Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F (Core i5-8250U, 8 GB, 256 GB)
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13IKB | |
| MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA | |
| MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13IKB | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 85 %
iluminação com acumulador: 294 cd/m²
Contraste: 633:1 (Preto: 0.46 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93, calibrated: 3.18
ΔE Greyscale 4.21 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
64% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
43.19% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.46
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F BOE0764 / TV140FHM-NH0, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13IKB LG Philips LGD04EF, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA AUO383D, , 1920x1080, 14" | MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 CMN N140HCE-EN2, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 38% | 40% | 55% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 43.19 | 64.3 49% | 61.3 42% | 67.5 56% |
| sRGB Coverage | 64 | 82.3 29% | 87.6 37% | 98.6 54% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.62 | 60.2 35% | 62.3 40% | 69.6 56% |
| Response Times | 21816% | 24% | 4150% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41 ? | 35 ? 15% | 35 ? 15% | 34.4 ? 16% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 37 ? | 25 ? 32% | 25 ? 32% | 24.8 ? 33% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 131000 ? 65400% | 25000 ? 12400% | |
| Screen | 9% | 41% | 42% | |
| Brightness middle | 291 | 335 15% | 421 45% | 285.4 -2% |
| Brightness | 276 | 303 10% | 398 44% | 269 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 85 | 85 0% | 86 1% | 86 1% |
| Black Level * | 0.46 | 0.46 -0% | 0.27 41% | 0.31 33% |
| Contrast | 633 | 728 15% | 1559 146% | 921 45% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.3 | 5.09 -18% | 4.08 5% | 1 77% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 10.01 | 11.92 -19% | 7.48 25% | 3.65 64% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.18 | 0.98 69% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.21 | 3.23 23% | 2.92 31% | 1.4 67% |
| Gamma | 2.46 89% | 2.18 101% | 2.32 95% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6867 95% | 6214 105% | 7043 92% | 6699 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 41 | 54 32% | 57 39% | 63.82 56% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 64 | 82 28% | 87 36% | 98.91 55% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 7288% /
4103% | 35% /
39% | 1416% /
769% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 95 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 41 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 61 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027 | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13IKB Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | Average SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 118% | 51% | 0% | |
| Read Seq | 522 | 1674 221% | 1549 197% | 506 ? -3% |
| Write Seq | 446.2 | 1191 167% | 269.7 -40% | 441 ? -1% |
| Read 512 | 310.1 | 658 112% | 823 165% | 308 ? -1% |
| Write 512 | 387.3 | 852 120% | 298.1 -23% | 347 ? -10% |
| Read 4k | 24.27 | 51.8 113% | 24.9 3% | 26.8 ? 10% |
| Write 4k | 53 | 114.9 117% | 97.1 83% | 54.4 ? 3% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 243.1 | 349.2 44% | 310.6 28% | 254 ? 4% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 222.4 | 332.2 49% | 208.4 -6% | 225 ? 1% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1977 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8497 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1146 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset | |
| MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 | |
| HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (10.4 - 110.7, n=82) | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13IKB | |
| Farming Simulator 17 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (8 - 67.9, n=12) | |
| 1920x1080 High Preset AA:2xMS AF:2x | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (18.8 - 26.2, n=11) | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 70.5 | 36.1 | 30.7 | 9.9 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 22.7 | |||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 62 | 26.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.6 / 32.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.2 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 38.3 °C / 100.9 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-10.6 °C / -19 F).
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.3% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 7.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13IKB audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 6.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 8.6% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 43% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 47% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 52% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 38% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 23.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (27.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 84% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 81% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 15% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.4 / 0.5 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.7 / 6.9 / 8.4 Watt |
| Carga |
32 / 32.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Toshiba KSG60ZMV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -10% | -21% | -48% | -13% | -31% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.7 | 3.9 -5% | 4.9 -32% | 5.6 -51% | 3.81 ? -3% | 4.51 ? -22% |
| Idle Average * | 6.9 | 7.7 -12% | 8.1 -17% | 6.5 6% | 6.94 ? -1% | 7.47 ? -8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.4 | 10.4 -24% | 10.6 -26% | 7.9 6% | 8.75 ? -4% | 9.11 ? -8% |
| Load Average * | 32 | 33.3 -4% | 32.2 -1% | 62.3 -95% | 35 ? -9% | 42.4 ? -33% |
| Load Maximum * | 32.6 | 34 -4% | 42.3 -30% | 67 -106% | 47.5 ? -46% | 60.5 ? -86% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 55.7 |
* ... smaller is better
| Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo Ideapad 720S-13IKB i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 46 Wh | HP EliteBook 745 G5 3UN74EA R7 2700U, Vega 10, 50 Wh | MSI Prestige PS42 8RB-059 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 50 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -18% | -39% | 4% | -5% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1414 | 1035 -27% | 639 -55% | 1010 -29% | 1300 ? -8% |
| H.264 | 725 | 426 -41% | 703 ? -3% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 597 | 608 2% | 394 -34% | 893 50% | 598 ? 0% |
| Load | 129 | 91 -29% | 95 -26% | 118 -9% | 117.1 ? -9% |
Pro
Contra
Finalmente, decidimos classificar o Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F como um portátil premium de escritório, embora isto não influencie sua avaliação. O W50F tem uma carcaça compacta e bem construída com recursos de segurança decentes. No entanto, não somo grandes fanáticos de seu teclado, nem da sua tela medíocre ou de sua escassa seleção de portas. Além disso, a decisão de equipar o dispositivo com um SSD SATA III é uma que questionaríamos inclusive em um portátil de apenas €500 (~ US $575), pior ainda em um que custa €999 (~ US $1.140).
O Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F é um portátil de escritório compacto e confiável que tem muito a oferecer. Infelizmente, algumas áreas não são muito boas, particularmente sua tela.
O modelo W60B mais caro, com sua GeForce MX150 e processador Core i7-8550U, poderia ser um melhor concorrente contra o MSI PS42 8RB Prestige. O MateBook D 14 W60B é menor e mais econômico, mas o MSI é mais leve e possui uma tela notavelmente melhor. Além disso, o Lenovo IdeaPad 720S-13IKB possui uma porta Thunderbolt 3 para aqueles que precisam, enquanto o HP EliteBook 745 G5 ganha mais alguns pontos pelas suas portas adicionais e sua licença de Windows 10 Pro, entre outras coisas. No geral, o Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F é um portátil impressionante que se sai bem contra a concorrência.
Huawei MateBook D 14 W50F
-
11/15/2018 v6 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Price comparison
