Breve Análise do Portátil HP ProBook 430 G7: Sem grandes melhorias com Comet Lake
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 84.5 % v7 (old) | 05/2020 | HP ProBook 430 G7-8VU53EA i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.8 % v7 (old) | 03/2019 | HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 18 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.2 % v6 (old) | 05/2018 | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 17.7 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.4 % v6 (old) | 02/2019 | Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 18.8 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 84.9 % v7 (old) | Dell Latitude 5300 i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.4 kg | 19 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell Latitude 5300 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 430 G7-8VU53EA | |
| Average of class Office (22.7 - 198.5, n=33, last 2 years) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell Latitude 5300 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 430 G7-8VU53EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Average of class Office (25 - 249, n=30, last 2 years) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G7-8VU53EA | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (49.8 - 1775, n=324) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| Dell Latitude 5300 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G7-8VU53EA | |
| Average Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX201 (136 - 1743, n=324) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA | |
| Dell Latitude 5300 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 296 cd/m²
Contraste: 1200:1 (Preto: 0.25 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.6
ΔE Greyscale 4 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
62.4% sRGB (Calman 2D)
62.4% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
44.21% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
62.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
42.79% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.23
| HP ProBook 430 G7-8VU53EA BOE08A6, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA CMN1375, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA IVO M133NVF3-R0, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE LP133WF2-SPL8, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 5300 LGD05ED-133WF6, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -1% | 46% | -5% | 55% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 42.79 | 41.87 -2% | 64.2 50% | 40.42 -6% | 68.2 59% |
| sRGB Coverage | 62.8 | 62.6 0% | 89.2 42% | 60.4 -4% | 94.4 50% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 44.21 | 43.3 -2% | 65.2 47% | 41.8 -5% | 68.7 55% |
| Response Times | 842% | 17% | 989% | 19% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48.8 ? | 40.8 ? 16% | 36 ? 26% | 42.8 ? 12% | 38 ? 22% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 30.4 ? 5% | 24.8 ? 22% | 30 ? 6% | 27.2 ? 15% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 26040 ? 2504% | 1020 ? 2% | 30490 ? 2949% | |
| Screen | 3% | 21% | -14% | 28% | |
| Brightness middle | 300 | 255 -15% | 316 5% | 298 -1% | 326 9% |
| Brightness | 285 | 238 -16% | 326 14% | 278 -2% | 313 10% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 88 -2% | 85 -6% | 81 -10% | 87 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.25 | 0.18 28% | 0.19 24% | 0.33 -32% | 0.27 -8% |
| Contrast | 1200 | 1417 18% | 1663 39% | 903 -25% | 1207 1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.9 | 5.4 8% | 4.5 24% | 6.5 -10% | 3.2 46% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 20 | 19.5 2% | 12.1 39% | 23.9 -20% | 6.3 68% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.6 | 4.1 11% | 2.9 37% | 4.9 -7% | 1.6 65% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4 | 3.8 5% | 5 -25% | 5.6 -40% | 3.8 5% |
| Gamma | 2.23 99% | 2.41 91% | 2.22 99% | 2.08 106% | 2.14 103% |
| CCT | 7154 91% | 7100 92% | 6018 108% | 6669 97% | 6900 94% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 40.4 | 39.4 -2% | 57.9 43% | 38.4 -5% | 63.8 58% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 62.4 | 62.5 0% | 87.3 40% | 60.1 -4% | 94.8 52% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 281% /
150% | 28% /
25% | 323% /
164% | 34% /
32% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 24.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3494 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5045 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4005 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G7-8VU53EA | |
* ... smaller is better
| HP ProBook 430 G7-8VU53EA Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ | Dell Latitude 5300 SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG) | Average Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 16% | 47% | 50% | 36% | -5% | |
| Write 4K | 124.7 | 101.8 -18% | 108.5 -13% | 99.6 -20% | 119.2 -4% | 114.9 ? -8% |
| Read 4K | 48.17 | 41.35 -14% | 40.53 -16% | 37.22 -23% | 41.43 -14% | 48 ? 0% |
| Write Seq | 694 | 929 34% | 1026 48% | 1432 106% | 1240 79% | 727 ? 5% |
| Read Seq | 757 | 1388 83% | 2080 175% | 2072 174% | 1668 120% | 885 ? 17% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 311 | 453.5 46% | 451 45% | 439.7 41% | 381.7 23% | 253 ? -19% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 495.5 | 286.2 -42% | 269.7 -46% | 264.8 -47% | 371.5 -25% | 400 ? -19% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1017 | 1302 28% | 1770 74% | 1549 52% | 1369 35% | 849 ? -17% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1530 | 1751 14% | 3214 110% | 3318 117% | 2652 73% | 1493 ? -2% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Office (1468 - 13132, n=88, last 2 years) | |
| Dell Latitude 5300 | |
| HP ProBook 430 G7-8VU53EA | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (1144 - 3432, n=244) | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE | |
| HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2006 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 7853 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1019 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 435 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 59 | 32.7 | 25.7 | 8.4 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 68.6 | 41.6 | 18.1 | 15.8 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 21.6 | 14.1 | 12.8 | |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018) | 14 | |||
| Total War: Three Kingdoms (2019) | 22.4 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29.7 / 29.7 / 30.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 30.4 / 31.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.7 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 39.2 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.8 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.6 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (-0.1 °C / -0.1 F).
