Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil HP Envy 17-n107ng
HP Envy 17-n107ng (Envy 17 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 4 x 2.6 - 3.5 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950M - 4 GB VRAM, Análises do: 1124 MHz, Memoría: 1800 MHz, DDR3, ForceWare 353.54, Nvidia Optimus
Memória
16 GB
, DDR3L, 1600 MHz, dual-dhannel, both slots occupied
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, Samsung SDC3854, IPS, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel HM170 (Skylake PCH-H)
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM851 MZNTE512HMJH, 512 GB
peso
2.82 kg, Suprimento de energia: 479 g
Preço
1499 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Samsung SDC3854 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 341 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 324.8 cd/m²iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 335 cd/m²
Contraste: 325:1 (Preto: 1.05 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.6 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 6.08 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
62% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.2% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.43
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | Asus N751JX-T4056H | Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | MSI PE70-2QEi581 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 8% | -2% | -7% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.7 | 76.8 17% | 67 2% | 66.6 1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.2 | 97.6 0% | 91.3 -6% | 84.6 -13% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.6 | 71.4 6% | 66.7 -1% | 61.9 -8% |
| Response Times | -3% | |||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 49 ? | 58 ? -18% | ||
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 28 ? 12% | ||
| PWM Frequency | 198 ? | |||
| Screen | 13% | 51% | 13% | |
| Brightness middle | 341 | 337 -1% | 346 1% | 305 -11% |
| Brightness | 325 | 312 -4% | 326 0% | 265 -18% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 86 -5% | 88 -3% | 79 -13% |
| Black Level * | 1.05 | 0.61 42% | 0.32 70% | 0.5 52% |
| Contrast | 325 | 552 70% | 1081 233% | 610 88% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.6 | 5.84 -27% | 4.01 13% | 4.83 -5% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.08 | 3.86 37% | 3.58 41% | 3.29 46% |
| Gamma | 2.43 91% | 2.59 85% | 2.23 99% | 2.39 92% |
| CCT | 7627 85% | 6859 95% | 6426 101% | 7080 92% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 62 | 64 3% | 56 -10% | |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 97 0% | 84 -13% | |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 11% /
12% | 15% /
29% | 3% /
8% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 49 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 33 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 83 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 198 Hz | ≤ 50 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 198 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 50 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 198 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R11.5 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | |
| Asus N751JX-T4056H | |
| Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | |
| MSI PE70-2QEi581 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | |
| Asus N751JX-T4056H | |
| Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | |
| MSI PE70-2QEi581 | |
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | |
| Asus N751JX-T4056H | |
| Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | |
| MSI PE70-2QEi581 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | |
| Asus N751JX-T4056H | |
| Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | |
| MSI PE70-2QEi581 | |
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | |
| Asus N751JX-T4056H | |
| Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | |
| MSI PE70-2QEi581 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | |
| Asus N751JX-T4056H | |
| Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | |
| MSI PE70-2QEi581 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | |
| Asus N751JX-T4056H | |
| Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | |
| MSI PE70-2QEi581 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | |
| Asus N751JX-T4056H | |
| Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | |
| MSI PE70-2QEi581 | |
| PCMark 7 Score | 5880 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3634 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4894 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4887 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
Samsung SSD PM851 MZNTE512HMJH
Sequential Read:
518 MB/s
Sequential Write:
433.1 MB/s
512K Read:
386 MB/s
512K Write:
379 MB/s
4K Read:
27.02 MB/s
4K Write:
85.2 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
370 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
309.5 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | |
| Asus N751JX-T4056H | |
| Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | |
| MSI PE70-2QEi581 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | |
| Asus N751JX-T4056H | |
| Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics (sort by value) | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | |
| Asus N751JX-T4056H | |
| Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 4633 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14389 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2772 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anno 2205 (2015) | 85 | 42.6 | 18.7 | |
| Fallout 4 (2015) | 66.2 | 40.2 | 21.7 | |
| Assassin's Creed Syndicate (2015) | 43.7 | 34.1 | 20.6 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 33.6 / 37.5 / 37.5 dB |
| DVD |
| 41 / dB |
| Carga |
| 42 / 42.6 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31.3 dB(A) | ||
| HP Envy 17-n107ng | Asus N751JX-T4056H | Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 | MSI PE70-2QEi581 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 22% | 9% | -3% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 71 | 38.3 46% | 43.8 38% | 46 35% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 82 | 43 48% | 41.4 50% | 42.3 48% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.1 | 25.7 -2% | 30.7 -22% | 36.4 -45% |
| Idle Bottom * | 25.6 | 26.5 -4% | 33 -29% | 38.7 -51% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 71 °C / 160 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 82 °C / 180 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.5 °C / -11.7 F).
