Breve Análise do Portátil LG Gram 15: Portátil peso pena de 15 polegadas com uma excelente tela
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
84.8 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | LG Gram 15Z90N i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.1 kg | 16.8 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.4 % v6 (old) | 08/2018 | LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.1 kg | 17 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
80.1 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 1.6 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
83.8 % v6 (old) | SCHENKER Work 15 i7-8750H, UHD Graphics 630 | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
82.9 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U R5 3580U, Vega 9 | 1.5 kg | 14.7 mm | 15.00" | 2496x1664 | |
82.6 % v6 (old) | SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 2x1 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64BG) | |
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (18.4 - 142, n=13, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64BG) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (22.5 - 207, n=13, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) |
Networking | |
iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B | |
iperf3 receive AX12 | |
Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324) | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B | |
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 |
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 316 cd/m²
Contraste: 1307:1 (Preto: 0.28 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 1.08
ΔE Greyscale 2.4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
96.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.25
LG Gram 15Z90N LP156WF9-SPN1, .2 IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B LP156WF9-SPN1, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Modern 15 A10RB Chi Mei N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER Work 15 LP156WFC-SPP1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U Sharp LQ150P1JX51, IPS, 2496x1664, 15" | SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 Chi Mei CMN15E8, IPS, 2x1, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -1% | -1% | -41% | -0% | -5% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66 | 65.3 -1% | 66 0% | 38.12 -42% | 66.9 1% | 63.7 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 96.4 | 96.2 0% | 92.1 -4% | 57.4 -40% | 99.3 3% | 87.7 -9% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.8 | 66.3 -1% | 66.5 0% | 39.39 -41% | 63.7 -5% | 63.9 -4% |
Response Times | -2% | -38% | -14% | -49% | -6% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36 ? | 34.3 ? 5% | 43.2 ? -20% | 37.2 ? -3% | 47.2 ? -31% | 37 ? -3% |
Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 23.7 ? -8% | 34.4 ? -56% | 27.2 ? -24% | 36.8 ? -67% | 24 ? -9% |
PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 21370 ? | 25000 ? | |||
Screen | -15% | -20% | -72% | 0% | -26% | |
Brightness middle | 366 | 349 -5% | 289.4 -21% | 238 -35% | 416.9 14% | 289 -21% |
Brightness | 342 | 331 -3% | 273 -20% | 235 -31% | 389 14% | 280 -18% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 84 -5% | 82 -7% | 87 -1% | 86 -2% | 87 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.28 | 0.32 -14% | 0.27 4% | 0.14 50% | 0.4 -43% | 0.36 -29% |
Contrast | 1307 | 1091 -17% | 1072 -18% | 1700 30% | 1042 -20% | 803 -39% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.68 | 3.1 -16% | 2.32 13% | 6.1 -128% | 2.75 -3% | 3.93 -47% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.25 | 6.6 -26% | 5.76 -10% | 14.2 -170% | 6.64 -26% | 6.98 -33% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.08 | 1.5 -39% | 2.49 -131% | 4.4 -307% | 0.71 34% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.4 | 3.3 -38% | 3 -25% | 5.2 -117% | 1.8 25% | 3.73 -55% |
Gamma | 2.25 98% | 2.16 102% | 2.22 99% | 2.45 90% | 2.09 105% | 2.42 91% |
CCT | 6474 100% | 6973 93% | 6867 95% | 7469 87% | 6646 98% | 6802 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61 | 61.46 1% | 59.8 -2% | 36.3 -40% | 63.4 4% | 57 -7% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 96 | 96.05 0% | 92 -4% | 57.2 -40% | 99.4 4% | 87 -9% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-10% | -20% /
-19% | -42% /
-59% | -16% /
-6% | -12% /
-19% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12 ms rise | |
↘ 10 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
36 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (33 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=56, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (380 - 439, n=3) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=56, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (1043 - 1630, n=3) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=57, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (153 - 172, n=3) | |
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 | |
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=62, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (539 - 736, n=3) | |
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (771 - 1075, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=60, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=55, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (4091 - 4252, n=3) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=53, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (13921 - 19168, n=3) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U | |
