Breve Análise do Portátil HP ProBook 450 G7 Core i7: É melhor que o Ryzen 7 ProBook 455 G7?
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
81.4 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 1.9 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.6 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA R7 4700U, Vega 7 | 1.8 kg | 19 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
80.1 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 1.6 kg | 15.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
79.6 % v6 (old) | Dell Latitude 15 3590 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620 | 2.1 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
83.2 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 2 kg | 23 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
82.9 % v7 (old) | Dynabook Tecra X50-F i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 17.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
HP EliteBook 1050 G1-4QY20EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) |
|
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 224.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 619:1 (Preto: 0.42 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 6.09 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 5.2
ΔE Greyscale 3.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
35.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.08% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.9% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.56
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT LG Philips LGD062E, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA AUO, B156HW02, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | MSI Modern 15 A10RB Chi Mei N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 15 3590 BOE0802 / NT15N41 / Dell: M9P74, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE N156HCE-EAA, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dynabook Tecra X50-F Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | 0% | 69% | 5% | 14% | -3% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 37.9 | 37.92 0% | 66 74% | 39.67 5% | 43.3 14% | 36.68 -3% |
sRGB Coverage | 56.5 | 57.1 1% | 92.1 63% | 59.7 6% | 64.4 14% | 55 -3% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.08 | 39.18 0% | 66.5 70% | 40.99 5% | 44.81 15% | 37.92 -3% |
Response Times | -1% | -18% | 23% | -12% | 4% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 35.2 ? | 41 ? -16% | 43.2 ? -23% | 41 ? -16% | 42.8 ? -22% | 38 ? -8% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30.4 ? | 26 ? 14% | 34.4 ? -13% | 12 ? 61% | 30.8 ? -1% | 25.6 ? 16% |
PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 250 ? | 24510 ? | |||
Screen | 20% | 41% | -28% | 11% | 3% | |
Brightness middle | 259.8 | 282 9% | 289.4 11% | 215 -17% | 247 -5% | 295.9 14% |
Brightness | 251 | 264 5% | 273 9% | 214 -15% | 228 -9% | 270 8% |
Brightness Distribution | 91 | 88 -3% | 82 -10% | 91 0% | 81 -11% | 86 -5% |
Black Level * | 0.42 | 0.19 55% | 0.27 36% | 0.385 8% | 0.18 57% | 0.3 29% |
Contrast | 619 | 1484 140% | 1072 73% | 558 -10% | 1372 122% | 986 59% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 6.09 | 5.56 9% | 2.32 62% | 10.31 -69% | 5.9 3% | 6.55 -8% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 16.33 | 19.07 -17% | 5.76 65% | 20.44 -25% | 22.9 -40% | 21.52 -32% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.2 | 4.5 13% | 2.49 52% | 3.88 25% | 4.7 10% | 5.73 -10% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.7 | 3.57 4% | 3 19% | 11.84 -220% | 5.1 -38% | 4.3 -16% |
Gamma | 2.56 86% | 2.61 84% | 2.22 99% | 2.67 82% | 2.21 100% | 2.475 89% |
CCT | 6759 96% | 6895 94% | 6867 95% | 13398 49% | 6398 102% | 7002 93% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 35.7 | 36 1% | 59.8 68% | 39 9% | 41.2 15% | 35 -2% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56.2 | 57 1% | 92 64% | 61 9% | 64.1 14% | 54 -4% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
14% | 31% /
39% | 0% /
-15% | 4% /
9% | 1% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 10.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
35.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 45 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Multi Core) | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (1015 - 1897, n=38) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
HP 17-by2437ng |
Cinebench R20 / CPU (Single Core) | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (362 - 497, n=37) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
HP 17-by2437ng | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Multi 64Bit | |
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (482 - 856, n=45) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
HP 17-by2437ng |
Cinebench R15 / CPU Single 64Bit | |
MSI Prestige 15 A10SC | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (113 - 202, n=42) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
HP 17-by2437ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT |
Blender / v2.79 BMW27 CPU | |
HP 17-by2437ng | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (628 - 1051, n=31) | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 -mmt1 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3747 - 4981, n=31) | |
HP 17-by2437ng | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE |
7-Zip 18.03 / 7z b 4 | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (12196 - 21298, n=31) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
HP 17-by2437ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Single-Core | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (977 - 1287, n=31) | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
