Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, SSD, FHD)

Name: HP Omen 15-dc0015ng
Brand: HP

Compact gaming racer.

O Omen 15 roda todos os jogos de computador atuais fluentemente na tela mate Full HD. A Hewlett-Packard usa um painel IPS de 144 Hz muito responsivo aqui, e o resto do equipamento também está bem: SSD NVMe, 32 GB de memória de trabalho, Thunderbolt 3.

Sascha Mölck, 👁 Sebastian Jentsch (traduzido por Ricardo Soto), Published 12/11/2018 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...

Coffee Lake Gaming Geforce Laptop / Notebook Thunderbolt Virtual Reality (VR) / Augmented Reality (AR) Windows

Test device courtesy of HP Deutschland

Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng (Omen 15-dc Serie)

Processador

Intel Core i7-8750H 6 x 2.2 - 4.1 GHz, Coffee Lake-H

Placa gráfica

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q - 8 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1379 MHz, Memoría: 2002 MHz, GDDR5, conexão de 256-bits, Nvidia 417.01, no Optimus

Memória

32 GB

, DDR4-2666, dual channel, dois slots (ambos ocupados)

Pantalha

15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, LG Philips LGD05C0, IPS, 144 Hz, Nvidia G-Sync, Brilhante: não

placa mãe

Intel Cannon Lake HM370

Disco rígido

Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G, 512 GB

, + HGST HTS721010A9E630, 1433 GB livre

Placa de Som

Realtek ALC295 @ Intel Cannon Lake PCH

Conexões

3 USB 3.0, 1 USB 3.1 Gen2, 1 Thunderbolt, 2 DVI, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Conexões Audio: porta de áudio combinada, entrada de microfone, Card Reader: SDXC, TPM 2.0

Funcionamento em rede

Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (10/100/1000MBit/s), Intel Wireless-AC 9560 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 5

Tamanho

altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 25 x 360 x 263

Bateria

70.07 Wh, 4550 mAh Lítio-Ion, 15.4 V

Sistema Operativo

Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit

Camera

Webcam: HD
Primary Camera: 0.9 MPix

Características adicionais

Alto falantes: stereo, Teclado: chiclet, McAfee LiveSafe (trial version), 24 Meses Garantia

peso

2.52 kg, Suprimento de energia: 652 g

Preço

2099 Euro

Links

HP página inicial

Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

see all specifications

Size Comparison

MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 HP Omen 15-dc0015ng HP Omen 15-dc0001ng SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 DIN A4 ❌

SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Average of class Gaming (19 - 202, n=87, last 2 years)	95.9 MB/s +21%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	79.1 MB/s
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	78 MB/s -1%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	26 MB/s -67%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	25 MB/s -68%
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Average of class Gaming (25.8 - 269, n=88, last 2 years)	120 MB/s +40%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	87 MB/s +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	86 MB/s
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	32 MB/s -63%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II)	32 MB/s -63%

Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Wireless-AC 9560	693 MBit/s +7%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	692 MBit/s +6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	665 MBit/s +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	650 (605^min - 668^max) MBit/s
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	643 MBit/s -1%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Wireless-AC 9260	642 MBit/s -1%
iperf3 receive AX12
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Killer Wireless-AC 1550 Wireless Network Adapter	694 MBit/s +7%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Intel Wireless-AC 9560	691 MBit/s +6%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	690 MBit/s +6%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Wireless-AC 9560	683 MBit/s +5%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Wireless-AC 9260	682 MBit/s +5%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560	650 (569^min - 693^max) MBit/s
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Wireless-AC 9560	585 (484^min - 680^max) MBit/s -10%

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø649 (569-693)

MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø630 (484-680)

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Wireless-AC 9560; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø650 (605-668)


274 cd/m²	279 cd/m²	307 cd/m²
263 cd/m²	317 cd/m²	300 cd/m²
242 cd/m²	276 cd/m²	293 cd/m²

Distribuição do brilho

LG Philips LGD05C0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2

Máximo: 317 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 283.4 cd/m² Minimum: 15.1 cd/m²
iluminação: 76 %
iluminação com acumulador: 317 cd/m²
Contraste: 511:1 (Preto: 0.62 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
65.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
93.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
64.2% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28

