Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV

Name: HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV
Brand: HP

Jogos equilibrados. O Pavilion 15 é uma ótima combinação de desempenho multimídia e de jogos, em um chassi modesto e portátil. Suas opções de conectividade e manutenção, no entanto, deixam muito o que desejar.

Allen Ngo (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 08/12/2016 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Windows Skylake Geforce Laptop / Notebook

Test device courtesy of CUKUSA.com

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV (Pavilion 15-cx Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1097 MHz, Memoría: 5010 MHz, GDDR5, 359.37, Optimus

Memória

16 GB

, 1300 MHz, 15-15-15-36, Dual-Channel, SK Hynix

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 3840 x 2160 pixel 271 PPI, SDC5958, IPS, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)

Disco rígido

SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, 128 GB

, Secondary: HGST HTS721010A9E630

Conexões

1 USB 2.0, 2 USB 3.0, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: SD reader, Brightness Sensor

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 24.4 x 382.5 x 252.4

Bateria

61.5 Wh Lítio-Polímero

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: 720p

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: Stereo B&O, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, Cartão de garantia, Amazon, B&O Audio Controller, CyberLink Power Media Player 14, CyberLink PowerDirector, HP Smart Friend, 12 Meses Garantia

peso

2.164 kg, Suprimento de energia: 530 g

Preço

1050 USD

Links

HP página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 Acer Aspire F15 F5-573G-53V1 Asus VivoBook X556UQ-XO076T HP Omen 15-ax007ng Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV DIN A4 ❌

Right: SD reader, USB 3.0, HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, AC adapter

Left: Kensington Lock, USB 2.0, USB 3.0, 3.5 mm headset

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)	135 MB/s +74%
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360	79 MB/s +2%
Apple MacBook Pro Retina 13 inch 2013-10	78 MB/s +1%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV	77.6 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 13 2016 9350 (FHD, i7-6560U)	210 MB/s +136%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV	88.8 MB/s
HP Pavilion 15-bk001ng x360	85.6 MB/s -4%

Networking
iperf Server (receive) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	570 MBit/s
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A 802.11a/b/g/n	81.4 MBit/s
iperf Client (transmit) TCP 1 m
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz Broadcom 802.11ac	397 MBit/s
Asus ZenPad 8.0 Z380M-6B026A 802.11a/b/g/n	93.5 MBit/s


345.6 cd/m²	333.9 cd/m²	321.7 cd/m²
342.6 cd/m²	336.2 cd/m²	319.6 cd/m²
304.1 cd/m²	300.1 cd/m²	299.8 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

SDC5958 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2

Máximo: 345.6 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 322.6 cd/m² Minimum: 14.9 cd/m²
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 336.2 cd/m²
Contraste: 534:1 (Preto: 0.629 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.32 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 2.88 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
85.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
55.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.8% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
85.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
60% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.34

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV SDC5958, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160	HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng Samsung SDC5544, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 CMN N156HGE-EAL (CMN15D2), TN LED, 15.6", 1920x1080	Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160	HP Omen 15-ax007ng LGD0519, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080
Display		-27%	32%	6%	-16%
Display P3 Coverage	60	43.03 -28%	85.8 43%	64.3 7%	59.9 0% 40.34 -33%
sRGB Coverage	85.8	64.7 -25%	99.8 16%	89.9 5%	85.9 0% 60.3 -30%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	61.8	44.47 -28%	84.1 36%	65.4 6%	61.6 0% 41.73 -32%
Response Times		-12%	-5%	-5%	-27%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	39.6 ?(18.4, 21.2)	48 ?(16, 32) -21%	43 ?(21, 22) -9%	43.2 ?(18, 25.2) -9%	55 ?(22, 33) -39%
Response Time Black / White *	27.2 ?(7.6, 19.6)	28 ?(6, 22) -3%	23 ?(7, 16) 15%	27.2 ?(7.6, 19.6) -0%	31 ?(8, 23) -14%
PWM Frequency	1282 ?(59)		1000 ?(80) -22%
Screen		4%	-63%	-22%	-29%
Brightness middle	336.2	254 -24%	216 -36%	252.9 -25%	214 -36%
Brightness	323	241 -25%	202 -37%	250 -23%	203 -37%
Brightness Distribution	87	78 -10%	83 -5%	89 2%	79 -9%
Black Level *	0.629	0.27 57%	0.48 24%	0.5 21%	0.28 55%
Contrast	534	941 76%	450 -16%	506 -5%	764 43%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	3.32	3.54 -7%	9.98 -201%	5.22 -57%	6.04 -82%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	7.4		17.12 -131%	8.33 -13%	12 -62%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2.88	2.29 20%	10.91 -279%	6.74 -134%	5.91 -105%
Gamma	2.34 ^94%	2.5 ^88%	2.31 ^95%	2.45 ^90%	2.44 ^90%
CCT	6279 ^104%	6698 ^97%	13185 ^49%	6026 ^108%	7362 ^88%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	55.3	41 -26%	75 36%	58.4 6%	38 -31%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	85.5	64 -25%	100 17%	89.7 5%	60 -30%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-12% / -5%	-12% / -34%	-7% / -14%	-24% / -25%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7.6 ms rise
27.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 19.6 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 66 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 18.4 ms rise
39.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 21.2 ms fall
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 57 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM detected

