Breve Análise do Portátil HP ProBook 650 G3 Z2W44ET
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) (Klaus I211) | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET (jseb) | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) (Klaus I211) | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET (jseb) | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET (jseb) | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET (jseb) | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET (jseb) | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET (jseb) | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 355 cd/m²
Contraste: 540:1 (Preto: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 11.02 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 13.14 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
81% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
52% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
57% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
81.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
55.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.7
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE AH-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) IPS, 2880x1800, 15.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -5% | -19% | 12% | -26% | -29% | ||
| Display P3 Coverage | 55.2 | 52.1 -6% | 44.49 -19% | 66.6 21% | 40.48 -27% | 39 -29% | |
| sRGB Coverage | 81.1 | 78.3 -3% | 66.9 -18% | 85.7 6% | 60.9 -25% | 58.3 -28% | |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 57 | 53.7 -6% | 45.97 -19% | 62.8 10% | 41.82 -27% | 40.33 -29% | |
| Response Times | -3% | -8% | 4% | -12% | -4% | 19453% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 38 ? | 41 ? -8% | 44 ? -16% | 38 ? -0% | 47 ? -24% | 39.2 ? -3% | 47.3 ? -24% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 27 ? | 27 ? -0% | 29 ? -7% | 25 ? 7% | 27 ? -0% | 28 ? -4% | 31.2 ? -16% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 200 ? 0% | 200 ? 0% | 117000 ? 58400% | |||
| Screen | -6% | -6% | 15% | -10% | 7% | 69% | |
| Brightness middle | 351 | 313 -11% | 248 -29% | 308 -12% | 228 -35% | 262 -25% | 483 38% |
| Brightness | 345 | 296 -14% | 230 -33% | 319 -8% | 236 -32% | 250 -28% | 465 35% |
| Brightness Distribution | 95 | 90 -5% | 88 -7% | 71 -25% | 90 -5% | 92 -3% | 92 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.65 | 0.59 9% | 0.56 14% | 0.61 6% | 0.56 14% | 0.29 55% | 0.33 49% |
| Contrast | 540 | 531 -2% | 443 -18% | 505 -6% | 407 -25% | 903 67% | 1464 171% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 11.02 | 11.89 -8% | 8.7 21% | 4.51 59% | 10.02 9% | 8.49 23% | 1.4 87% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 17.68 | 20.81 -18% | 14.96 15% | 10.19 42% | 15.93 10% | 17.99 -2% | 3 83% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 13.14 | 12.95 1% | 11.48 13% | 2.91 78% | 10.66 19% | 8.11 38% | 1.5 89% |
| Gamma | 2.7 81% | 2.4 92% | 2.38 92% | 2.4 92% | 2.48 89% | 2.37 93% | 2.34 94% |
| CCT | 16626 39% | 15063 43% | 11179 58% | 6740 96% | 11800 55% | 6300 103% | 6650 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 52 | 50 -4% | 42 -19% | 56 8% | 39 -25% | 37.07 -29% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 81 | 78 -4% | 67 -17% | 86 6% | 61 -25% | 57.94 -28% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -5% /
-5% | -11% /
-9% | 10% /
13% | -16% /
-13% | -9% /
-2% | 9761% /
5355% |
* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 27 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 64 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 38 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 51 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET | |
| Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
| Geekbench 3 | |
| 32 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
| 32 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
| Geekbench 4.0 | |
| 64 Bit Single-Core Score | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
| 64 Bit Multi-Core Score | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
| JetStream 1.1 - Total Score | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 3124 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3149 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3741 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4118 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET Hitachi Travelstar Z7K500 HTS725050A7E630 | HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ15 | Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B Kingston RBU-SNS8152S3256GG2 | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 12% | 8793% | 10223% | 42% | |
| Read Seq | 109.4 | 122.1 12% | 479.1 338% | 474.7 334% | 113.6 4% |
| Write Seq | 99.9 | 110.7 11% | 333.1 233% | 155 55% | 111.7 12% |
| Read 512 | 16.34 | 33.53 105% | 418 2458% | 393.6 2309% | 39.65 143% |
| Write 512 | 43.45 | 51.3 18% | 320.5 638% | 119.7 175% | 55.3 27% |
| Read 4k | 0.337 | 0.357 6% | 25.66 7514% | 34 9989% | 0.488 45% |
| Write 4k | 0.866 | 0.641 -26% | 64.7 7371% | 96.6 11055% | 1.022 18% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 0.826 | 0.778 -6% | 226.2 27285% | 383.3 46304% | 1.367 65% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 0.859 | 0.672 -22% | 211.4 24510% | 100.2 11565% | 1.036 21% |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 6656 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1359 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 46690 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5064 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 600 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET | |
| Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomb Raider (2013) | 52.1 | 26.2 | 14.4 | 9.6 |
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 32.9 | 20.1 | 16.1 | 6.9 |
| Battlefield 4 (2013) | 24.4 | 19.3 | 12.2 | 6.1 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.5 / 31.5 / 31.5 dB |
| HDD |
| 32 dB |
| DVD |
| 36.7 / dB |
| Carga |
| 34.6 / 33.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.7 dB(A) | ||
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Pro A8-8600B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -0% | -0% | -9% | -4% | 3% | -5% | |
| off / environment * | 30.7 | 30.5 1% | 31.5 -3% | 31.2 -2% | 31.2 -2% | 29.4 4% | 30.4 1% |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.5 | 30.5 3% | 31.6 -0% | 32.5 -3% | 31.2 1% | 30.1 4% | 30.6 3% |
| Idle Average * | 31.5 | 31.6 -0% | 31.6 -0% | 32.5 -3% | 33.2 -5% | 30.1 4% | 30.6 3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 31.5 | 31.9 -1% | 31.6 -0% | 35 -11% | 34.3 -9% | 30.1 4% | 30.6 3% |
| Load Average * | 34.6 | 34.7 -0% | 33.5 3% | 42 -21% | 36.6 -6% | 33.4 3% | 34.7 -0% |
| Load Maximum * | 33.3 | 34.5 -4% | 33.5 -1% | 37.5 -13% | 34.7 -4% | 34.7 -4% | 46.3 -39% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 31.9 °C / 89 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 32.1 °C / 90 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.1 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.6 °C / 78.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+2.1 °C / 3.8 F).
