Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 15t-ce000 (7700HQ, GTX 1060 Max-Q, UHD)
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
SD Card Reader | |
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE |
|
iluminação: 95 %
iluminação com acumulador: 358.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 919:1 (Preto: 0.39 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
HP Omen 15t-ce000 AU Optronics AUO23EB, IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE LG Philips LP156WF6-SPK3, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 ID: LG Philips LGD053F, Name: 156WF6, Dell P/N: 4XK13, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Gigabyte Aero 15 N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE LG Display LP156WF6-SPP1, AH-IPS, Normally Black, Transmissive, 15.6", 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-ce002ng AUO42ED, IPS, 15.6", 1920x1080 | Aorus X5 v7 AU Optronics B156ZAN02.3 (AUO23EB), IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -39% | -42% | -0% | -5% | -1% | -1% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.1 | 39.01 -41% | 37.07 -44% | 65.2 -1% | 65.8 0% | 65.8 0% | 65.3 -1% |
sRGB Coverage | 91.8 | 58.4 -36% | 55.6 -39% | 92.5 1% | 85.1 -7% | 90.9 -1% | 91.9 0% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.9 | 40.34 -40% | 38.32 -43% | 66.5 -1% | 62.2 -7% | 66.5 -1% | 66.3 -1% |
Response Times | -11% | -3% | -22% | -23% | -21% | -12% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 37.6 ? | 39 ? -4% | 35.6 ? 5% | 42.8 ? -14% | 41 ? -9% | 43.2 ? -15% | 44 ? -17% |
Response Time Black / White * | 24.8 ? | 29 ? -17% | 27.6 ? -11% | 32 ? -29% | 34 ? -37% | 31.2 ? -26% | 26.4 ? -6% |
PWM Frequency | 21000 ? | 26000 ? | |||||
Screen | -22% | -27% | -6% | -3% | 9% | 0% | |
Brightness middle | 358.5 | 283 -21% | 235.4 -34% | 320 -11% | 322 -10% | 304 -15% | 307 -14% |
Brightness | 350 | 281 -20% | 223 -36% | 316 -10% | 297 -15% | 289 -17% | 297 -15% |
Brightness Distribution | 95 | 91 -4% | 91 -4% | 90 -5% | 86 -9% | 86 -9% | 92 -3% |
Black Level * | 0.39 | 0.39 -0% | 0.28 28% | 0.36 8% | 0.31 21% | 0.26 33% | 0.3 23% |
Contrast | 919 | 726 -21% | 841 -8% | 889 -3% | 1039 13% | 1169 27% | 1023 11% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 6.1 -33% | 5.6 -22% | 4.62 -0% | 4.73 -3% | 3.46 25% | 4.72 -3% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.5 | 11.08 -30% | 20.3 -139% | 9.75 -15% | 12.37 -46% | 7.72 9% | 8.07 5% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 5.69 -9% | 3.6 31% | 6 -15% | 2.99 42% | 2.46 53% | 4.79 8% |
Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.44 90% | 2.23 99% | 2.46 89% | 2.32 95% | 2.38 92% | 2.42 91% |
CCT | 6410 101% | 6702 97% | 7214 90% | 6761 96% | 6905 94% | 6915 94% | 7690 85% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 66.9 | 37 -45% | 35.2 -47% | 60 -10% | 56 -16% | 59 -12% | 60 -10% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91.8 | 58 -37% | 55.4 -40% | 92 0% | 85 -7% | 91 -1% | 92 0% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | -24% /
-24% | -24% /
-27% | -9% /
-7% | -10% /
-6% | -4% /
3% | -4% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
24.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise | |
↘ 12.4 ms fall | ||
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 54 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
37.6 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 19.6 ms rise | |
↘ 18 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM not detected | |||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
Cinebench R10 | |
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
Rendering Single 32Bit | |
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 |
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 |
* ... smaller is better
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4325 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 6901 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 2484 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3969 pontos | |
Ajuda |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Aorus X5 v7 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AS SSD | -9% | 32% | -436% | 133% | |
Copy Game MB/s | 736 | 197.3 -73% | 382.5 -48% | 988 34% | 1134 54% |
Copy Program MB/s | 195.4 | 127.3 -35% | 274.8 41% | 424.4 117% | 534 173% |
Copy ISO MB/s | 1087 | 497.6 -54% | 814 -25% | 1482 36% | 1936 78% |
Score Total | 1515 | 1434 -5% | 2405 59% | 490 -68% | 3781 150% |
Score Write | 361 | 368 2% | 594 65% | 24 -93% | 1556 331% |