1282 Hz

≤ 59 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 1282 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 59 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 1282 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Cinebench R15 | Cinebench R11.5 | Cinebench R10 | wPrime 2.10 | Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	140 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	166 Points +19%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	149 Points +6%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	144 Points +3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	125 Points -11%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	125 Points -11%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	676 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	865 Points +28%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	707 Points +5%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	723 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	490 Points -28%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	266 Points -61%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	1.68 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	1.91 Points +14%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	1.7 Points +1%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	1.67 Points -1%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	1.46 Points -13%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	1.37 Points -18%
CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	7.48 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	9.56 Points +28%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	7.76 Points +4%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	7.86 Points +5%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	5.29 Points -29%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	3.2 Points -57%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	20090 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	26150 Points +30%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	21022 Points +5%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	21568 Points +7%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	14329 Points -29%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	9677 Points -52%
Rendering Single 32Bit (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	5451 Points
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	6487 Points +19%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	5671 Points +4%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	5539 Points +2%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	4999 Points -8%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	4901 Points -10%

wPrime 2.10 - 1024m (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	232.4 s *
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	178.5 s * +23%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	224.6 s * +3%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	205.8 s * +11%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	323 s * -39%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	525 s * -126%

Super Pi Mod 1.5 XS 32M - 32M (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV Intel Core i7-6700HQ	555 s *
DogHouse Systems Mobius SS Intel Core i7-6700K	498.3 s * +10%
Asus G701VO-CS74K Intel Core i7-6820HK	559 s * -1%
MSI PX60 QD-034US Intel Core i7-5700HQ	570 s * -3%
Lenovo IdeaPad Y50 Intel Core i7-4700HQ	569 s * -3%
HP Spectre 13 Intel Core i7-6500U	685 s * -23%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

6442

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

20090

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

5451

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

46.58 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

7.48 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.68 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

29.29 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

676 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

140 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	3101 Points
HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	3946 Points +27%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY	3603 Points +16%
HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	3665 Points +18%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3077 Points -1%
Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	3717 Points
HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	5003 Points +35%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY	4951 Points +33%
HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	4823 Points +30%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	3867 Points +4%
Creative Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	4648 Points
HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	4992 Points +7%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY	4375 Points -6%
HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	4551 Points -2%
Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	4357 Points -6%

PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		3101 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		4648 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		3717 pontos
Ajuda

	HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY	Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	HP Omen 15-ax007ng Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
CrystalDiskMark 3.0		-38%	51%	321%	17%
Read Seq	484.6	465.8 -4%	530 9%	1633 237%	475.7 -2%
Write Seq	185.2	120.2 -35%	442.7 139%	1579 753%	169.2 -9%
Read 512	307.6	314.1 2%	409.1 33%	1068 247%	327.6 7%
Write 512	180	75.9 -58%	417.3 132%	1570 772%	169.6 -6%
Read 4k	22.08	18.49 -16%	21.81 -1%	50.4 128%	33.14 50%
Write 4k	77.7	21.18 -73%	93 20%	128.6 66%	81.4 5%
Read 4k QD32	143.7	94.8 -34%	257 79%	534 272%	276.8 93%
Write 4k QD32	177.6	21.66 -88%	168.3 -5%	344 94%	168 -5%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

AS SSD

SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G

Sequential Read: 484.6 MB/s

Sequential Write: 185.2 MB/s

512K Read: 307.6 MB/s

512K Write: 180 MB/s

4K Read: 22.08 MB/s

4K Write: 77.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 143.7 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 177.6 MB/s

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5452 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	12472 Points +129%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	9824 Points +80%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	7919 Points +45%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	4938 Points -9%
HP Envy 17-n107ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	4444 Points -18%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6500U	2734 Points -50%
1280x720 Performance Combined (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5472 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	8343 Points +52%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7952 Points +45%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	7134 Points +30%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	5417 Points -1%
HP Envy 17-n107ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	3499 Points -36%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6500U	2405 Points -56%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	27162 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	64343 Points +137%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	50205 Points +85%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	36659 Points +35%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	29742 Points +9%
HP Envy 17-n107ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	20707 Points -24%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6500U	11713 Points -57%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	4249 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	9608 Points +126%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	7321 Points +72%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ	5904 Points +39%
MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	4239 Points 0%
HP Envy 17-n107ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ	3093 Points -27%
Dell Inspiron 17 7778 NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, 6500U	1889 Points -56%
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	2004 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	4623 Points +131%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ	3517 Points +75%
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics (sort by value)
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ	942 Points
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ	2299 Points +144%

3DMark 11 Performance		5775 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		37758 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		16612 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		3954 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		1990 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

	alto	ultra	4K
Sleeping Dogs (2012)	91.2	24.1
BioShock Infinite (2013)	110	45.8
Metro: Last Light (2013)	58.4	31.4
Thief (2014)	55	28.2
Batman: Arkham Knight (2015)	34	22
Metal Gear Solid V (2015)	45.9	32.1	14.5
Fallout 4 (2015)	29.9	24.1
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016)	29.6	23.5
Overwatch (2016)	66.8	40.2	19.8

Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	55 fps +134%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	42.8 fps +82%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	30.6 fps +30%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	23.5 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	21.2 fps -10%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	15.3 (14^min - 18^max) fps -35%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	86.4 fps +89%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	69.5 fps +52%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	45.8 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	44.1 fps -4%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	24 (5.7^min - 45.5^max) fps -48%

Sleeping Dogs - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:Extreme
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	57.5 fps +139%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	44.9 fps +86%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	24.1 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	23.4 fps -3%

Metro: Last Light - 1920x1080 Very High (DX11) AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	50.5 fps +61%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	31.4 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	30.9 fps -2%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	20.1 (8.1^min - 34^max) fps -36%

Thief - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FXAA & High SS AF:8x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	58.6 fps +108%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	47.5 fps +68%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	28.2 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	26.6 fps -6%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	18.3 (14.2^min - 25^max) fps -35%

Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	36 fps +64%
Medion Erazer P6661 MD 99873 GeForce GTX 950M, 6500U, Phison 128GB PS3109-S9	22 (15^min - 30^max) fps 0%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	22 fps
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	19 fps -14%

Metal Gear Solid V - 1920x1080 Extra High / On
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	60 fps +87%
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	60 fps +87%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	37.5 fps +17%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	32.1 fps

Fallout 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	57.9 fps +140%
Asus Strix GL502VT-DS74 GeForce GTX 970M, 6700HQ, Lite-On CV1-8B128	43.5 fps +80%
Dell XPS 15 9550 i7 FHD GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung PM951 NVMe 512 GB	24.2 fps 0%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	24.1 fps

Overwatch - 1920x1080 Epic (Render Scale 100 %) AA:SM AF:16x
Asus Strix GL502VY-DS71 GeForce GTX 980M, 6700HQ, SanDisk SD8SN8U1T001122	87.3 fps +117%
HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B	49.6 fps +23%
HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	40.2 fps

Barulho

Ocioso		32.3 / 32.4 / 32.4 dB
Carga		40.5 / 50.3 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29.5 dB(A)

	HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G	HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY	Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Samsung SM951 MZVPV512HDGL m.2 PCI-e	HP Omen 15-ax007ng GeForce GTX 965M, 6700HQ, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B
Noise		-7%	-5%	8%	-3%
off / environment *	29.5		30 -2%		30 -2%
Idle Minimum *	32.3	34 -5%	35 -8%	28.9 11%	32 1%
Idle Average *	32.4	35 -8%	36 -11%	28.9 11%	33 -2%
Idle Maximum *	32.4	36 -11%	37 -14%	30.2 7%	36 -11%
Load Average *	40.5	44 -9%	41 -1%	41.8 -3%	43 -6%
Load Maximum *	50.3	51 -1%	46 9%	43.9 13%	49 3%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade


24 °C	31 °C	38.2 °C
23.8 °C	29 °C	41 °C
23.8 °C	24.2 °C	37.2 °C

Máximo: 41 °C
Médio: 30.2 °C


42.6 °C	31.2 °C	25.4 °C
33.8 °C	26.6 °C	24.8 °C
37.6 °C	26.6 °C	25.6 °C

Máximo: 42.6 °C
Médio: 30.5 °C

alimentação elétrica 49 °C | Temperatura do quarto 20 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer

(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 30.2 °C / 86 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.7 °C / 75 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-8.3 °C / -15 F).

HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (64 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

SCHENKER F516 Flex audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (69 dB)
Analysis not possible as minimum curve is missing or too high

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.24 / 0.78 Watt
Ocioso	8.3 / 14.8 / 16.8 Watt
Carga	71 / 119.2 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk Z400s SD8SNAT-128G, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"	HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, Samsung CM871 MZNLF128HCHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, Toshiba HG6 THNSNJ128G8NY, TN LED, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Zenbook Pro UX501JW-FI218H 4720HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, SanDisk SD7SN3Q128G1002, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6"	HP Omen 15-ax007ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M, Adata IM2S3138E-128GM-B, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Power Consumption		14%	-8%	-24%	4%
Idle Minimum *	8.3	7 16%	10 -20%	15.6 -88%	7 16%
Idle Average *	14.8	11 26%	14 5%	20.5 -39%	11 26%
Idle Maximum *	16.8	17 -1%	19 -13%	21.2 -26%	19 -13%
Load Average *	71	69 3%	82 -15%	75.8 -7%	79 -11%
Load Maximum *	119.2	89 25%	118 1%	72.9 39%	119 -0%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		8h 30min
WiFi Websurfing		4h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 33min

	HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 61.5 Wh	HP Pavilion 15-ak003ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 950M, 48 Wh	MSI GL62-6QFi781H11 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 41.4 Wh	Asus ZenBook Pro UX501VW-DS71T 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 960M, 96 Wh	HP Omen 15-ax007ng 6700HQ, GeForce GTX 965M, 61.5 Wh
Battery Runtime		-2%	-33%	35%	-2%
Reader / Idle	510	572 12%	339 -34%	689 35%	467 -8%
WiFi v1.3	264	304 15%	158 -40%	379 44%	272 3%
Load	93	62 -33%	71 -24%	117 26%	93 0%

Pro

+ Opções de armazenamento primaria e secundaria de 2,5-polegadas

+ Muito bom desempenho dos jogos para o tamanho

+ Boas cores e escalas de cinzas

+ Brilhante iluminação de fundo da tela

+ Design fino e atraente

Contra

- Afogamento sob estresse extremo

- Temperaturas da superfície irregulares

- Sem portas USB Type-C, sem mDP

- O plástico do pousa palma se sente barato

- Forte ruído da ventoinha durante os jogos

- Clickpad suave; resposta pobre

- Sem opções de NVMe ou RAID 0

- Ventoinhas do sistema sempre ativas

- Acessibilidade difícil

- Duração média da bateria

- Contraste médio

In review: HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV. Test model provided by CUKUSA.com

O novo Pavilion 15 é o intermédio entre o Pavilion 15 de 2015 equipado com GTX 950M e o mais recente Omen 15 equipado com GTX 965M, lançado há algumas semanas. Por isso, também tem um preço correspondente de alguns centos de de dólares a menos que o Omen 15 de nível de entrada, mas com maior capacidade gráfica. Dado que ambos os modelos são essencialmente iguais, o Pavilion 15 é uma opção mais atraente e acessível para usuários que desejam um ótimo desempenho de jogos em 1080p, por $1000 USD ou menos. Essencialmente é um aparelho de talento múltiplos para o trabalho e para jogos.

Além de não estar no mesmo nível, o mais recente Pavilion 15 é apenas uma atualização marginal do chassi sobre seus predecessores e não oferece o suficiente para se destacar entre a multidão. Isto seria um problema se não fosse pelo visual do Asus UX501 ou Dell XPS 15, ambos os quais são melhor construídos sem sacrificar o alto desempenho da GPU GTX 960M. O XPS 15 é notavelmente mais leve e mais portável e se torna difícil recomendar o HP quando já há alternativas de 15 polegadas muito fortes disponíveis. Neste caso, a maior vantagem do Pavilion 15 está em seu preço e pode valer a penas deixar de lado a configuração UHD pelo painel FHD, dado que lida melhor com a GPU.

Um sistema barebone multimídia e de jogos para um preço mais econômico que o da concorrência. O seu hardware e recursos são esmagadores em comparação com a concorrência, mas sua capacidade para jogos deve atrair gamers com um orçamento medido, á procura de um portátil que se ajuste a muitos usos.

Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.

HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV - 2016-08-05 08/05/2016 v5.1 ^(old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento

75 / 98 → 77%

Teclado

77%

Mouse

64%

Conectividade

53 / 81 → 65%

Peso

62 / 10-66 → 93%

Bateria

78%

Pantalha

85%

Desempenho do jogos

83%

Desempenho da aplicação

82%

Temperatura

86 / 95 → 91%

Ruído

76 / 90 → 84%

Audio

65%

Camera

42 / 85 → 50%

Médio

71%

80%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Allen Ngo - Lead Editor U.S. - 5238 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2011

contact me via: @AllenNgoNBC

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 15 UHD T9Y85AV

Allen Ngo, 2016-08-12 (Update: 2020-06- 8)