Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion Gaming 16: Portátil barato de 16 polegadas com GPU GeForce
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 79.9 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | 2.2 kg | 23.5 mm | 16.10" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.7 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | 2.4 kg | 21.6 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.7 % v7 (old) | 06/2020 | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.2 kg | 24.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.3 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.6 kg | 21 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.3 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | 2.5 kg | 26.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 79.5 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M | 2 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 319 cd/m²
Contraste: 1772:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.52
ΔE Greyscale 1.53 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
60% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
41.77% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
40.42% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.39
| HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng BOE08F6, IPS, 1920x1080, 16.1" | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F BOE NV156FH, WVA, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 LM156LF-2F01, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 NV156FHM-N4G (BOE0867), IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H BOE CQ NV156FHM-NX1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR AU Optronics B156HAN08.0 (AUO80ED), IPS-Level, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 52% | -4% | 57% | -4% | 49% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 40.42 | 63 56% | 38.92 -4% | 65.2 61% | 38.8 -4% | 62 53% |
| sRGB Coverage | 60.7 | 90.1 48% | 58.5 -4% | 92.1 52% | 57.8 -5% | 86.8 43% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 41.77 | 64.1 53% | 40.22 -4% | 66.4 59% | 40.09 -4% | 62.7 50% |
| Response Times | 59% | 21% | 71% | 42% | 65% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.2 ? | 20.4 ? 53% | 34 ? 21% | 8.8 ? 80% | 26 ? 40% | 16 ? 63% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30.4 ? | 10.8 ? 64% | 24 ? 21% | 12 ? 61% | 17 ? 44% | 10.4 ? 66% |
| PWM Frequency | 198.4 ? | |||||
| Screen | -6% | -31% | 2% | -26% | -15% | |
| Brightness middle | 319 | 292 -8% | 280 -12% | 316 -1% | 301 -6% | 311 -3% |
| Brightness | 306 | 290 -5% | 254 -17% | 295 -4% | 277 -9% | 313 2% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 77 -15% | 88 -3% | 87 -4% | 77 -15% | 88 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.27 -50% | 0.15 17% | 0.23 -28% | 0.26 -44% | 0.43 -139% |
| Contrast | 1772 | 1081 -39% | 1867 5% | 1374 -22% | 1158 -35% | 723 -59% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4 | 3.99 -0% | 5.89 -47% | 3.84 4% | 5.12 -28% | 4.5 -13% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.18 | 6.11 45% | 19 -70% | 5.69 49% | 8.86 21% | 7.97 29% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.52 | 3.02 14% | 4.79 -36% | 1.64 53% | 4.88 -39% | 2.65 25% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 1.53 | 3.3 -116% | 4.08 -167% | 3.66 -139% | 3.47 -127% | 3.3 -116% |
| Gamma | 2.39 92% | 2.25 98% | 2.33 94% | 2.62 84% | 2.37 93% | 2.129 103% |
| CCT | 6533 99% | 7047 92% | 7303 89% | 7165 91% | 7062 92% | 7227 90% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 58.1 53% | 37 -3% | 60 58% | 37 -3% | 63 66% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 60 | 89.7 50% | 58 -3% | 92 53% | 57 -5% | 86 43% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 35% /
13% | -5% /
-19% | 43% /
21% | 4% /
-14% | 33% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 81 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21.2 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4455 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 6793 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5176 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4868 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F Samsung PM991 MZ9LQ512HALU | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H Samsung PM991 MZALQ512HALU | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 17% | 11% | 114% | 29% | 155% | |
| Seq Read | 1438 | 1386 -4% | 1682 17% | 2772 93% | 2012 40% | 2730 90% |
| Seq Write | 905 | 1234 36% | 904 0% | 2489 175% | 1261 39% | 2513 178% |
| 4K Read | 50.3 | 41.32 -18% | 60.2 20% | 48.62 -3% | 43.66 -13% | 61.4 22% |
| 4K Write | 111.7 | 128 15% | 164.8 48% | 136.6 22% | 109.3 -2% | 156.1 40% |
| 4K-64 Read | 324 | 854 164% | 472.5 46% | 1393 330% | 851 163% | 1780 449% |
| 4K-64 Write | 729 | 721 -1% | 845 16% | 1450 99% | 780 7% | 1920 163% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.105 | 0.098 7% | 0.087 17% | 0.088 16% | 0.117 -11% | 0.063 40% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.047 | 0.095 -102% | 0.02 57% | 0.03 36% | 0.036 23% | 0.025 47% |
| Score Read | 518 | 1034 100% | 701 35% | 1719 232% | 1096 112% | 2114 308% |
| Score Write | 931 | 973 5% | 1101 18% | 1835 97% | 1016 9% | 2327 150% |
| Score Total | 1707 | 2536 49% | 2143 26% | 4424 159% | 2643 55% | 5518 223% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1145 | 1284 12% | 675 -41% | 1481 29% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 602 | 401.9 -33% | 248.4 -59% | 467.5 -22% | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 929 | 1013 9% | 535 -42% | 734 -21% |
* ... smaller is better
Continuous read speed: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 12461 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 101019 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 27911 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8780 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4315 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3748 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Gaming (35.6 - 449, n=125, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=168, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H | |
| Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 | |
| Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 | |
| MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 309 | 251 | 227 | 99 |
| GTA V (2015) | 173 | 165 | 107 | 53.2 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 202 | 123 | 69.2 | 36.6 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 136.2 | 123.8 | 117.1 | 113 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 181 | 124 | 68.3 | 58.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 107 | 55.2 | 40.9 | |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 90.1 | 81.4 | 69.5 | |
| Far Cry 5 (2018) | 119 | 67 | 62 | 58 |
| Strange Brigade (2018) | 230 | 95 | 75.2 | 62.7 |
| Far Cry New Dawn (2019) | 104 | 66 | 62 | 57 |
| Borderlands 3 (2019) | 122 | 63.4 | 40.8 | 30.5 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 25 / 33 / 42 dB |
| Carga |
| 48 / 54 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 25 dB(A) | ||
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49 °C / 120 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 50 °C / 122 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.6 °C / 82 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.1 °C / 102 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 41 °C / 105.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-12.1 °C / -21.8 F).
