Breve Análise do Portátil LG Gram 14Z90N: Leve ao Custo do Desempenho
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
85.3 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | LG Gram 14Z90N i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 994 g | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | 04/2020 | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 18 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
88.9 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.2 kg | 14.8 mm | 13.40" | 1920x1200 | |
85 % v6 (old) | 07/2019 | Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 12 mm | 14.00" | 3840x2160 | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
82 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 14Z90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 14Z90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 microSDXC 64GB) | |
LG Gram 14T90N (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 316.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 960:1 (Preto: 0.33 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 1.74 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.37
ΔE Greyscale 2.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
95.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
LG Gram 14Z90N LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | LG Gram 14T90N LG Philips LP140WFA-SPY1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 LG Philips LP140WF7-SPG1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Sharp LQ134N1, IPS, 13.4", 1920x1200 | Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL B140ZAN01.3, IPS, 14", 3840x2160 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T CEC PA LM140LF-3L03, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -0% | 3% | 21% | 1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65 | 65 0% | 64.7 0% | 66.3 2% | 87.5 35% | 66.7 3% |
sRGB Coverage | 95.5 | 95.7 0% | 94.3 -1% | 97.3 2% | 99.7 4% | 92.3 -3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.1 | 66.7 1% | 66 0% | 68.5 4% | 81.1 23% | 67.5 2% |
Response Times | -24% | 3% | -20% | -27% | 11% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40.4 ? | 54 ? -34% | 36.8 ? 9% | 50 ? -24% | 57.2 ? -42% | 36 ? 11% |
Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 32.8 ? -14% | 30 ? -4% | 33.2 ? -15% | 32 ? -11% | 26 ? 10% |
PWM Frequency | 2500 ? | 44 ? | ||||
Screen | -10% | -26% | 2% | -26% | -72% | |
Brightness middle | 316.8 | 322.2 2% | 333.8 5% | 607.6 92% | 594.5 88% | 253 -20% |
Brightness | 298 | 301 1% | 307 3% | 595 100% | 536 80% | 245 -18% |
Brightness Distribution | 89 | 86 -3% | 83 -7% | 96 8% | 83 -7% | 78 -12% |
Black Level * | 0.33 | 0.25 24% | 0.4 -21% | 0.4 -21% | 0.43 -30% | 0.225 32% |
Contrast | 960 | 1289 34% | 835 -13% | 1519 58% | 1383 44% | 1124 17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 1.74 | 3.62 -108% | 3.54 -103% | 3.23 -86% | 4.87 -180% | 8.89 -411% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.41 | 6.9 -28% | 5.8 -7% | 8.67 -60% | 7.9 -46% | 4.56 16% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.37 | 1.22 11% | 2.36 -72% | 1.01 26% | 2.83 -107% | 4.9 -258% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.7 | 3.9 -44% | 4.7 -74% | 5.5 -104% | 6.7 -148% | 6.33 -134% |
Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.43 91% | 2.14 103% | 2.12 104% | 2.091 105% | 2.52 87% |
CCT | 6655 98% | 6344 102% | 6261 104% | 6413 101% | 6891 94% | 6745 96% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.3 | 61.3 0% | 61.2 0% | 63 3% | 72 17% | 60 -2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 95.4 | 95.6 0% | 94.7 -1% | 97.5 2% | 100 5% | 91 -5% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-10% | -8% /
-18% | -5% /
-1% | -11% /
-17% | -20% /
-48% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise | |
↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 73 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
40.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20.8 ms rise | |
↘ 19.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 60 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 | |
Asus ZenBook 15 UX534FT-DB77 | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (358 - 474, n=31) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API | |
LG Gram 14Z90N | |
Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
LG Gram 14Z90N | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (675 - 1650, n=23) | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (3289 - 4589, n=24) | |
LG Gram 14Z90N | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (948 - 1348, n=18) | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
LG Gram 14Z90N | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2464 - 4855, n=18) | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
LG Gram 14Z90N |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Asus VivoBook 14 X403FA | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (2.2 - 6.38, n=22) | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
MSI Modern 14 A10RB | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-14API | |
Dell Latitude 13 3390 | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
LG Gram 14Z90N |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
LG Gram 14Z90N | |
LG Gram 14T90N | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (46.9 - 85.3, n=19) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
LG Gram 14Z90N | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
Average Intel Core i7-1065G7 (0.661 - 0.798, n=18) | |
LG Gram 14T90N |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3402 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5141 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4231 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 14Z90N |
* ... smaller is better
LG Gram 14Z90N Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | LG Gram 14T90N Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD | Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 20% | -56% | -25% | 19% | |
Seq Read | 1744 | 1829 5% | 476.1 -73% | 1956 12% | 2625 51% |
Seq Write | 1450 | 2048 41% | 487.4 -66% | 1227 -15% | 1360 -6% |
4K Read | 57.4 | 54.2 -6% | 30.57 -47% | 63 10% | 47.71 -17% |
4K Write | 140.9 | 120.5 -14% | 66.1 -53% | 156.6 11% | 115.5 -18% |
4K-64 Read | 907 | 1512 67% | 352.9 -61% | 475.6 -48% | 1492 64% |
4K-64 Write | 1372 | 1573 15% | 263.1 -81% | 539 -61% | 1154 -16% |
Access Time Read * | 0.059 | 0.046 22% | 0.092 -56% | 0.042 29% | 0.045 24% |
Access Time Write * | 0.081 | 0.091 -12% | 0.055 32% | 0.105 -30% | 0.032 60% |
Score Read | 1138 | 1749 54% | 431 -62% | 734 -36% | 1802 58% |
Score Write | 1658 | 1899 15% | 378 -77% | 818 -51% | 1406 -15% |
Score Total | 3380 | 4560 35% | 1040 -69% | 1915 -43% | 4069 20% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1520 | 1891 24% | 514 -66% | 1022 -33% | |
Copy Program MB/s | 539 | 569 6% | 259.3 -52% | 302.8 -44% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 1070 | 1425 33% | 521 -51% | 491.4 -54% | |
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 11% | -67% | 0% | -8% | |
Write 4K | 183.6 | 181.4 -1% | 74.7 -59% | 186.8 2% | 105.3 -43% |
Read 4K | 48.51 | 52.5 8% | 14.89 -69% | 71.4 47% | 40.9 -16% |
Write Seq | 1520 | 1592 5% | 502 -67% | 1203 -21% | 1914 26% |
Read Seq | 1914 | 1617 -16% | 498.6 -74% | 2600 36% | 2224 16% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 529 | 556 5% | 214.3 -59% | 514 -3% | 419.3 -21% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 560 | 539 -4% | 225.5 -60% | 570 2% | 288.1 -49% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1540 | 2955 92% | 505 -67% | 786 -49% | 1954 27% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3408 | 3270 -4% | 560 -84% | 2947 -14% | 3382 -1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
17% | -62% /
-60% | -13% /
-16% | 6% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 3050 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6971 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1363 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 602 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 32.5 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 56.3 | 32.6 | 19 | 17.7 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 22.8 | 11.7 | 11.9 |
LG Gram 14Z90N Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | LG Gram 14T90N UHD Graphics 620, i7-10510U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i7-1065G7, Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD | Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -10% | -5% | -6% | -6% | -9% | |
off / environment * | 28.6 | 29 -1% | 28.2 1% | 28.3 1% | 28.3 1% | 29.8 -4% |
Idle Minimum * | 28.6 | 30 -5% | 28.4 1% | 28.3 1% | 28.3 1% | 28 2% |
Idle Average * | 29.2 | 30 -3% | 28.4 3% | 28.3 3% | 28.3 3% | 28 4% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.2 | 30 -3% | 28.4 3% | 28.3 3% | 31.3 -7% | 28 4% |
Load Average * | 29.2 | 35.2 -21% | 35.7 -22% | 32.5 -11% | 34.3 -17% | 36.8 -26% |
Load Maximum * | 29.5 | 37 -25% | 34.2 -16% | 39.3 -33% | 34.3 -16% | 39 -32% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 39.3 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 28.6 / 29.2 / 29.2 dB |
Carga |
| 29.2 / 29.5 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.6 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (+0.5 °C / 0.9 F).
