Breve Análise do Portátil HP ProBook 440 G5 (i5-8250U, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=35, last 2 years) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=31, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 88 %
iluminação com acumulador: 234 cd/m²
Contraste: 908:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.7 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 3.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59.2% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
37.7% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.88% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.56% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.1
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES LGD04B2, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Innolux N140HCA-EAC, , 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Innolux N140BGE, , 1366x768, 14" | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD N140HCA-EAB, , 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA AUO1E3D, , 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW Innolux N140HCA-EAC, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 6% | 2% | 4% | -5% | 5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.56 | 41.88 6% | 40.21 2% | 41.04 4% | 37.6 -5% | 41.56 5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59.3 | 62.8 6% | 60.5 2% | 61.2 3% | 56.6 -5% | 62.2 5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.88 | 43.29 6% | 41.55 2% | 42.47 4% | 38.85 -5% | 42.96 5% |
| Response Times | -9% | -4% | 3% | 4% | -10% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 40 ? | 44 ? -10% | 47 ? -18% | 39 ? 2% | 43.2 ? -8% | 44.8 ? -12% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 28.8 ? | 31.2 ? -8% | 26 ? 10% | 28 ? 3% | 24.4 ? 15% | 31.2 ? -8% |
| PWM Frequency | 24880 ? | 25000 ? | 25000 ? | |||
| Screen | 13% | -45% | -1% | -34% | 1% | |
| Brightness middle | 236 | 251 6% | 206 -13% | 271 15% | 216 -8% | 262 11% |
| Brightness | 221 | 231 5% | 193 -13% | 256 16% | 203 -8% | 245 11% |
| Brightness Distribution | 88 | 80 -9% | 87 -1% | 85 -3% | 83 -6% | 83 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.19 27% | 0.48 -85% | 0.43 -65% | 0.47 -81% | 0.19 27% |
| Contrast | 908 | 1321 45% | 429 -53% | 630 -31% | 460 -49% | 1379 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.7 | 5.1 11% | 11 -93% | 5.03 12% | 8.98 -58% | 7 -23% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 22 | 10.6 52% | 19.57 11% | 11.9 46% | 14.07 36% | 23.6 -7% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.8 | 4.5 -18% | 11.51 -203% | 4.02 -6% | 9.61 -153% | 6.4 -68% |
| Gamma | 2.1 105% | 2.18 101% | 2.23 99% | 2.31 95% | 2.63 84% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 7318 89% | 6146 106% | 13671 48% | 6659 98% | 11265 58% | 6065 107% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 37.7 | 39.8 6% | 38.46 2% | 39 3% | 35.9 -5% | 39.5 5% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59.2 | 62.5 6% | 60.61 2% | 61 3% | 56.7 -4% | 61.9 5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 3% /
9% | -16% /
-30% | 2% /
0% | -12% /
-23% | -1% /
0% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 28.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 11.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 74 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 40 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 58 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (98 - 284, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (81 - 147, n=97) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Office (246 - 2642, n=95, last 2 years) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U (320 - 730, n=101) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Office (4252 - 4830, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2986 - 4458, n=69) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2699 - 5106, n=58) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| Average of class Office (2900 - 5526, n=7, last 2 years) | |
| PCMark 10 | |
| Digital Content Creation | |
| Average of class Office (2049 - 9773, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2613 - 3082, n=67) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Productivity | |
| Average of class Office (3041 - 10415, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3851 - 6653, n=67) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Essentials | |
| Average of class Office (5575 - 20841, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (5855 - 9289, n=67) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Score | |
| Average of class Office (2463 - 7344, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3358 - 4081, n=67) | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3774 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4922 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3577 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 Lenovo LENSE20256GMSP34MEAT2TA | Dell Latitude 14 3470 Toshiba MQ01ACF050 | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002 | Average Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -31% | -95% | 2% | -51% | -12% | |
| Read Seq | 1181 | 1295 10% | 108.9 -91% | 1086 -8% | 491.2 -58% | 1122 ? -5% |
| Write Seq | 602 | 160.6 -73% | 103.2 -83% | 581 -3% | 322.2 -46% | 524 ? -13% |
| Read 512 | 923 | 872 -6% | 869 -6% | 310.1 -66% | 767 ? -17% | |
| Write 512 | 600 | 122 -80% | 584 -3% | 276 -54% | 541 ? -10% | |
| Read 4k | 35.48 | 25.72 -28% | 0.362 -99% | 35.89 1% | 19.57 -45% | 29.9 ? -16% |
| Write 4k | 139.8 | 95.2 -32% | 0.946 -99% | 122.4 -12% | 77.8 -44% | 114.5 ? -18% |
| Read 4k QD32 | 287.8 | 389.9 35% | 0.721 -100% | 462.9 61% | 146.3 -49% | 279 ? -3% |
| Write 4k QD32 | 417.1 | 118.3 -72% | 0.901 -100% | 370.9 -11% | 241.4 -42% | 356 ? -15% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (7982 - 58068, n=63, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Office (736 - 9375, n=91, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 | |
| HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 3470 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1736 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7127 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 873 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 53.6 | 28.19 | 23.14 | |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 25 | |||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 20.26 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.1 / 29.1 / 30.7 dB |
| Carga |
| 34.5 / 36 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.1 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39 °C / 102 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 45.5 °C / 114 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.9 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 24.5 °C / 76.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(+) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (+3.1 °C / 5.6 F).
