Breve Análise do Portátil HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
| Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
| Networking | |
| iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Lenovo Ideapad 310-15IKB | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 77 %
iluminação com acumulador: 214 cd/m²
Contraste: 498:1 (Preto: 0.43 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.68 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 11.32 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.24% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.89% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.26
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA Chi Mei CMN15C4, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Lenovo LP156WF6-SPK2, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE LG LP156WF6-SPK1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 15-3570 LG Philips LGD04AF / 156WHU, , 1366x768, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 LG Philips 156WHU, , 1366x768, 15.6" | HP ProBook 450 G3 AU Optronics, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -2% | 2% | 1% | -4% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.89 | 38.5 -3% | 39 -2% | 40.61 2% | 40.48 1% | 38.1 -4% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.5 | 57.5 -3% | 58.3 -2% | 61.1 3% | 60.9 2% | 57.3 -4% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.24 | 39.8 -3% | 40.33 -2% | 41.96 2% | 41.82 1% | 39.37 -5% |
| Response Times | 25% | 15% | 2% | 9% | 13% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 51 ? | 38.4 ? 25% | 39.2 ? 23% | 37 ? 27% | 47 ? 8% | 41.2 ? 19% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 22.4 ? 25% | 28 ? 7% | 37 ? -23% | 27 ? 10% | 28 ? 7% |
| PWM Frequency | 50 ? | |||||
| Screen | 27% | 22% | -11% | 2% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle | 214 | 257 20% | 262 22% | 202 -6% | 228 7% | 211 -1% |
| Brightness | 201 | 234 16% | 250 24% | 211 5% | 236 17% | 214 6% |
| Brightness Distribution | 77 | 83 8% | 92 19% | 88 14% | 90 17% | 91 18% |
| Black Level * | 0.43 | 0.27 37% | 0.29 33% | 0.62 -44% | 0.56 -30% | 0.43 -0% |
| Contrast | 498 | 952 91% | 903 81% | 326 -35% | 407 -18% | 491 -1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.68 | 7.16 33% | 8.49 21% | 12.35 -16% | 10.02 6% | 9.25 13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 18.07 | 17.99 -0% | 19.9 -10% | 15.93 12% | ||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.32 | 6.28 45% | 8.11 28% | 13.46 -19% | 10.66 6% | 9.83 13% |
| Gamma | 2.26 97% | 2.44 90% | 2.37 93% | 2.44 90% | 2.48 89% | 2.82 78% |
| CCT | 12204 53% | 6806 96% | 6300 103% | 15217 43% | 11800 55% | 10890 60% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 36.6 -4% | 37.07 -2% | 39 3% | 39 3% | 36.4 -4% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 57.3 -3% | 57.94 -2% | 61 3% | 61 3% | 57.3 -3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 16% /
20% | 12% /
17% | -2% /
-6% | 4% /
3% | 5% /
4% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 20 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 28 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 50 Hz | ≤ 40 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 50 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 40 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 50 Hz is very low, so the flickering may cause eyestrain and headaches after extended use. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3163 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4725 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS | Dell Latitude 15-3570 Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -27% | -35% | 26% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.159 | 0.112 30% | 0.188 -18% | 0.07 56% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.141 | 0.171 -21% | 0.14 1% | 0.114 19% |
| 4K-64 Write | 195.5 | 33.55 -83% | 19.37 -90% | 82.7 -58% |
| 4K-64 Read | 137.1 | 83.9 -39% | 81.8 -40% | 356.1 160% |
| 4K Write | 73.4 | 34.46 -53% | 21.57 -71% | 91.1 24% |
| 4K Read | 17.96 | 17.2 -4% | 17.25 -4% | 29.68 65% |
| Seq Write | 315.9 | 162 -49% | 130 -59% | 146.2 -54% |
| Seq Read | 493.8 | 497.1 1% | 489.1 -1% | 488.5 -1% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| Dell Latitude 15-3570 | |
| HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA | |
| Dell Latitude 15 E5570 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE | |
| HP ProBook 450 G3 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2248 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 6908 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1454 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 94.8 | 51.2 | 41.77 | 14.42 |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 37.29 | 29.32 | 17.58 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 35.28 | 19.58 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 32.6 / 32.6 / 33 dB |
| DVD |
| 37.8 / dB |
| Carga |
| 38.9 / 38.9 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31.6 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 44.3 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 46.3 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.6 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.7 °C / 76.5 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+2.9 °C / 5.2 F).
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.7% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 6.9% higher than median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 62% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 52% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.19 / 0.52 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.8 / 6.6 / 11.3 Watt |
| Carga |
38 / 45 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 6500U, Radeon R7 M370, Samsung CM871 MZ7LF192HCGS, IPS-Panel, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, WDC Slim WD10SPCX-21KHST0, AH-IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 6300U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SSD PM871 MZ7LN128HCHP, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -15% | 5% | 13% | 10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 4.2 -11% | 5 -32% | 4.9 -29% | 4.5 -18% |
| Idle Average * | 6.6 | 7.5 -14% | 7.9 -20% | 7.2 -9% | 7.6 -15% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.3 | 8.2 27% | 8.6 24% | 7.5 34% | 8.7 23% |
| Load Average * | 38 | 49.6 -31% | 27.5 28% | 25.4 33% | 28.5 25% |
| Load Maximum * | 45 | 65.8 -46% | 33.7 25% | 28 38% | 29.2 35% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 45 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E560-20EWS00000 6500U, Radeon R7 M370, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L560-20F10026GE 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 15-3570 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 65 Wh | Dell Latitude 15 E5570 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 62 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -10% | -13% | 24% | 37% | |
| Reader / Idle | 746 | 884 18% | 698 -6% | 1024 37% | 1231 65% |
| WiFi v1.3 | 513 | 342 -33% | 406 -21% | 542 6% | 632 23% |
| Load | 123 | 104 -15% | 109 -11% | 157 28% | 151 23% |
| H.264 | 413 | 277 | 571 |
Pro
Contra
O ProBook 450 G4 é, de fato, um aparelho sólido A carcaça é boa e dificilmente apresenta fraquezas, o pousa palmas de metal se sente bem, e o aparelho oferece uma seleção de interfaces muito sólida que inclusive inclui o USB Type-C. Embora esta porta não seja capaz de nada a não ser USB, ela fornece segurança para o futuro. O processador oferece bom desempenho, o teclado é adequado para digitar, e o touchpad corresponde ao padrão do Precision. Finalmente, está a boa duração da bateria que é certamente atraente para trabalhar em movimento.
Infelizmente, isto não compensa a maior desvantagem do aparelho: A péssima tela. Isto poderia talvez ser justificado com um preço de 600 Euros (~$627), mas isto é simplesmente inaceitável com quase 1000 Euros (~$1045). Depois estão as outras desvantagens: O leitor de digitais é muito pouco viável e o processador esquenta muito durante o suo intenso. A HP deveria permitir que a ventoinha gire a uma velocidade um pouco mais alta aqui.
Uma pena: O fabricante estraga um pacote quase completo com uma tela que é simplesmente inapropriada para o preço.
O ProBook tem pouca concorrência no setor empresarial, pelo menos em termos de processador. No entanto, isto mudará em breve: O ThinkPad E570 foi anunciado, e será um aparelho de comparação interessante com o seu painel IPS e GeForce 950M. Os outros concorrentes provavelmente seguirão no início de 2017.
HP ProBook 450 G4 Y8B60EA
- 12/14/2016 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
