Breve Análise do Portátil Huawei MateBook D 53010BAJ (8250U, MX150)

Name: Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ
Brand: Huawei

Livro antigo, nova página. O MateBook D todo de alumínio de 15,6 polegadas da Huawei recebe hardware Kaby Lake-R e gráficos GeForce MX150. Como o portátil multimídia se compara ao seu predecessor idêntico, e será que a Huawei fez o suficiente para diferenciar o MateBook D da forte concorrência neste segmento?

Bernie Pechlaner, 👁 Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 08/28/2018 🇺🇸 🇫🇷 ...

Windows Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of CUKUSA.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ (Matebook D 15 Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i5-8250U 4 x 1.6 - 3.4 GHz, Kaby Lake Refresh

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 1531 MHz, Memoría: 6008 MHz, 398.36, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, PC4-19200 DDR4 SDRAM

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, no, AU Optronics B156HW02, IPS, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Kaby Lake-U + iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH

Disco rígido

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, 512 GB

Placa de Som

Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, Conexões Audio: Headphone/microphone combo, Sensores: Accelerometer and Hall sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.1

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 16.9 x 358 x 239

Bateria

43.3 Wh, 3800 mAh Lítio-Ion

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo w/ Dolby Atmos® Sound System, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: não, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

1.848 kg, Suprimento de energia: 182 g

Preço

930 USD

Links

Huawei página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
maximum SDCardreader Maximum Transfer Rate
Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=57, last 2 years)	133.2 MB/s
average SDCardreader Average Transfer Rate
Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=58, last 2 years)	96 MB/s

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	680 MBit/s +32%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	611 MBit/s +18%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	539 MBit/s +4%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	516 MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	471 MBit/s -9%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	48 MBit/s -91%
iperf3 receive AX12
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8265	644 MBit/s
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Intel 8265 Tri-Band WiFi (Oak Peak) Network Adapter	585 MBit/s -9%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	554 MBit/s -14%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter	542 MBit/s -16%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265	541 MBit/s -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 3165	174 MBit/s -73%


263.8 cd/m²	256.8 cd/m²	263.9 cd/m²
260.5 cd/m²	265.7 cd/m²	266.2 cd/m²
245.1 cd/m²	254.6 cd/m²	243.5 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

AU Optronics B156HW02 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 266.2 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 257.8 cd/m² Minimum: 5.03 cd/m²
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 265.7 cd/m²
Contraste: 857:1 (Preto: 0.31 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.01 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 3.94
ΔE Greyscale 5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60.92% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.24% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.24% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.96% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.7

