Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil HP Notebook 15s: Com CPU Ice Lake e Design Fino
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.5 % v7 (old) | 02/2020 | HP 15s-fq1556ng i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | 1.7 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88.4 % v6 (old) | 10/2024 | Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE R7 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.9 kg | 19.9 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 82.9 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Dell Latitude 5500 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.9 kg | 22 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 78.4 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW R5 3500U, Vega 8 | 1.8 kg | 18 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Dell Latitude 5500 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW | |
| HP 15s-fq1556ng | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE | |
| Dell Latitude 5500 | |
| Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW | |
| HP 15s-fq1556ng | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 86 %
iluminação com acumulador: 215 cd/m²
Contraste: 1411:1 (Preto: 0.18 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 5.58 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 4.53
ΔE Greyscale 5.02 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
56% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
36% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
38.91% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
56.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
37.66% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.83
| HP 15s-fq1556ng AU Optronics B156HW02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE NV156FHM-N49, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 5500 LGD05FF 156WFD, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW CEC PANDA LM156LF-CL07, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 5% | 1% | 5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 37.66 | 39.88 6% | 38.07 1% | 39.53 5% |
| sRGB Coverage | 56.4 | 58.6 4% | 57.3 2% | 59.5 5% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 38.91 | 41.2 6% | 39.33 1% | 40.84 5% |
| Response Times | 8% | 19% | 26% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 51 ? | 41.2 ? 19% | 37.6 ? 26% | 36 ? 29% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 32.8 ? -3% | 28.4 ? 11% | 25 ? 22% |
| PWM Frequency | 1220 ? | 178 ? | ||
| Screen | 4% | -5% | -9% | |
| Brightness middle | 254 | 318 25% | 234 -8% | 250 -2% |
| Brightness | 234 | 297 27% | 229 -2% | 228 -3% |
| Brightness Distribution | 86 | 89 3% | 93 8% | 83 -3% |
| Black Level * | 0.18 | 0.17 6% | 0.23 -28% | 0.205 -14% |
| Contrast | 1411 | 1871 33% | 1017 -28% | 1220 -14% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 5.58 | 5.5 1% | 5.2 7% | 5.65 -1% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 9.83 | 21 -114% | 14.7 -50% | 13.7 -39% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 4.53 | 5.1 -13% | 4.6 -2% | |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.02 | 1.8 64% | 2.5 50% | 6.32 -26% |
| Gamma | 2.83 78% | 2.12 104% | 2.44 90% | 2.45 90% |
| CCT | 6570 99% | 6257 104% | 6649 98% | 7287 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 36 | 37.6 4% | 36.2 1% | 38 6% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 56 | 58.2 4% | 57 2% | 59 5% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 6% /
5% | 5% /
-1% | 7% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 51 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 25 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 26 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 86 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3673 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5035 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3992 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP 15s-fq1556ng Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG | Dell Latitude 5500 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02 | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8 | Average Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -21% | 22% | -9% | -12% | |
| Write 4K | 203.1 | 129.5 -36% | 149 -27% | 114.9 -43% | 136 ? -33% |
| Read 4K | 65.3 | 41.23 -37% | 48.26 -26% | 52.7 -19% | 55.2 ? -15% |
| Write Seq | 973 | 811 -17% | 1772 82% | 1361 40% | 926 ? -5% |
| Read Seq | 1651 | 1145 -31% | 1200 -27% | 1385 -16% | 1523 ? -8% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 526 | 314.1 -40% | 414.5 -21% | 181.1 -66% | 381 ? -28% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 345.2 | 356.2 3% | 393 14% | 340.5 -1% | 334 ? -3% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 980 | 839 -14% | 2941 200% | 1519 55% | 987 ? 1% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1883 | 2042 8% | 1510 -20% | 1515 -20% | 1744 ? -7% |
| AS SSD | 13% | 58% | 3% | -20% | |
| Seq Read | 1705 | 1698 0% | 1287 -25% | 1358 -20% | 1423 ? -17% |
| Seq Write | 904 | 740 -18% | 1280 42% | 1300 44% | 828 ? -8% |
| 4K Read | 58.5 | 39.18 -33% | 49.57 -15% | 44.88 -23% | 51.3 ? -12% |
| 4K Write | 165.4 | 87.7 -47% | 158 -4% | 77.5 -53% | 128.9 ? -22% |
| 4K-64 Read | 323.1 | 764 136% | 1043 223% | 586 81% | 326 ? 1% |
| 4K-64 Write | 827 | 669 -19% | 1415 71% | 738 -11% | 721 ? -13% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.056 | 0.04 29% | 0.039 30% | 0.09003 ? -61% | |
| Access Time Write * | 0.044 | 0.036 18% | 0.027 39% | 0.057 -30% | 0.07378 ? -68% |
| Score Read | 522 | 973 86% | 1221 134% | 767 47% | 519 ? -1% |
| Score Write | 1083 | 831 -23% | 1701 57% | 945 -13% | 932 ? -14% |
| Score Total | 1901 | 2261 19% | 3558 87% | 2115 11% | 1708 ? -10% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -4% /
-1% | 40% /
43% | -3% /
-2% | -16% /
-17% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2784 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Average of class Office (5.42 - 103.1, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (13 - 16.8, n=8) | |
| HP 15s-fq1556ng | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Average of class Office (3.02 - 51.7, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) (6.8 - 8.32, n=6) | |
| HP 15s-fq1556ng | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 71.9 | 37.2 | 32.21 | 11.58 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 57.7 | 40.9 | 21.8 | 19.9 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 12.99 | 6.85 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.3 / 30.3 / 30.3 dB |
| Carga |
| 34 / 41.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.3 dB(A) | ||
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.2 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.2 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 23.3 °C / 74 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 25.9 °C / 78.6 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.7 °C / 81.9 F (+1.8 °C / 3.3 F).
HP 15s-fq1556ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 19.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.7% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (7.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.7% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 67% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 22%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 35% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 57% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.34 / 0.48 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.3 / 6.4 / 6.8 Watt |
| Carga |
29 / 46 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP 15s-fq1556ng i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE R7 3700U, Vega 10, SK Hynix BC501 HFM512GDJTNG, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Latitude 5500 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV1T02, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW R5 3500U, Vega 8, Intel SSD 660p 1TB SSDPEKNW010T8, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -13% | -31% | -7% | -13% | -34% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.3 | 4.2 -27% | 4.4 -33% | 3.7 -12% | 4.13 ? -25% | 4.57 ? -38% |
| Idle Average * | 6.4 | 7.92 -24% | 6.9 -8% | 6.2 3% | 7.07 ? -10% | 7.53 ? -18% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.8 | 8.16 -20% | 7.7 -13% | 8.4 -24% | 8.36 ? -23% | 9.16 ? -35% |
| Load Average * | 29 | 29 -0% | 43.6 -50% | 31.1 -7% | 30.6 ? -6% | 42.5 ? -47% |
| Load Maximum * | 46 | 42.2 8% | 69.1 -50% | 43.1 6% | 45.6 ? 1% | 60.7 ? -32% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP 15s-fq1556ng i5-1035G1, UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU), 41 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad E595-20NF0000GE R7 3700U, Vega 10, 45 Wh | Dell Latitude 5500 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 68 Wh | Acer Aspire 5 A515-43-R6WW R5 3500U, Vega 8, 48 Wh | Average of class Office | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 12% | 106% | 30% | 49% | |
| Reader / Idle | 785 | 941 20% | 1061 35% | 1300 ? 66% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 357 | 460 29% | 736 106% | 466 31% | 595 ? 67% |
| Load | 104 | 92 -12% | 130 25% | 117.5 ? 13% |
Pro
Contra
Veredicto - Um portátil com potencial para a otimização
Na variante com o equipamento que testamos, o HP 15s é adequado para usuários cujas demandas não são altas. O sistema faz o que deve ser feito, e os aplicativos habituais de escritório, navegar na Internet e o consumo de conteúdo de mídia não apresentam nenhum problema. Gostamos do design e o acabamento também é sólido. Uma duração de bateria de quase seis horas também deve satisfazer a maioria dos usuários.
Embora o HP 15s possa satisfazer a maioria dos usuários, aqueles que desejam usar um sistema ideal precisarão fazer alguns compromissos.
Somente quando você olha um pouco mais de perto, algumas fraquezas se tornam aparentes. Elas não são de forma alguma graves, mas podem levar a algumas sacudidas de cabeças além do mercado consumidor. Ainda podemos aceitar que o HP 15s não pode ser atualizado. No entanto, o estranho comportamento do ventilador, que até tem um efeito negativo no perfil de potência "Melhor desempenho", tem um calibre diferente. Para obter um melhor uso da CPU, os usuários precisam modificar ativamente o controle do ventilador. Mas se eles fizerem isso, o nível de ruído também aumentará fortemente.
HP 15s-fq1556ng
- 02/10/2020 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Price comparison