Score Read | 789 | 746 -5% | 1241 57% | 361 -54% | 1493 89% |
Access Time Write * | 0.034 | 0.032 6% | 0.037 -9% | 1.987 -5744% | 0.026 24% |
Access Time Read * | 0.071 | 0.07 1% | 0.058 18% | 0.067 6% | 0.04 44% |
4K-64 Write | 175.9 | 158.6 -10% | 375.8 114% | 2.12 -99% | 1262 617% |
4K-64 Read | 568 | 463.2 -18% | 929 64% | 112.5 -80% | 1206 112% |
4K Write | 111.2 | 127.9 15% | 100.2 -10% | 2.03 -98% | 141.1 27% |
4K Read | 43.09 | 46.98 9% | 46.95 9% | 38.45 -11% | 51.9 20% |
Seq Write | 743 | 814 10% | 1181 59% | 200.3 -73% | 1530 106% |
Seq Read | 1774 | 2362 33% | 2652 49% | 2103 19% | 2342 32% |
* ... smaller is better
3DMark | |
3840x2160 Fire Strike Ultra Graphics | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
Fire Strike Extreme Graphics | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 |
3DMark 11 Performance | 11761 pontos | |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 21508 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8725 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 4487 pontos | |
Ajuda |
Rise of the Tomb Raider | |
3840x2160 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x (sort by value) | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
1920x1080 High Preset AA:FX AF:4x (sort by value) | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 |
The Witcher 3 | |
3840x2160 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) (sort by value) | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) (sort by value) | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) (sort by value) | |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 | |
Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE | |
Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 | |
Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE | |
HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
Aorus X5 v7 | |
HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dirt 3 (2011) | 140.1 | 126.3 | 112.2 | 64.5 | |
Sleeping Dogs (2012) | 218.4 | 192.7 | 164.7 | 69.5 | |
Hitman: Absolution (2012) | 105.8 | 101 | 88.7 | 70 | |
Tomb Raider (2013) | 308.4 | 277.7 | 170.5 | 115.6 | |
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 209 | 193.3 | 180.1 | 102.4 | |
GRID 2 (2013) | 210.8 | 152.8 | 143.3 | 116.7 | |
Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 68.9 | 65.7 | 63.4 | 40 | |
Thief (2014) | 117.2 | 112 | 107.6 | 69 | |
Middle-earth: Shadow of Mordor (2014) | 170.2 | 139.9 | 96.7 | 76.9 | |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 172.3 | 133.8 | 68.5 | 35 | 23.7 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 148.1 | 117.8 | 67.6 | 54.6 | 24 |
Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 75.8 | 62.2 | 53.2 | 20.8 | |
Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 110.3 | 93 | 52 | 27.6 | 16.3 |
Prey (2017) | 116 | 92.9 | 80.2 | 30.7 | |
Ark Survival Evolved (2017) | 109 | 48 | 35.5 | 25.6 | 8.5 |
Middle-earth: Shadow of War (2017) | 128 | 81 | 62 | 46 | 27 |
ELEX (2017) | 108.1 | 83.5 | 69.6 | 57.2 | 17 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 30.4 / 30.4 / 30.5 dB |
Carga |
| 38.5 / 49 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1 (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-7300HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Gigabyte Aero 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035 | HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Aorus X5 v7 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7820HK, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Noise | -1% | 7% | -7% | -5% | -8% | -18% | |
off / environment * | 28.2 | 30.6 -9% | 28 1% | 31 -10% | 30.4 -8% | 30 -6% | 30 -6% |
Idle Minimum * | 30.4 | 31.9 -5% | 28 8% | 32 -5% | 30.9 -2% | 30 1% | 35 -15% |
Idle Average * | 30.4 | 31.9 -5% | 28 8% | 33 -9% | 30.9 -2% | 33 -9% | 36 -18% |
Idle Maximum * | 30.5 | 31.9 -5% | 28 8% | 34 -11% | 31.5 -3% | 37 -21% | 40 -31% |
Load Average * | 38.5 | 34.6 10% | 30.3 21% | 39 -1% | 40.7 -6% | 41 -6% | 43 -12% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 37.6 | 39.3 -5% | 39.5 -5% | 43 -14% | 45.5 -21% | 42 -12% | 49 -30% |
Load Maximum * | 49 | 41.7 15% | 46.5 5% | 50 -2% | 43.9 10% | 50 -2% | 55 -12% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 46 °C / 115 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 49.2 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 31.2 °C / 88 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31 °C / 87.8 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-2.1 °C / -3.8 F).
