Breve Análise do Portátil HP ProBook x360 435 G7: AMD Ryzen também brilha no conversível empresarial
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 86.8 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U R5 4500U, Vega 6 | 1.4 kg | 17.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 89 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 16 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.5 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr R5 4500U, Vega 6 | 1.3 kg | 16.4 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.2 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 17.6 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Convertible (17.7 - 209, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Convertible (22.6 - 263, n=29, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 360 cd/m²
Contraste: 2213:1 (Preto: 0.16 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 2
ΔE Greyscale 4.5 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
90.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.29
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U LGD0675, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA InfoVison IVO857A, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 N133HCE-EP2, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 8% | 5% | 7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.1 | 69.3 10% | 65.9 4% | 68.1 8% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.8 | 92.2 2% | 97.4 7% | 94.7 4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.5 | 72.9 13% | 67.8 5% | 70.2 9% |
| Response Times | -53% | -5% | 11% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 45.6 ? | 74 ? -62% | 47.6 ? -4% | 40 ? 12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30.8 ? | 44 ? -43% | 32.4 ? -5% | 28 ? 9% |
| PWM Frequency | 952 ? | 25000 ? | 25000 ? | |
| Screen | -7% | 10% | 21% | |
| Brightness middle | 354 | 542 53% | 452.6 28% | 340 -4% |
| Brightness | 344 | 653 90% | 438 27% | 336 -2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 70 -16% | 93 12% | 90 8% |
| Black Level * | 0.16 | 0.22 -38% | 0.29 -81% | 0.18 -13% |
| Contrast | 2213 | 2464 11% | 1561 -29% | 1889 -15% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.4 | 4.72 -39% | 2.67 21% | 1.3 62% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 5.8 | 10.5 -81% | 4.11 29% | 2.8 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 2 | 1.36 32% | 0.7 65% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 7.71 -71% | 2.1 53% | 1.9 58% |
| Gamma | 2.29 96% | 2.31 95% | 2.01 109% | 2.15 102% |
| CCT | 6046 108% | 6670 97% | 6505 100% | 6735 97% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 63 7% | 62.2 5% | 64.1 9% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 90.6 | 100 10% | 97.6 8% | 99.6 10% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% /
-10% | 3% /
7% | 13% /
17% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 12.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 45.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 76 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
| Average of class Convertible (242 - 7303, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 4500U (1843 - 2530, n=13) | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
| Average of class Convertible (149.8 - 781, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 4500U (424 - 453, n=12) | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (110.1 - 2889, n=66, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 4500U (715 - 1007, n=18) | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Convertible (68.6 - 302, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 4500U (156 - 177, n=13) | |
| HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 4500U (533 - 748, n=11) | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Average of class Convertible (175 - 1059, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
| Average of class Convertible (3672 - 6493, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 4500U (4235 - 4338, n=11) | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| 7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
| Average of class Convertible (12977 - 72400, n=61, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 4500U (22466 - 25891, n=11) | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
| Average of class Convertible (319 - 2062, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 4500U (1082 - 1220, n=10) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
| Average of class Convertible (663 - 14016, n=64, last 2 years) | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 4500U (4352 - 6234, n=10) | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.73 - 22.4, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 4500U (5.86 - 7.33, n=10) | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 4500U (58.2 - 78, n=11) | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| Average of class Convertible (42 - 121.5, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
| Average AMD Ryzen 5 4500U (0.614 - 0.654, n=10) | |
| HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr | |
| Average of class Convertible (0.4102 - 1.013, n=60, last 2 years) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3889 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5084 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4481 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U | |
* ... smaller is better
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G | Average WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 6% | -21% | 46% | 7% | |
| Write 4K | 94.1 | 146.4 56% | 94.8 1% | 172.3 83% | 138.5 ? 47% |
| Read 4K | 41.01 | 46.91 14% | 45.5 11% | 44.37 8% | 44.2 ? 8% |
| Write Seq | 1465 | 981 -33% | 732 -50% | 1492 2% | 1265 ? -14% |
| Read Seq | 1453 | 908 -38% | 959 -34% | 1471 1% | 1237 ? -15% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 322.6 | 474.9 47% | 224.6 -30% | 483.1 50% | 404 ? 25% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 421.8 | 442.3 5% | 365.2 -13% | 551 31% | 421 ? 0% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1463 | 1451 -1% | 864 -41% | 2951 102% | 1491 ? 2% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1751 | 1638 -6% | 1580 -10% | 3289 88% | 1741 ? -1% |
Continuous load read: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3805 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13166 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2008 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 781 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 39.4 | 24.7 | 12.7 | |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 89.2 | 68.3 | 35.4 | 33.3 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 35.6 | 26.8 | 24.4 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 31.8 | 11.8 | ||
| Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 36.4 | 11.5 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.3 / 29.3 / 30.4 dB |
| Carga |
| 31.3 / 34.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.3 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.6 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 35.4 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.3 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.1 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28 °C / 82.4 F (+0.2 °C / 0.4 F).
HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 22.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 67% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 28% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 65% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.1% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | reduced highs - on average 8.1% lower than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (8.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (29.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 86% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 11% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 85% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 12% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.33 / 0.52 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.8 / 5.7 / 7.9 Watt |
| Carga |
29.3 / 48.6 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U R5 4500U, Vega 6, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr R5 4500U, Vega 6, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average AMD Radeon RX Vega 6 (Ryzen 4000/5000) | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -16% | -5% | -27% | -11% | -44% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 3.4 11% | 3.9 -3% | 3.7 3% | 3.98 ? -5% | 5.21 ? -37% |
| Idle Average * | 5.7 | 7.8 -37% | 5.8 -2% | 6.2 -9% | 6.53 ? -15% | 8.23 ? -44% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.9 | 10.3 -30% | 6 24% | 11.2 -42% | 8.65 ? -9% | 11.1 ? -41% |
| Load Average * | 29.3 | 36 -23% | 41.5 -42% | 44.3 -51% | 35 ? -19% | 46.7 ? -59% |
| Load Maximum * | 48.6 | 49.5 -2% | 50.4 -4% | 65 -34% | 51.5 ? -6% | 67.3 ? -38% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U R5 4500U, Vega 6, 45 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G4 7YL44EA i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | HP Envy x360 13-ay0010nr R5 4500U, Vega 6, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga 20R6S00800 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 46 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 89% | 53% | 11% | 33% | |
| H.264 | 659 | 394 -40% | 770 ? 17% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 580 | 564 -3% | 708 22% | 459 -21% | 596 ? 3% |
| Load | 63 | 177 181% | 116 84% | 123 95% | 113.1 ? 80% |
| Reader / Idle | 729 | 1916 | 912 | 1330 ? |
Pro
Contra
Com o ProBook x360 435 G7, a HP oferece algo que nem a Dell nem a Lenovo têm no segmento empresarial: Um portátil conversível com processador AMD Ryzen 4000.
Isso por si só é suficiente para dar ao HP ProBook uma recomendação de compra, porque em termos de desempenho, é claramente superior ao seu concorrente direto, o Lenovo ThinkPad L13 Yoga. Isso não se aplica apenas ao desempenho da CPU, mas também ao da GPU. Além disso, a HP continua a usar slots de RAM, ao contrário da Lenovo. Consequentemente, a memória pode ser expandida até um máximo de 64 GB. Embora isso resulte em menos espaço disponível para a bateria, o portátil HP também tem um forte desempenho nesta categoria graças ao seu baixo consumo. A imagem é semelhante em termos de emissão de calor, que é mantida dentro de limites, apesar do bom desempenho.
Mesmo se você mudar o foco dos componentes para as características externas, o HP ProBook 435 x360 G7 ainda é convincente em grande parte: A carcaça é quase inteiramente feita de alumínio, o que proporciona grande estabilidade e uma sensação de alta qualidade. O teclado é adequado para a digitação frequente e o touchpad é virtualmente perfeito.
O ProBook naturalmente também tem fraquezas. É relativamente grande e pesado para um conversível de 13,3 polegadas, e o marco da tela é bastante largo. Uma caneta não está incluída com o ProBook e a caneta opcional disponível também não pode ser armazenada na carcaça. Em termos de configuração das portas, descobrimos que pelo menos uma segunda porta USB-C deve ser integrada, e o Thunderbolt 3 também está ausente. Recursos de segurança, como obturador mecânico de webcam ou leitor de cartão inteligente, estão ausentes. Além disso, a tela não atinge o nível de brilho prometido, e o desempenho do módulo Wi-Fi não é tão bom quanto esperávamos. Além disso, a garantia é extremamente curta, de apenas 12 meses.
Um conversível empresarial e AMD Ryzen 4000: Essa combinação torna o HP ProBook x360 435 muito atraente.
Você deve manter esses pontos de crítica em mente ao comprar. Apesar dessas críticas, o HP ProBook x360 435 G7 é, em geral, um pacote muito atraente. Se você está procurando um conversível comercial, ele, definitivamente, deve estar na lista.
HP ProBook x360 435 G7, Ryzen 5 4500U
- 09/08/2020 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