Download Arquivo ICC (X-Rite i1Pro 2)

	HP Omen 15-dc0015ng IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	HP Omen 15-dc0001ng IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6"	MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 TN, 1920x1080, 15.6"
Display		-37%	0%	1%	0%	0%	26%
Display P3 Coverage	64.2	39.64 -38%	65.1 1%	66.7 4%	64.4 0%	64.3 0%	90 40%
sRGB Coverage	93.4	59 -37%	91.1 -2%	91.2 -2%	93.4 0%	94.1 1%	100 7%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage	65.1	40.95 -37%	65.9 1%	66.7 2%	65.5 1%	65.3 0%	86 32%
Response Times		-187%	3%	33%	6%	10%	-44%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *	17 ?(9, 8)	47.2 ?(23.6, 23.6) -178%	16 ?(9, 7) 6%	7.4 ?(3.8, 3.6) 56%	13.6 ?(7.6, 6) 20%	16 ?(8.4, 7.6) 6%	24.4 ?(14.4, 10) -44%
Response Time Black / White *	11 ?(7, 4)	32.4 ?(18, 14.4) -195%	11 ?(7, 4) -0%	10 ?(4.4, 5.6) 9%	12 ?(7.6, 4.4) -9%	9.6 ?(5.2, 4.4) 13%	15.8 ?(13.8, 2) -44%
PWM Frequency		200 ?(99)					25510 ?(19)
Screen		-14%	14%	20%	22%	17%	-6%
Brightness middle	317	275 -13%	235 -26%	294 -7%	304.3 -4%	325 3%	292 -8%
Brightness	283	254 -10%	235 -17%	275 -3%	293 4%	303 7%	258 -9%
Brightness Distribution	76	90 18%	85 12%	84 11%	80 5%	90 18%	81 7%
Black Level *	0.62	0.27 56%	0.22 65%	0.24 61%	0.38 39%	0.33 47%	0.23 63%
Contrast	511	1019 99%	1068 109%	1225 140%	801 57%	985 93%	1270 149%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *	2.83	4.62 -63%	2.82 -0%	2.57 9%	1.79 37%	2.69 5%	5.82 -106%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *	5.78	8.05 -39%	4.82 17%	4.88 16%	3.69 36%	4.91 15%	9.05 -57%
Greyscale dE 2000 *	2	4.31 -116%	2.32 -16%	2.41 -21%	1.1 45%	2.34 -17%	4.61 -131%
Gamma	2.28 ^96%	2.49 ^88%	2.49 ^88%	2.5 ^88%	2.27 ^97%	2.38 ^92%	2.65 ^83%
CCT	6493 ^100%	7000 ^93%	6310 ^103%	6370 ^102%	6665 ^98%	6872 ^95%	6950 ^94%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)	60	38 -37%	59 -2%	59 -2%	59.8 0%	60 0%	76 27%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)	93	59 -37%	92 -1%	91 -2%	92.8 0%	94 1%	100 8%
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated *		3.59	4.88	2.14		1.27	2.82
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-79% / -42%	6% / 10%	18% / 18%	9% / 15%	9% / 13%	-8% / -4%

* ... smaller is better

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

ℹ

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.

Screen flickering / PWM not detected

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

Display Response Times

ℹ

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.

↔ Response Time Black to White
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 7 ms rise
11 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 4 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 26 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms).
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↗ 9 ms rise
17 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined	↘ 8 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 28 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms).

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø983 (970.71-1067.24)

HP Omen 15-dc0001ng Intel Core i5-8300H, Intel Core i5-8300H: Ø796 (778-805.1)

MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø993 (983.33-1046.24)

Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1004 (937.73-1119.73)

Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø924 (911.97-1007.8)

SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1104 (1087.93-1138.69)

MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Intel Core i7-8750H, Intel Core i7-8750H: Ø1024 (1006.34-1167)

CPU clock speeds while running the CB15 loop

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit

11042

Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit

31360

Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit

6473

Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit

75.2 fps

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit

11.77 Points

Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit

1.92 Points

Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit

99.6 %

Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit

115.4 fps

Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit

1067 Points

Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit

169 Points

Ajuda

... comparado com

Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (191.9 - 318, n=191, last 2 years)	278 Points +64%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Core i7-8750H	176 Points +4%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points +4%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H	175 Points +4%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng Intel Core i5-8300H	173 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	172 Points +2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (163 - 177, n=86)	172 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	169 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	166 Points -2%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (905 - 5663, n=194, last 2 years)	3421 Points +221%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Intel Core i7-8750H	1167 Points +9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	1154 Points +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	1120 Points +5%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (863 - 1251, n=93)	1113 Points +4%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H	1100 Points +3%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	1067 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Core i7-8750H	1008 Points -6%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng Intel Core i5-8300H	805 Points -25%

Cinebench R11.5
CPU Multi 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (10.4 - 64.3, n=18, last 2 years)	37.2 Points +216%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	12.89 Points +10%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Intel Core i7-8750H	12.7 Points +8%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	12.44 Points +6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (9.54 - 13.5, n=41)	12.2 Points +4%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	11.77 Points
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H	11.43 Points -3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng Intel Core i5-8300H	8.68 Points -26%
CPU Single 64Bit
Average of class Gaming (2.62 - 3.73, n=17, last 2 years)	3.33 Points +73%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.99 Points +4%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H	1.99 Points +4%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (1.89 - 2, n=40)	1.967 Points +2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H	1.96 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng Intel Core i5-8300H	1.94 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	1.92 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H	1.89 Points -2%

Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Average of class Gaming (32456 - 112749, n=18, last 2 years)	63783 Points +103%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (29664 - 35307, n=25)	33163 Points +6%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	31360 Points
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H	31213 Points 0%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Average of class Gaming (5719 - 15819, n=18, last 2 years)	9755 Points +51%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (6236 - 6645, n=25)	6479 Points 0%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	6473 Points
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H	6440 Points -1%

Geekbench 3
32 Bit Multi-Core Score
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	22587 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (20725 - 22665, n=13)	21871 Points -3%
32 Bit Single-Core Score
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	4144 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (3734 - 4163, n=13)	3995 Points -4%

Geekbench 4.0
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming (31808 - 41034, n=3, last 2 years)	36990 Points +75%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	21175 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (17048 - 22006, n=8)	19665 Points -7%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming (6453 - 7348, n=3, last 2 years)	6951 Points +39%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	4997 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (4548 - 4997, n=8)	4839 Points -3%

Geekbench 4.4
64 Bit Multi-Core Score
Average of class Gaming (31241 - 71700, n=15, last 2 years)	54312 Points +140%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	22614 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (17709 - 23313, n=17)	21069 Points -7%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H	17709 Points -22%
64 Bit Single-Core Score
Average of class Gaming (6158 - 8945, n=15, last 2 years)	8126 Points +59%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H	5126 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (4669 - 5146, n=17)	4982 Points -3%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H	4669 Points -9%

Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H (EDGE: 42.17134.1.0)	1174 ms * -7%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (695 - 1272, n=50)	1108 ms * -1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)	1100 ms *
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)	1088 ms * +1%
Average of class Gaming (421 - 674, n=176, last 2 years)	503 ms * +54%

Octane V2 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming (69893 - 115768, n=56, last 2 years)	95460 Points +171%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)	35283 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)	34795 Points -1%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (27460 - 44549, n=47)	34108 Points -3%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H (EDGE: 42.17134.1.0)	33963 Points -4%

JetStream 1.1 - Total Score
Average of class Gaming (357 - 669, n=33, last 2 years)	526 Points +117%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 42.17134.1.0)	259.2 Points +7%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H (EDGE: 42.17134.1.0)	249.8 Points +3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H (205 - 299, n=49)	247 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H (Edge 44)	241.9 Points

* ... smaller is better

PCMark 7 Score		7168 pontos
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2		5130 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2		5908 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2		5818 pontos
PCMark 10 Score		5728 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

PCMark 10 | PCMark 8

PCMark 10
Score
Average of class Gaming (5776 - 9852, n=165, last 2 years)	7799 Points +36%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	5728 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (4910 - 5728, n=9)	5223 Points -9%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	5191 Points -9%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5184 Points -9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5170 Points -10%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4910 Points -14%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G	4707 Points -18%
Essentials
Average of class Gaming (9057 - 12334, n=164, last 2 years)	10832 Points +17%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	9270 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	8770 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	8712 Points -6%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (6838 - 9270, n=9)	8199 Points -12%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G	8085 Points -13%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	8051 Points -13%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	7853 Points -15%
Productivity
Average of class Gaming (6662 - 14612, n=164, last 2 years)	9904 Points +31%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	7532 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	7390 Points -2%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (7032 - 7793, n=9)	7324 Points -3%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	7162 Points -5%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	7065 Points -6%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	7030 Points -7%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G	7030 Points -7%
Digital Content Creation
Average of class Gaming (6703 - 18475, n=164, last 2 years)	12117 Points +66%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	7303 Points
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (5793 - 7303, n=9)	6468 Points -11%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	6355 Points -13%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	6200 Points -15%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5970 Points -18%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	5793 Points -21%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G	4980 Points -32%

PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (4560 - 5937, n=20, last 2 years)	5223 Points +2%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	5130 Points
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	4650 Points -9%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	4620 Points -10%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (4393 - 5130, n=10)	4599 Points -10%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	4585 Points -11%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	4446 Points -13%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	4271 Points -17%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G	4109 Points -20%
Work Score Accelerated v2
Average of class Gaming (5520 - 6853, n=18, last 2 years)	6102 Points +5%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	5818 Points
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	5706 Points -2%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	5705 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	5669 Points -3%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	5651 Points -3%
Average Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (5323 - 5818, n=10)	5628 Points -3%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G	5362 Points -8%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-8750H, Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	5210 Points -10%

CrystalDiskMark 3.0

CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6

AS SSD

Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G

Sequential Read: 1407 MB/s

Sequential Write: 524 MB/s

512K Read: 643 MB/s

512K Write: 524 MB/s

4K Read: 13.6 MB/s

4K Write: 112.9 MB/s

4K QD32 Read: 599 MB/s

4K QD32 Write: 523 MB/s

	HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G	HP Omen 15-dc0001ng Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G	MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Kingston RBUSNS8154P3512GJ	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Samsung SSD 970 Pro 1TB	MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Samsung SSD PM871a MZNLN256HMHQ	Average Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6		-37%	27%	48%	75%	97%	-25%	36%
Write 4K	87.5	77.1 -12%	89.2 2%	98.2 12%	97.9 12%	100.5 15%	66.4 -24%	114 ?(79.1 - 148.7, n=12) 30%
Read 4K	16.08	29.51 84%	34.36 114%	39.43 145%	41.32 157%	48.64 202%	29.59 84%	35.6 ?(16.1 - 49.7, n=12) 121%
Write Seq	614	130.9 -79%	949 55%	1386 126%	1594 160%	1456 137%	477.9 -22%	684 ?(250 - 1342, n=12) 11%
Read Seq	1341	857 -36%	899 -33%	1100 -18%	1353 1%	1278 -5%	515 -62%	1612 ?(276 - 2353, n=12) 20%
Write 4K Q32T1	307.9	104.1 -66%	371.4 21%	270.3 -12%	305.6 -1%	298.1 -3%	180.2 -41%	401 ?(266 - 518, n=12) 30%
Read 4K Q32T1	358.4	195.8 -45%	399 11%	340.3 -5%	354.1 -1%	348.7 -3%	199.5 -44%	427 ?(258 - 773, n=12) 19%
Write Seq Q32T1	525	130.8 -75%	1035 97%	1454 177%	2033 287%	2742 422%	497.6 -5%	830 ?(459 - 2969, n=12) 58%
Read Seq Q32T1	3077	1096 -64%	1603 -48%	1681 -45%	2543 -17%	3389 10%	547 -82%	2950 ?(1783 - 3228, n=12) -4%
Write 4K Q8T8			760					887 ?(527 - 1246, n=2)
Read 4K Q8T8			811					1060 ?(722 - 1397, n=2)
AS SSD		-69%	65%	48%	146%	123%	-27%	69%
Seq Read	2432	1238 -49%	850 -65%	903 -63%	1820 -25%	1915 -21%	512 -79%	2137 ?(1408 - 2612, n=15) -12%
Seq Write	843	123.5 -85%	869 3%	1261 50%	1917 127%	2324 176%	462.8 -45%	744 ?(261 - 2294, n=15) -12%
4K Read	21.24	31.48 48%	36.43 72%	40.02 88%	48.56 129%	48.03 126%	32.36 52%	30.1 ?(21.2 - 52.8, n=15) 42%
4K Write	99.3	79.3 -20%	84.4 -15%	103.6 4%	99.2 0%	106 7%	68.6 -31%	93.6 ?(4.25 - 154.1, n=15) -6%
4K-64 Read	730	187.8 -74%	839 15%	1030 41%	1177 61%	1598 119%	348.6 -52%	784 ?(528 - 1464, n=15) 7%
4K-64 Write	484.4	103.6 -79%	602 24%	1285 165%	1664 244%	2085 330%	294.3 -39%	515 ?(86 - 1350, n=15) 6%
Access Time Read *	0.126	0.177 -40%	0.104 17%	0.129 -2%	0.05 60%	0.038 70%	0.101 20%	0.09253 ?(0.05 - 0.2, n=15) 27%
Access Time Write *	0.063	0.227 -260%	0.044 30%	0.036 43%	0.037 41%	0.034 46%	0.051 19%	0.1653 ?(0.026 - 1.066, n=15) -162%
Score Read	994	343 -65%	960 -3%	1161 17%	1407 42%	1837 85%	432 -57%	1028 ?(733 - 1773, n=15) 3%
Score Write	668	195 -71%	773 16%	1515 127%	1955 193%	2423 263%	409 -39%	683 ?(119 - 1733, n=15) 2%
Score Total	2091	670 -68%	2233 7%	3294 58%	4095 96%	5224 150%	1071 -49%	2170 ?(1157 - 4406, n=15) 4%
Copy ISO MB/s	1632		840 -49%		1452 -11%			1109 ?(585 - 1963, n=10) -32%
Copy Program MB/s	30.89		306.9 894%		370.7 1100%			380 ?(30.9 - 570, n=10) 1130%
Copy Game MB/s	980		622 -37%		882 -10%			738 ?(458 - 1173, n=10) -25%
Total Average (Program / Settings)		-53% / -56%	46% / 51%	48% / 48%	111% / 120%	110% / 112%	-26% / -26%	53% / 57%

