Breve Análise do Portátil Jumper Tech EZbook X3 Air: Design atraente e preço razoável

Name: Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air
Brand: Jumper

Celeron resfriado passivamente.

O Jumper EZbook X3 Air é baseado em modelos muito mais caros com sua construção plana e design fino. A carcaça de metal oferece uma impressão robusta e de alta qualidade. O teste mostrará o que o hardware pode alcançar em um dispositivo por cerca de 350 Euros (~$ 410).

Mike Wobker (traduzido por Notebookcheck), Published 10/20/2020 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Windows Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of Jumper

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air

Processador

Intel Celeron N4100 4 x 1.1 - 2.4 GHz, Gemini Lake

Placa gráfica

Intel UHD Graphics 600

Memória

8 GB

, Dual-Channel

Pantalha

13.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, Sharp SHP1447, IPSJ390, Brilhante: sim

placa mãe

Gemini Lake

Disco rígido

128 GB NVMe, 128 GB

, 90 GB livre

Placa de Som

Intel Gemini Lake SoC - High Definition Audio Controller

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: 3,5-mm-Klinkenanschluss, Card Reader: microSD

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 11 x 305 x 198

Bateria

4250 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 0.9 MP, 16:9 (1280x720)

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Estéreo, Teclado: chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, 12 Meses Garantia, fanless

peso

1.1 kg, Suprimento de energia: 170 g

Preço

300 Euro

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Rating	Date	Model	Weight	Height	Size	Resolution
79.4 % v7 ^(old)	10/2020	Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600	1.1 kg	11 mm	13.30"	1920x1080
69.1 % v7 ^(old)		Chuwi Hi10 X Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600	600 g	8.8 mm	10.10"	1920x1200
74.9 % v7 ^(old)		BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600	1 kg	14.4 mm	11.60"	1920x1080
73.3 % v6 ^(old)	10/2018	Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600	2 kg	23 mm	15.60"	1366x768

Size comparison

Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Chuwi Hi10 X DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	25.6 MB/s
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	24.55 MB/s
Chuwi Hi10 X (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	23.9 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	26.9 MB/s +1%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air	26.7 MB/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26.32 MB/s -1%
Chuwi Hi10 X (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II)	26.2 MB/s -2%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Chuwi Hi10 X Wireless AC-9461	346 (309^min - 369^max) MBit/s +10%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	335 (328^min - 344^max) MBit/s +7%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	314 (234^min - 398^max) MBit/s
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	298 MBit/s -5%
Average Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (48 - 346, n=71)	280 MBit/s -11%
iperf3 receive AX12
Chuwi Hi10 X Wireless AC-9461	367 (359^min - 373^max) MBit/s +17%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	344 MBit/s +10%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	322 (313^min - 327^max) MBit/s +3%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	314 (268^min - 325^max) MBit/s
Average Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165 (54 - 360, n=71)	304 MBit/s -3%

Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø313 (268-325)

Chuwi Hi10 X Wireless AC-9461; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø367 (359-373)

BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø322 (313-327)

Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø314 (234-398)

Chuwi Hi10 X Wireless AC-9461; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø346 (309-369)

BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø335 (328-344)

ColorChecker Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air: 19.52 ∆E min: 5.66 - max: 30.6 ∆E


337 cd/m²	342 cd/m²	341 cd/m²
325 cd/m²	355 cd/m²	329 cd/m²
318 cd/m²	312 cd/m²	314 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

Sharp SHP1447 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 355 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 330.3 cd/m² Minimum: 10 cd/m²
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 355 cd/m²
Contraste: 1291:1 (Preto: 0.275 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.92 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.55 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
96% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.6% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.06