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ AU Optronics B156HW02, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX BOE070C, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 BOE NV156FHM-N48, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB LG Philips LGD0573 LP156WF9-SPK2, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng AU Optronics, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080	Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Sharp SHP149A LQ156M1, LED IGZO IPS InfinityEdge, 15.6", 1920x1080	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 BOE0747 NV156FHM-N61, IPS LED, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		2%	-3%	-6%	-9%	59%	52%
Display P3 Coverage	40.96	41.79 2%	39.86 -3%	38.62 -6%	37.28 -9%	66 61%	66.5 62%
sRGB Coverage	60.9	61.5 1%	58.7 -4%	58.1 -5%	56.1 -8%	96.5 58%	86.9 43%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	42.24	43.17 2%	41.18 -3%	39.91 -6%	38.51 -9%	66.7 58%	63.5 50%
Response Times		-31%	-17%	-6%	14%	-23%	-28%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	36.4 ?(18.4, 18)	46.4 ?(23.2, 23.2) -27%	42 ?(22, 20) -15%	42 ?(22, 20) -15%	45 ?(24, 21) -24%	49 ?(25, 40) -35%	47.9 ?(22.4, 25.5) -32%
Response Time Black / White *	27.2 ?(15.6, 11.6)	36.8 ?(22.4, 14.4) -35%	32 ?(17, 15) -18%	26 ?(15, 11) 4%	13 ?(8, 5) 52%	30 ?(16, 14) -10%	33.7 ?(19.2, 14.5) -24%
PWM Frequency		21190	21000 ?(80)			961 ?(10)	21800 ?(99)
Screen		-7%	11%	9%	-39%	45%	23%
Brightness middle	265.7	268 1%	248 -7%	270 2%	234 -12%	413 55%	296 11%
Brightness	258	258 0%	237 -8%	250 -3%	230 -11%	378 47%	288 12%
Brightness Distribution	91	92 1%	79 -13%	87 -4%	76 -16%	86 -5%	89 -2%
Black Level *	0.31	0.47 -52%	0.21 32%	0.25 19%	0.34 -10%	0.29 6%	0.32 -3%
Contrast	857	570 -33%	1181 38%	1080 26%	688 -20%	1424 66%	925 8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	6.01	5.7 5%	4.98 17%	4.79 20%	12.19 -103%	2.44 59%	4.3 28%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	18.87	21.7 -15%	8.41 55%	8.83 53%	20.81 -10%	4.46 76%	8.7 54%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *	3.94					2.48 37%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	5	4.2 16%	4.26 15%	5.66 -13%	13.99 -180%	2.48 50%	3 40%
Gamma	2.7 ^81%	2.3 ^96%	2.37 ^93%	2.64 ^83%	2.32 ^95%	2.43 ^91%	2.1 ^105%
CCT	6569 ^99%	6820 ^95%	7149 ^91%	7179 ^91%	15863 ^41%	7006 ^93%	7100 ^92%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	42.24	43.2 2%	38 -10%	37 -12%	36 -15%	62 47%	56.83 35%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	60.92	61.5 1%	58 -5%	59 -3%	56 -8%	96 58%	86.86 43%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-12% / -9%	-3% / 5%	-1% / 4%	-11% / -26%	27% / 39%	16% / 22%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 15.6 ms rise
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 11.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.4 ms rise
36.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 18 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 48 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Intel Core i5-8300H	167 Points +14%
Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX Intel Core i7-7500U	149 Points +2%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng Intel Core i5-8250U	146 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ Intel Core i5-8250U	146 Points
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 Intel Core i5-8250U	145 Points -1%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Intel Core i5-8250U	145 (144.66^min - 144.78^max) Points -1%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (81 - 147, n=97)	141.1 Points -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Intel Core i5-7200U	129 Points -12%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh Intel Core i5-8300H	840 Points +66%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Intel Core i5-8250U	576 (544.28^min - 575.47^max) Points +14%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (320 - 730, n=101)	570 Points +13%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 Intel Core i5-8250U	560 Points +11%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng Intel Core i5-8250U	556 Points +10%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ Intel Core i5-8250U	505 Points
Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX Intel Core i7-7500U	343 Points -32%
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Intel Core i5-7200U	331 Points -34%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 32Bit
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Intel Core i5-8250U	1.46 Points
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (1.41 - 1.47, n=9)	1.452 Points
CPU Multi 32Bit
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Intel Core i5-8250U	5.95 Points
Average Intel Core i5-8250U (5.37 - 7.16, n=9)	5.87 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

146 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

505 Points

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

95.3 fps

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8 | PCMark 10

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4464 Points +15%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	4030 Points +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND	3935 Points +1%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3889 Points
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3766 Points -3%
Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1027	3721 Points -4%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (3274 - 3935, n=10)	3687 Points -5%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng GeForce 940MX, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006	3683 Points -5%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	5271 Points +8%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND	4992 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4894 Points
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4882 Points 0%
Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1027	4860 Points -1%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng GeForce 940MX, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006	4812 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (4339 - 4992, n=10)	4772 Points -2%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	4746 Points -3%

PCMark 10 - Score
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	4479 Points +15%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	3904 Points
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND	3802 Points -3%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	3686 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i5-8250U, NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (3007 - 3904, n=10)	3542 Points -9%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng GeForce 940MX, i5-8250U, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006	3505 Points -10%
Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1027	3081 Points -21%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3889 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		4894 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		3904 pontos
Ajuda

	Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 Hynix HFS128G39TND	Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
AS SSD		-77%	-11%	-73%	-12%
Seq Read	1567	515 -67%	1806 15%	491.7 -69%	1471 -6%
Seq Write	1411	124 -91%	1226 -13%	452 -68%	1077 -24%
4K Read	53	29.84 -44%	51.4 -3%	25.92 -51%	49.82 -6%
4K Write	81.9	77.5 -5%	113.9 39%	49.33 -40%	144.8 77%
4K-64 Read	1455	355.3 -76%	485.7 -67%	343.9 -76%	1312 -10%
4K-64 Write	1486	114.1 -92%	1652 11%	155.5 -90%	470.1 -68%
Access Time Read *	0.043	0.101 -135%	0.06 -40%	0.133 -209%	0.079 -84%
Access Time Write *	0.143	0.273 -91%	0.032 78%	0.091 36%	0.025 83%
Score Read	1665	437 -74%	1881 13%	419 -75%	1509 -9%
Score Write	1709	204 -88%	710 -58%	250 -85%	723 -58%
Score Total	4225	854 -80%	35 -99%	890 -79%	2991 -29%

* ... smaller is better

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ

CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 1846 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 1816 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 1015 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 1707 MB/s

CDM 5 Read Seq: 501 MB/s

CDM 5 Write Seq: 407.5 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 48.41 MB/s

CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 150.9 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U	8329 Points +85%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	4742 Points +5%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	4501 Points
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	4252 Points -6%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (2796 - 4905, n=47)	4191 Points -7%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U	3728 Points -17%
Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	2910 Points -35%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-8250U	2471 Points -45%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1666 Points -63%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U	4374 Points +4%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	4267 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	4192 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (2820 - 4421, n=46)	3957 Points -6%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	3845 Points -8%
Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	2735 Points -35%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U	2734 Points -35%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-8250U	1907 Points -55%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	1501 Points -64%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U	36552 Points +91%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	21666 Points +13%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (16227 - 22183, n=43)	19512 Points +2%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	19132 Points
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	17552 Points -8%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U	15613 Points -18%
Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	13199 Points -31%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-8250U	9012 Points -53%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl Intel UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U	8567 Points -55%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB AMD Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U	5705 Points +59%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	3688 Points +3%
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	3592 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (2323 - 3739, n=44)	3310 Points -8%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 NVIDIA GeForce MX150, i5-8250U	3263 Points -9%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 AMD Radeon RX Vega 10, R7 2700U	2442 Points -32%
Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U	2376 Points -34%
HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i5-8250U	1720 Points -52%

3DMark 11 Performance		4710 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		11944 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3229 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

Rise of the Tomb Raider
1024x768 Lowest Preset (sort by value)
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	51.4 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	71.9 fps +40%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	63.2 fps +23%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100	10.4 fps -80%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (41.6 - 86, n=28)	64.6 fps +26%
1366x768 Medium Preset AF:2x (sort by value)
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	34 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	51.6 fps +52%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	37 fps +9%
HP Pavilion 15-cs0053cl UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Toshiba MQ04ABF100	6.5 fps -81%
Acer Swift 3 SF315-41-R6J9 Vega 10, R7 2700U, Micron SSD 1100 SED 512GB, M.2 (MTFDDAV512TBN)	30 fps -12%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	73.2 fps +115%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (28.2 - 60, n=29)	38.7 fps +14%
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value)
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	21.8 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	30.6 fps +40%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	19.9 fps -9%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	40.6 fps +86%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (14.8 - 27, n=28)	20.9 fps -4%
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value)
Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	15.2 fps
Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	24.1 fps +59%
Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	16.8 fps +11%
Dell XPS 15 2018 i5 FHD 97Wh GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-8300H, Lite-On CA3-8D256-Q11	33.2 fps +118%
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX150 (14.8 - 26, n=23)	18 fps +18%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
Hitman: Absolution (2012)	71.3	67.2	45.9	22
The Witcher 3 (2015)		35
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	51.4	34	21.8	15.2