* ... smaller is better

3DMark 06 Standard Score		35269 pontos
3DMark 11 Performance		16908 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score		165902 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score		34535 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score		12877 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score		6571 pontos
3DMark Time Spy Score		4856 pontos
Ajuda

... comparado com

3DMark 11 | 3DMark

3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU
Average of class Gaming (1029 - 72178, n=183, last 2 years)	43810 Points +128%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	23061 Points +20%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	19187 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (17680 - 20829, n=18)	19016 Points -1%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	18296 Points -5%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	18234 Points -5%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	14367 Points -25%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	14180 Points -26%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H	9266 Points -52%

3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Average of class Gaming (15902 - 193851, n=101, last 2 years)	143583 Points +42%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	101453 Points
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	99921 Points -2%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (73739 - 107807, n=16)	97317 Points -4%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	81178 Points -20%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	80748 Points -20%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	73739 Points -27%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H	49254 Points -51%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Average of class Gaming (781 - 53059, n=194, last 2 years)	31415 Points +113%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	17720 Points +20%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (14146 - 16165, n=16)	14910 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	14724 Points
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	14463 Points -2%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, Intel Core i7-8750H	11558 Points -22%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	11315 Points -23%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, Intel Core i5-8300H	7576 Points -49%
2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics
Average of class Gaming (224 - 22717, n=189, last 2 years)	13118 Points +179%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	4734 Points +1%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, Intel Core i7-8750H	4708 Points
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (4548 - 4795, n=5)	4687 Points 0%