LG Gram 14Z90N audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 40% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 27% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 66% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.2 / 1.04 Watt |
Ocioso | 2.6 / 5.9 / 8 Watt |
Carga |
29.8 / 39.5 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
LG Gram 14Z90N i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), Intel SSDPEMKF512G8 NVMe SSD, IPS, 1920x1200, 13.4" | Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -4% | -21% | -60% | -27% | -49% | |
Idle Minimum * | 2.6 | 2.9 -12% | 4.2 -62% | 5.2 -100% | 3.6 -38% | 3.5 -35% |
Idle Average * | 5.9 | 5.8 2% | 6.9 -17% | 10.2 -73% | 7.2 -22% | 8.9 -51% |
Idle Maximum * | 8 | 6.2 22% | 7.5 6% | 11.9 -49% | 10.8 -35% | 12.3 -54% |
Load Average * | 29.8 | 32.9 -10% | 33.3 -12% | 42.1 -41% | 38 -28% | 54.2 -82% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 30.9 | 37.1 -20% | 42.4 -37% | |||
Load Maximum * | 39.5 | 48.5 -23% | 48.4 -23% | 53.6 -36% | 45.2 -14% | 52.1 -32% |
* ... smaller is better
LG Gram 14Z90N i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 72 Wh | LG Gram 14T90N i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | LG Gram 14Z980-U.AAW5U1 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9300 Core i7-1065G7 i7-1065G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 52 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad S940-14IWL i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10, 47 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -22% | -19% | -9% | -65% | -51% | |
Reader / Idle | 2735 | 1966 -28% | 2238 -18% | 506 -81% | 1068 -61% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 838 | 751 -10% | 720 -14% | 763 -9% | 299 -64% | 404 -52% |
Load | 211 | 153 -27% | 159 -25% | 103 -51% | 125 -41% |
Pro
Contra
O LG Gram 14Z90N trata apenas de algumas deficiências no Gram 14Z980 do ano passado enquanto ignora o resto. As mudanças bem-vindas incluem o suporte ao Thunderbolt 3, um design de dobradiça mais forte e uma resposta aparentemente mais forte das teclas.
Infelizmente, os principais inconvenientes permanecem, tais como o desempenho sombrio do processador, o brilho médio da tela e a difícil manutenção. Os usuários que podem estar ansiosos para ter uma CPU Core i7 Ice Lake-U só vão encontrar uma pisca do que o processador é capaz quando comparado com máquinas com exatamente a mesma CPU como a Dell XPS 13 9300. Suspeitamos que o fabricante teve que diminuir o desempenho do Core i7 a fim de atender as metas baixas e o potencial de resfriamento limitado. É também decepcionante que a LG não tenha tomado o tempo para aumentar o brilho da luz de fundo porque, por mais leve e portátil que seja o sistema, não é tão bom assim em exteriores onde o brilho se torna predominante.
As principais vantagens do Gram foram, felizmente, transferidas para tornar o pacote geral ainda atraente. As opções super leves, ampla variedade de portas, ventilador silencioso, tela nítida e bem calibrada e duração de bateria extralonga são todas representativas do alto preço pedido de ~$1,500 USD. Se você está procurando por mais poder de CPU e GPU, entretanto, alternativas da Dell, HP, Lenovo ou Asus seriam sua melhor aposta.
Ótimo para tarefas de escritório leves a moderadas, especialmente em movimento. O LG Gram 14 é bastante versátil considerando o peso leve, mas não o sobrecarregue com aplicações exigentes, pois o desempenho da CPU está bem abaixo da média para um Core i7 classe U.
LG Gram 14Z90N
- 05/16/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo