Breve Análise do Portátil Huawei MateBook D 53010BAJ (8250U, MX150)
| SD Card Reader | |
| maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 265.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 857:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 3.94
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60.92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.24% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.24% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.96% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.7
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ AU Optronics B156HW02, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX BOE070C, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 BOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB LG Philips LGD0573 LP156WF9-SPK2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng AU Optronics, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Sharp SHP149A LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 BOE0747 NV156FHM-N61, IPS LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 2% | -3% | -6% | -9% | 59% | 52% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.96 | 41.79 2% | 39.86 -3% | 38.62 -6% | 37.28 -9% | 66 61% | 66.5 62% |
| sRGB Coverage | 60.9 | 61.5 1% | 58.7 -4% | 58.1 -5% | 56.1 -8% | 96.5 58% | 86.9 43% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 42.24 | 43.17 2% | 41.18 -3% | 39.91 -6% | 38.51 -9% | 66.7 58% | 63.5 50% |
| Response Times | -31% | -17% | -6% | 14% | -23% | -28% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 36.4 ? | 46.4 ? -27% | 42 ? -15% | 42 ? -15% | 45 ? -24% | 49 ? -35% | 47.9 ? -32% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27.2 ? | 36.8 ? -35% | 32 ? -18% | 26 ? 4% | 13 ? 52% | 30 ? -10% | 33.7 ? -24% |
| PWM Frequency | 21190 | 21000 ? | 961 ? | 21800 ? | |||
| Screen | -7% | 11% | 9% | -39% | 45% | 23% | |
| Brightness middle | 265.7 | 268 1% | 248 -7% | 270 2% | 234 -12% | 413 55% | 296 11% |
| Brightness | 258 | 258 0% | 237 -8% | 250 -3% | 230 -11% | 378 47% | 288 12% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 92 1% | 79 -13% | 87 -4% | 76 -16% | 86 -5% | 89 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.31 | 0.47 -52% | 0.21 32% | 0.25 19% | 0.34 -10% | 0.29 6% | 0.32 -3% |
| Contrast | 857 | 570 -33% | 1181 38% | 1080 26% | 688 -20% | 1424 66% | 925 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.01 | 5.7 5% | 4.98 17% | 4.79 20% | 12.19 -103% | 2.44 59% | 4.3 28% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.87 | 21.7 -15% | 8.41 55% | 8.83 53% | 20.81 -10% | 4.46 76% | 8.7 54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.94 | 2.48 37% | |||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5 | 4.2 16% | 4.26 15% | 5.66 -13% | 13.99 -180% | 2.48 50% | 3 40% |
| Gamma | 2.7 81% | 2.3 96% | 2.37 93% | 2.64 83% | 2.32 95% | 2.43 91% | 2.1 105% |
| CCT | 6569 99% | 6820 95% | 7149 91% | 7179 91% | 15863 41% | 7006 93% | 7100 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 42.24 | 43.2 2% | 38 -10% | 37 -12% | 36 -15% | 62 47% | 56.83 35% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60.92 | 61.5 1% | 58 -5% | 59 -3% | 56 -8% | 96 58% | 86.86 43% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -12% /
-9% | -3% /
5% | -1% /
4% | -11% /
-26% | 27% /
39% | 16% /
22% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (81 - 147, n=97) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (320 - 730, n=101) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB | |
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 32Bit | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (1.41 - 1.47, n=9) | |
| CPU Multi 32Bit | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (5.37 - 7.16, n=9) | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (3274 - 3935, n=10) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (4339 - 4992, n=10) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3889 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4894 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3904 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 Hynix HFS128G39TND | Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006 | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -77% | -11% | -73% | -12% | |
| Seq Read | 1567 | 515 -67% | 1806 15% | 491.7 -69% | 1471 -6% |
| Seq Write | 1411 | 124 -91% | 1226 -13% | 452 -68% | 1077 -24% |
| 4K Read | 53 | 29.84 -44% | 51.4 -3% | 25.92 -51% | 49.82 -6% |
| 4K Write | 81.9 | 77.5 -5% | 113.9 39% | 49.33 -40% | 144.8 77% |
| 4K-64 Read | 1455 | 355.3 -76% | 485.7 -67% | 343.9 -76% | 1312 -10% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1486 | 114.1 -92% | 1652 11% | 155.5 -90% | 470.1 -68% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.043 | 0.101 -135% | 0.06 -40% | 0.133 -209% | 0.079 -84% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.143 | 0.273 -91% | 0.032 78% | 0.091 36% | 0.025 83% |
| Score Read | 1665 | 437 -74% | 1881 13% | 419 -75% | 1509 -9% |
| Score Write | 1709 | 204 -88% | 710 -58% | 250 -85% | 723 -58% |
| Score Total | 4225 | 854 -80% | 35 -99% | 890 -79% | 2991 -29% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (2796 - 4905, n=47) | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (2820 - 4421, n=46) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (16227 - 22183, n=43) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (2323 - 3739, n=44) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4710 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 11944 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3229 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
| 1024x768 Lowest Preset (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (41.6 - 86, n=28) | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl | |
| Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (28.2 - 60, n=29) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (14.8 - 27, n=28) | |
| 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 | |
| Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (14.8 - 26, n=23) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hitman: Absolution (2012) | 71.3 | 67.2 | 45.9 | 22 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 35 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 51.4 | 34 | 21.8 | 15.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.4 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB |
| Carga |
| 43.5 / 45.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 27.8 dB(A) | ||
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND | Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1027 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | 2% | -3% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 27.8 | 30.5 -10% | 30.3 -9% | 31 -12% | 28.8 -4% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29.4 | 30.5 -4% | 30.3 -3% | 31 -5% | 30 -2% |
| Idle Average * | 29.6 | 30.5 -3% | 30.3 -2% | 31 -5% | 30.2 -2% |
| Idle Maximum * | 29.6 | 30.9 -4% | 30.3 -2% | 32.6 -10% | 30.2 -2% |
| Load Average * | 43.5 | 35.7 18% | 39.2 10% | 41.6 4% | 39 10% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 43.5 | 41.6 4% | 41.6 4% | 38.7 11% | |
| Load Maximum * | 45.8 | 35.6 22% | 39.2 14% | 44.7 2% | 39 15% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.4 °C / -4.4 F).
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 63% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.55 / 0.61 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.2 / 7.2 / 12.1 Watt |
| Carga |
51.1 / 59.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB i5-7200U, Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng i5-8250U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1027, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 9% | -47% | 18% | 10% | 6% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.2 | 3.8 10% | 9.9 -136% | 2.8 33% | 3.7 12% | 5.14 -22% |
| Idle Average * | 7.2 | 6.5 10% | 9.5 -32% | 5.8 19% | 7.5 -4% | 9.07 -26% |
| Idle Maximum * | 12.1 | 9.1 25% | 10.7 12% | 7.5 38% | 8 34% | 9.33 23% |
| Load Average * | 51.1 | 53.4 -5% | 62 -21% | 54 -6% | 49 4% | 46.76 8% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 52.7 | 84 -59% | 50.6 4% | 40.18 24% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 59.9 | 55.6 7% | 86.7 -45% | 56 7% | 55.2 8% | 42.59 29% |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 43.3 Wh | Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 49.7 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB i5-7200U, Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), 40 Wh | HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng i5-8250U, GeForce 940MX, 41.7 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 60 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 43.3 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 11% | -11% | -15% | 47% | 9% | |
| Reader / Idle | 910 | 963 6% | 956 5% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 462 | 511 11% | 425 -8% | 395 -15% | 597 29% | 441 -5% |
| Load | 74 | 50 -32% | 122 65% | 93 26% | ||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 83 |
Pro
Contra
Economize para o hardware atualizado, o novo MateBook D 53010BAJ ainda é o mesmo portátil multimídia mainstream de alumínio de 15,6 polegadas da Huawei, lançado no ano passado. Para a faixa de preço determinada, o chassi é muito bem projetado, robusto e agradável visualmente. O desempenho do sistema é satisfatório, mesmo que o novo portátil não esteja muito à frente do predecessor nesse aspecto. Nós aplaudimos a Huawei por não tentar colocar uma CPU hexa-core Coffee Lake-H no chassi fino, pois isso certamente teria sobrecarregado completamente o sistema de resfriamento e teria reduzido a duração da bateria também. Inclusive com a CPU ULV de 15 W, no entanto, o afogamento continua sendo um problema quando está sob uso intenso. A Huawei continua a empregar o afogamento agressiva de CPU e GPU para manter as temperaturas internas e da superfície sob controle, ao custo de desempenho reduzido e aumento da atividade dos ventiladores. O resultado líquido: o MateBook D oferece melhor desempenho, mas infelizmente é tão quente quanto o antecessor e também se tornou um pouco mais barulhento. Devemos observar que o afogamento observado provavelmente impactará apenas os usuários avançados e não deverá afetar a navegação, processamento de texto e tarefas semelhantes do dia a dia.
Não há dúvida de que a Huawei teve que cortar alguns cantos adicionais para manter o preço tão baixo: a seleção de portas é o que nós consideramos o mínimo, e falta um leitor de cartões SD, porta USB-C e várias saídas de vídeo. O painel da tela, apesar de razoavelmente brilhante, fica aquém quando se trata de precisão e gama de cores.
O MateBook D é um portátil multimídia sólido com especificações impressionantes para o preço. O desempenho melhorou em relação ao predecessor, mas o afogamento sob uso intenso, infelizmente, continua sendo um problema.
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ
- 08/17/2018 v6 (old)
Bernie Pechlaner
Price comparison