	baixo	média	alto	ultra
BioShock Infinite (2013)	313.8	279.9	256	139.4
GTA V (2015)	166.7	159.8	145.9	64.6
The Witcher 3 (2015)	251	170.8	97.7	55.3
Dota 2 Reborn (2015)	126.9	118.2	111.7	109.7
World of Warships (2015)	205.4	169.8	146.3	140.7
Mass Effect Andromeda (2017)	150.1	110.8	77.6	68.5
Warhammer 40.000: Dawn of War III (2017)	167.3	106.4	100.9	89.9
Team Fortress 2 (2017)	128.4	126.3	122	120.8
Ark Survival Evolved (2017)	158.3	62.7	45.7	31.9
Destiny 2 (2017)	152.6	137.4	130.8	111
X-Plane 11.11 (2018)	109	96.5	81.1
Monster Hunter World (2018)	156.5	88.4	80.4	60.3
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (2018)	130	78	72	61
Call of Duty Black Ops 4 (2018)	169.8	105	98.9	93.3
Hitman 2 (2018)	92	80.5	74.8	68.8
Battlefield V (2018)	140.7	80.6	70	64.7
Farming Simulator 19 (2018)	214.4	167.6	110.4	89.6
Darksiders III (2018)	169.2	83.9	68.3	59.7
Just Cause 4 (2018)	126.1	86.1	78.8	75.7

The Witcher 3 | BioShock Infinite

The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+)
Average of class Gaming (18.4 - 216, n=163, last 2 years)	128.3 fps +132%
MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	60.6 fps +10%
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	55.3 fps
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	51.5 (45^min - 58^max) fps -7%
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (46 - 55.3, n=19)	51.5 fps -7%
Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	49.2 fps -11%
SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	38.6 fps -30%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q	37 fps -33%
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng Intel Core i5-8300H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	24.2 fps -56%

BioShock Infinite - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF)
HP Omen 15-dc0015ng Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	139.4 fps
Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q (109.6 - 139.4, n=10)	127.3 fps -9%
MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	118 (22^min - 273^max) fps -15%
Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 Intel Core i7-8750H, NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q	109.8 fps -21%

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, i7-8750H, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV512G: Ø53.7 (49-58)

GPU values measured during The Witcher 3 test.

Barulho

Ocioso		30.6 / 30.6 / 32.2 dB
Carga		47.2 / 42.3 dB

	30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.6 dB(A)

	HP Omen 15-dc0015ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	HP Omen 15-dc0001ng i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Noise		-7%	2%	-12%	-0%	-14%	-10%	-2%	7%
off / environment *	30.6	29 5%	30.7 -0%	29 5%	28.1 8%	29 5%	30 2%	29.4 ?(28 - 30.7, n=15) 4%	24 ?(19.5 - 27.9, n=154, last 2 years) 22%
Idle Minimum *	30.6	29 5%	32.1 -5%	33 -8%	28.1 8%	29 5%	30 2%	30.5 ?(28.5 - 33, n=16) -0%	25.5 ?(22.8 - 35, n=155, last 2 years) 17%
Idle Average *	30.6	33 -8%	32.1 -5%	34 -11%	33 -8%	35 -14%	35 -14%	31.8 ?(28.5 - 37, n=16) -4%	27.2 ?(23 - 37.5, n=155, last 2 years) 11%
Idle Maximum *	32.2	41 -27%	32.4 -1%	40 -24%	33.5 -4%	40 -24%	36 -12%	34.6 ?(28.6 - 43, n=16) -7%	30.4 ?(23 - 47, n=155, last 2 years) 6%
Load Average *	47.2	44 7%	39 17%	47 -0%	42.2 11%	50 -6%	42 11%	43.2 ?(35.2 - 49, n=16) 8%	42.7 ?(25.2 - 62.9, n=155, last 2 years) 10%
Witcher 3 ultra *	41.7	47 -13%		51 -22%	45.3 -9%	53 -27%	54 -29%
Load Maximum *	42.3	49 -16%	40.2 5%	53 -25%	45.7 -8%	58 -37%	56 -32%	48.2 ?(40.2 - 54.2, n=16) -14%	53.4 ?(43 - 67.5, n=155, last 2 years) -26%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


45.1 °C	48.1 °C	43.1 °C
40.2 °C	49.7 °C	40.3 °C
29.5 °C	27.6 °C	30.9 °C

Máximo: 49.7 °C
Médio: 39.4 °C


43.6 °C	42.1 °C	43.6 °C
31.1 °C	48 °C	42.8 °C
27.6 °C	27.1 °C	28.2 °C

Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 37.1 °C

alimentação elétrica 43.5 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.1 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


31.7 °C	32 °C	30.1 °C
30.3 °C	31.1 °C	28.1 °C
26.7 °C	25.6 °C	26.9 °C

Máximo: 32 °C
Médio: 29.2 °C


34 °C	30.6 °C	32.8 °C
28 °C	32 °C	30.2 °C
25.7 °C	25.5 °C	25.6 °C

Máximo: 34 °C
Médio: 29.4 °C

alimentação elétrica 40.1 °C | Temperatura do quarto 22.4 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

Carga Máxima

Inatividade

Witcher 3


45.3 °C	48.8 °C	45 °C
43.1 °C	52.2 °C	44 °C
32 °C	34 °C	33.4 °C

Máximo: 52.2 °C
Médio: 42 °C


56.2 °C	43 °C	51 °C
36.6 °C	47.4 °C	39 °C
30 °C	28 °C	27.5 °C

Máximo: 56.2 °C
Médio: 39.9 °C

alimentação elétrica 57.2 °C | Temperatura do quarto 23 °C | FIRT 550-Pocket

(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 39.4 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 49.7 °C / 121 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 29.2 °C / 85 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).

	HP Omen 15-dc0015ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	HP Omen 15-dc0001ng i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Heat		-9%	4%	-4%	-5%	-7%	5%	-1%	3%
Maximum Upper Side *	49.7	51 -3%	46.6 6%	54 -9%	51.2 -3%	56 -13%	48 3%	52.1 ?(46.6 - 58, n=16) -5%	46.2 ?(28.2 - 60, n=154, last 2 years) 7%
Maximum Bottom *	48	58 -21%	56.6 -18%	60 -25%	55.2 -15%	68 -42%	49 -2%	57.3 ?(41.2 - 65, n=16) -19%	49.1 ?(33.6 - 66, n=154, last 2 years) -2%
Idle Upper Side *	32	35 -9%	28.8 10%	30 6%	31 3%	28 12%	29 9%	29.2 ?(24 - 33, n=16) 9%	31.3 ?(22.4 - 42.8, n=154, last 2 years) 2%
Idle Bottom *	34	35 -3%	28.5 16%	30 12%	35.6 -5%	29 15%	31 9%	29.9 ?(25 - 34, n=16) 12%	32.3 ?(22.6 - 43.6, n=154, last 2 years) 5%

* ... smaller is better

Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (70.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 21.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.3% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (8.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (19.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 68% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 45% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia

desligado	0.45 / 0.6 Watt
Ocioso	14 / 18.2 / 24 Watt
Carga	143 / 190 Watt


Key: min: , med: , max: Metrahit Energy

	HP Omen 15-dc0015ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	HP Omen 15-dc0001ng i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile	MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile	MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile	Average NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q	Average of class Gaming
Power Consumption		24%	31%	-10%	13%	22%	8%	17%	-3%
Idle Minimum *	14	12 14%	7.4 47%	17 -21%	14.9 -6%	10 29%	9 36%	11.4 ?(7 - 19.1, n=16) 19%	13.5 ?(2 - 39, n=154, last 2 years) 4%
Idle Average *	18.2	14 23%	11.7 36%	20 -10%	17.5 4%	13 29%	14 23%	15.7 ?(11 - 20.8, n=16) 14%	18.9 ?(8 - 55.6, n=154, last 2 years) -4%
Idle Maximum *	24	18 25%	16.8 30%	29 -21%	19.2 20%	18 25%	19 21%	20.7 ?(13.7 - 29, n=16) 14%	26.7 ?(9 - 101.1, n=154, last 2 years) -11%
Load Average *	143	92 36%	94 34%	112 22%	103.2 28%	95 34%	91 36%	98.1 ?(73.7 - 143, n=16) 31%	106.3 ?(32.1 - 201, n=153, last 2 years) 26%
Witcher 3 ultra *	126	100 21%		152 -21%	123.1 2%	114 10%	182 -44%
Load Maximum *	190	142 25%	177 7%	211 -11%	132.7 30%	179 6%	238 -25%	173.8 ?(150.3 - 211, n=16) 9%	249 ?(64.5 - 418, n=154, last 2 years) -31%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria

Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)		7h 40min
WiFi Websurfing (Edge 44)		4h 34min
Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p		3h 24min
Carga (máximo brilho)		1h 57min