HP Omen 15t-ce000 audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (65.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 13.8% lower than median
(-) | bass is not linear (15.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (21.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 76% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 19% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 58% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 35% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.33 / 0.64 Watt |
Ocioso | 15.4 / 22.4 / 22.4 Watt |
Carga |
78.1 / 133.52 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP Omen 15t-ce000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW128HEGR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Seagate Mobile HDD 1TB ST1000LM035, AH-IPS, Normally Black, Transmissive, 1920x1080, 15.6" | HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Aorus X5 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPU7, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 39% | 39% | 4% | 15% | -13% | -58% | |
Idle Minimum * | 15.4 | 5.2 66% | 7.1 54% | 12 22% | 7.2 53% | 18 -17% | 26 -69% |
Idle Average * | 22.4 | 8.3 63% | 7.6 66% | 15 33% | 10.5 53% | 23 -3% | 31 -38% |
Idle Maximum * | 22.4 | 10.1 55% | 8.6 62% | 20 11% | 16 29% | 30 -34% | 36 -61% |
Load Average * | 78.1 | 62.7 20% | 59.5 24% | 82 -5% | 82 -5% | 85 -9% | 93 -19% |
Witcher 3 ultra * | 97.5 | 94 4% | 89 9% | 111 -14% | 124 -27% | 96 2% | 176 -81% |
Load Maximum * | 133.52 | 100 25% | 112.8 16% | 161 -21% | 155 -16% | 158 -18% | 240 -80% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Omen 15t-ce000 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Lenovo Legion Y520-15IKBN 80WK0042GE i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 45 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 7000 7577 i5-7300HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 56 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 94.24 Wh | Acer Aspire VN7-593G-73HP V15 Nitro BE i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 69 Wh | HP Omen 15-ce002ng i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Aorus X5 v7 i7-7820HK, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 94 Wh | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 53% | 79% | 84% | 71% | -8% | -19% | |
Reader / Idle | 298 | 634 113% | 659 121% | 638 114% | 501 68% | 256 -14% | 208 -30% |
WiFi v1.3 | 208 | 310 49% | 416 100% | 422 103% | 357 72% | 198 -5% | 151 -27% |
Load | 83 | 81 -2% | 96 16% | 112 35% | 144 73% | 80 -4% | 84 1% |
Pro
Contra
Não é muito difícil encontrar falhas ao examinar portáteis de jogos com preços mais baixos, já que o fabricante deve seguir uma linha muito fina para equilibrar materiais comparativamente baratos com boa aparência e hardware suficientemente potente para atrair o maior número possível de usuários. Para o Omen 15, talvez tenhamos a tentação de criticar a casca metálica superior estampada com suas bordas bastante afiadas, o bleeding da tela bastante notório ou o sistema da ventoinha bastante obstrutivo. Mas nenhuma das falhas é crucial quando se trata de um sistema de jogos: em resumo, o HP Omen 15 é um sistema Max-Q de preço acessível com suficiente poder para lidar com muitos jogos atuais, pelo menos com a resolução de tela Full HD .
O design mais novo com seu estilo mais "no seu rosto" pode não ser atraente para todos, mas não há dúvida de que a qualidade de construção em si é bastante decente com boa rigidez de torção da unidade base e pouco ou nada de afundamento no teclado. Os dispositivos de entrada funcionam bem, o hardware oferece muito poder e a tela UHD IPS brilhante é - especialmente após uma calibração - bastante incrível pelo preço. O Omen 15 ainda esquenta bastante, mas não é tão quente quanto alguns outros sistemas. As ventoinhas são, no entanto, bastante irritantes, enquanto giram frequentemente e produzem frequentemente um som oscilante que irrita os nervos.
Os usuários que procuram um portátil de jogos acessível de gama média-baixa com tela 4K definitivamente devem colocar o Omen 15 em sua lista de potenciais candidatos.
O portátil de jogos Dell Inspiron 15 possui uma tela inferior, mas um desempenho ainda muito decente e dura duas vezes mais com a bateria.
HP Omen 15t-ce000
- 12/01/2017 v6 (old)
Bernie Pechlaner