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Sharp SHP1447, IPSJ390, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Chuwi Hi10 X AU Optronics AUO17D8, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 LC116LF3L01, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6"	Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM NT156WHM-N42, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"
Display		2%	-4%	-45%
Display P3 Coverage	65.5	67.9 4%	62.4 -5%	35.95 -45%
sRGB Coverage	95.6	96.8 1%	93.4 -2%	53.9 -44%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	67.4	68.9 2%	64.2 -5%	37.14 -45%
Response Times		21%	2636%	105%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	41 ?(21, 20)	30.4 ?(18.8, 11.6) 26%	36.1 ?(16.9, 19.2) 12%	38.4 ?(18.8, 19.6) 6%
Response Time Black / White *	29 ?(16, 13)	24.4 ?(12.4, 12) 16%	30.4 ?(16.8, 14.6) -5%	13.6 ?(8.4, 5.2) 53%
PWM Frequency	250 ?(10)		20000 ?(25) 7900%	893 ?(99) 257%
Screen		-34%	-22%	-56%
Brightness middle	355	256.3 -28%	258 -27%	212.7 -40%
Brightness	330	255 -23%	248 -25%	203 -38%
Brightness Distribution	88	93 6%	94 7%	82 -7%
Black Level *	0.275	0.41 -49%	0.26 5%	0.52 -89%
Contrast	1291	625 -52%	992 -23%	409 -68%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	5.92	10.04 -70%	7.1 -20%	8.75 -48%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	10.41	17.49 -68%	14.8 -42%	23.6 -127%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	6.55	10.4 -59%	9.6 -47%	10.1 -54%
Gamma	2.06 ^107%	2.23 ^99%	2.148 ^102%	2.14 ^103%
CCT	7661 ^85%	10211 ^64%	10313 ^63%	10452 ^62%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	61	63 3%		34.1 -44%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	96	96.7 1%		53.6 -44%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		2.17	1.3	4.92
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-4% / -19%	870% / 552%	1% / -24%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 16 ms rise
29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 13 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 21 ms rise
41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 20 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

250 Hz

≤ 10 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 250 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 10 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 250 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100, Intel Celeron N4100: Ø209 (208-211.45)

Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100, Intel Celeron N4100: Ø170.4 (168.8-171.36)

BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100, Intel Celeron N4100: Ø178.2 (171.97-187.94)

Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM Intel Celeron N4100, Intel Celeron N4100: Ø172.4 (168.92-174.97)

Cinebench R20: CPU (Single Core) | CPU (Multi Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core)
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100	153 Points +1%
Average Intel Celeron N4100 (151 - 155, n=7)	152.6 Points 0%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100	152 Points 0%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100	152 Points

Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core)
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100	451 Points
Average Intel Celeron N4100 (368 - 560, n=7)	440 Points -2%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100	391 Points -13%
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100	378 Points -16%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100	68.8 Points +1%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100	68.4 Points
Average Intel Celeron N4100 (62 - 71, n=12)	68.1 Points 0%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM Intel Celeron N4100	68 Points -1%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100	66.3 Points -3%

Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100	211 (208^min - 211.45^max) Points
Average Intel Celeron N4100 (161 - 254, n=12)	206 Points -2%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100	188 (171.97^min - 187.94^max) Points -11%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM Intel Celeron N4100	175 Points -17%
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100	171 (168.8^min - 171.36^max) Points -19%

Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100	3436 Seconds * -23%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100	3176 Seconds * -13%
Average Intel Celeron N4100 (2437 - 3527, n=7)	3032 Seconds * -8%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100	2801 Seconds *

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1
Average Intel Celeron N4100 (2125 - 2459, n=7)	2209 MIPS +3%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100	2155 MIPS
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100	2150 MIPS 0%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100	2125 MIPS -1%

7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100	6873 MIPS
Average Intel Celeron N4100 (5620 - 7835, n=7)	6674 MIPS -3%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100	6048 MIPS -12%
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100	5620 MIPS -18%

Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100	409 Points +1%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100	404 Points
Average Intel Celeron N4100 (378 - 414, n=7)	403 Points 0%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100	400 Points -1%

Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100	1407 Points
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100	1271 Points -10%
Average Intel Celeron N4100 (1082 - 1419, n=7)	1267 Points -10%
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100	1082 Points -23%

HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100	1.24 fps
Average Intel Celeron N4100 (0.974 - 1.5, n=6)	1.211 fps -2%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100	1.11 fps -10%
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100	1.03 fps -17%

LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100	172 s * -11%
Average Intel Celeron N4100 (155 - 178, n=5)	164.8 s * -6%
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100	161 s * -4%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100	155 s *

R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean
Average Intel Celeron N4100 (1.75 - 1.786, n=5)	1.761 sec * -0%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100	1.759 sec * -0%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100	1.756 sec *
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100	1.75 sec * -0%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

211 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

17.3 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

97.8 %

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

68.4 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Multi Core)

451 Points

Cinebench R20 CPU (Single Core)

152 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600 (1670 - 2259, n=12)	1912 Points 0%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, 128 GB NVMe	1910 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, BMSC51A3500F4SA	1872 Points -2%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, FORESEE 256GB	1864 Points -2%
Chuwi Hi10 X UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, SanDisk DF4128	1670 Points -13%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, 128 GB NVMe	2920 Points
Average Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600 (2590 - 3191, n=9)	2895 Points -1%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, FORESEE 256GB	2838 Points -3%
Chuwi Hi10 X UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, SanDisk DF4128	2738 Points -6%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		1910 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		2920 pontos
Ajuda

DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, FORESEE 256GB	2142 μs * -112%
Chuwi Hi10 X UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, SanDisk DF4128	1981 μs * -96%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air UHD Graphics 600, Celeron N4100, 128 GB NVMe	1010 μs *

* ... smaller is better

	Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air 128 GB NVMe	Chuwi Hi10 X SanDisk DF4128	BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 FORESEE 256GB	Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM BMSC51A3500F4SA	Average 128 GB NVMe
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-60%		6%	0%
Write 4K	54.2	12.85 -76%		66.1 22%	54.2 ?() 0%
Read 4K	9.892	10.02 1%		8.937 -10%	9.89 ?() 0%
Write Seq	391.3	120.8 -69%		385.3 -2%	391 ?() 0%
Read Seq	403.6	259.7 -36%		429.1 6%	404 ?() 0%
Write 4K Q32T1	122.3	15.17 -88%		106.8 -13%	122.3 ?() 0%
Read 4K Q32T1	96.1	33.09 -66%		130.7 36%	96.1 ?() 0%
Write Seq Q32T1	464.3	108.8 -77%		478.2 3%	464 ?() 0%
Read Seq Q32T1	539	180.1 -67%		550 2%	539 ?() 0%
AS SSD		-78%	-1%	24%	0%
Seq Read	469.7	258.5 -45%	476 1%	440.9 -6%	470 ?() 0%
Seq Write	422.9	120.8 -71%	445 5%	426.1 1%	423 ?() 0%
4K Read	18.01	5.94 -67%	20.03 11%	14.99 -17%	18 ?() 0%
4K Write	40.29	12.4 -69%	39.11 -3%	52.1 29%	40.3 ?() 0%
4K-64 Read	94.5	25.96 -73%	113.4 20%	168.2 78%	94.5 ?() 0%
4K-64 Write	194.6	10.16 -95%	205.1 5%	217.8 12%	194.6 ?() 0%
Access Time Read *	0.437	0.597 -37%	0.794 -82%	0.111 75%	0.437 ?() -0%
Access Time Write *	0.41	1.105 -170%	0.383 7%	0.355 13%	0.41 ?() -0%
Score Read	159	58 -64%	181 14%	227 43%	159 ?() 0%
Score Write	277	35 -87%	289 4%	313 13%	277 ?() 0%
Score Total	523	117 -78%	569 9%	660 26%	523 ?() 0%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-69% / -70%	-1% / -1%	15% / 16%	0% / 0%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

DiskSpd

128 GB NVMe

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 539 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 464.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 96.1 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 122.3 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 403.6 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 391.3 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 9.892 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 54.2 MB/s

Continuous read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8

No graph data

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100	603 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600 (410 - 854, n=27)	558 Points -7%
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100	477 Points -21%
Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100	462 Points -23%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100	461 Points -24%

3DMark
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100	486 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600 (307 - 637, n=21)	421 Points -13%
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100	357 Points -27%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100	348 Points -28%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100	123 Points
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600 (85 - 124, n=12)	107.5 Points -13%
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100	94 Points -24%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel UHD Graphics 600, Intel Celeron N4100	91 Points -26%

3DMark 11 Performance		674 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		451 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		141 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Dota 2 Reborn | X-Plane 11.11 | Final Fantasy XV Benchmark

Dota 2 Reborn
1280x720 min (0/3) fastest
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600 (15.5 - 42.9, n=19)	33 fps +6%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600	31 (27^min) fps
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600	19.1 (17.6^min) fps -38%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600	18.3 (16.6^min) fps -41%
1366x768 med (1/3)
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600	15.8 (10.8^min) fps
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600 (6.9 - 20.8, n=19)	14.9 fps -6%
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600	12.4 (9.3^min) fps -22%
BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600	11.9 (9.7^min) fps -25%

X-Plane 11.11 - 1280x720 low (fps_test=1)
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600	7.09 fps
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600 (3.94 - 8.89, n=18)	6.78 fps -4%
Chuwi Hi10 X Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600	3.94 fps -44%

Final Fantasy XV Benchmark - 1280x720 Lite Quality
Average Intel UHD Graphics 600 (2.9 - 5.49, n=9)	4.43 fps +11%
Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Intel Celeron N4100, Intel UHD Graphics 600	4 fps

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	31	15.8	7.7	7.1
Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018)	4
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	7.09	5	4.53

