Breve Análise do Portátil Huawei MateBook X Pro (i7-8550U, MX150)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
|
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 550 cd/m²
Contraste: 1719:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.28 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 0.8
ΔE Greyscale 3.27 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
98% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.35
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 JDI LPM139M422A, , 3000x2000, 13.9" | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA AUO383D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD ID: Sharp SHP148B, Name: LQ133D1, Dell P/N: 8XDHY, , 3840x2160, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T Chi Mei CMN14D2 / N140HCE-EN1, , 1920x1080, 14" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 Tianma XM, , 3000x2000, 13.9" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -8% | 3% | 0% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 65.8 | 61.3 -7% | 68.9 5% | 65.6 0% | 65.9 0% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.7 | 87.6 -10% | 98.4 1% | 97.4 0% | 95.2 -3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.5 | 62.3 -8% | 69.5 3% | 67.8 0% | 67.6 0% |
Response Times | 9% | -71% | 15% | 1% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 42 ? | 35 ? 17% | 69.6 ? -66% | 30 ? 29% | 40.4 ? 4% |
Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 25 ? -0% | 44 ? -76% | 25 ? -0% | 25.6 ? -2% |
PWM Frequency | 3759 ? | ||||
Screen | -20% | -26% | -61% | -33% | |
Brightness middle | 550 | 421 -23% | 478.5 -13% | 377 -31% | 442.7 -20% |
Brightness | 512 | 398 -22% | 466 -9% | 339 -34% | 428 -16% |
Brightness Distribution | 88 | 86 -2% | 86 -2% | 76 -14% | 84 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.27 16% | 0.43 -34% | 0.4 -25% | 0.31 3% |
Contrast | 1719 | 1559 -9% | 1113 -35% | 943 -45% | 1428 -17% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.28 | 4.08 -79% | 3.09 -36% | 3.33 -46% | 2.24 2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.36 | 7.48 -72% | 5.94 -36% | 8.02 -84% | 7.19 -65% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 0.8 | 2.06 -158% | 3.5 -338% | 1.11 -39% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.27 | 2.92 11% | 2.4 27% | 4.89 -50% | 9.7 -197% |
Gamma | 2.35 94% | 2.32 95% | 2.063 107% | 2.37 93% | 1.42 155% |
CCT | 6819 95% | 7043 92% | 6883 94% | 7620 85% | 6227 104% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 57 -8% | 69.47 12% | 62 0% | 61.6 -1% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 98 | 87 -11% | 98.36 0% | 98 0% | 95 -3% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
-14% | -31% /
-26% | -15% /
-40% | -11% /
-22% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3183 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4417 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3546 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A | Average Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G | |
---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -14% | -35% | 17% | |
Read Seq | 1317 | 1549 18% | 480.3 -64% | 1641 ? 25% |
Write Seq | 459.9 | 269.7 -41% | 263.9 -43% | 591 ? 29% |
Read 512 | 628 | 823 31% | 266.9 -57% | 779 ? 24% |
Write 512 | 461.4 | 298.1 -35% | 263.2 -43% | 558 ? 21% |
Read 4k | 33.79 | 24.9 -26% | 29.58 -12% | 29.9 ? -12% |
Write 4k | 117.5 | 97.1 -17% | 68.4 -42% | 106.6 ? -9% |
Read 4k QD32 | 360 | 310.6 -14% | 322.2 -10% | 402 ? 12% |
Write 4k QD32 | 273.6 | 208.4 -24% | 243.3 -11% | 401 ? 47% |
3DMark 11 Performance | 3783 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 12193 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2568 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (98.1 - 203, n=33) | |
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA | |
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
1366x768 Medium Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (60 - 115, n=33) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
1366x768 High Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (59.7 - 98, n=33) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (27.8 - 35.2, n=33) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 | |
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA | |
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (41.6 - 86, n=28) | |
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA | |
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (28.2 - 60, n=29) | |
Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (14.8 - 27, n=28) | |
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (14.8 - 26, n=23) |
Thief | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (16 - 23.2, n=6) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
1366x768 High Preset AA:FXAA & Low SS AF:4x | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (30.2 - 44.1, n=6) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
1366x768 Normal Preset AA:FX | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (32.5 - 51.9, n=6) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 | |
1024x768 Very Low Preset | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (41.5 - 79.2, n=6) | |
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 161 | 92 | 76 | 28 |
Thief (2014) | 47 | 36 | 32 | 17 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 86 | 60 | 27 | 26 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 31.3 dB |
Carga |
| 39.3 / 41.2 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.5 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.1 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (33.5 °C / 92.3 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-5.2 °C / -9.4 F).
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 59% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 23% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 72% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.7 / 0.7 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.7 / 8.7 / 9.8 Watt |
Carga |
39.4 / 40.4 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, LTPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, IPS, 3840x2160, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, SK Hynix HFS256G39TND-N210A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.9" | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 2% | -6% | -9% | -14% | -16% | -14% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.7 | 4.9 -4% | 5 -6% | 4.5 4% | 3.5 26% | 4.48 ? 5% | 4.49 ? 4% |
Idle Average * | 8.7 | 8.1 7% | 8.3 5% | 7.8 10% | 8.9 -2% | 7.88 ? 9% | 7.66 ? 12% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.8 | 10.6 -8% | 8.8 10% | 8.1 17% | 12.3 -26% | 9.76 ? -0% | 9.56 ? 2% |
Load Average * | 39.4 | 32.2 18% | 46.4 -18% | 52 -32% | 54.2 -38% | 54.7 ? -39% | 46.6 ? -18% |
Load Maximum * | 40.4 | 42.3 -5% | 48.6 -20% | 59 -46% | 52.1 -29% | 63.5 ? -57% | 68.6 ? -70% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 42.4 |
* ... smaller is better
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 57 Wh | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, 50 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9370 i7 UHD i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX3430UN-GV174T i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 48 Wh | Huawei Matebook X Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 57.4 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -35% | -23% | -6% | 1% | 22% | |
Reader / Idle | 1160 | 639 -45% | 819 -29% | 1367 18% | 1243 7% | 1750 ? 51% |
WiFi v1.3 | 506 | 394 -22% | 465 -8% | 485 -4% | 557 10% | 719 ? 42% |
Load | 157 | 95 -39% | 109 -31% | 108 -31% | 133 -15% | 116.6 ? -26% |
H.264 | 426 | 505 | 896 ? |
Pro
Contra
O Huawei MateBook X Pro apresenta-se como um portátil de alto desempenho com um sistema fluente e uma tela com cores intensas. Em comparação com dispositivos equipados de forma similar, notamos que o desempenho do processador não pode superar o do Intel Core i5-8250U mais barato e que o desempenho da GPU também está abaixo da média. Portanto, o preço mais alto do processador supostamente mais rápido não é realmente justificado.
O Huawei MateBook X Pro oferece um bom desempenho do sistema e um ótimo design por um preço moderado. Mas um sistema de resfriamento melhor teria permitido um desempenho ainda melhor.
Além desta fraqueza, os compradores podem desfrutar de excelentes durações de bateria e um portátil que é adequado para jogos moderados. O dispositivo Huawei também lida bem com programas de escritório mais exigentes, enquanto o SSD de 512 GB deve oferecer espaço suficiente para seus dados.
Huawei MateBook X Pro, i7
- 08/20/2018 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker