Breve Análise do Portátil HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7: Já desatualizado por um Intel Comet Lake e Nvidia Pascal mesmo sem um sucessor
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
82.7 % v7 (old) | 10/2020 | HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 i7-10610U, Quadro P520 | 1.8 kg | 19.2 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
80.8 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA i7-8565U, Radeon Pro WX 3200 | 1.6 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2160 | |
81.2 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE i7-8565U, Quadro P520 | 1.9 kg | 19.95 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
86.3 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Dell Precision 5550 P91F i7-10875H, Quadro T2000 Max-Q | 2 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 3840x2400 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
Size comparison
|
iluminação: 92 %
iluminação com acumulador: 389 cd/m²
Contraste: 1814:1 (Preto: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 3.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
68.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 LGD064F, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA AU Optronics AUO30EB, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Lenovo LEN40BA, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Precision 5550 P91F Sharp LQ156R1, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 NE156QUM-N66, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | -41% | 25% | 18% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 68.8 | 69.2 1% | 39.58 -42% | 89.9 31% | 80.7 17% |
sRGB Coverage | 97.7 | 97.1 -1% | 57.6 -41% | 100 2% | 98.1 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69.8 | 69.7 0% | 40.89 -41% | 99.9 43% | 95.5 37% |
Response Times | -26% | -13% | -8% | 18% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 68.8 ? -56% | 51.2 ? -16% | 46 ? -5% | 42 ? 5% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30.8 ? | 29.6 4% | 33.6 ? -9% | 34 ? -10% | 21.6 ? 30% |
PWM Frequency | |||||
Screen | -12% | -67% | -38% | 3% | |
Brightness middle | 381 | 451 18% | 260 -32% | 469.8 23% | 489 28% |
Brightness | 382 | 434 14% | 243 -36% | 464 21% | 501 31% |
Brightness Distribution | 92 | 89 -3% | 88 -4% | 85 -8% | 91 -1% |
Black Level * | 0.21 | 0.25 -19% | 0.18 14% | 0.42 -100% | 0.35 -67% |
Contrast | 1814 | 1804 -1% | 1444 -20% | 1119 -38% | 1397 -23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3 | 4.4 -47% | 6 -100% | 5.16 -72% | 3 -0% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.2 | 6.7 -29% | 19.2 -269% | 9.33 -79% | 5.1 2% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.5 | 1.8 -20% | 4.3 -187% | 3.75 -150% | 0.8 47% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.5 | 5 -43% | 4.2 -20% | 5.5 -57% | 4 -14% |
Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.31 95% | 2.49 88% | 2 110% | 2.24 98% |
CCT | 7254 90% | 7717 84% | 6865 95% | 6198 105% | 7400 88% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 64.3 | 63 -2% | 37.6 -42% | 89.2 39% | 84.7 32% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97.5 | 97 -1% | 59.2 -39% | 100 3% | 98.1 1% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-12% | -40% /
-55% | -7% /
-22% | 13% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise | |
↘ 14.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise | |
↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
Average of class Workstation (1863 - 4363, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE | |
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (548 - 738, n=6) | |
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
Average of class Workstation (166.2 - 301, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (133 - 200, n=6) | |
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
Average of class Workstation (2990 - 10276, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (1271 - 1663, n=6) |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
Average of class Workstation (564 - 827, n=29, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (349 - 482, n=6) |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (641 - 816, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Average of class Workstation (121 - 295, n=28, last 2 years) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Average of class Workstation (4981 - 6960, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 | |
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (3653 - 4853, n=6) |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
Average of class Workstation (47244 - 109204, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (15369 - 20332, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
Average of class Workstation (1474 - 2095, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (1155 - 1261, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
Average of class Workstation (8050 - 19316, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (3731 - 4622, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
Average of class Workstation (12.7 - 27.1, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (4.54 - 5.66, n=6) | |
HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (56.1 - 106, n=6) | |
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
Average of class Workstation (36.5 - 95.2, n=28, last 2 years) | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
Average Intel Core i7-10610U (0.637 - 0.855, n=6) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T14s-20UJS00K00 | |
Dell Precision 5550 P91F | |
Average of class Workstation (0.3825 - 0.54, n=28, last 2 years) |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3311 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3781 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4298 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4096 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 |
* ... smaller is better
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW256G8 | Dell Precision 5550 P91F SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB | Average Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -13% | 7% | -9% | -3% | |
Write 4K | 133.1 | 156 17% | 195.9 47% | 122.6 -8% | 136.3 ? 2% |
Read 4K | 51.6 | 45.73 -11% | 74.9 45% | 42.4 -18% | 50.7 ? -2% |
Write Seq | 1986 | 1158 -42% | 1194 -40% | 2167 9% | 1869 ? -6% |
Read Seq | 2208 | 1132 -49% | 2309 5% | 1747 -21% | 1984 ? -10% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 462.3 | 369.2 -20% | 507 10% | 388.8 -16% | 435 ? -6% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 400.2 | 573 43% | 624 56% | 367.3 -8% | 439 ? 10% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 3074 | 1969 -36% | 1206 -61% | 2629 -14% | 3019 ? -2% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3268 | 3138 -4% | 3091 -5% | 3460 6% | 3016 ? -8% |
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 Performance | 4495 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14333 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2957 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1121 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 57 | 32.6 | 19.1 | 10.8 | |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 141 | 120 | 67 | 60.4 | 21.8 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 71.1 | 53.2 | 48 | 21.3 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 51.2 | 19.3 | |||
Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 71.2 | 20.9 | 12.2 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 29.3 / 29.3 / 30 dB |
Carga |
| 32.8 / 32.8 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM-1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) |
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51.5 °C / 125 F, compared to the average of 38.2 °C / 101 F, ranging from 22.2 to 69.8 °C for the class Workstation.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 60.3 °C / 141 F, compared to the average of 41.2 °C / 106 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.9 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 32 °C / 90 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35 °C / 95 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.9 °C / 82.2 F (-7.1 °C / -12.8 F).
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 54% of all tested devices in this class were better, 11% similar, 34% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 36% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 56% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell Precision 5550 P91F audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (85 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 5.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (6.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 0% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 18%, worst was 35%
Compared to all devices tested
» 1% of all tested devices were better, 0% similar, 99% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.53 / 0.9 Watt |
Ocioso | 3.5 / 6.7 / 9.6 Watt |
Carga |
60 / 68.6 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 i7-10610U, Quadro P520, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA i7-8565U, Radeon Pro WX 3200, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE i7-8565U, Quadro P520, Intel SSD 760p SSDPEKKW256G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Precision 5550 P91F i7-10875H, Quadro T2000 Max-Q, SK Hynix PC601A NVMe 1TB, IPS, 3840x2400, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 i7-10510U, GeForce MX330, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV1T02, IPS LED, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA Quadro P520 | Average of class Workstation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -22% | 6% | -77% | -36% | -2% | -115% | |
Idle Minimum * | 3.5 | 5.5 -57% | 2.74 22% | 5.6 -60% | 4.3 -23% | 3.14 ? 10% | 9.05 ? -159% |
Idle Average * | 6.7 | 9.8 -46% | 6.4 4% | 11.2 -67% | 13.8 -106% | 7.3 ? -9% | 14 ? -109% |
Idle Maximum * | 9.6 | 12 -25% | 9.7 -1% | 18.4 -92% | 16.2 -69% | 10.4 ? -8% | 19.9 ? -107% |
Load Average * | 60 | 59 2% | 55.2 8% | 114 -90% | 66 -10% | 60.7 ? -1% | 95.2 ? -59% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 49.3 | 51 -3% | 76.7 -56% | 53 -8% | |||
Load Maximum * | 68.6 | 70 -2% | 69.4 -1% | 134.2 -96% | 67.4 2% | 68.9 ? -0% | 166.7 ? -143% |
* ... smaller is better
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 i7-10610U, Quadro P520, 53 Wh | HP ZBook 15u G6 6TP54EA i7-8565U, Radeon Pro WX 3200, 56 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad P53s-20N6001NGE i7-8565U, Quadro P520, 57 Wh | Dell Precision 5550 P91F i7-10875H, Quadro T2000 Max-Q, 86 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 i7-10510U, GeForce MX330, 57 Wh | Average of class Workstation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -4% | 5% | -17% | -32% | -16% | |
H.264 | 730 | 705 -3% | 483 -34% | 671 ? -8% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 546 | 415 -24% | 517 -5% | 540 -1% | 426 -22% | 513 ? -6% |
Load | 120 | 140 17% | 148 23% | 82 -32% | 72 -40% | 80.9 ? -33% |
Reader / Idle | 745 | 1510 | 1354 | 927 ? |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto: O HP ZBook Firefly é bom, mas não o suficiente
Um novo nome por si só não traz uma revolução - é por isso que a HP também deu ao seu workstation ultrabook ZBook Firefly 15 G7 um novo design, que tem pontos fortes e fracos.
A maior melhoria: A nova carcaça é muito mais compacta. Por outro lado, você perde a porta docking dedicada e a Ethernet RJ45. Para compensar, há mais uma porta Thunderbolt 3, mas ainda falta um leitor de cartão (micro) SD. Não há mudança qualitativa no que diz respeito aos dispositivos de entrada, a carcaça de metal e a tela 4K - o ZBook Firefly está em um nível de alta qualidade em todas as três áreas, inclusive quando a LCD 4K infelizmente não é um painel de gama ampla.
Em termos de componentes, os dois slots de RAM devem ser elogiados, pois permitem até 64 GB. A CPU e GPU causam menos entusiasmo: Nenhum dos componentes está abaixo da concorrência direta quando se trata de desempenho, mas eles estão simplesmente muito desatualizados agora. Quanto às CPUs, gostaríamos de ver a série Ryzen 4000 da AMD sendo usada, enquanto a Quadro P520 precisaria urgentemente ser substituída por uma nova versão baseada na GeForce MX450. Podemos, pelo menos, elogiar o baixo nível de ruído, bem como a boa duração da bateria, enquanto o desenvolvimento da temperatura na carcaça é um pouco alto para o nosso gosto.
Bom, mas caro e internamente um tanto desatualizado sem uma opção AMD: O HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
Em suma, a HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7 é um bom workstation para tarefas CAD leves. Se você, como cliente corporativo, tem um contrato com a HP e precisa de portáteis para essa área de trabalho, comprar o portátil HP não será um erro. Mas todos os outros clientes deveriam procurar portáteis com CPUs AMD Ryzen 4000 - ou esperar por uma versão com Intel Tiger Lake e uma GPU Quadro mais recente.
HP ZBook Firefly 15 G7
- 10/14/2020 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig