Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil HP Omen 15 (7700HQ, GTX 1060 Max-Q, Full-HD)
HP Omen 15-ce002ng (Omen 15-ce Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 4 x 2.8 - 3.8 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q - 6 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1063 MHz, Memoría: 8000 MHz, GDDR5, ForceWare 381.89
Memória
16 GB
, 2x 8 GB DDR4-2400 SO-DIMM, dual-channel, ambos os slots ocupados, máx. 32 GB
Pantalha
15.60 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 141 PPI, AUO42ED, IPS, Full HD, 120 Hz, G-Sync, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM175
Disco rígido
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, 256 GB
, NVMe-SSD + HGST HTS721010A9E630, 1 TB HDD @ 7200 rpm. Slots: 1x M.2 Type 2280 PCIe 3.0 x4 & 1x 2,5-inch
peso
2.62 kg, Suprimento de energia: 818 g
Preço
1665 EUR
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
AUO42ED tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 314 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 288.9 cd/m² Minimum: 14 cd/m²iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 304 cd/m²
Contraste: 1169:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.46 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.46 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
66.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
90.9% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.38
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng AUO42ED, 1920x1080 | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 LG Philips LGD0550 / LP156WF6-SPK4, 1920x1080 | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US 3840x2160 | Gigabyte Aero 15 N156HCA-EA1 (CMN15D7), 1920x1080 | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO AUO B156HTN05.2 (AUO52ED), 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -39% | -24% | 0% | -1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.8 | 38.88 -41% | 48.21 -27% | 65.2 -1% | 66.4 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 90.9 | 58.2 -36% | 72.6 -20% | 92.5 2% | 88.9 -2% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 66.5 | 40.2 -40% | 49.81 -25% | 66.5 0% | 65.1 -2% |
| Response Times | 38% | 30% | -1% | 53% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43.2 ? | 22 ? 49% | 28 ? 35% | 42.8 ? 1% | 24 ? 44% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 31.2 ? | 23 ? 26% | 23.6 ? 24% | 32 ? -3% | 12 ? 62% |
| PWM Frequency | 1351 ? | 26000 ? | |||
| Screen | -29% | -66% | -24% | -69% | |
| Brightness middle | 304 | 281 -8% | 274.2 -10% | 320 5% | 357 17% |
| Brightness | 289 | 257 -11% | 263 -9% | 316 9% | 365 26% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 85 -1% | 92 7% | 90 5% | 85 -1% |
| Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.32 -23% | 0.44 -69% | 0.36 -38% | 0.5 -92% |
| Contrast | 1169 | 878 -25% | 623 -47% | 889 -24% | 714 -39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.46 | 5.16 -49% | 8 -131% | 4.62 -34% | 9.93 -187% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.72 | 9.09 -18% | 14.6 -89% | 9.75 -26% | 14.87 -93% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.46 | 4.57 -86% | 9.1 -270% | 6 -144% | 10.32 -320% |
| Gamma | 2.38 92% | 2.59 85% | 2.24 98% | 2.46 89% | 2.11 104% |
| CCT | 6915 94% | 6931 94% | 5020 129% | 6761 96% | 10096 64% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 37 -37% | 45.7 -23% | 60 2% | 58 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 58 -36% | 72.1 -21% | 92 1% | 89 -2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
-22% | -20% /
-45% | -8% /
-16% | -6% /
-39% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 31.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43.2 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 21.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 69 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8746 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4858 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5348 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4861 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | SCHENKER XMG A517 Samsung SSD 960 Evo 500GB m.2 NVMe | Gigabyte P56XT LiteOn CX2-8B256 | Asus Zephyrus GX501 Samsung SSD SM961 1TB M.2 MZVKW1T0HMLH | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 20% | -11% | -3% | |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3431 | 3389 -1% | 2445 -29% | 3445 0% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 1246 | 1706 37% | 790 -37% | 1848 48% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 586 | 627 7% | 588 0% | 547 -7% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 486 | 591 22% | 455.5 -6% | 463 -5% |
| Read Seq | 1419 | 1856 31% | 1881 33% | 954 -33% |
| Write Seq | 1266 | 1652 30% | 797 -37% | 1049 -17% |
| Read 4K | 47.14 | 49 4% | 46.69 -1% | 45 -5% |
| Write 4K | 156 | 196 26% | 142.5 -9% | 149 -4% |
Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3431 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
1246 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
586 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
486 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
1419 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
1266 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
47.14 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
156 MB/s
| 3DMark - 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 | |
| Unigine Heaven 4.0 - Extreme Preset DX11 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO | |
| Gigabyte Aero 15 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 11902 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 138488 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 25573 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 8949 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 3271 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
The Witcher 3 ultra
The Witcher 3 | Batman: Arkham Knight | Star Wars Battlefront | Assassin's Creed Syndicate | Rainbow Six Siege | Rise of the Tomb Raider | Far Cry Primal | The Division | Doom | Mirror's Edge Catalyst | Deus Ex Mankind Divided | Battlefield 1 | Titanfall 2 | Call of Duty Infinite Warfare | Dishonored 2 | Watch Dogs 2 | Resident Evil 7 | For Honor | Ghost Recon Wildlands | Prey | Dirt 4
| The Witcher 3 - 1920x1080 Ultra Graphics & Postprocessing (HBAO+) | |
| MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Batman: Arkham Knight - 1920x1080 High / On AA:SM AF:16x | |
| MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Star Wars Battlefront - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:FX | |
| MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Assassin's Creed Syndicate - 1920x1080 Ultra High Preset AA:4x MSAA + FX | |
| MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Rainbow Six Siege - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:FX AF:16x | |
| MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Far Cry Primal - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
| MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| The Division - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x | |
| MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Doom - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:SM | |
| MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AF:16x | |
| MSI GT62VR-6RE16H21 | |
| SCHENKER XMG P507 | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:2xMS AF:8x | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Battlefield 1 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Titanfall 2 - 1920x1080 Very High (Insane Texture Quality) / Enabled AA:TS AF:16x | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Call of Duty Infinite Warfare - 1920x1080 Ultra / On AA:T2X SM | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| MSI GT62VR | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Dishonored 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:TX | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| MSI GT62VR | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Watch Dogs 2 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| MSI GT62VR | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Resident Evil 7 - 1920x1080 Very High / On AA:FXAA+T | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| MSI GT62VR | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| For Honor - 1920x1080 Extreme Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| MSI GT62VR | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:T AF:16x | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| MSI GT62VR | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| Prey - 1920x1080 Very High Preset AA:2TX SM AF:16x | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| MSI GT62VR | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| Dirt 4 - 1920x1080 Ultra Preset AA:4xMS AF:16x | |
| Asus G752VS | |
| MSI GT62VR | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng | |
| MSI GE72 7RE-046 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | 4K | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 119 | 63.2 | 34.6 | 22.9 | |
| Batman: Arkham Knight (2015) | 129 | 81 | 54 | 26 | |
| Star Wars Battlefront (2015) | 188 | 93 | 80.9 | 29.3 | |
| Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) | 82.6 | 65.8 | 29.4 | 22.2 | |
| Rainbow Six Siege (2015) | 224 | 126 | 102 | 37.3 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 124 | 65.6 | 51.1 | 23.5 | |
| Far Cry Primal (2016) | 81 | 71 | 53 | 22 | |
| The Division (2016) | 127 | 61.9 | 48.8 | 22.1 | |
| Doom (2016) | 127 | 91.1 | 86.2 | 28.4 | |
| Mirror's Edge Catalyst (2016) | 130 | 66.4 | 59.6 | 20.5 | |
| Deus Ex Mankind Divided (2016) | 93.8 | 50.2 | 26.7 | 15.8 | |
| FIFA 17 (2016) | 330 | 250 | 248 | 95.2 | |
| Battlefield 1 (2016) | 154 | 76 | 67.8 | 25.3 | |
| Titanfall 2 (2016) | 144 | 79 | 67.3 | 24.8 | |
| Call of Duty Infinite Warfare (2016) | 124 | 91.6 | 81.7 | 34.6 | |
| Dishonored 2 (2016) | 85.4 | 64.7 | 54.8 | 23.7 | |
| Watch Dogs 2 (2016) | 101 | 56.8 | 39.4 | 18.9 | |
| Resident Evil 7 (2017) | 169 | 93 | 76.1 | 25.1 | |
| For Honor (2017) | 92.3 | 87.8 | 63.9 | 25.7 | |
| Ghost Recon Wildlands (2017) | 65 | 58.7 | 33.2 | 19.4 | |
| Prey (2017) | 126 | 101 | 84.7 | 27.7 | |
| Rocket League (2017) | 194 | 134 | 56.5 | ||
| Dirt 4 (2017) | 129 | 93.6 | 49.9 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 33 / 37 dB |
| HDD |
| 34 dB |
| Carga |
| 41 / 50 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte Aero 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 7% | 1% | 0% | -9% | |
| off / environment * | 30 | 30.4 -1% | 28.8 4% | 31 -3% | 31 -3% |
| Idle Minimum * | 30 | 31.4 -5% | 33.1 -10% | 32 -7% | 33 -10% |
| Idle Average * | 33 | 31.4 5% | 33.1 -0% | 33 -0% | 34 -3% |
| Idle Maximum * | 37 | 31.4 15% | 34 8% | 34 8% | 44 -19% |
| Load Average * | 41 | 36.8 10% | 37.2 9% | 39 5% | 46 -12% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 42 | 46.1 -10% | 43 -2% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 50 | 41.3 17% | 47.1 6% | 50 -0% | 52 -4% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 41.2 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 33.9 °C / 93 F for the devices in the class Gaming.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 47 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 40.5 °C / 105 F, ranging from 21.2 to 68.8 °C for the class Gaming.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 54 °C / 129 F, compared to the average of 43.2 °C / 110 F
(±) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 33.8 °C / 93 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(-) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 39.8 °C / 104 F, compared to the device average of 33.9 °C / 93 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (34 °C / 93.2 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.9 °C / 84 F (-5.1 °C / -9.2 F).
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte Aero 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 17% | 24% | 10% | 2% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 47 | 47 -0% | 56 -19% | 49.2 -5% | |
| Maximum Bottom * | 54 | 47 13% | 61 -13% | 62 -15% | |
| Idle Upper Side * | 36 | 28.4 21% | 28.4 21% | 25 31% | 32.4 10% |
| Idle Bottom * | 40 | 27.1 32% | 29.6 26% | 24 40% | 33 17% |
* ... smaller is better
HP Omen 15-ce002ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.9% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.5% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (3.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (13.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 74% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 18%, worst was 132%
Compared to all devices tested
» 13% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 84% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (73 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (2.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 31% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 17% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 79% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.4 / 0.7 Watt |
| Ocioso | 18 / 23 / 30 Watt |
| Carga |
85 / 158 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | Gigabyte Aero 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 40% | 9% | 15% | 7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 18 | 7 61% | 14.5 19% | 12 33% | 14 22% |
| Idle Average * | 23 | 10.2 56% | 17.3 25% | 15 35% | 18 22% |
| Idle Maximum * | 30 | 14 53% | 17.4 42% | 20 33% | 24 20% |
| Load Average * | 85 | 78 8% | 93 -9% | 82 4% | 87 -2% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 96 | 128.8 -34% | 111 -16% | ||
| Load Maximum * | 158 | 127 20% | 161 -2% | 201 -27% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Omen 15-ce002ng GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q, i7-7700HQ, 70 Wh | Acer Aspire VX5-591G-75C4 VX15 GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 52.5 Wh | MSI GS63VR 7RF-228US GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 65 Wh | Gigabyte Aero 15 GeForce GTX 1060 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 94.24 Wh | SCHENKER XMG P507 PRO GeForce GTX 1070 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, 60 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 27% | 21% | 102% | -4% | |
| Reader / Idle | 256 | 322 26% | 386 51% | 638 149% | |
| H.264 | 224 | 464 107% | 213 -5% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 198 | 302 53% | 232 17% | 422 113% | 195 -2% |
| Load | 80 | 81 1% | 75 -6% | 112 40% |
Pro
+ Tela de 120-Hz com G-Sync
+ Design expressivo
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Bom som
+ Alto desempenho
+ Thunderbolt 3
+ SSD PCIe
Contra
- Fonte de alimentação desnecessariamente grande com cabo muito grosso
- Design Max-Q dificilmente traz vantagens
- Curta duração da bateria
Durante anos, muitos fabricantes de portáteis dormiram em seus louros, ou para ser exatos, seus casos e além das novas GPUs e CPUs, só atualizaram as entranhas, com a nova geração de Omen, a HP se atreve a um redesenho completo que, em nossa opinião parece ter êxito em muitos aspectos.
Embora a carcaça não tenha ficado mais fina ou leve, ele ganha pontos com uma maior estabilidade, melhores dispositivos de entrada e materiais mais elegantes. A HP também merece respeito pelo visual excêntrico, você goste ou não. Além dos tempos de resposta um tanto fracos, a tela também é atraente.
O painel de 120 Hz incorporado no modelo top convence com ângulos de visão estáveis, um alto contraste e valores de cor decentes.
Nós também quase não tivemos queixas sobre os falantes.
Temos impressões confusas sobre a placa gráfica. Na prática, o design Max-Q tem apenas um efeito positivo mínimo, se houver, enquanto, por outro lado, perder quase 10% de desempenho e não o torna mais acessível. Outros fabricantes conseguem as mesmas ou mesmo menores emissões (temperatura, ruído) com uma GTX 1060 regular.
No entanto, a HP consegue dar um passo decisivo, de modo que desta vez seja suficiente para um bom lugar na nossa lista dos Top 10 (Tabelas de Portáteis de Jogos Finos e Leves).
HP Omen 15-ce002ng
- 07/20/2017 v6 (old)
Florian Glaser
Gaming - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