LG Gram 15Z90N |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=56, last 2 years) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 () | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 () |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=55, last 2 years) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 (4.63 - 4.71, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U | |
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average of class Subnotebook (38.5 - 220, n=55, last 2 years) | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 () | |
LG Gram 15Z90N |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7 () | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=55, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (3497 - 3725, n=2) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U | |
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1739 - 4730, n=2, last 2 years) | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Average Intel Core i5-1035G7, Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (4755 - 4772, n=2) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U | |
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B | |
Average of class Subnotebook (1609 - 5271, n=2, last 2 years) |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3497 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5038 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4772 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3906 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N |
* ... smaller is better
LG Gram 15Z90N SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | MSI Modern 15 A10RB WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | SCHENKER Work 15 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Average SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 15% | 8% | -45% | 0% | -17% | |
Write 4K | 177.1 | 208.4 18% | 149.6 -16% | 99 -44% | 187.2 6% | 143.3 ? -19% |
Read 4K | 47.88 | 51 7% | 49.29 3% | 35.63 -26% | 51.8 8% | 45.3 ? -5% |
Write Seq | 2182 | 2687 23% | 1653 -24% | 706 -68% | 1438 -34% | 1514 ? -31% |
Read Seq | 1900 | 2168 14% | 1468 -23% | 1044 -45% | 1347 -29% | 1758 ? -7% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 448.4 | 489.2 9% | 478.2 7% | 326.6 -27% | 396.7 -12% | 425 ? -5% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 470.3 | 600 28% | 561 19% | 270 -43% | 534 14% | 459 ? -2% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2228 | 2699 21% | 3272 47% | 820 -63% | 3280 47% | 1531 ? -31% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3454 | 3374 -2% | 3550 3% | 2028 -41% | 3556 3% | 2895 ? -16% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 1283 | 2067 61% | 918 ? -28% | |||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 1052 | 1064 1% | 819 ? -22% | |||
AS SSD | 7% | 36% | -67% | 23% | -13% | |
Seq Read | 2842 | 2084 -27% | 2716 -4% | 1122 -61% | 2661 -6% | 2266 ? -20% |
Seq Write | 974 | 2442 151% | 2531 160% | 514 -47% | 2426 149% | 1137 ? 17% |
4K Read | 50.5 | 47.52 -6% | 55.9 11% | 34.98 -31% | 59 17% | 43.2 ? -14% |
4K Write | 147.5 | 135.8 -8% | 134.7 -9% | 96.8 -34% | 166 13% | 118.8 ? -19% |
4K-64 Read | 1191 | 1043 -12% | 1183 -1% | 492 -59% | 1314 10% | 819 ? -31% |
4K-64 Write | 1275 | 955 -25% | 2280 79% | 339.9 -73% | 1494 17% | 956 ? -25% |
Access Time Read * | 0.043 | 0.062 -44% | 0.034 21% | 0.056 -30% | 0.046 -7% | 0.04909 ? -14% |
Access Time Write * | 0.027 | 0.076 -181% | 0.028 -4% | 0.11 -307% | 0.023 15% | 0.04845 ? -79% |
Score Read | 1526 | 1299 -15% | 1510 -1% | 639 -58% | 1639 7% | 1089 ? -29% |
Score Write | 1520 | 1335 -12% | 2668 76% | 488 -68% | 1902 25% | 1188 ? -22% |
Score Total | 3741 | 3326 -11% | 4952 32% | 1434 -62% | 4379 17% | 2787 ? -26% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1135 | 1926 70% | 2041 80% | 828 -27% | 1286 ? 13% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 346 | 714 106% | 405.7 17% | 200.5 -42% | 470 ? 36% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 665 | 1425 114% | 1000 50% | 387.4 -42% | 837 ? 26% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11% /
10% | 22% /
24% | -56% /
-59% | 12% /
14% | -15% /
-15% |
* ... smaller is better
Dauerleistung Lesen: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Average of class Subnotebook (968 - 16296, n=52, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (2112 - 4630, n=28) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 | |
SCHENKER Work 15 |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Average of class Subnotebook (5577 - 58319, n=28, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (7024 - 18881, n=24) | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Subnotebook (832 - 11887, n=56, last 2 years) | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U | |
Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) (1418 - 3156, n=27) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
SCHENKER Work 15 | |
LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B |
3DMark 11 Performance | 2736 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 14678 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6616 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1298 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 626 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 48.6 | 25.8 | 21.1 | 7.8 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 54.4 | 29 | 17.5 | 16.4 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 19.5 | 15.3 | 7.89 | 6.28 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 21.5 | 11.4 | 11.3 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.7 / 30.7 / 31.9 dB |
Carga |
| 34 / 34.2 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 38.6 °C / 101 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.3 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28.2 °C / 82.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.1 °C / 0.1 F).