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


37.1 °C	41.6 °C	30.6 °C
33.7 °C	37 °C	29.2 °C
31.2 °C	30.4 °C	28.8 °C

Máximo: 41.6 °C
Médio: 33.3 °C


31.8 °C	39.4 °C	37.9 °C
29.8 °C	34.1 °C	34.2 °C
29.4 °C	31.8 °C	32.2 °C

Máximo: 39.4 °C
Médio: 33.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 39.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24.2 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 29.8 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Netbook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 33.1 °C / 92 F, ranging from 21.6 to 53.2 °C for the class Netbook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.7 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.8 °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 29.3 °C / 84.7 F (-1.9 °C / -3.5 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 24.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 29% of all tested devices in this class were better, 14% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 14%, average was 25%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 42% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 51% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.5 / 0.45 Watt
Ocioso	3.4 / 6.9 / 7.4 Watt
Carga	17 / 18.5 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 128 GB NVMe, IPSJ390, 1920x1080, 13.3"	Chuwi Hi10 X Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, SanDisk DF4128, IPS, 1920x1200, 10.1"	BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, FORESEE 256GB, IPS, 1920x1080, 11.6"	Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, BMSC51A3500F4SA, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6"	Average Intel UHD Graphics 600
Power Consumption		10%	-11%	17%	8%
Idle Minimum *	3.4	3.7 -9%	4.1 -21%	3 12%	3.47 ?(1.9 - 7.1, n=27) -2%
Idle Average *	6.9	6.3 9%	7.7 -12%	5.7 17%	5.61 ?(1.9 - 9.6, n=27) 19%
Idle Maximum *	7.4	6.7 9%	9 -22%	7.5 -1%	6.6 ?(2.9 - 10.4, n=27) 11%
Load Average *	17	14 18%	14.5 15%	12.6 26%	13.6 ?(7.8 - 19.1, n=27) 20%
Load Maximum *	18.5	14.5 22%	21 -14%	13.1 29%	20.2 ?(9.5 - 27.8, n=27) -9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria


WiFi Websurfing		7h 21min

	Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, Wh	Chuwi Hi10 X Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 24 Wh	BMAX MaxBook Y11 H1M6 Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 26.6 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 330-15IGM Celeron N4100, UHD Graphics 600, 30 Wh	Average of class Netbook
Battery Runtime
WiFi v1.3	441	336 -24%	248 -44%	328 -26%

Pro

+ Carcaça estável

+ Slot de expansão de fácil acesso

+ Tela brilhante

+ Touchpad grande

+ Operação silenciosa

Contra

- Tela altamente refletiva

- O desempenho é suficiente apenas para aplicativos simples

- Teclado disponível apenas com layout QWERTY

Veredicto - Hardware simples em um chassi robusto

In review: Jumper EZbook X3 Air. Test device provided by: Jumper Tech

Antes de comprar o Jumper EZbook X3 Air, os compradores devem considerar cuidadosamente a aplicação para a qual o portátil se destina. Se apenas usará programas simples de escritório e navegador da Internet para trabalhos ocasionais, o pequeno portátil fará um bom trabalho. Componentes como WLAN, SSD e tela cumprem suas tarefas de forma confiável, sendo que o último também oferece bom brilho. Além disso, a carcaça parece de alta qualidade e oferece um slot de fácil acesso para expansão de memória.

O Jumper EZbook X3 Air é um portátil acessível com energia suficiente para tarefas simples.

Além do desempenho suficiente para tarefas simples, os usuários também devem conviver com a superfície da tela altamente refletiva. Como resultado, o portátil dificilmente pode ser usado em exteriores e mesmo em salas fechadas, por exemplo, fontes de luz artificial são refletidas. O layout QWERTY do teclado também pode não ser confortável para todos os usuários.

Jumper EZbook X3 Air na Gearbest

Jumper Tech Ez Book X3 Air - 10/08/2020 v7 ^(old)
Mike Wobker

Acabamento

78 / 98 → 80%

Teclado

69%

Mouse

87%

Conectividade

39 / 80 → 48%

Peso

74 / 35-78 → 90%

Bateria

76%

Pantalha

80%

Desempenho do jogos

21 / 68 → 30%

Desempenho da aplicação

60 / 87 → 69%

Temperatura

93 / 91 → 100%

Ruído

100%

Audio

69 / 91 → 76%

Camera

26 / 85 → 31%

Médio

67%

79%

Netbook - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 459232 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008

contact me via: Facebook

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Jumper Tech EZbook X3 Air: Design atraente e preço razoável

Mike Wobker, 2020-10-20 (Update: 2020-10-21)