Breve Análise do Portátil HP Pavilion 15 (Core i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 16 GB RAM)
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng (Pavilion 15-cs Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-8265U 4 x 1.6 - 3.9 GHz, Whiskey Lake-U
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 4 GB VRAM, GDDR5 SDRAM, 1D13, Intel UHD Graphics 620
Memória
16 GB
, DDR4, dual-channel
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, BOE080D, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Cannon Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, 256 GB
, 1 TB WDC WD10SPZX-60Z10T0, 1220 GB livre
peso
1.94 kg, Suprimento de energia: 340 g
Preço
1100 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø676 (636-689)
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø562 (507-591)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE080D tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 321 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 293 cd/m² Minimum: 19.5 cd/m²iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 273 cd/m²
Contraste: 1231:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.5 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 4.71 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
88% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
58% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
88.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
67.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.45
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng BOE080D, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L BOE NV156FHM-N48, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T LP156WFC-SPD1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Chi Mei CMN15E8 N156HCE/EN1, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AU Optronics AUO23ED, , 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -37% | -38% | -2% | -41% | -42% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 67.2 | 40.02 -40% | 38.51 -43% | 63.5 -6% | 36.7 -45% | 36.27 -46% |
| sRGB Coverage | 88.1 | 58.5 -34% | 57.9 -34% | 87.9 0% | 55 -38% | 54.6 -38% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.4 | 41.34 -36% | 39.79 -38% | 63.9 -1% | 37.91 -41% | 37.47 -42% |
| Response Times | 0% | 9% | 3970% | 9% | -1% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 ? | 45 ? -5% | 38.8 ? 10% | 42 ? 2% | 40 ? 7% | 45 ? -5% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 29 ? | 33 ? -14% | 26.8 ? 8% | 32 ? -10% | 26 ? 10% | 28 ? 3% |
| PWM Frequency | 208 ? | 250 ? 20% | 25000 ? 11919% | |||
| Screen | -6% | -12% | 9% | -16% | -37% | |
| Brightness middle | 320 | 278 -13% | 262 -18% | 289 -10% | 186 -42% | 240 -25% |
| Brightness | 293 | 271 -8% | 256 -13% | 262 -11% | 180 -39% | 237 -19% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 89 3% | 90 5% | 75 -13% | 88 2% | 90 5% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.26 -0% | 0.21 19% | 0.26 -0% | 0.15 42% | 0.42 -62% |
| Contrast | 1231 | 1069 -13% | 1248 1% | 1112 -10% | 1240 1% | 571 -54% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.5 | 4.73 -5% | 5.8 -29% | 2.9 36% | 5.94 -32% | 7.43 -65% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.81 | 8.38 5% | 14.3 -62% | 5.71 35% | 10.81 -23% | 12.42 -41% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.71 | 2.59 45% | 2.5 47% | 1.42 70% | 4.44 6% | 6.26 -33% |
| Gamma | 2.45 90% | 2.38 92% | 1.99 111% | 2.39 92% | 2.81 78% | 2.96 74% |
| CCT | 7085 92% | 6160 106% | 6528 100% | 6705 97% | 6272 104% | 6661 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 58 | 36 -38% | 36.6 -37% | 57 -2% | 35 -40% | 35 -40% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 88 | 58 -34% | 57.6 -35% | 87 -1% | 55 -37% | 54 -39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 5.17 | 4.6 | 2.88 | 6.07 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -14% /
-10% | -14% /
-15% | 1326% /
750% | -16% /
-18% | -27% /
-33% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 29 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 13 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 75 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 22 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 21 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 208 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 208 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 208 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Intel Core i5-8265U, Intel Core i5-8265U: Ø495 (482.45-528.56)
Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø470 (467.49-492.88)
Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T Intel Core i7-8550U, Intel Core i7-8550U: Ø570 (535-723)
MSI PS63 Modern 8RC Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø529 (524.25-571.63)
HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng AMD Ryzen 5 2500U, AMD Ryzen 5 2500U: Ø431 (417.88-605.96)
HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng Intel Core i5-8250U, Intel Core i5-8250U: Ø484 (479.58-505.2)
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=86, last 2 years) | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (111 - 164, n=35) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=90, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U (457 - 750, n=38) | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4484 - 5583, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3603 - 4220, n=2) | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Average Intel Core i5-8265U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (4965 - 5223, n=2) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3115 - 6078, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3603 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5223 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4190 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027 | MSI PS63 Modern 8RC WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7 | HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF | Average Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 20% | -48% | 12% | -19% | -46% | -8% | |
| Write 4K | 149.3 | 130.1 -13% | 51.5 -66% | 121.3 -19% | 105.8 -29% | 66.9 -55% | 114.9 ? -23% |
| Read 4K | 52.7 | 27.64 -48% | 28.53 -46% | 44.07 -16% | 29.22 -45% | 30.33 -42% | 48 ? -9% |
| Write Seq | 667 | 1438 116% | 444.2 -33% | 1176 76% | 581 -13% | 447.6 -33% | 727 ? 9% |
| Read Seq | 818 | 1319 61% | 477.7 -42% | 1139 39% | 1065 30% | 534 -35% | 885 ? 8% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 332.1 | 323.3 -3% | 208.7 -37% | 257.8 -22% | 201 -39% | 197.5 -41% | 253 ? -24% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 467.1 | 359.9 -23% | 224.3 -52% | 325.9 -30% | 278.6 -40% | 234.5 -50% | 400 ? -14% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 985 | 1454 48% | 515 -48% | 1455 48% | 584 -41% | 495.6 -50% | 849 ? -14% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1454 | 1740 20% | 559 -62% | 1741 20% | 1824 25% | 559 -62% | 1493 ? 3% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 207.5 | 536 ? | |||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 223.6 | 560 ? | |||||
| AS SSD | 69% | -57% | 69% | -6% | -24% | -13% | |
| Seq Read | 1153 | 1557 35% | 504 -56% | 1372 19% | 1480 28% | 522 -55% | 1283 ? 11% |
| Seq Write | 736 | 1237 68% | 202.7 -72% | 1244 69% | 540 -27% | 476.1 -35% | 676 ? -8% |
| 4K Read | 46.51 | 42.56 -8% | 27.67 -41% | 43.34 -7% | 20.36 -56% | 30.14 -35% | 42.7 ? -8% |
| 4K Write | 114.1 | 127.2 11% | 51.1 -55% | 162.2 42% | 54 -53% | 64.3 -44% | 87.7 ? -23% |
| 4K-64 Read | 618 | 1034 67% | 373.6 -40% | 1044 69% | 491.4 -20% | 319.2 -48% | 575 ? -7% |
| 4K-64 Write | 461.4 | 1186 157% | 173 -63% | 1111 141% | 390.3 -15% | 239.8 -48% | 270 ? -41% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.421 | 0.077 82% | 0.365 13% | 0.058 86% | 0.138 67% | 0.131 69% | 0.2746 ? 35% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.233 | 0.028 88% | 0.603 -159% | 0.024 90% | 0.078 67% | 0.056 76% | 0.3361 ? -44% |
| Score Read | 780 | 1233 58% | 452 -42% | 1224 57% | 660 -15% | 402 -48% | 746 ? -4% |
| Score Write | 649 | 1437 121% | 244 -62% | 1398 115% | 498 -23% | 352 -46% | 426 ? -34% |
| Score Total | 1822 | 3291 81% | 921 -49% | 3249 78% | 1451 -20% | 967 -47% | 1536 ? -16% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 1313 | 810 | 491.3 | 761 ? | |||
| Copy Program MB/s | 334.6 | 332.5 | 203.9 | 243 ? | |||
| Copy Game MB/s | 684 | 557 | 359.3 | 457 ? | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 45% /
48% | -53% /
-53% | 41% /
45% | -13% /
-12% | -35% /
-33% | -11% /
-11% |
* ... smaller is better
Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G
Sequential Read:
798 MB/s
Sequential Write:
685 MB/s
512K Read:
637 MB/s
512K Write:
592 MB/s
4K Read:
46.16 MB/s
4K Write:
106.8 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
337 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
186.8 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=77, last 2 years) | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3585 - 4942, n=29) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years) | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (13805 - 23863, n=25) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2939 - 3885, n=29) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (881 - 1169, n=22) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4994 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 13164 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3318 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Multimedia (36 - 428, n=47, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (47.4 - 70, n=24) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Average of class Multimedia (23 - 327, n=40, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (30 - 40, n=27) | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (11.2 - 290, n=73, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (16.3 - 23.1, n=27) | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (8 - 143.2, n=80, last 2 years) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (9 - 16, n=24) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (133.9 - 212, n=14) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (98.4 - 117.5, n=14) | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (84 - 100.5, n=14) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| MSI PS63 Modern 8RC | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (32.3 - 38.1, n=14) | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L | |
| Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 197 | 110 | 93 | 35 |
| Dota 2 (2013) | 101 | 88 | 64 | |
| Thief (2014) | 66.8 | 47.5 | 44.3 | 21 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 65 | 37 | 21 | 16 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 71 | 39 | 24 | 20 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.5 / 31.5 / 31.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 42.5 / 42.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.3 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 44.6 °C / 112 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 26 °C / 79 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.8 °C / 87.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2 °C / -3.6 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (71.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 69% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 23% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 53% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 40% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.3 / 0.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 4.9 / 7.9 / 10.1 Watt |
| Carga |
60 / 38 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, Toshiba KBG30ZMV256G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, SanDisk SD9SN8W256G1027, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 15.6" | MSI PS63 Modern 8RC i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, Intel SSD 600p SSDPEKKW512G7, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, SK Hynix SC313 HFS256G39TNF, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -7% | 3% | -50% | 11% | 1% | -13% | -68% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 4.9 | 4.4 10% | 3.1 37% | 6.8 -39% | 4.5 8% | 3.3 33% | 4.1 ? 16% | 6.78 ? -38% |
| Idle Average * | 7.9 | 6.9 13% | 6.3 20% | 9.8 -24% | 7.3 8% | 6.1 23% | 7.91 ? -0% | 11.3 ? -43% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.1 | 9.9 2% | 8.6 15% | 11.4 -13% | 9.4 7% | 8.3 18% | 10.4 ? -3% | 13.4 ? -33% |
| Load Average * | 60 | 55 8% | 56.4 6% | 76 -27% | 34 43% | 56 7% | 58.6 ? 2% | 71.1 ? -19% |
| Load Maximum * | 38 | 63.4 -67% | 62.7 -65% | 93 -145% | 41.9 -10% | 67 -76% | 68.9 ? -81% | 117.3 ? -209% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 45 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng i5-8265U, GeForce MX250, 41 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-52G-723L i7-8565U, GeForce MX250, 48 Wh | Asus VivoBook S15 S530UN-BQ097T i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 42 Wh | MSI PS63 Modern 8RC i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q, 82 Wh | HP Pavilion 15-cw0003ng R5 2500U, Vega 8, 41 Wh | HP Pavilion 15-cs0003ng i5-8250U, GeForce MX130, 41 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 49% | 31% | 106% | 22% | 17% | 92% | |
| Reader / Idle | 480 | 773 61% | 838 75% | 504 5% | 493 3% | 1168 ? 143% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 297 | 414 39% | 388 31% | 683 130% | 302 2% | 284 -4% | 625 ? 110% |
| Load | 79 | 117 48% | 168 113% | 126 59% | 121 53% | 97.8 ? 24% |
Pro
+ Design premium
+ Acessível
+ Resfriamento decente
+ Bom desempenho do sistema
Contra
- PWM é utilizado para o controle do brilho
- Opções limitadas de manutenção
- Curta duração da bateria
O HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng é uma atualização moderada de seus irmãos e confirma nossas impressões anteriores sobre a série. O Pavilion 15 é um dispositivo bem construído que aparenta ser caro e tem uma sólida seleção de portas. O cs2019ng também oferece mais do que suficiente potência para todas as tarefas diárias e pode até mesmo lidar com alguns jogos leves. A atualização para uma CPU Whiskey Lake e a GeForce MX250 também oferece um aumento modesto no desempenho.
O HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng é um elegante portátil de 15,6 polegadas que tem muito a oferecer. Sua fraca duração de bateria e uso de PWM tiram o brilho do que é um portátil multimídia que de outra forma é competente.
Infelizmente, o cs2019ng compartilha as mesmas falhas de seus irmãos. O dispositivo tem uma duração de bateria comparativamente curta, e é difícil acessar seus componentes internos. A inclusão do PWM também é decepcionante e será problemático para algumas pessoas. No geral, o Pavilion 15-cs2019ng oferece mais potência do que seus irmãos Kaby Lake e AMD, mantendo seu design premium e bom desempenho de resfriamento.
HP Pavilion 15-cs2019ng
- 04/21/2019 v6 (old)
Mike Wobker
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