LG Gram 15Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF) | MSI Modern 15 A10RB GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | SCHENKER Work 15 UHD Graphics 630, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U Vega 9, R5 3580U, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Heat | -7% | -29% | -1% | -13% | -6% | |
Maximum Upper Side * | 38 | 43 -13% | 54.2 -43% | 40.2 -6% | 43.6 -15% | 40.3 -6% |
Maximum Bottom * | 38.6 | 41 -6% | 59.4 -54% | 43 -11% | 49.4 -28% | 47.1 -22% |
Idle Upper Side * | 26.5 | 28 -6% | 28 -6% | 24.7 7% | 27.4 -3% | 25 6% |
Idle Bottom * | 26.5 | 27 -2% | 30 -13% | 24.4 8% | 27.8 -5% | 26.4 -0% |
* ... smaller is better
LG Gram 15Z90N audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI Modern 15 A10RB audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (82.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 42% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 48% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 51% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 41% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.24 / 0.88 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.9 / 7.7 / 11.4 Watt |
Carga |
31.5 / 32 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
LG Gram 15Z90N i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), .2 IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix Canvas SC300 512GB M.2 (HFS512G39TNF), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | SCHENKER Work 15 i7-8750H, UHD Graphics 630, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U R5 3580U, Vega 9, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 2496x1664, 15" | SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 500GB, IPS, 2x1, 15.6" | Average Intel Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -18% | -118% | -35% | -15% | -5% | -18% | -41% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.9 | 3.7 -28% | 6.6 -128% | 3.7 -28% | 3.3 -14% | 3.2 -10% | 3.91 ? -35% | 4.54 ? -57% |
Idle Average * | 7.7 | 8.5 -10% | 9.9 -29% | 6.4 17% | 7.1 8% | 6.5 16% | 7.33 ? 5% | 7.75 ? -1% |
Idle Maximum * | 11.4 | 10 12% | 14.7 -29% | 7.1 38% | 7.2 37% | 11.3 1% | 9.16 ? 20% | 9.65 ? 15% |
Load Average * | 31.5 | 36 -14% | 82.9 -163% | 42.5 -35% | 44.8 -42% | 32 -2% | 39.2 ? -24% | 46.7 ? -48% |
Load Maximum * | 32 | 48.7 -52% | 109.3 -242% | 86 -169% | 53 -66% | 42.2 -32% | 49.8 ? -56% | 68.8 ? -115% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 59.4 | 45.1 |
* ... smaller is better
LG Gram 15Z90N i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 80 Wh | LG Gram 15Z980-B.AA78B i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 52 Wh | SCHENKER Work 15 i7-8750H, UHD Graphics 630, 62 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 Ryzen 5 3580U R5 3580U, Vega 9, 45 Wh | SCHENKER Slim 15-RE-E19 i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 36 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 26% | -49% | -43% | -37% | -63% | -5% | |
Reader / Idle | 1536 | 924 -40% | 582 -62% | 1121 -27% | 1599 ? 4% | ||
H.264 | 674 | 950 41% | 350 -48% | 896 ? 33% | |||
WiFi v1.3 | 728 | 805 11% | 388 -47% | 504 -31% | 546 -25% | 268 -63% | 710 ? -2% |
Load | 252 | 101 -60% | 175 -31% | 102 -60% | 116 ? -54% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - LG Gram 15 2020 como um cavalo de trabalho ultraportável
O Gram 15Z90N é outra entrada da série de dispositivos ultraleves da LG. Pesando 1,1 kg (~ 2,4 lb), o dispositivo de 15,6 polegadas é muito leve e não possui concorrentes. O fabricante fez uso de materiais muito premium, que, infelizmente, não se sentem muito premium. Além disso, o chassi e a tampa da tela não são particularmente rígidos, dado que o dispositivo tem um peso tão baixo. A tampa da tela é muito fácil de dobrar. No entanto, o Gram 15 está longe de ser um fracasso, especialmente quando se trata da duração da bateria. A bateria grande permite que o dispositivo funcione um dia inteiro com uma única carga.