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Pro A8-8600B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -26% | -26% | -17% | -36% | -23% | -18% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 31.9 | 39.6 -24% | 35.8 -12% | 35.2 -10% | 37.3 -17% | 37.2 -17% | 43 -35% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 32.1 | 41.8 -30% | 37.6 -17% | 38 -18% | 41.5 -29% | 36 -12% | 40 -25% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 23.5 | 31.6 -34% | 33.4 -42% | 29.5 -26% | 34.2 -46% | 30.7 -31% | 26 -11% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25.3 | 29.7 -17% | 33.2 -31% | 29 -15% | 38.8 -53% | 32.8 -30% | 25 1% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (68 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 8.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 45% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 54% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.23 / 0.28 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4 / 6.9 / 7.6 Watt |
| Carga |
29 / 28.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620 | HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Pro A8-8600B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo) | Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 6300U, HD Graphics 520 | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520 | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 2% | -16% | -46% | -7% | -13% | -77% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4 | 3.4 15% | 5.8 -45% | 6.6 -65% | 4.5 -13% | 5 -25% | 2.9 27% |
| Idle Average * | 6.9 | 7.5 -9% | 7.5 -9% | 10.4 -51% | 7.6 -10% | 7.9 -14% | 9.7 -41% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.6 | 7.6 -0% | 8.6 -13% | 12.7 -67% | 8.7 -14% | 8.6 -13% | 10.1 -33% |
| Load Average * | 29 | 28.4 2% | 31 -7% | 36 -24% | 28.5 2% | 27.5 5% | 65 -124% |
| Load Maximum * | 28.7 | 28.4 1% | 30.5 -6% | 35 -22% | 29.2 -2% | 33.7 -17% | 89.5 -212% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | HP ProBook 650 G2-T9X61ET 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh | HP ProBook 650 G2 V1A44ET 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh | HP ProBook 655 G2 T9X09ET Pro A8-8600B, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 48 Wh | Acer TravelMate P658-M-537B 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 55 Wh | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 62 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2016 (2.6 GHz, 450) 6700HQ, Radeon Pro 450, 76 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -9% | -9% | -53% | -4% | 31% | -23% | -4% | |
| Reader / Idle | 765 | 690 -10% | 840 10% | 1231 61% | 698 -9% | |||
| H.264 | 402 | 382 -5% | 571 42% | 277 -31% | 516 28% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 467 | 408 -13% | 424 -9% | 220 -53% | 512 10% | 632 35% | 406 -13% | 602 29% |
| Load | 177 | 163 -8% | 123 -31% | 151 -15% | 109 -38% | 55 -69% |
Pro
Contra
O portátil empresarial de gama média da HP atinge um desempenho um pouco melhor graças aos novos processadores Kaby Lake. No entanto, isto será quase imperceptível durante as tarefas do dia a dia. Os novos processadores melhoram as durações da bateria. O portátil pode exceder os já bons resultados dos predecessores. O computador funciona de forma silenciosa e dificilmente esquenta sem importar a carga de trabalho. Graças a um disco rígido de 500 GB, você não ficará sem espaço rapidamente. É possível substituir o HD por um SSD. Isto requererá remover o lado inferior - que é bastante simples.
Em geral, a HP entrega um sólido portátil empresarial com o ProBook 650 G3. No entanto, o modelo de teste é menos atraente do que poderia, dado que o preço é muito alto para os recursos incluídos.
Por falar do SSD: A HP atualmente oferece um portátil de 1.050-Euros (~$1111) com um HD em vez de um SSD. Isto, sem dúvida é um ponto negativo significante O teclado utilizado parece bom e está feito para escritores prolíficos. No entanto, não possui uma iluminação de fundo. Isto deveria ser um recursos padrão em vista do preço do computador. Além disso, a tela é realmente decepcionante. A empresa incorporou um modelo TN de baixo contraste com ângulos de visão estreitos. Esta tela deve estar absolutamente fora de questão em um portátil desta classe de preços. Nós esperamos um modelo IPS.
HP Probook 650 G3 Z2W44ET
- 02/21/2017 v6 (old)
Sascha Mölck
Price comparison
