Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 (A10-9620P, HD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A | |
HP 15-ba077ng | |
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
HP 15-ba077ng | |
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
Asus X555DA-BB11 |
|
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 251.3 cd/m²
Contraste: 524:1 (Preto: 0.48 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 9.9 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 11.7 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.17% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
39.17% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.92% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.05
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 BOE06A4, TN LED, 15.6", 1366x768 | Asus X555DA-BB11 TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 BOE NT15N41, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Chi Mei CMN15C4 / N156HGE-EAB, TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 AUO B156HAN04.4, IPS LED, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL 15.6", 1366x768 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -7% | -4% | 5% | 2% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 37.92 | 35.12 -7% | 36.24 -4% | 39.72 5% | 38.65 2% | 37.39 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 56.8 | 52.7 -7% | 54.6 -4% | 59.2 4% | 58 2% | 56.2 -1% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 39.17 | 36.29 -7% | 37.44 -4% | 41.07 5% | 39.94 2% | 38.63 -1% |
Response Times | -2% | 17% | 4806% | -12% | -14% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 41.6 ? | 42 ? -1% | 43 ? -3% | 42.4 ? -2% | 44.8 ? -8% | 58 ? -39% |
Response Time Black / White * | 22 ? | 22.4 ? -2% | 14 ? 36% | 14.6 ? 34% | 25.6 ? -16% | 23 ? -5% |
PWM Frequency | 198.4 ? | 28740 14386% | 200 ? 1% | |||
Screen | 10% | -11% | -2% | 31% | 6% | |
Brightness middle | 251.3 | 242.7 -3% | 145 -42% | 224 -11% | 242 -4% | 253 1% |
Brightness | 243 | 232 -5% | 144 -41% | 201 -17% | 243 0% | 246 1% |
Brightness Distribution | 83 | 88 6% | 90 8% | 75 -10% | 75 -10% | 86 4% |
Black Level * | 0.48 | 0.52 -8% | 0.49 -2% | 0.46 4% | 0.24 50% | 0.43 10% |
Contrast | 524 | 467 -11% | 296 -44% | 487 -7% | 1008 92% | 588 12% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 9.9 | 4.9 51% | 9.27 6% | 10.5 -6% | 4.65 53% | |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 22.9 | 20.3 11% | 16.9 26% | 16.8 27% | 9.64 58% | |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.7 | 2.7 77% | 12.28 -5% | 11.23 4% | 3.39 71% | |
Gamma | 2.05 107% | 2.34 94% | 2.03 108% | 2.12 104% | 2.7 81% | |
CCT | 11713 55% | 6876 95% | 10732 61% | 11096 59% | 6246 104% | |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 39.17 | 33.5 -14% | 35 -11% | 38 -3% | 36.69 -6% | |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56.8 | 52.5 -8% | 55 -3% | 59 4% | 57.66 2% | |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 0% /
5% | 1% /
-6% | 1603% /
901% | 7% /
19% | -3% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
22 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise | |
↘ 6 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
41.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14.8 ms rise | |
↘ 26.8 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 63 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 198.4 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 198.4 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 198.4 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
HP 15-ba077ng | |
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A | |
Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
HP 15-ba077ng | |
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A | |
Asus X555DA-BB11 |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2624 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 3075 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 3669 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 2080 pontos | |
Ajuda |
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD | Asus X555DA-BB11 Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G) | HP 15-ba077ng SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G | Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Liteonit CV3-8D128 | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | -26% | 6943% | 4243% | 4443% | 11273% | |
Read Seq | 109.6 | 106.9 -2% | 502 358% | 447.4 308% | 348.6 218% | 1140 940% |
Write Seq | 104.6 | 97.5 -7% | 458.1 338% | 243.3 133% | 311.8 198% | 468.1 348% |
Read 512 | 36.88 | 32.28 -12% | 382.8 938% | 333.4 804% | 295.9 702% | 759 1958% |
Write 512 | 56.3 | 35.39 -37% | 385.7 585% | 283.1 403% | 185.8 230% | 414 635% |
Read 4k | 0.436 | 0.373 -14% | 29.25 6609% | 20.99 4714% | 23.76 5350% | 34.3 7767% |
Write 4k | 1.212 | 0.636 -48% | 55.9 4512% | 62.7 5073% | 44.94 3608% | 123.4 10082% |
Read 4k QD32 | 1.234 | 0.694 -44% | 285.2 23012% | 143.1 11496% | 171.6 13806% | 530 42850% |
Write 4k QD32 | 1.242 | 0.682 -45% | 239.6 19191% | 138 11011% | 143.2 11430% | 319.2 25600% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
Asus X555DA-BB11 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 1686 pontos | |
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 37793 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4365 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 898 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 464 pontos | |
Ajuda |
BioShock Infinite | |
1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
Asus X555DA-BB11 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
HP 15-ba077ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ | |
1366x768 Medium Preset (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
HP 15-ba077ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ | |
1366x768 High Preset (sort by value) | |
