Breve Análise do Portátil Honor Magicbook 14: Uma versão melhor do MateBook D 14?
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86.5 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | Honor Magicbook 14 R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
87.3 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.4 kg | 16 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
82 % v7 (old) | 12/2019 | Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.6 kg | 17.9 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 | |
74.5 % v7 (old) | 01/2020 | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230 | 1.8 kg | 21 mm | 14.00" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size Comparison
|
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 308 cd/m²
Contraste: 1728:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
65.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
42.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
46.42% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
44.93% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
Honor Magicbook 14 BOE CQ TV140FHM-NH1, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS Chi Mei CMN1404, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T CEC PA LM140LF-3L03, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE Chi Mei, CMN14D4, N140HCA-EAC, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF Chi Mei 140HCA, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 4% | 44% | -4% | -7% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 44.93 | 46.54 4% | 66.7 48% | 42.93 -4% | 41.84 -7% |
sRGB Coverage | 66.2 | 69.8 5% | 92.3 39% | 64 -3% | 62.3 -6% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 46.42 | 48.1 4% | 67.5 45% | 44.43 -4% | 43.33 -7% |
Response Times | 114% | -18% | 116% | -14% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44.8 ? | 41.2 ? 8% | 36 ? 20% | 40.8 ? 9% | 41 ? 8% |
Response Time Black / White * | 34 ? | 28.8 ? 15% | 26 ? 24% | 28 ? 18% | 31 ? 9% |
PWM Frequency | 5952 ? | 25000 ? 320% | 44 ? -99% | 25000 ? 320% | 2500 ? -58% |
Screen | -5% | -11% | -63% | -9% | |
Brightness middle | 311 | 250 -20% | 253 -19% | 256 -18% | 226 -27% |
Brightness | 296 | 241 -19% | 245 -17% | 232 -22% | 214 -28% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 94 2% | 78 -15% | 86 -7% | 92 0% |
Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.22 -22% | 0.225 -25% | 0.96 -433% | 0.17 6% |
Contrast | 1728 | 1136 -34% | 1124 -35% | 267 -85% | 1329 -23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.3 | 4.4 17% | 8.89 -68% | 6.5 -23% | 5.21 2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.5 | 19.7 -6% | 4.56 75% | 21.5 -16% | 22.15 -20% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.2 | 4.2 -0% | 4.9 -17% | 4.8 -14% | 4.43 -5% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 2.9 17% | 6.33 -81% | 5.7 -63% | 3.27 7% |
Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.3 96% | 2.52 87% | 1.9 116% | 2.36 93% |
CCT | 7078 92% | 7045 92% | 6745 96% | 6282 103% | 6538 99% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 42.5 | 44.3 4% | 60 41% | 40.9 -4% | 40 -6% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 65.8 | 69.6 6% | 91 38% | 63.7 -3% | 62 -6% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 38% /
18% | 5% /
-3% | 16% /
-21% | -10% /
-9% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
34 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.2 ms rise | |
↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 90 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise | |
↘ 20.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 5952 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 5952 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 5952 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Single 64Bit | CPU Multi 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (128 - 790, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE | |
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
Honor Magicbook 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (317 - 372, n=15) | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Subnotebook (579 - 8541, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Honor Magicbook 14 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (1063 - 1540, n=15) |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (72.4 - 307, n=58, last 2 years) | |
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE | |
Honor Magicbook 14 | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (131 - 147, n=18) | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Subnotebook (327 - 3345, n=63, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Honor Magicbook 14 | |
Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF | |
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (482 - 682, n=19) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (680 - 796, n=10) | |
Honor Magicbook 14 | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (159 - 2271, n=61, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2669 - 6403, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE | |
Honor Magicbook 14 | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (3502 - 3580, n=10) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Subnotebook (11775 - 77867, n=54, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE | |
Honor Magicbook 14 | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (15825 - 17508, n=10) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (621 - 2350, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE | |
Honor Magicbook 14 | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (777 - 909, n=9) |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Subnotebook (2557 - 14728, n=57, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Honor Magicbook 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (2543 - 3269, n=9) |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.97 - 25.1, n=56, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Honor Magicbook 14 | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (3.35 - 4.15, n=10) |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average AMD Ryzen 5 3500U (0.734 - 0.804, n=8) | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS | |
Honor Magicbook 14 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE | |
Average of class Subnotebook (0.413 - 1.456, n=56, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4235 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5141 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5039 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3862 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
Honor Magicbook 14 |
* ... smaller is better
Honor Magicbook 14 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | Average Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 0% | -34% | 8% | 1% | 3% | |
Write 4K | 137.7 | 145.4 6% | 118.8 -14% | 169.7 23% | 159.6 16% | 135.2 ? -2% |
Read 4K | 42.49 | 46.25 9% | 41.62 -2% | 47.6 12% | 53.5 26% | 44.6 ? 5% |
Write Seq | 2341 | 2583 10% | 796 -66% | 1761 -25% | 1174 -50% | 2091 ? -11% |
Read Seq | 2436 | 2141 -12% | 1101 -55% | 1630 -33% | 1648 -32% | 2097 ? -14% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 261 | 239.5 -8% | 234.7 -10% | 390.5 50% | 420.8 61% | 370 ? 42% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 335.4 | 340 1% | 313.8 -6% | 464.9 39% | 564 68% | 372 ? 11% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2343 | 2701 15% | 842 -64% | 2347 0% | 1231 -47% | 2308 ? -1% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3569 | 2871 -20% | 1645 -54% | 3505 -2% | 2274 -36% | 3395 ? -5% |
AS SSD | 45% | -4% | 56% | -58% | 12% | |
Seq Read | 2591 | 2263 -13% | 1417 -45% | 2501 -3% | 2074 -20% | 2276 ? -12% |
Seq Write | 2133 | 2255 6% | 781 -63% | 2051 -4% | 775 -64% | 1486 ? -30% |
4K Read | 50 | 40.36 -19% | 37.03 -26% | 60.3 21% | 37.81 -24% | 49.6 ? -1% |
4K Write | 95.7 | 116.9 22% | 80.1 -16% | 131.5 37% | 101.3 6% | 129.5 ? 35% |
4K-64 Read | 607 | 1282 111% | 740 22% | 873 44% | 1265 108% | 683 ? 13% |
4K-64 Write | 482.6 | 1224 154% | 748 55% | 1565 224% | 383.5 -21% | 895 ? 85% |
Access Time Read * | 0.075 | 0.074 1% | 0.047 37% | 0.046 39% | 0.081 -8% | 0.06433 ? 14% |
Access Time Write * | 0.034 | 0.039 -15% | 0.045 -32% | 0.027 21% | 0.263 -674% | 0.04793 ? -41% |
Score Read | 916 | 1549 69% | 918 0% | 1184 29% | 1510 65% | 960 ? 5% |
Score Write | 792 | 1566 98% | 906 14% | 1902 140% | 562 -29% | 1173 ? 48% |
Score Total | 2168 | 3909 80% | 2270 5% | 3685 70% | 2781 28% | 2598 ? 20% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1306 | 716 | 1474 ? | |||
Copy Program MB/s | 365.8 | 335.4 | 426 ? | |||
Copy Game MB/s | 434.9 | 484.8 | 760 ? | |||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 23% /
26% | -19% /
-17% | 32% /
36% | -29% /
-33% | 8% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark 11 Performance | 4095 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 66654 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2419 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 882 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 47.4 | 16.4 | ||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 72 | 65.4 | 39.8 | 37.3 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 28.1 | 20.6 | 18.1 | |
Far Cry 5 (2018) | 31 | 14 | ||
F1 2019 (2019) | 54 | 23 | 20 | 16 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.6 / 29.6 / 29.6 dB |
Carga |
| 30.8 / 35.3 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.6 dB(A) |
Honor Magicbook 14 Vega 8, R5 3500U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS Vega 8, R5 3500U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T Vega 10, R7 3700U, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A | Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF GeForce MX230, i7-1065G7, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 1% | -3% | 3% | -12% | |
off / environment * | 29.6 | 29.6 -0% | 29.8 -1% | 29.2 1% | 30.3 -2% |
Idle Minimum * | 29.6 | 29.6 -0% | 28 5% | 29.2 1% | 30.3 -2% |
Idle Average * | 29.6 | 29.6 -0% | 28 5% | 29.2 1% | 30.3 -2% |
Idle Maximum * | 29.6 | 29.6 -0% | 28 5% | 29.6 -0% | 30.3 -2% |
Load Average * | 30.8 | 30.7 -0% | 36.8 -19% | 30.2 2% | 42.9 -39% |
Load Maximum * | 35.3 | 33.3 6% | 39 -10% | 31.8 10% | 43.3 -23% |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40.2 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.8 °C / 111 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.1 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.3 °C / -6 F).