The Witcher 3 medium

Barulho

Ocioso		29.4 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB
Carga		43.5 / 45.8 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 27.8 dB(A)

	Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Hynix HFS128G39TND	Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 GeForce MX150, i5-8250U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP	Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1027
Noise		3%	2%	-3%	4%
off / environment *	27.8	30.5 -10%	30.3 -9%	31 -12%	28.8 -4%
Idle Minimum *	29.4	30.5 -4%	30.3 -3%	31 -5%	30 -2%
Idle Average *	29.6	30.5 -3%	30.3 -2%	31 -5%	30.2 -2%
Idle Maximum *	29.6	30.9 -4%	30.3 -2%	32.6 -10%	30.2 -2%
Load Average *	43.5	35.7 18%	39.2 10%	41.6 4%	39 10%
Witcher 3 ultra *	43.5		41.6 4%	41.6 4%	38.7 11%
Load Maximum *	45.8	35.6 22%	39.2 14%	44.7 2%	39 15%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


39.8 °C	45.6 °C	33.8 °C
36 °C	38.6 °C	30.2 °C
31.2 °C	28.8 °C	28.4 °C

Máximo: 45.6 °C
Médio: 34.7 °C


35 °C	47.8 °C	43 °C
32.4 °C	39 °C	40 °C
31 °C	33.8 °C	35.4 °C

Máximo: 47.8 °C
Médio: 37.5 °C

alimentação elétrica 40 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Raytek Raynger ST

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


28.4 °C	29.8 °C	28 °C
26.8 °C	28 °C	27 °C
26 °C	25.8 °C	27.2 °C

Máximo: 29.8 °C
Médio: 27.4 °C


32.2 °C	24.6 °C	33 °C
31.8 °C	32 °C	31.6 °C
31 °C	30.6 °C	30.2 °C

Máximo: 33 °C
Médio: 30.8 °C

Temperatura do quarto 21.8 °C | Raytek Raynger ST

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


39.6 °C	44.2 °C	35.8 °C
37.6 °C	39 °C	30.2 °C
31.2 °C	28.8 °C	28.8 °C

Máximo: 44.2 °C
Médio: 35 °C


34.6 °C	48 °C	43.6 °C
33 °C	39.6 °C	39.6 °C
31.4 °C	34.6 °C	35.4 °C

Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 37.8 °C

alimentação elétrica 40 °C | Temperatura do quarto 21.6 °C | Raytek Raynger ST

(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.7 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 45.6 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.2 °C / 88.2 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.4 °C / -4.4 F).

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ audio analysis

(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.9 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.8% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 78% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.55 / 0.61 Watt
Ocioso	4.2 / 7.2 / 12.1 Watt
Carga	51.1 / 59.9 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Hynix HFS128G39TND, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB i5-7200U, Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng i5-8250U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SN8U256G1006, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, SanDisk SD8SN8U128G1027, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		9%	-47%	18%	10%	6%
Idle Minimum *	4.2	3.8 10%	9.9 -136%	2.8 33%	3.7 12%	5.14 -22%
Idle Average *	7.2	6.5 10%	9.5 -32%	5.8 19%	7.5 -4%	9.07 -26%
Idle Maximum *	12.1	9.1 25%	10.7 12%	7.5 38%	8 34%	9.33 23%
Load Average *	51.1	53.4 -5%	62 -21%	54 -6%	49 4%	46.76 8%
Witcher 3 ultra *	52.7		84 -59%		50.6 4%	40.18 24%
Load Maximum *	59.9	55.6 7%	86.7 -45%	56 7%	55.2 8%	42.59 29%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		15h 10min
WiFi Websurfing		7h 42min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 14min

	Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 43.3 Wh	Acer Swift 3 SF315-51G-57E5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 49.7 Wh	Lenovo IdeaPad 720-15IKB i5-7200U, Radeon RX 560 (Laptop), 40 Wh	HP Pavilion 15-cc107ng i5-8250U, GeForce 940MX, 41.7 Wh	Xiaomi Mi Notebook Pro i5 i5-8250U, GeForce MX150, 60 Wh	Huawei MateBook D 15, i7-7500U 940MX i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 43.3 Wh
Battery Runtime		11%	-11%	-15%	47%	9%
Reader / Idle	910		963 6%			956 5%
WiFi v1.3	462	511 11%	425 -8%	395 -15%	597 29%	441 -5%
Load	74		50 -32%		122 65%	93 26%
Witcher 3 ultra					83

Pro

+ Chassi todo em alumínio

+ Construção de alta qualidade

+ tela IPS anti refletiva

+ Boa duração da bateria

+ SSD + HDD

+ Bom valor

Contra

- Afogamento notório da GPU sob carga

- Quente

- Sem teclado iluminado

- Gama de cor pobre

- Sem porta USB-C, uma saída de vídeo

Huawei MateBook D, courtesy of Computer Upgrade King. Use coupon code NCB10 for $10 Off

Economize para o hardware atualizado, o novo MateBook D 53010BAJ ainda é o mesmo portátil multimídia mainstream de alumínio de 15,6 polegadas da Huawei, lançado no ano passado. Para a faixa de preço determinada, o chassi é muito bem projetado, robusto e agradável visualmente. O desempenho do sistema é satisfatório, mesmo que o novo portátil não esteja muito à frente do predecessor nesse aspecto. Nós aplaudimos a Huawei por não tentar colocar uma CPU hexa-core Coffee Lake-H no chassi fino, pois isso certamente teria sobrecarregado completamente o sistema de resfriamento e teria reduzido a duração da bateria também. Inclusive com a CPU ULV de 15 W, no entanto, o afogamento continua sendo um problema quando está sob uso intenso. A Huawei continua a empregar o afogamento agressiva de CPU e GPU para manter as temperaturas internas e da superfície sob controle, ao custo de desempenho reduzido e aumento da atividade dos ventiladores. O resultado líquido: o MateBook D oferece melhor desempenho, mas infelizmente é tão quente quanto o antecessor e também se tornou um pouco mais barulhento. Devemos observar que o afogamento observado provavelmente impactará apenas os usuários avançados e não deverá afetar a navegação, processamento de texto e tarefas semelhantes do dia a dia.

Não há dúvida de que a Huawei teve que cortar alguns cantos adicionais para manter o preço tão baixo: a seleção de portas é o que nós consideramos o mínimo, e falta um leitor de cartões SD, porta USB-C e várias saídas de vídeo. O painel da tela, apesar de razoavelmente brilhante, fica aquém quando se trata de precisão e gama de cores.

O MateBook D é um portátil multimídia sólido com especificações impressionantes para o preço. O desempenho melhorou em relação ao predecessor, mas o afogamento sob uso intenso, infelizmente, continua sendo um problema.

Huawei MateBook D 15-53010BAJ - 2018-08-17 08/17/2018 v6 ^(old)
Bernie Pechlaner

Acabamento

82 / 98 → 83%

Teclado

84%

Mouse

82%

Conectividade

38 / 81 → 47%

Peso

65 / 20-67 → 95%

Bateria

90%

Pantalha

82%

Desempenho do jogos

74 / 85 → 87%

Desempenho da aplicação

90 / 92 → 98%

Temperatura

85%

Ruído

84 / 95 → 89%

Audio

64%

Camera

58 / 85 → 68%

Médio

75%

83%

Multimedia - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Bernie Pechlaner - Senior Tech Writer - 276 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2012

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil Huawei MateBook D 53010BAJ (8250U, MX150)

Bernie Pechlaner, 2018-08-28 (Update: 2018-09- 8)