HP ProBook 430 G7-8VU53EA audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (76.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 18.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 33% of all tested devices in this class were better, 7% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 43% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.28 / 0.52 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.3 / 6.1 / 8.6 Watt |
| Carga |
32.4 / 42.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP ProBook 430 G7-8VU53EA i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB256HAHQ, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 5300 i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620, SK Hynix PC401 512GB M.2 (HFS512GD9TNG), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -22% | -2% | -12% | -18% | -10% | -29% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 4.5 -36% | 3.5 -6% | 3.8 -15% | 3.8 -15% | 3.81 ? -15% | 4.54 ? -38% |
| Idle Average * | 6.1 | 6.4 -5% | 5.76 6% | 6.8 -11% | 6.9 -13% | 6.94 ? -14% | 7.49 ? -23% |
| Idle Maximum * | 8.6 | 9.2 -7% | 8.3 3% | 9.8 -14% | 7.5 13% | 8.75 ? -2% | 9.14 ? -6% |
| Load Average * | 32.4 | 35.7 -10% | 34.8 -7% | 32.4 -0% | 41.4 -28% | 35 ? -8% | 42.8 ? -32% |
| Load Maximum * | 42.7 | 65.4 -53% | 45.7 -7% | 52 -22% | 63.1 -48% | 47.5 ? -11% | 61.3 ? -44% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP ProBook 430 G7-8VU53EA i7-10510U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | HP ProBook 430 G6-5TJ89EA i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | HP EliteBook 830 G5-3JX74EA i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 49 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad L390-20NR0013GE i5-8265U, UHD Graphics 620, 45 Wh | Dell Latitude 5300 i5-8365U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -0% | -15% | -22% | 6% | 6% | |
| H.264 | 586 | 546 -7% | 481 -18% | 566 -3% | 704 ? 20% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 473 | 569 20% | 424 -10% | 419 -11% | 500 6% | 600 ? 27% |
| Load | 168 | 145 -14% | 140 -17% | 83 -51% | 118.1 ? -30% | |
| Reader / Idle | 969 | 766 | 974 | 1300 ? |
Pro
Contra
A HP permanece com o design estabelecido do modelo do ano passado e faz apenas algumas modificações "sob o capô".
O veredicto básico do HP ProBook 430 G6 é verdade. O portátil de escritório, comparativamente acessível, tem muitos pontos positivos do seu lado: O teclado confortável, a excelente capacidade de atualização ou o leitor de cartões SD. Todos estes pontos devem ser suficientes para tornar o ProBook um dispositivo companheiro ideal para muitos estudantes ou usuários autônomos.
As mudanças internas são, ao mesmo tempo, positivas e negativas. Sem dúvida o Wi-Fi 6 é uma grande melhoria. Já o mais novo processador Comet Lake não consegue superar o antigo predecessor Whiskey Lake. Apesar da estagnação do desempenho, o ProBook funciona mais quente do que o modelo mais antigo e é menos duradouro quando se trata da duração da bateria. Esses não são ruins o suficiente, mas também não são aspectos realmente positivos. Existem outros novos problemas: O ventilador pulsante e o problema de latência do DPC. Fora isso, os pontos negativos do modelo antigo permanecem: A tela tem uma fraca cobertura de gama de cores, falta o Thunderbolt e recursos empresariais, não há pointing-stick e o ProBook tem apenas um ano de garantia.
O HP ProBook 430 G7 não é uma grande atualização de forma alguma. Mas também não foi realmente necessária, pois o modelo mais antigo já era um bom portátil de escritório.
Os proprietários do ProBook 430 G6 deveriam atualizar? Não exatamente Em geral, recomendamos o ProBook, mas a HP deve ao menos consertar o irritante ventilador pulsante com uma atualização do firmware.
HP ProBook 430 G7-8VU53EA
- 05/13/2020 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