Honor Magicbook 14 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 77% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (69.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.4% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 42% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.38 / 0.67 Watt |
Ocioso | 5.2 / 7.7 / 9.3 Watt |
Carga |
40.3 / 48 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
Honor Magicbook 14 R5 3500U, Vega 8, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS R5 3500U, Vega 8, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK hynix BC501 HFM512GDHTNG-8310A, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB256HBHQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 8 (Ryzen 2000/3000) | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 3% | 7% | 22% | -1% | -4% | -9% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.2 | 5.2 -0% | 3.6 31% | 2.94 43% | 4.7 10% | 5.68 ? -9% | 4.49 ? 14% |
Idle Average * | 7.7 | 7.7 -0% | 7.2 6% | 5.2 32% | 6.6 14% | 8.75 ? -14% | 7.66 ? 1% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.3 | 8.7 6% | 10.8 -16% | 5.96 36% | 5.9 37% | 10.1 ? -9% | 9.56 ? -3% |
Load Average * | 40.3 | 35.4 12% | 38 6% | 28.2 30% | 56 -39% | 37.8 ? 6% | 46.6 ? -16% |
Load Maximum * | 48 | 48.3 -1% | 45.2 6% | 62.2 -30% | 60.2 -25% | 46.2 ? 4% | 68.6 ? -43% |
* ... smaller is better
Honor Magicbook 14 R5 3500U, Vega 8, 56 Wh | Huawei MateBook D 14-53010TVS R5 3500U, Vega 8, 56 Wh | Asus ZenBook 14 UM431DA-AM020T R7 3700U, Vega 10, 47 Wh | Lenovo ThinkBook 14-IML-20RV006TGE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Dell Inspiron 14 3493-4KWCF i7-1065G7, GeForce MX230, 42 Wh | Average of class Subnotebook | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 22% | -2% | -17% | -19% | 26% | |
H.264 | 661 | 674 2% | 522 -21% | 518 -22% | 896 ? 36% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 570 | 862 51% | 404 -29% | 515 -10% | 390 -32% | 710 ? 25% |
Load | 100 | 113 13% | 125 25% | 79 -21% | 98 -2% | 116.6 ? 17% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto – MagicBook 14 é o rei do preço-desempenho
Depois que o Huawei MateBook D 14 já deixou uma boa impressão durante nossa análise, também estamos convencidos pela construção similar do Honor MagicBook 14. A única diferença real entre as duas unidades de teste é a capacidade de armazenamento do SSD, mas em troca, o menos caro oferece até um painel mais brilhante, bem como um SSD NVMe mais rápido da Samsung. Exceto pela cor do chassi, os dois dispositivos são idênticos, começando pela boa carcaça metálica, as portas, os dispositivos de entrada, até o desempenho.
Em nossa opinião, o MagicBook 14 supera claramente as expectativas que você pode ter para um portátil nesta faixa de preço. Exceto por alguns pequenos inconvenientes (como o equipamento de portas), o portátil Honor também poderia competir com aparelhos muito mais caros.
Com exceção do disco rígido menor, não há inconvenientes em relação à unidade de teste do MateBook D 14 de construção similar. O Honor MagicBook 14 é difícil de derrotar por um preço de apenas 599 Euros (~$648).
O preço mais baixo é definitivamente uma vantagem para o Honor MagicBook 14. Se você não precisa de uma GPU dedicada e só precisa de um bom portátil para as tarefas diárias, nós podemos facilmente recomendar o MagicBook 14, pois existem apenas pequenos compromissos apesar do baixo preço.
Honor Magicbook 14
-
05/15/2020 v7 (old)
Andreas Osthoff