Breve Análise do Portátil LG Gram 13Z980-A (i5-8250U)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| LG Gram 13Z980-A (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US (Toshiba THN-M401S0640E2) | |
| LG Gram 13Z980-A (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| LG Gram 13Z980-A | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| LG Gram 13Z980-A | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 89 %
iluminação com acumulador: 347.8 cd/m²
Contraste: 966:1 (Preto: 0.36 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.37 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 4.21
ΔE Greyscale 2.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.15
| LG Gram 13Z980-A LG LP133WF6-SPC1, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US ID: BOE06E1, Name: NV133FHB-N31, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 SHP1484, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre 13-af033ng AU Optronics AUO422D, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 AU Optronics B139HAN03.0, IPS, 13.9", 1920x1080 | Huawei MateBook X Chi Mei CMN8201 / P130ZDZ-EF1, , 13.3", 2160x1440 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -7% | 2% | -5% | -6% | -2% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.9 | 63.4 -5% | 68.9 3% | 64 -4% | 62.5 -7% | 65.8 -2% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.3 | 88.6 -9% | 96.6 -1% | 90.7 -7% | 91.7 -6% | 96.2 -1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.9 | 64 -6% | 69.6 3% | 65.1 -4% | 64.1 -6% | 66.8 -2% |
| Response Times | -17% | -66% | 21% | -18% | 13% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.6 ? | 41.6 ? -11% | 62.4 ? -66% | 27 ? 28% | 46 ? -22% | 33 ? 12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27.6 ? | 34 ? -23% | 45.6 ? -65% | 24 ? 13% | 31.6 ? -14% | 24 ? 13% |
| PWM Frequency | 210.1 ? | 1008 ? | ||||
| Screen | -10% | -7% | -8% | -54% | 11% | |
| Brightness middle | 347.8 | 510.7 47% | 428 23% | 304 -13% | 297.9 -14% | 408 17% |
| Brightness | 331 | 481 45% | 405 22% | 287 -13% | 278 -16% | 395 19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 89 | 90 1% | 87 -2% | 80 -10% | 81 -9% | 88 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.36 | 0.66 -83% | 0.26 28% | 0.21 42% | 0.44 -22% | 0.45 -25% |
| Contrast | 966 | 774 -20% | 1646 70% | 1448 50% | 677 -30% | 907 -6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.37 | 2.4 -1% | 3.8 -60% | 3.66 -54% | 5.1 -115% | 1.55 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.21 | 7.3 -73% | 7.2 -71% | 5.66 -34% | 11 -161% | 2.19 48% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.21 | |||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.5 | 2.4 4% | 4.4 -76% | 3.51 -40% | 6.7 -168% | 1.91 24% |
| Gamma | 2.15 102% | 2.23 99% | 2.21 100% | 2.55 86% | 2.9 76% | 2.34 94% |
| CCT | 6384 102% | 6747 96% | 7067 92% | 6955 93% | 6839 95% | 6491 100% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62.5 | 57 -9% | 62.8 0% | 59 -6% | 64.1 3% | 61 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 88.1 -9% | 96.4 -1% | 91 -6% | 91.7 -5% | 96 -1% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -11% /
-10% | -24% /
-13% | 3% /
-4% | -26% /
-39% | 7% /
9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.8 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 67 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8719 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| HP Spectre 13-af033ng | |
| LG Gram 13Z980-A | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| LG Gram 13Z980-A | |
| HP Spectre 13-af033ng | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
| HP Spectre 13-af033ng | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| LG Gram 13Z980-A | |
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US | |
| LG Gram 13Z980-A | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3241 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3308 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4592 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3381 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| LG Gram 13Z980-A SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | HP Spectre 13-af033ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 28% | 8% | 180% | 72% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 191.7 | 186.8 -3% | 381.2 99% | 319.2 67% | 225.9 18% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 127.6 | 213 67% | 337.8 165% | 463.3 263% | 156.4 23% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 204.5 | 335.9 64% | 695 240% | 1341 556% | 297.8 46% |
| Score Total | 997 | 1057 6% | 1879 88% | 2536 154% | 2266 127% |
| Score Write | 316 | 350 11% | 105 -67% | 608 92% | 360 14% |
| Score Read | 453 | 463 2% | 1201 165% | 1316 191% | 1293 185% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.235 | 0.053 77% | 2.294 -876% | 0.028 88% | 0.034 86% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.084 | 0.066 21% | 0.073 13% | 0.044 48% | 0.069 18% |
| 4K-64 Write | 231.3 | 223.8 -3% | 69.7 -70% | 391.3 69% | 223.7 -3% |
| 4K-64 Read | 376.7 | 379.4 1% | 1020 171% | 1039 176% | 1122 198% |
| 4K Write | 61 | 79.2 30% | 1.07 -98% | 128.1 110% | 107.7 77% |
| 4K Read | 27.16 | 31.24 15% | 45.86 69% | 48.46 78% | 38.11 40% |
| Seq Write | 241.7 | 466 93% | 337.5 40% | 885 266% | 282.6 17% |
| Seq Read | 496.4 | 520 5% | 1351 172% | 2282 360% | 1332 168% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| LG Gram 13Z980-A | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| Huawei Matebook E | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| LG Gram 13Z980-A | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| Huawei Matebook E | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| LG Gram 13Z980-A | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| LG Gram 13Z980-A | |
| Dell Latitude 7390 | |