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.1% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 31% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 66% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 29% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5.2% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (10.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 37% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 54% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP ProBook 450 G5-2UB53EA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (79.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 62% of all tested devices were better, 6% similar, 32% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.52 / 0.69 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.4 / 7.1 / 10.2 Watt |
| Carga |
36.5 / 48.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW256G7, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KNCTO1WW i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMT128G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, Toshiba MQ01ACF050, TN LED, 1366x768, 14" | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, SanDisk SD8SNAT256G1002, TN, 1920x1080, 14" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 23% | 13% | 10% | 13% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.4 | 3.5 20% | 5 -14% | 4.5 -2% | 3 32% |
| Idle Average * | 7.1 | 5.3 25% | 6.8 4% | 7.1 -0% | 5.4 24% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.2 | 6.1 40% | 8.9 13% | 10.2 -0% | 6.3 38% |
| Load Average * | 36.5 | 30 18% | 26.2 28% | 29.8 18% | 37.5 -3% |
| Load Maximum * | 48.7 | 42.3 13% | 31.8 35% | 31 36% | 61.1 -25% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES i5-8250U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E480-20KQS00000 i5-8250U, Radeon RX 550 (Laptop), 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 14 3470 6100U, HD Graphics 520, 41 Wh | Acer TravelMate P449-G2-M-56CD i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | HP ProBook 440 G4-Y8B51EA i7-7500U, GeForce 930MX, 48 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 28% | -25% | 21% | 42% | 70% | |
| Reader / Idle | 821 | 1164 42% | 668 -19% | 976 19% | 1083 32% | 1234 ? 50% |
| H.264 | 224 | 536 139% | 503 125% | 571 155% | 716 ? 220% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 416 | 341 -18% | 278 -33% | 341 -18% | 414 0% | 608 ? 46% |
| Load | 185 | 88 -52% | 140 -24% | 104 -44% | 151 -18% | 117.4 ? -37% |
Pro
Contra
Como o seu irmão maior, o ProBook 440 G5 oferece uma boa relação de preço-desempenho. É uma pena que a HP estrague o seu bom trabalho permitindo que o teclado se flexione sob pressão.
Mas vamos começar com os aspectos positivos: Definitivamente gostamos do touchpad do ProBook, bem como do desempenho da GPU, que está muito na frente daquele de seu concorrente da Lenovo. O ProBook também pode oferecer uma seleção de portas um pouco melhor que a do ThinkPad E480, dado que ele oferece não apenas VGA, HDMI e DisplayPort (via USB Type-C), mas também oferece um leitor de cartões de tamanho completo. Como no ProBook maior, podemos elogiar os alto-falantes, bem como a expansibilidade do aparelho - embora haja um signo de interrogação atrás do slot de 2,5 polegadas devido ao caddy faltante. Infelizmente é aqui onde as vantagens acabam. Embora a tela seja finalmente um painel IPS, não podemos realmente elogiá-la devido aos seus baixos níveis de brilho. O ventilador é significativamente mais barulhento e tem uma frequência maior do que o do ProBook 450 G5. Portanto, o sistema de resfriamento e a tela não são aspectos positivos deste dispositivo.
O teclado foi uma decepção clara, porque dá lugar à pressão. Isso estraga a experiência de digitação, o que é um grande problema para um portátil de escritório. Também nos incomodou o acabamento do ProBook 450 G5 em torno do repouso do pousa palmas, exatamente onde você costuma colocar as mãos. Assim como a boa seleção de portas, a HP poderia ter escolhido melhores posições para elas. Particularmente, a porta USB C é colocada muito longe na frente. A capacidade de expansão é boa, mas a manutenção geral é decepcionante, pois é difícil acessar a bateria e a ventoinha de resfriamento. Finalmente, também temos que mencionar a garantia curta de um ano.
O ProBook 440 G5 poderia ser uma boa opção se não fosse pelo teclado fraco.
No geral, não podemos realmente recomendar o ProBook devido ao seu teclado instável. Esperamos que o teclado de um portátil de escritório permaneça estável ao digitar normalmente, o que não é o caso aqui. Boas alternativas podem ser o Lenovo ThinkPad E480 com uma GPU Intel, que estamos testando atualmente, ou o Dell Latitude 3490 (análise disponível em breve).
HP ProBook 440 G5-3KX87ES
- 02/23/2018 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