	HP Omen 15-dc0015ng i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 70.07 Wh	HP Omen 15-dc0001ng i5-8300H, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, 70 Wh	MSI P65 8RF-451 - Creator i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 82 Wh	Asus Zephyrus S GX531GS i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Max-Q, 50 Wh	Razer Blade 15 GTX 1060 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, 80 Wh	SCHENKER XMG Neo 15 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, 46.7 Wh	MSI GE63 Raider RGB 8RF-008 i7-8750H, GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, 51 Wh	Average of class Gaming
Battery Runtime		66%	25%	-54%	47%	5%	-33%	33%
Reader / Idle	460	626 36%	447 -3%	213 -54%		400 -13%	340 -26%	565 ?(155 - 1290, n=67, last 2 years) 23%
H.264	204	506 148%	353 73%			288 41%		409 ?(129 - 837, n=79, last 2 years) 100%
WiFi v1.3	274	514 88%	428 56%	157 -43%	402 47%	262 -4%	240 -12%	375 ?(85 - 889, n=154, last 2 years) 37%
Load	117	106 -9%	85 -27%	42 -64%		111 -5%	46 -61%	85.6 ?(41 - 173, n=117, last 2 years) -27%

Pro

+ Tela IPS mate

+ Resolução Full HD

+ Painel de 144 Hz

+ SSD NVMe + HD

+ Bom teclado (iluminado)

+ Thunderbolt 3

+ Pronto para RV

Contra

- Tela de baixo contraste

- Sem uma solução para a comutação gráfica (Optimus)

- Duração da bateria abaixo da média

The HP Omen 15-dc0015ng, provided by HP Germany

O hardware do Omen roda todos os jogos de computador atuais para a tela Full HD mate sem engasgar. Você sempre pode selecionar configurações de qualidade de gráficos em altas a máximas. A tecnologia G-Sync da Nvidia garante uma imagem fluente na tela de 144-Hz. De acordo com o manual de manutenção, o G-Sync também está disponível para monitores externos. Ao conectar o monitor correspondente, resoluções além de Full HD também são possíveis, mas você precisa reduzir o nível de gráficos.

Com o Omen 15, a Hewlett-Packard oferece um portátil compacto para jogos que, no geral, pode ser chamado de sucesso. No entanto, apesar de seu preço de compra de 2.100 Euros (~$2396), ele não está livre de fraquezas.

Um SSD NVMe extremamente veloz garante um sistema veloz. Além disso, o portátil também está equipado com um disco rígido de 1 TB. Ambos os módulos de armazenamento podem ser substituídos. Isto é acompanhado por um bom teclado. Embora a duração da bateria não seja capaz de inspirar, é aceitável que um portátil para jogos tem um núcleo gráfico integrado desativado.

A tela mate Full HD agrada com ângulos de visão estáveis e tempos de resposta rápidos. No entanto, falta brilho, e o contraste, em particular, é muito baixo para um portátil dessa classe de preço.

Embora o modelo irmão testado anteriormente ofereça apenas um slot USB 3.1 Gen 1 Type-C, nossa unidade de teste atual traz uma conexão Thunderbolt-3, para que você também possa conectar uma GPU externa caso, um dia, o modelo embutido não seja capaz de atender às suas necessidades.

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng - 12/10/2018 v6 ^(old)
Sascha Mölck

Acabamento

79 / 98 → 81%

Teclado

81%

Mouse

78%

Conectividade

66 / 81 → 81%

Peso

60 / 10-66 → 89%

Bateria

74%

Pantalha

88%

Desempenho do jogos

97%

Desempenho da aplicação

95%

Temperatura

83 / 95 → 87%

Ruído

82 / 90 → 91%

Audio

74%

Camera

44 / 85 → 52%

Médio

77%

86%

Gaming - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Editor of the original article: Mark Riege - Translator - 535 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2018

Please share our article, every link counts!

> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 15 (i7-8750H, GTX 1070 Max-Q, SSD, FHD)

Sascha Mölck, 2018-12-11 (Update: 2018-12-11)

Size Comparison

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

Display Response Times

HP Omen 15-dc0015ng audio analysis

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

Pro

Contra

More articles related to this device

Price comparison