HP 17-by2437ng |
Geekbench 5.5 / Multi-Core | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (2474 - 4484, n=31) | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
HP 17-by2437ng |
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2 / 4k Preset | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (3.41 - 6.04, n=31) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
HP 17-by2437ng |
LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
HP 17-by2437ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (50.7 - 77.8, n=27) | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N |
R Benchmark 2.5 / Overall mean | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
HP 17-by2437ng | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U (0.637 - 0.81, n=28) | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 10 | |
Score | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3861 - 5409, n=11) | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
Dynabook Tecra X50-F | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Essentials | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (8021 - 9764, n=11) | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
Dynabook Tecra X50-F | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Productivity | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (6625 - 7972, n=11) | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Dynabook Tecra X50-F | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Digital Content Creation | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2621 - 5547, n=11) | |
Dynabook Tecra X50-F | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3214 - 3958, n=8) | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (4599 - 5443, n=8) | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3585 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4992 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 4231 pontos | |
Ajuda |
DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
HP Envy x360 15-dr1679cl | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
HP 17-by2437ng | |
Asus VivoBook 17 S712FA-DS76 | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 |
* ... smaller is better
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT Crucial P1 SSD CT1000P1SSD8 | HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | MSI Modern 15 A10RB WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Dell Latitude 15 3590 Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G | Dynabook Tecra X50-F Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | 19% | 113% | -29% | 67% | 31% | |
Seq Read | 1155 | 1929 67% | 2084 80% | 498.7 -57% | 1383 20% | 1461 26% |
Seq Write | 984 | 1199 22% | 2442 148% | 361.7 -63% | 852 -13% | 1039 6% |
4K Read | 48.85 | 43.9 -10% | 47.52 -3% | 34.65 -29% | 45.72 -6% | 45.98 -6% |
4K Write | 96.6 | 116.2 20% | 135.8 41% | 79.8 -17% | 120.2 24% | 125.5 30% |
4K-64 Read | 581 | 897 54% | 1043 80% | 372.5 -36% | 1344 131% | 560 -4% |
4K-64 Write | 658 | 801 22% | 955 45% | 247.7 -62% | 926 41% | 1162 77% |
Access Time Read * | 0.066 | 0.069 -5% | 0.062 6% | 0.06 9% | 0.063 5% | 0.045 32% |
Access Time Write * | 0.207 | 0.033 84% | 0.076 63% | 0.042 80% | 0.036 83% | 0.032 85% |
Score Read | 745 | 1134 52% | 1299 74% | 457 -39% | 1528 105% | 752 1% |
Score Write | 853 | 1037 22% | 1335 57% | 364 -57% | 1132 33% | 1391 63% |
Score Total | 1986 | 2723 37% | 3326 67% | 1060 -47% | 3420 72% | 2521 27% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 2635 | 1409 -47% | 1926 -27% | 1147 -56% | ||
Copy Program MB/s | 95.1 | 70.2 -26% | 714 651% | 419.8 341% | ||
Copy Game MB/s | 361.9 | 254.9 -30% | 1425 294% | 928 156% | ||
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 19% | 108% | -36% | 21% | 10% | |
Write 4K | 111.1 | 141.9 28% | 208.4 88% | 79.5 -28% | 115.3 4% | 100.1 -10% |
Read 4K | 56.3 | 37.25 -34% | 51 -9% | 32.72 -42% | 43.34 -23% | 42.4 -25% |
Write Seq | 559 | 998 79% | 2687 381% | 472.5 -15% | 1014 81% | |
Read Seq | 1348 | 1233 -9% | 2168 61% | 504 -63% | 1481 10% | |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 277.1 | 338.4 22% | 489.2 77% | 322.6 16% | 495.4 79% | 245.9 -11% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 312.1 | 431.1 38% | 600 92% | 249.9 -20% | 332.6 7% | 230.3 -26% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 1652 | 1367 -17% | 2699 63% | 531 -68% | 1654 0% | 1910 16% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 1588 | 2355 48% | 3374 112% | 544 -66% | 1746 10% | 3454 118% |
Write 4K Q8T8 | 877 | 1033 | ||||
Read 4K Q8T8 | 518 | 892 | ||||
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 19% /
19% | 111% /
111% | -33% /
-32% | 44% /
50% | 21% /
23% |
* ... smaller is better
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
3DMark 11 | |
1280x720 Performance GPU | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3585 - 4942, n=29) | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Asus VivoBook 17 S712FA-DS76 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
HP Envy x360 15-dr1679cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 | |
HP 17-by2437ng | |
1280x720 Performance Combined | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E590-20NB0012GE | |
MSI Modern 15 A10RB | |
Lenovo ThinkPad T15 Gen1-20S7S02U00 | |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT | |
Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3532 - 4638, n=29) | |
Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 15 i7-1065G7 | |
HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA | |
Lenovo IdeaPad 3 14IIL05 | |
Lenovo ThinkBook 15 | |
Asus VivoBook 17 S712FA-DS76 | |
HP Envy x360 15-dr1679cl | |
Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE | |
LG Gram 15Z90N | |
HP 17-by2437ng | |
Dell Latitude 15 3590 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 4452 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13121 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3072 pontos | |
3DMark Time Spy Score | 1119 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 66.7 | 34.7 | 21 | 11.2 |
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 110 | 96.2 | 68 | 60.7 |
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 44.3 | 38.7 | 35.5 |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Crucial P1 SSD CT1000P1SSD8 | HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA Vega 7, R7 4700U, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU | MSI Modern 15 A10RB GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G | Dell Latitude 15 3590 UHD Graphics 620, i5-8250U, Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-8265U, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G | Dynabook Tecra X50-F UHD Graphics 620, i7-8665U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -6% | -11% | -11% | 1% | -5% | |
off / environment * | 26.2 | 30.7 -17% | 28.3 -8% | 30.6 -17% | 29 -11% | 30.2 -15% |
Idle Minimum * | 26.2 | 30.7 -17% | 32 -22% | 30.6 -17% | 29 -11% | 30.2 -15% |
Idle Average * | 26.2 | 30.7 -17% | 32 -22% | 31.9 -22% | 29 -11% | 30.2 -15% |
Idle Maximum * | 26.2 | 30.7 -17% | 32 -22% | 31.9 -22% | 29 -11% | 30.2 -15% |
Load Average * | 38.1 | 33.9 11% | 34.5 9% | 39 -2% | 29 24% | 33.4 12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.5 | 39.5 -5% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 47 | 36.8 22% | 50.9 -8% | 39.1 17% | 33.8 28% | 39 17% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 26.2 / 26.2 / 26.2 dB |
Carga |
| 38.1 / 47 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 26.2 dB(A) |
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 40 °C / 104 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 56.6 °C / 134 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 29.8 °C / 85.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-2.2 °C / -3.9 F).
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (81.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.5% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 9% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 88% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.17 / 1.3 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.8 / 9.5 / 10.7 Watt |
Carga |
61.8 / 69 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, Crucial P1 SSD CT1000P1SSD8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA R7 4700U, Vega 7, Samsung PM991 MZVLQ512HALU, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN730 SDBPNTY-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 15 3590 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871b MZ7LN256HAJQ, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG6AZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dynabook Tecra X50-F i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 25% | -32% | 29% | 27% | 28% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.8 | 3.8 21% | 6.6 -38% | 4.3 10% | 3.96 17% | 3.9 19% |
Idle Average * | 9.5 | 7.7 19% | 9.9 -4% | 7.2 24% | 6.9 27% | 7 26% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.7 | 10.5 2% | 14.7 -37% | 9.8 8% | 9.8 8% | 7.3 32% |
Load Average * | 61.8 | 32 48% | 82.9 -34% | 38 39% | 31.4 49% | 32.7 47% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 50 | 59.4 -19% | ||||
Load Maximum * | 69 | 45.4 34% | 109.3 -58% | 24 65% | 45.4 34% | 57.8 16% |
* ... smaller is better
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 45 Wh | HP ProBook 455 G7-175W8EA R7 4700U, Vega 7, 45 Wh | MSI Modern 15 A10RB i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 52 Wh | Dell Latitude 15 3590 i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 56 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L590-20Q70019GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Dynabook Tecra X50-F i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | -8% | -8% | 23% | 18% | -37% | |
Reader / Idle | 890 | 755 -15% | 924 4% | 1209 36% | 1044 17% | 349 -61% |
WiFi v1.3 | 433 | 455 5% | 388 -10% | 544 26% | 429 -1% | 278 -36% |
Load | 122 | 106 -13% | 101 -17% | 129 6% | 168 38% | 104 -15% |
Pro
Contra
Quando configurado com a CPU Core i7, sem GPU GeForce, tela 1080p, 8 GB de RAM e HDD de 500 GB, o ProBook 450 G7 é vendido por cerca de $1.200 USD na HP.com. Ao configurar o ProBook 455 G7 com as mesmas especificações, mas com a CPU Ryzen 7, o sistema seria vendido por apenas cerca de $800 USD. Esses preços podem muito bem mudar no futuro, mas a mensagem permanece clara: o ProBook 455 G7 com Ryzen é a opção mais rápida e mais barata para torná-lo o melhor sistema, especialmente em termos de desempenho por dólar.
Ainda vale a pena comprar o ProBook 450 G7 com processador Intel? As opções Nvidia GeForce estão disponíveis apenas em SKUs Intel, que oferecem desempenho gráfico mais rápido do que a solução AMD integrada para quem precisa. Ofertas potenciais do ProBook 450 G7 como aquela na CUKUSA também pode fazer o sistema valer a pena considerar. Caso contrário, a Intel terá uma longa batalha difícil contra a AMD e suas alternativas Ryzen emergentes.
O HP ProBook 450 G7 integra muitos recursos para um portátil empresarial econômico, incluindo uma GPU GeForce MX dedicada. Se o último não for importante para suas cargas de trabalho, entretanto, o ProBook 455 G7 será a opção superior em quase todos os aspectos.
HP ProBook 450 G7 8WC04UT
- 08/02/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo