Breve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 15 (i5-8300H, GTX 1050 Ti, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 (oshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Asus GL503VD-DB74 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Asus GL503VD-DB74 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 (oshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 90 %
iluminação com acumulador: 275 cd/m²
Contraste: 1019:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.62 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 3.59
ΔE Greyscale 4.31 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
59% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.95% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
59% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
39.64% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng BOE07A1, IPS, 1920x1080 | HP Omen 15-ce002ng AUO42ED, IPS, 1920x1080 | Dell G5 15 5587 LGD053F, 156WF6, IPS, 1920x1080 | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 BOEhydis NV156FHM-N61 (BOE0747), IPS, 1920x1080 | Medion Erazer X6603 LP156WF6-SPK3, AH-IPS, LED, 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU BOE NV156FHM-N42 , a-Si TFT-LCD, IPS, 1920x1080 | Asus GL503VD-DB74 LG Philips LP156WF6, IPS, 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 61% | -4% | 57% | -7% | 2% | 52% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 39.64 | 65.8 66% | 38.13 -4% | 66.6 68% | 36.82 -7% | 40.53 2% | 64.3 62% |
| sRGB Coverage | 59 | 90.9 54% | 56.8 -4% | 87.3 48% | 54.9 -7% | 59.9 2% | 84.4 43% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 40.95 | 66.5 62% | 39.47 -4% | 63.8 56% | 38.09 -7% | 41.87 2% | 61.7 51% |
| Response Times | 6% | 28% | 3545% | 333% | 3295% | 3482% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 47.2 ? | 43.2 ? 8% | 33 ? 30% | 53.2 ? -13% | 46 ? 3% | 49 ? -4% | 36.4 ? 23% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32.4 ? | 31.2 ? 4% | 24 ? 26% | 41.6 ? -28% | 29 ? 10% | 36 ? -11% | 26.2 ? 19% |
| PWM Frequency | 200 ? | 21550 ? 10675% | 2174 ? 987% | 20000 ? 9900% | 21010 ? 10405% | ||
| Screen | 22% | -23% | 15% | -23% | -1% | 5% | |
| Brightness middle | 275 | 304 11% | 229 -17% | 283 3% | 252 -8% | 267 -3% | 315.9 15% |
| Brightness | 254 | 289 14% | 224 -12% | 269 6% | 246 -3% | 250 -2% | 304 20% |
| Brightness Distribution | 90 | 86 -4% | 87 -3% | 87 -3% | 94 4% | 82 -9% | 88 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.26 4% | 0.28 -4% | 0.23 15% | 0.23 15% | 0.31 -15% | 0.37 -37% |
| Contrast | 1019 | 1169 15% | 818 -20% | 1230 21% | 1096 8% | 861 -16% | 854 -16% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.62 | 3.46 25% | 6.1 -32% | 4.68 -1% | 7.83 -69% | 4.65 -1% | 4.9 -6% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.05 | 7.72 4% | 12.2 -52% | 8 1% | 15.5 -93% | 8.2 -2% | 9.7 -20% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 3.59 | 6.12 -70% | 2.5 30% | ||||
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 4.31 | 2.46 43% | 5.68 -32% | 4.32 -0% | 7.11 -65% | 2.65 39% | 3.8 12% |
| Gamma | 2.49 88% | 2.38 92% | 2.4 92% | 2.36 93% | 2.19 100% | 2.44 90% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 7000 93% | 6915 94% | 6989 93% | 7612 85% | 7930 82% | 6820 95% | 6847 95% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 38 | 59 55% | 36 -5% | 57 50% | 35 -8% | 38 0% | 55 45% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 59 | 91 54% | 57 -3% | 87 47% | 55 -7% | 59 0% | 84 42% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 30% /
28% | 0% /
-13% | 1206% /
646% | 101% /
47% | 1099% /
618% | 1180% /
666% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 87 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 47.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23.6 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 200 Hz | ≤ 99 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 99 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 200 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 | |
| Asus GL503VD-DB74 | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4109 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5362 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4707 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng Toshiba KBG30ZMV128G | Dell G5 15 5587 SK hynix SC311 M.2 | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 Samsung PM871b MZNLN128HAHQ | Medion Erazer X6603 Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU Kingston RBUSNS8180DS3128GH | Asus GL503VD-DB74 ADATA SX7000NP 256 GB | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | -7% | 48% | 257% | 51% | 155% | |
| Seq Read | 1238 | 511 -59% | 502 -59% | 2805 127% | 488.4 -61% | 1226 -1% |
| Seq Write | 123.5 | 243.7 97% | 450.1 264% | 1081 775% | 394.2 219% | 825 568% |
| 4K Read | 31.48 | 24.44 -22% | 38.11 21% | 46.58 48% | 36.25 15% | 31.4 0% |
| 4K Write | 79.3 | 62.2 -22% | 104.1 31% | 129.3 63% | 64.7 -18% | 110.7 40% |
| Score Read | 343 | 240 -30% | 343 0% | 1162 239% | 460 34% | 419 22% |
| Score Write | 195 | 199 2% | 302 55% | 750 285% | 395 103% | 851 336% |
| Score Total | 670 | 557 -17% | 834 24% | 2431 263% | 1099 64% | 1476 120% |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 8908 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 22454 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 6653 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
| Asus GL503VD-DB74 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Medion Erazer X6603 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU | |
| Asus GL503VD-DB74 | |
| The Witcher 3 | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng | |
| Asus GL503VD-DB74 | |
| 1920x1080 High Graphics & Postprocessing (Nvidia HairWorks Off) | |
| Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Dell G5 15 5587 | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 44.2 | 24.2 | ||
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 88.3 | 66.6 | ||
| Overwatch (2016) | 117 | 71 | ||
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 47.5 | 43.3 | ||
| Farming Simulator 17 (2016) | 153 | 114 | ||
| Destiny 2 (2017) | 62.8 | 51.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 29 / 33 / 41 dB |
| HDD |
| 33 dB |
| Carga |
| 44 / 49 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 29 dB(A) | ||
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H | HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Dell G5 15 5587 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ | Medion Erazer X6603 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ | Asus GL503VD-DB74 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | 7% | -3% | 7% | 10% | 4% | |
| off / environment * | 29 | 30 -3% | 30.3 -4% | 30 -3% | 30.9 -7% | 30.4 -5% | 28.3 2% |
| Idle Minimum * | 29 | 30 -3% | 31.1 -7% | 30 -3% | 30.9 -7% | 30.4 -5% | 30.6 -6% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 33 -0% | 31.1 6% | 34 -3% | 30.9 6% | 30.8 7% | 30.8 7% |
| Idle Maximum * | 41 | 37 10% | 34.2 17% | 38 7% | 31.6 23% | 30.8 25% | 32.8 20% |
| Load Average * | 44 | 41 7% | 34.9 21% | 44 -0% | 38.5 12% | 33.6 24% | 37.6 15% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 47 | 42 11% | 42.7 9% | 50 -6% | 47 -0% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 49 | 50 -2% | 44 10% | 55 -12% | 40.8 17% | 43.4 11% | 53.5 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 51 °C / 124 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 58 °C / 136 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 32 °C / 90 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) The palmrests and touchpad can get very hot to the touch with a maximum of 42 °C / 107.6 F.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-13.1 °C / -23.6 F).