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 | |
HP 15-ba077ng | |
Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 | |
Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Tomb Raider (2013) | 51.8 | 29.1 | 21.3 | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 45.9 | 28.7 | 21.8 | |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 19 | 12.2 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 31 / 31.2 / 31.3 dB |
Carga |
| 34.4 / 38.9 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.3 dB(A) |
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 Radeon R5 (Carrizo), A10-9620P, Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD | Asus X555DA-BB11 Radeon R6 (Carrizo), A10-8700P, Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 Radeon R7 M445, i7-7500U, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G) | HP 15-ba077ng Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), A12-9700P, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G | Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A Radeon R8 M445DX, A12-9700P, Liteonit CV3-8D128 | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 GeForce GTX 950M, i5-7200U, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK | Lenovo Ideapad 110-15ACL Radeon R5 (Beema/Carrizo-L), A8-7410 | Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0 | Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz HD Graphics 515, 6Y30, Apple SSD AP0256 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | 0% | -5% | 2% | 1% | 3% | 4% | 3% | ||
off / environment * | 28.3 | 28.9 -2% | 30.6 -8% | 30.6 -8% | 30.5 -8% | 29 -2% | 30.4 -7% | 30.5 -8% | |
Idle Minimum * | 31 | 31.6 -2% | 30.6 1% | 31.5 -2% | 31.4 -1% | 29 6% | 30.9 -0% | 30.8 1% | |
Idle Average * | 31.2 | 32 -3% | 30.6 2% | 31.8 -2% | 31.4 -1% | 29 7% | 30.9 1% | 30.8 1% | |
Idle Maximum * | 31.3 | 32.4 -4% | 30.6 2% | 31.8 -2% | 31.9 -2% | 29 7% | 31 1% | 30.8 2% | |
Load Average * | 34.4 | 33.3 3% | 41.9 -22% | 31.4 9% | 33.7 2% | 34.3 -0% | 31.8 8% | 32.1 7% | |
Load Maximum * | 38.9 | 35.5 9% | 41.8 -7% | 33.4 14% | 33.8 13% | 40.1 -3% | 31.9 18% | 33.8 13% | |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.6 |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 38 °C / 100 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.8 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26.2 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 36 °C / 96.8 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-7.2 °C / -13 F).
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.5% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (16.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.6% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (9.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 55% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 36% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 39% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.16 / 0.9 Watt |
Ocioso | 5.38 / 7.9 / 8.98 Watt |
Carga |
34.74 / 42.41 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 A10-9620P, Radeon R5 (Carrizo), Avolusion MD1TBLSSHD, TN LED, 1366x768, 15.6" | Asus X555DA-BB11 A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), Seagate Momentus SpinPoint M8 ST1000LM024 HN-M101MBB, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 i7-7500U, Radeon R7 M445, SanDisk X400 SED 256GB, SATA (SD8TB8U-256G), TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP 15-ba077ng A12-9700P, Radeon R7 (Bristol Ridge), SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-256G, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A A12-9700P, Radeon R8 M445DX, Liteonit CV3-8D128, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, Toshiba THNSF5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Western Digital Scorpio Blue WD5000LPCX-24C6HT0, TN LED, 1920x1080, 17.3" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | -21% | -4% | 14% | -37% | -4% | -6% | |
Idle Minimum * | 5.38 | 8.3 -54% | 4 26% | 4.4 18% | 7.2 -34% | 2.8 48% | 5.3 1% |
Idle Average * | 7.9 | 8.6 -9% | 5.4 32% | 6.8 14% | 10.3 -30% | 6.3 20% | 10.1 -28% |
Idle Maximum * | 8.98 | 13.1 -46% | 8.3 8% | 8.9 1% | 11.9 -33% | 6.9 23% | 10.5 -17% |
Load Average * | 34.74 | 31.2 10% | 54 -55% | 30.9 11% | 48.2 -39% | 51.6 -49% | 34.3 1% |
Load Maximum * | 42.41 | 43.9 -4% | 55.4 -31% | 31 27% | 63 -49% | 69.7 -64% | 37 13% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 51.8 |
* ... smaller is better
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000 A10-9620P, Radeon R5 (Carrizo), 31 Wh | Asus X555DA-BB11 A10-8700P, Radeon R6 (Carrizo), 37 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5567-1753 i7-7500U, Radeon R7 M445, 42 Wh | Acer Aspire E15 E5-553G-109A A12-9700P, Radeon R8 M445DX, 40 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E570-20H6S00000 i5-7200U, GeForce GTX 950M, 41 Wh | Acer Aspire E5-774-54HJ i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 41 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 2% | 53% | -1% | 114% | 44% | |
Reader / Idle | 381 | 435 14% | 466 22% | 358 -6% | 883 132% | |
WiFi v1.3 | 222 | 176 -21% | 417 88% | 257 16% | 462 108% | 320 44% |
Load | 64 | 72 13% | 95 48% | 55 -14% | 129 102% |
Pro
Contra
O Pavilion 15z é um portátil de 15,6 polegadas razoavelmente leve, discreto, mas também pouco inspirador. O componente do processador da APU AMD não funciona tão bem como as CPUs Intel ULV da geração atual, embora a Radeon R5 iGP ofereça um desempenho decente o suficiente para lidar com pelo menos alguns jogos mais antigos com configurações e resoluções mais baixas.
O sistema é retido por seu disco rígido mecânico, uma tela HD TN com baixa estabilidade dos ângulos de visão e sua bateria funesta.
Com tantas ofertas de nível de entrada no mercado, é difícil defender o HP Pavilion 15z - simplesmente não se destaca entre a multidão.
HP Pavilion 15z-bw000
-
07/15/2017 v6 (old)
Bernie Pechlaner