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 71 °C / 160 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 82 °C / 180 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (35.3 °C / 95.5 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-6.5 °C / -11.7 F).
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.25 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.5 / 10.8 / 11 Watt |
| Carga |
72 / 85 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Envy 17-n107ng GeForce GTX 950M, 6700HQ, Samsung SSD PM851 MZNTE512HMJH | Asus N751JX-T4056H GeForce GTX 950M, 4720HQ, Toshiba MQ01ABD100 | Acer Aspire V Nitro Black Edition VN7-792G-74Q4 GeForce GTX 960M, 6700HQ, Toshiba MQ02ABD100H | MSI PE70-2QEi581 GeForce GTX 960M, 4210H, Toshiba HG5d THNSNH256GMCT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -46% | -22% | -48% | |
| Reader / Idle | 898 | 410 -54% | 345 -62% | |
| WiFi v1.3 | 452 | 244 -46% | 254 -44% | 158 -65% |
| Load | 73 | 96 32% | 61 -16% |
Pro
+ Chassi de alumínio robusto e belo
+ Todas as portas na traseira
+ Bateria acessível desde o exterior
+ Boa tela em geral
+ Quad-core veloz
+ Muita RAM
+ SSD veloz
+ 4 GB de VRAM
+ Excelente sistema de som
+ Muito frugal durante o modo inativo
+ Durações de bateria muito longas
Contra
- Não há muita informação sobre a série nos websites da HP
- Manutenção complicada
- Valor de preto é muito alto, baixo contraste
- Tempos de reação da te muito lento para os gamers
- Utilização do Turbo medíocre
- Resultados de carga máxima sustentados em um chassi quente
As altas temperaturas do HP Envy 17-n107ng afetaram um pouco a avaliação geral, e isto é justificado para temperaturas de até 82 °C (107,6 °F). Aquelas temperaturas são concentradas em alguns pontos no chassi e são alcançadas somente depois de longos períodos de uso intenso. Não é um problema crítico para o autor, que evitariam uma compra do portátil multimídia, em geral, convincente. Achamos que a má capacidade de manutenção é, de fato, um problema maior.
A CPU, a memória e o SSD, sem dúvida, garantem uma experiência de usuário muito fluente. A placa de vídeo convencional também é suficientemente poderosa para jogos 3D modernos quando pode viver com alguns compromissos.
Além do ótimo chassi de alumínio com o layout ergonômico das portas, gostamos particularmente do ótimo som para um portátil e também a tela, apesar de algumas falhas. Os dispositivos de entrada estão longe da qualidade da série Lenovo ThinkPad, por exemplo, mas, de fato, funciona muito bem e deve satisfazer a maioria dos usuários. Por um preço de até 1.300 Euros (~$1410), que deve ser o caso em breve, podemos recomendar o aparelho. As versões mais econômicas da série Envy 17 da HP poderia inclusive ser uma barganha, porque a tela, chassi e dispositivos de entrada da versão de gama baixa de 850 Euros (~$922) não se diferencia da configuração de da análise.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
HP Envy 17-n107ng
-
03/09/2016 v5 (old)
Sven Kloevekorn
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