O Intel Core i5-1035G7 no nosso dispositivo de análise, pode acompanhar facilmente o desempenho do Intel Core i7-8550U antecessor em cargas breves. No entanto, o modelo 2020 do Gram 15 perde para seu antecessor direto no loop contínuo do Cinebench R15 de vários núcleos. No entanto, há algum sentid em olhar para o novo modelo com um chip baseado em Ice Lake, porque oferece um aumento significativo no desempenho da GPU.
O baixo peso é o principal ponto de venda do LG Gram 15; além do mais, o Gram 15 oferece excelente duração da bateria.
O dispositivo de 1.400 euros (US$ 1.582) com o Intel Core i5-1035G7 oferece desempenho suficiente para tarefas de escritório. More performance is always welcome. No entanto, não temos a impressão de que a CPU esteja diminuindo a velocidade do dispositivo. O mesmo pode ser dito do SSD de 512 GB. Felizmente, os usuários podem adicionar mais espaço de armazenamento e RAM após a compra.
Também gostamos da tela brilhante de 15,6 polegadas, calibrada de fábrica. A boa cobertura do espaço de cores completa o pacote, tornando a tela adequada para edição de imagens e vídeos. Os bons dispositivos de entrada combinam bem com o tema geral do LG Gram 15, porque os usuários de ultraportáteis realmente precisam deles. Além disso, o sistema não produz muito ruído sob uso intenso.
The Gram 15Z90N is another entry in LG’s series of ultralight devices. Weighing in at 1.1 kilograms (~2.4 lb), the 15.6-inch device is very light and has no competitors. The manufacturer made use of very premium materials, which, unfortunately, do not feel very premium. Moreover, both the chassis and the display lid are not particularly rigid since the device has such a low weight. The display lid is very easy to bend. Nevertheless, the Gram 15 is far from being a failure, especially when it comes to battery life. The large battery allows the device to run an entire day on a single charge.
The Intel Core i5-1035G7 in our review device can easily keep up with the predecessor’s Intel Core i7-8550U in short workloads. However, the 2020 model of the Gram 15 loses to its direct predecessor in the multi-core Cinebench R15 continuous loop. Nevertheless, there is some point in looking at the new model with an Ice Lake-based chip, because it offers a significant boost in GPU performance.
The low weight is the main selling point of the LG Gram 15; what is more, the Gram 15 offers great battery life.
The 1400-Euro ($1582) device with the Intel Core i5-1035G7 offers enough performance for office tasks. More performance is always welcome. However, we do not get an impression that the CPU is slowing down the device in any way. The same can be said of the 512 GB SSD. Fortunately, users can add more storage space and RAM after the purchase.
We also liked the bright, factory-calibrated 15.6-inch display. The good colour space coverage rounds off the package, making the display suitable for image and video editing. The good input devices fit well with the overall theme of the LG Gram 15, because users of ultraportable laptops really need them. Moreover, the system does not produce much noise under load.
LG Gram 15Z90N
-
07/09/2020 v7 (old)
Sebastian Bade