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H | HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Dell G5 15 5587 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ | Medion Erazer X6603 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ | Asus GL503VD-DB74 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | -1% | 10% | 10% | 26% | 19% | -2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 51 | 47 8% | 50.2 2% | 46 10% | 44.3 13% | 41.6 18% | 60.4 -18% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 58 | 54 7% | 57 2% | 52 10% | 39.5 32% | 42.5 27% | 55.2 5% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 35 | 36 -3% | 28.6 18% | 32 9% | 24.8 29% | 29.7 15% | 32.4 7% |
| Idle Bottom * | 35 | 40 -14% | 28.9 17% | 32 9% | 24.6 30% | 29.4 16% | 36 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (4.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.9% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 36% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 58% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 22% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 73% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
HP Omen 15-ce002ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.3 / 1.1 Watt |
| Ocioso | 12 / 14 / 18 Watt |
| Carga |
92 / 142 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H | HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Dell G5 15 5587 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ | Medion Erazer X6603 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ | Asus GL503VD-DB74 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -30% | 23% | 6% | 38% | 40% | 20% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 12 | 18 -50% | 4.9 59% | 10 17% | 4.7 61% | 4 67% | 8.2 32% |
| Idle Average * | 14 | 23 -64% | 8.5 39% | 13 7% | 7.6 46% | 6.9 51% | 11.1 21% |
| Idle Maximum * | 18 | 30 -67% | 9.1 49% | 19 -6% | 9.2 49% | 9.4 48% | 11.8 34% |
| Load Average * | 92 | 85 8% | 90.7 1% | 68 26% | 81 12% | 72.6 21% | 81 12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 100 | 96 4% | 110 -10% | 110 -10% | 95.1 5% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 142 | 158 -11% | 144 -1% | 136 4% | 112 21% | 122 14% | 123.3 13% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Omen 15-dc0001ng GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i5-8300H, 70 Wh | HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 70 Wh | Dell G5 15 5587 GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i5-8300H, 56 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Gaming Laptop 7300HQ 1060 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, 55 Wh | Medion Erazer X6603 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 45 Wh | Acer Aspire 7 A715-71G-53TU GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i5-7300HQ, 48 Wh | Asus GL503VD-DB74 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 64 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -50% | -6% | -39% | -52% | -23% | -20% | |
| Reader / Idle | 626 | 256 -59% | 705 13% | 386 -38% | 340 -46% | 592 -5% | 647 3% |
| H.264 | 506 | 224 -56% | 325 -36% | 265 -48% | 227 -55% | 306 -40% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 514 | 198 -61% | 391 -24% | 275 -46% | 257 -50% | 336 -35% | 348 -32% |
| Load | 106 | 80 -25% | 133 25% | 80 -25% | 46 -57% | 94 -11% | 73 -31% |
Pro
Contra
O Omen 15 de nível de entrada acabou por ser um dos melhores portáteis de jogos na faixa de preço de menos de $1.000.
Verdade, a combinação do Core i5 2430M, GeForce GTX 1050 Ti, e 8 GB de RAM DDR4 pode não estar particularmente preparado para o futuro. No entanto, atualmente o Omen 15 de 15 polegadas pode rodar quase todos os jogos com configurações altas ou máximas e, portanto, é ideal para jogadores com orçamento limitado.
A HP obviamente teve que cortar custos para obter o preço abaixo da faixa dos $1.000, por exemplo, a cobertura de espaço de cor ruim e o baixo brilho da tela, o baixo desempenho de gravação do SSD ou a falta do Thunderbolt 3.
Se você não se importar com essas desvantagens, você terá um portátil para jogos muito bem equilibrado com uma carcaça estilosa, dispositivos de entrada decentes, várias portas e um desempenho de som decente. Os marcos estreitos da tela e a longa duração da bateria foram certamente os dois destaques deste dispositivo.
Dado que os seus concorrentes são mais frios e silenciosos ao mesmo tempo, a HP deve abordar a solução de resfriamento do Omen 15. Especialmente considerando que um modelo Core i7 2670QM será disponibilizado em breve.
HP Omen 15-dc0001ng
- 07/26/2018 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Price comparison
