5271, n=2, last 2 years)	3440 Points -28%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3497 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5038 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4772 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		3906 pontos
Ajuda

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
LG Gram 15Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	4990 μs *

* ... smaller is better

	LG Gram 15Z90N SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	MSI Modern 15 A10RB WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	SCHENKER Work 15 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG	SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	Average SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		15%	8%	-45%	0%	-17%
Write 4K	177.1	208.4 18%	149.6 -16%	99 -44%	187.2 6%	143.3 ?(114.4 - 202, n=10) -19%
Read 4K	47.88	51 7%	49.29 3%	35.63 -26%	51.8 8%	45.3 ?(41.4 - 50.5, n=10) -5%
Write Seq	2182	2687 23%	1653 -24%	706 -68%	1438 -34%	1514 ?(635 - 2561, n=10) -31%
Read Seq	1900	2168 14%	1468 -23%	1044 -45%	1347 -29%	1758 ?(1274 - 2065, n=10) -7%
Write 4K Q32T1	448.4	489.2 9%	478.2 7%	326.6 -27%	396.7 -12%	425 ?(287 - 681, n=10) -5%
Read 4K Q32T1	470.3	600 28%	561 19%	270 -43%	534 14%	459 ?(261 - 754, n=10) -2%
Write Seq Q32T1	2228	2699 21%	3272 47%	820 -63%	3280 47%	1531 ?(662 - 2736, n=10) -31%
Read Seq Q32T1	3454	3374 -2%	3550 3%	2028 -41%	3556 3%	2895 ?(2515 - 3473, n=10) -16%
Write 4K Q8T8	1283		2067 61%			918 ?(724 - 1283, n=3) -28%
Read 4K Q8T8	1052		1064 1%			819 ?(690 - 1052, n=3) -22%
AS SSD		7%	36%	-67%	23%	-13%
Seq Read	2842	2084 -27%	2716 -4%	1122 -61%	2661 -6%	2266 ?(1596 - 3012, n=11) -20%
Seq Write	974	2442 151%	2531 160%	514 -47%	2426 149%	1137 ?(680 - 2424, n=11) 17%
4K Read	50.5	47.52 -6%	55.9 11%	34.98 -31%	59 17%	43.2 ?(24 - 55.6, n=11) -14%
4K Write	147.5	135.8 -8%	134.7 -9%	96.8 -34%	166 13%	118.8 ?(97.9 - 147.8, n=11) -19%
4K-64 Read	1191	1043 -12%	1183 -1%	492 -59%	1314 10%	819 ?(623 - 1569, n=11) -31%
4K-64 Write	1275	955 -25%	2280 79%	339.9 -73%	1494 17%	956 ?(486 - 1922, n=11) -25%
Access Time Read *	0.043	0.062 -44%	0.034 21%	0.056 -30%	0.046 -7%	0.04909 ?(0.043 - 0.07, n=11) -14%
Access Time Write *	0.027	0.076 -181%	0.028 -4%	0.11 -307%	0.023 15%	0.04845 ?(0.026 - 0.07, n=11) -79%
Score Read	1526	1299 -15%	1510 -1%	639 -58%	1639 7%	1089 ?(860 - 1914, n=11) -29%
Score Write	1520	1335 -12%	2668 76%	488 -68%	1902 25%	1188 ?(677 - 2309, n=11) -22%
Score Total	3741	3326 -11%	4952 32%	1434 -62%	4379 17%	2787 ?(1951 - 5185, n=11) -26%
Copy ISO MB/s	1135	1926 70%	2041 80%	828 -27%		1286 ?(757 - 2489, n=9) 13%
Copy Program MB/s	346	714 106%	405.7 17%	200.5 -42%		470 ?(333 - 728, n=9) 36%
Copy Game MB/s	665	1425 114%	1000 50%	387.4 -42%		837 ?(362 - 1670, n=9) 26%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		11% / 10%	22% / 24%	-56% / -59%	12% / 14%	-15% / -15%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)

Sequential Read: 1961 MB/s

Sequential Write: 2106 MB/s

512K Read: 1656 MB/s

512K Write: 2022 MB/s

4K Read: 58.7 MB/s

4K Write: 170.8 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 485.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 455.7 MB/s

Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=53, last 2 years)	9600 Points +229%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U	4905 Points +68%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	4380 Points +50%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2112 - 4630, n=28)	3996 Points +37%
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G7	2914 Points
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i5-8265U	1835 Points -37%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel UHD Graphics 630, Intel Core i7-8750H	1805 Points -38%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (5577 - 58319, n=29, last 2 years)	36827 Points +424%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U	23806 Points +239%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	19255 Points +174%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (7024 - 18881, n=24)	15496 Points +121%
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel UHD Graphics 630, Intel Core i7-8750H	11199 Points +59%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	10131 Points +44%
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G7	7024 Points
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=57, last 2 years)	6933 Points +389%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB NVIDIA GeForce MX250, Intel Core i7-10510U	3868 Points +173%
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U AMD Radeon RX Vega 9, AMD Ryzen 5 3580U	2789 Points +97%
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (1418 - 3156, n=27)	2594 Points +83%
LG Gram 15Z90N Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel Core i5-1035G7	1418 Points
SCHENKER Work 15 Intel UHD Graphics 630, Intel Core i7-8750H	1326 Points -6%
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B Intel UHD Graphics 620, Intel Core i7-8550U	1284 Points -9%