| HP 250 G6 2UB93ES | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| HP Envy 17-ae143ng | |
| HP Envy x360 15-bq102ng | |
| LG Gram 13Z980-A | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad 25 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1965 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 59410 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7325 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1014 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 63 | 35 | 29.2 | 9.7 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 21.5 | 13.5 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.1 / 28.1 / 28.1 dB |
| Carga |
| 34.3 / 34.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.1 dB(A) | ||
| LG Gram 13Z980-A UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | HP Spectre 13-af033ng UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 GeForce 940MX, 6200U, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -1% | -3% | -3% | -2% | -13% | |
| off / environment * | 28.1 | 28.4 -1% | 29.1 -4% | 30.13 -7% | 28 -0% | 31.15 -11% |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.1 | 28.4 -1% | 29.1 -4% | 30.13 -7% | 28 -0% | 31.15 -11% |
| Idle Average * | 28.1 | 28.4 -1% | 29.1 -4% | 30.13 -7% | 28.8 -2% | 31.15 -11% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.1 | 28.4 -1% | 29.1 -4% | 30.13 -7% | 30.3 -8% | 31.15 -11% |
| Load Average * | 34.3 | 33.2 3% | 32.2 6% | 31.5 8% | 34.5 -1% | 38.2 -11% |
| Load Maximum * | 34.3 | 35.2 -3% | 37.3 -9% | 33.5 2% | 34.3 -0% | 41.7 -22% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.4 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25 °C / 77 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (+3.8 °C / 6.8 F).
LG Gram 13Z980-A audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.7 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 9% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 72% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 22% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.19 / 0.47 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.9 / 7.3 / 7.4 Watt |
| Carga |
36.1 / 35.8 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| LG Gram 13Z980-A i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung CM871a MZNTY256HDHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-af033ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.9" | Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) 5350U, HD Graphics 6000, Apple SSD SM0128G, TN LED, 1440x900, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -21% | 4% | 5% | 8% | 5% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.9 | 3.8 3% | 3.14 19% | 2.8 28% | 3.1 21% | 3.4 13% |
| Idle Average * | 7.3 | 11 -51% | 5.22 28% | 6.2 15% | 6.6 10% | 6.3 14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.4 | 11.3 -53% | 6 19% | 9.4 -27% | 7 5% | 7 5% |
| Load Average * | 36.1 | 35.6 1% | 38.5 -7% | 32.2 11% | 35.2 2% | 34.5 4% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.8 | 37.2 -4% | 50.4 -41% | 36.6 -2% | 34.6 3% | 40 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
| LG Gram 13Z980-A i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N-K01US i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 30 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9370 FHD i5 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | HP Spectre 13-af033ng i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 43 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 920-13IKB-80Y7 i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 70 Wh | Apple MacBook Air 13.3" 1.8 GHz (2017) 5350U, HD Graphics 6000, 54 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -61% | -11% | -51% | -5% | -12% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 724 | 279 -61% | 644 -11% | 352 -51% | 685 -5% | 638 -12% |
| Reader / Idle | 695 | 1417 | 1655 | |||
| Load | 60 | 119 | 104 | 140 |
Pro
Contra
O Gram 13 exibe conjuntos únicos de vantagens e desvantagens em comparação com outros portáteis. No lado positivo, sua tela é mais precisa do que muitos outros Ultrabooks e a duração da bateria é surpreendentemente longa. Este último aspecto é particularmente notável, já que alternativas mais pesadas, como o XPS 13 ou o Spectre 13, possuem tempos de duração comparativamente mais curtos. Em contraste com o Samsung NP900X3N, o LG é a prova de que a duração da bateria não tem que sofrer quando se pretende um design super leve.
Os principais pontos negativos do sistema são difíceis de ignorar quando colocados ao lado da lista de pontos positivos. A tampa é muito frágil e flexível, especialmente para uma tela táctil, e as variações muito limitadas nos SKUs fazem com que o Gram 13 se sinta menos capaz do que os Ultrabooks mais populares. O XPS 13, Samsung NP900X3N, e Spectre 13, por exemplo, contam com Intel iris ou 4K, gráficos GeForce MX150, e opções Thunderbolt 3, respectivamente, algo que não encontramos no Gram 13. É uma experiência mais barebone com o LG, já que os usuários estão sacrificando o desempenho e os recursos em nome da portabilidade e do peso.
Outros atributos importantes, como a rigidez do chassi, a resposta do teclado e do trackpad e o brilho da tela, são apenas médios, se não um pouco abaixo dos concorrentes populares. Embora o Gram 13 seja muito leve, não é o melhor companheiro ao ar livre, já que há Ultrabooks mais brilhantes e inflexíveis por aí, nessa faixa de preços.
Se a visibilidade ao ar livre é primordial, o Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X3N é a opção mais brilhante ao pesar menos que o LG. Seu peso leve, longa duração da bateria e slots M.2 duplos são os principais atributos que o Gram 13 tem sobre a maior parte de sua concorrência. Caso contrário, o sistema estéril não oferece nada atraente ou indispensável para o alto preço inicial de $1.200.
LG Gram 13Z980-A
- 04/13/2018 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