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 51% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 32% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 60% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.3 / 0.3 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3 / 7 / 18 Watt |
| Carga |
86 / 144 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -40% | -36% | -79% | -15% | -71% | -133% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3 | 6.5 -117% | 5.4 -80% | 10 -233% | 3.2 -7% | 11 -267% | 13.5 ? -350% |
| Idle Average * | 7 | 10.6 -51% | 10 -43% | 13 -86% | 8.3 -19% | 14 -100% | 18.9 ? -170% |
| Idle Maximum * | 18 | 11 39% | 10.5 42% | 20 -11% | 8.7 52% | 25 -39% | 26.7 ? -48% |
| Load Average * | 86 | 84.1 2% | 135 -57% | 100 -16% | 82 5% | 72 16% | 106.6 ? -24% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 82 | 152.9 -86% | 144 -76% | 159 -94% | 151 -84% | 100 -22% | |
| Load Maximum * | 144 | 180.4 -25% | 147 -2% | 196 -36% | 195 -35% | 163 -13% | 249 ? -73% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng i5-10300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, 52 Wh | Dell G5 15 SE 5505 P89F R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5600M, 51 Wh | Asus TUF Gaming A15 FA506IV-HN172 R7 4800H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 48 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 2019 i7-9750H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 55 Wh | Lenovo Legion 5 15IMH05H i5-10300H, GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile, 60 Wh | MSI Bravo 15 A4DCR R7 4800H, Radeon RX 5300M, 51 Wh | Average of class Gaming | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -28% | -27% | -57% | -14% | -53% | -30% | |
| Reader / Idle | 992 | 671 -32% | 587 -41% | 370 -63% | 848 -15% | 418 -58% | 565 ? -43% |
| H.264 | 531 | 322 -39% | 554 4% | 408 ? -23% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 496 | 372 -25% | 370 -25% | 264 -47% | 433 -13% | 268 -46% | 376 ? -24% |
| Load | 120 | 87 -27% | 116 -3% | 48 -60% | 84 -30% | 53 -56% | 85.3 ? -29% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Bom desempenho, baixo preço
O HP Pavilion Gaming 16 é um portátil para jogos de baixo custo com bom hardware. Apesar de uma tela maior, o dispositivo é pouco maior do que portáteis de 15,6 polegadas comparáveis. Demos uma olhada na configuração com o Intel Core i5-10300H e a NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. Atualmente, nosso dispositivo de análise é vendido por cerca de 900 Euros (~$ 1068), o que é inteiramente justificado dadas as especificações. A quantidade de espaço de armazenamento pode ser criticada, porque 512 GB não é muito para um portátil de jogos. No entanto, os usuários podem expandir facilmente a capacidade de armazenamento. Em nossa análise, o Pavilion Gaming 16 apresentou um bom nível de desempenho, embora a GeForce GTX 1650 Ti seja uma placa de vídeo dedicada de baixo custo. Tendo dito isso, a GPU ainda é poderosa o suficiente para ser capaz de rodar muitos videogames a 1080p nas configurações mais altas.
O HP Pavilion Gaming 16 é um portátil para jogos com uma ótima relação preço-desempenho.
Os usuários terão que se contentar com um desempenho multi-core relativamente pobre, porque o Core i5-10300H tem apenas quatro núcleos. Quando se trata de portas, o Pavilion Gaming 16 oferece o mínimo. Uma porta USB Tipo A adicional seria útil. Wi-Fi 6 também seria uma inclusão bem-vinda. No entanto, nosso dispositivo de análise vem com 16 GB de RAM e uma tela IPS com uma boa relação de contraste.
The HP Pavilion Gaming 16 is a low-priced gaming notebook with good hardware. Despite a bigger screen, the device is barely larger than comparable 15.6-inch laptops. We have taken a close look at the configuration with the Intel Core i5-10300H and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti. Currently, our review device retails for about 900 Euros (~$1068), which is entirely justified given the specifications. The amount of storage space can be criticised, because 512 GB is not much for a gaming laptop. However, users can easily expand storage capacity. In our review, the Pavilion Gaming 16 delivered a good level of performance, even though the GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is a low-end dedicated graphics card. Having said that, the GPU is still powerful enough to be able to run many video games at 1080p on the highest settings.
The HP Pavilion Gaming 16 is a gaming notebook with a very good price-to-performance ratio.
Users will have to make do with relatively poor multi-core performance, because the Core i5-10300H has only four cores. When it comes to the ports, the Pavilion Gaming 16 offers the bare minimum. An additional USB Type-A port would have come in handy. Wi-Fi 6 would also be a welcome inclusion. However, our review device comes with 16 GB of RAM and an IPS display with a good contrast ratio.
HP Pavilion Gaming 16-a0242ng
- 08/19/2020 v7 (old)
Sebastian Bade
Price comparison