3DMark 11 Performance		2736 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		14678 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		6616 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		1298 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		626 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	48.6	25.8	21.1	7.8
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	54.4	29	17.5	16.4
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	19.5	15.3	7.89	6.28
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	21.5	11.4	11.3

Barulho

Ocioso		30.7 / 30.7 / 31.9 dB
Carga		34 / 34.2 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A)

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


32.9 °C	38 °C	35.6 °C
30.7 °C	36.8 °C	30.2 °C
27.5 °C	27.4 °C	28.2 °C

Máximo: 38 °C
Médio: 31.9 °C


35.6 °C	38.6 °C	32 °C
30.2 °C	31.6 °C	29.8 °C
29 °C	29 °C	28.7 °C

Máximo: 38.6 °C
Médio: 31.6 °C

alimentação elétrica 41 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23.8 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.1 °C / 0.1 F).

	LG Gram 15Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG)	LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF)	MSI Modern 15 A10RB GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G	SCHENKER Work 15 UHD Graphics 630, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB	Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U Vega 9, R5 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG	SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB
Heat		-7%	-29%	-1%	-13%	-6%
Maximum Upper Side *	38	43 -13%	54.2 -43%	40.2 -6%	43.6 -15%	40.3 -6%
Maximum Bottom *	38.6	41 -6%	59.4 -54%	43 -11%	49.4 -28%	47.1 -22%
Idle Upper Side *	26.5	28 -6%	28 -6%	24.7 7%	27.4 -3%	25 6%
Idle Bottom *	26.5	27 -2%	30 -13%	24.4 8%	27.8 -5%	26.4 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

LG Gram 15Z90N audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

MSI Modern 15 A10RB audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.24 / 0.88 Watt
Ocioso	2.9 / 7.7 / 11.4 Watt
Carga	31.5 / 32 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	LG Gram 15Z90N i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), .2 IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	SCHENKER Work 15 i7-8750H, UHD Graphics 630, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U R5 3580U, Vega 9, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 2496x1664, 15"	SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, IPS, 2x1, 15.6"	Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU)	Average of class Subnotebook
Power Consumption		-18%	-118%	-35%	-15%	-5%	-18%	-40%
Idle Minimum *	2.9	3.7 -28%	6.6 -128%	3.7 -28%	3.3 -14%	3.2 -10%	3.91 ?(1.8 - 6.9, n=26) -35%	4.49 ?(1.3 - 9.3, n=58, last 2 years) -55%
Idle Average *	7.7	8.5 -10%	9.9 -29%	6.4 17%	7.1 8%	6.5 16%	7.33 ?(4.6 - 11.5, n=26) 5%	7.66 ?(2.5 - 16, n=58, last 2 years) 1%
Idle Maximum *	11.4	10 12%	14.7 -29%	7.1 38%	7.2 37%	11.3 1%	9.16 ?(6.1 - 12, n=26) 20%	9.56 ?(4.1 - 16.8, n=58, last 2 years) 16%
Load Average *	31.5	36 -14%	82.9 -163%	42.5 -35%	44.8 -42%	32 -2%	39.2 ?(25.7 - 53.3, n=26) -24%	46.6 ?(19.1 - 78.6, n=56, last 2 years) -48%
Load Maximum *	32	48.7 -52%	109.3 -242%	86 -169%	53 -66%	42.2 -32%	49.8 ?(27 - 65.2, n=26) -56%	68.6 ?(24.2 - 121.2, n=58, last 2 years) -114%
Witcher 3 ultra *			59.4		45.1

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		25h 36min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44.18362.449.0)		12h 08min
WiFi Websurfing max. Brightness (Edge 44.18362.449.0)		9h 20min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		11h 14min
Carga (máximo brilho)		4h 12min

	LG Gram 15Z90N i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 80 Wh	LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh	MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 52 Wh	SCHENKER Work 15 i7-8750H, UHD Graphics 630, 62 Wh	Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U R5 3580U, Vega 9, 45 Wh	SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 36 Wh	Average of class Subnotebook
Battery Runtime		26%	-49%	-43%	-37%	-63%	-2%
Reader / Idle	1536		924 -40%	582 -62%	1121 -27%		1750 ?(581 - 3407, n=12, last 2 years) 14%
H.264	674	950 41%		350 -48%			896 ?(527 - 1251, n=26, last 2 years) 33%
WiFi v1.3	728	805 11%	388 -47%	504 -31%	546 -25%	268 -63%	719 ?(389 - 1585, n=59, last 2 years) -1%
Load	252		101 -60%	175 -31%	102 -60%		116.6 ?(57 - 197, n=46, last 2 years) -54%

Pro

+ Chassi de liga de magnésio

+ Extremamente leve

+ Muitas portas, incluindo Thunderbolt 3

+ Tela brilhante e rica em contraste

+ Slots M.2 adicionais

+ WiFi 6

+ Baixas emissões

+ Muito boa duração da bateria

Contra

- Tampa de tela muito flexível

- Superfície da tela altamente refletiva

Veredicto - LG Gram 15 2020 como um cavalo de trabalho ultraportável

O Gram 15Z90N é outra entrada da série de dispositivos ultraleves da LG. Pesando 1,1 kg (~ 2,4 lb), o dispositivo de 15,6 polegadas é muito leve e não possui concorrentes. O fabricante fez uso de materiais muito premium, que, infelizmente, não se sentem muito premium. Além disso, o chassi e a tampa da tela não são particularmente rígidos, dado que o dispositivo tem um peso tão baixo. A tampa da tela é muito fácil de dobrar. No entanto, o Gram 15 está longe de ser um fracasso, especialmente quando se trata da duração da bateria. A bateria grande permite que o dispositivo funcione um dia inteiro com uma única carga.

O Intel Core i5-1035G7 no nosso dispositivo de análise, pode acompanhar facilmente o desempenho do Intel Core i7-8550U antecessor em cargas breves. No entanto, o modelo 2020 do Gram 15 perde para seu antecessor direto no loop contínuo do Cinebench R15 de vários núcleos. No entanto, há algum sentid em olhar para o novo modelo com um chip baseado em Ice Lake, porque oferece um aumento significativo no desempenho da GPU.

O baixo peso é o principal ponto de venda do LG Gram 15; além do mais, o Gram 15 oferece excelente duração da bateria.

O dispositivo de 1.400 euros (US$ 1.582) com o Intel Core i5-1035G7 oferece desempenho suficiente para tarefas de escritório. More performance is always welcome. No entanto, não temos a impressão de que a CPU esteja diminuindo a velocidade do dispositivo. O mesmo pode ser dito do SSD de 512 GB. Felizmente, os usuários podem adicionar mais espaço de armazenamento e RAM após a compra.

Também gostamos da tela brilhante de 15,6 polegadas, calibrada de fábrica. A boa cobertura do espaço de cores completa o pacote, tornando a tela adequada para edição de imagens e vídeos. Os bons dispositivos de entrada combinam bem com o tema geral do LG Gram 15, porque os usuários de ultraportáteis realmente precisam deles. Além disso, o sistema não produz muito ruído sob uso intenso.

Reviewing the LG Gram 15Z90N. Review device provided courtesy of: LG Germany.

The Gram 15Z90N is another entry in LG’s series of ultralight devices. Weighing in at 1.1 kilograms (~2.4 lb), the 15.6-inch device is very light and has no competitors. The manufacturer made use of very premium materials, which, unfortunately, do not feel very premium. Moreover, both the chassis and the display lid are not particularly rigid since the device has such a low weight. The display lid is very easy to bend. Nevertheless, the Gram 15 is far from being a failure, especially when it comes to battery life. The large battery allows the device to run an entire day on a single charge.

The Intel Core i5-1035G7 in our review device can easily keep up with the predecessor’s Intel Core i7-8550U in short workloads. However, the 2020 model of the Gram 15 loses to its direct predecessor in the multi-core Cinebench R15 continuous loop. Nevertheless, there is some point in looking at the new model with an Ice Lake-based chip, because it offers a significant boost in GPU performance.

The low weight is the main selling point of the LG Gram 15; what is more, the Gram 15 offers great battery life.

The 1400-Euro ($1582) device with the Intel Core i5-1035G7 offers enough performance for office tasks. More performance is always welcome. However, we do not get an impression that the CPU is slowing down the device in any way. The same can be said of the 512 GB SSD. Fortunately, users can add more storage space and RAM after the purchase.

We also liked the bright, factory-calibrated 15.6-inch display. The good colour space coverage rounds off the package, making the display suitable for image and video editing. The good input devices fit well with the overall theme of the LG Gram 15, because users of ultraportable laptops really need them. Moreover, the system does not produce much noise under load.

LG Gram 15Z90N - 07/09/2020 v7 ^(old)
Sebastian Bade

Acabamento

77 / 98 → 78%

Teclado

80%

Mouse

83%

Conectividade

61 / 75 → 81%

Peso

74 / 20-75 → 98%

Bateria

89%

Pantalha

84%

Desempenho do jogos

53 / 78 → 68%

Desempenho da aplicação

77 / 85 → 90%

Temperatura

94%

Ruído

95%

Audio

67 / 91 → 73%

Camera

31 / 85 → 36%

Médio

74%

85%

Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil LG Gram 15: Portátil peso pena de 15 polegadas com uma excelente tela

Sebastian Bade, 2020-07-14 (Update: 2021-03-12)

Size Comparison

Display Response Times

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

LG Gram 15Z90N audio analysis

MSI Modern 15 A10RB audio analysis

Pro

Contra

Veredicto - LG Gram 15 2020 como um cavalo de trabalho ultraportável

More articles related to this device

Price comparison