Breve Análise do Portátil HP Envy 17-ce1002ng: Um máquina fina de 17 polegadas com desempenho misto
HP Envy 17-ce1004ng (Envy 17 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10510U 4 x 1.8 - 4.9 GHz, Comet Lake-U
Placa gráfica
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 - 2048 MB VRAM, Análises do: 1519 MHz, Memoría: 1752 MHz, NVIDIA 430.86, Intel UHD Graphics 620
Memória
16 GB
, DDR4-2666, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
17.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 127 PPI, BOE0825, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, 512 GB
, 360 GB livre
peso
2.78 kg, Suprimento de energia: 210 g
Preço
1000 Euro
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 78.5 % v7 (old) | 11/2019 | HP Envy 17-ce1004ng i7-10510U, GeForce MX250 | 2.8 kg | 23 mm | 17.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 83.5 % v6 (old) | 04/2019 | LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 17.8 mm | 17.00" | 2560x1600 | |
| 84 % v7 (old) | Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | 2.4 kg | 20.85 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 79.7 % v6 (old) | 08/2019 | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10 | 1.8 kg | 19.5 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.3 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | 1.9 kg | 19.1 mm | 15.60" | 1920x1080 |
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (18.4 - 201, n=60, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Average of class Multimedia (25.8 - 266, n=59, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 (Toshiba Exceria Pro M501 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2019 i5 4TB3 | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
HP Envy 17-ce1004ng; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø703 (563-724)
HP Envy 17-ce1004ng; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø640 (628-650)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
BOE0825 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 309 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 279.7 cd/m² Minimum: 16.6 cd/m²iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 280 cd/m²
Contraste: 875:1 (Preto: 0.335 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.79 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91, calibrated: 1.76
ΔE Greyscale 6.32 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
91% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
59% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
64.6% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
91.5% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
63.3% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.49
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng BOE0825, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 LG Philips LP170WQ1-SPA1, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 AU Optronics B156HAN02.1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 LG Philips 156WFC, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE CMN N156HCE-EN1, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 3% | -38% | -40% | 0% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 63.3 | 64.2 1% | 38.3 -39% | 37.31 -41% | 64.9 3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 91.5 | 96.3 5% | 57.5 -37% | 56.2 -39% | 88.7 -3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 64.6 | 66.3 3% | 39.57 -39% | 38.55 -40% | 64.9 0% |
| Response Times | -57% | -47% | -23% | -48% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 30 ? | 42 ? -40% | 41 ? -37% | 28.4 ? 5% | 39.2 ? -31% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 18 ? | 31.2 ? -73% | 28 ? -56% | 27.2 ? -51% | 29.6 ? -64% |
| PWM Frequency | 25510 ? | ||||
| Screen | 25% | -7% | -24% | 15% | |
| Brightness middle | 293 | 370.6 26% | 271 -8% | 253.6 -13% | 330 13% |
| Brightness | 280 | 356 27% | 256 -9% | 227 -19% | 315 13% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 89 7% | 91 10% | 84 1% | 88 6% |
| Black Level * | 0.335 | 0.28 16% | 0.26 22% | 0.27 19% | 0.2 40% |
| Contrast | 875 | 1324 51% | 1042 19% | 939 7% | 1650 89% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.79 | 3.28 32% | 3.63 24% | 6.05 -26% | 4.4 8% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.42 | 5.85 49% | 7.13 38% | 14.03 -23% | 7.4 35% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.76 | 1.03 41% | 4.62 -163% | 4.97 -182% | 2.7 -53% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.32 | 4.9 22% | 2.21 65% | 3.2 49% | 4.8 24% |
| Gamma | 2.49 88% | 2.19 100% | 2.5 88% | 2 110% | 2.24 98% |
| CCT | 8002 81% | 6376 102% | 6383 102% | 6820 95% | 6760 96% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 59 | 60.8 3% | 36 -39% | 35.5 -40% | 57.8 -2% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 91 | 96.6 6% | 57 -37% | 55.6 -39% | 88.5 -3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -10% /
11% | -31% /
-18% | -29% /
-27% | -11% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 18 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 10 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 36 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM not detected |  | ||
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
HP Envy 17-ce1004ng Intel Core i7-10510U, Intel Core i7-10510U: Ø496 (486.1-549.01)
LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø508 (504.9-529.32)
Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 Intel Core i5-9300H, Intel Core i5-9300H: Ø752 (744.8-791.06)
Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 AMD Ryzen 7 3700U, AMD Ryzen 7 3700U: Ø654 (639.01-676.19)
Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel Core i7-8565U: Ø624 (617.82-662.76)
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit | |
| Average of class Multimedia (99.6 - 323, n=89, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (113 - 202, n=42) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 | |
| LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1252 - 4774, n=94, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U (482 - 856, n=45) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (4484 - 5583, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3214 - 3958, n=8) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3115 - 6078, n=10, last 2 years) | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10510U, NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (4599 - 5443, n=8) | |
| LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3502 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5138 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4442 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ | Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G | Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR | Average Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -39% | 11% | -19% | 54% | 2% | |
| Write 4K | 134.8 | 89.7 -33% | 113.3 -16% | 105.9 -21% | 173 28% | 136 ? 1% |
| Read 4K | 54.7 | 36.59 -33% | 42.7 -22% | 36.56 -33% | 51.9 -5% | 55.2 ? 1% |
| Write Seq | 872 | 422.4 -52% | 1457 67% | 1165 34% | 1067 22% | 926 ? 6% |
| Read Seq | 1447 | 454.9 -69% | 1432 -1% | 423.2 -71% | 1024 -29% | 1523 ? 5% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 392.2 | 321.1 -18% | 347.5 -11% | 332.1 -15% | 462 18% | 381 ? -3% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 331.6 | 340.1 3% | 382.6 15% | 229.3 -31% | 549 66% | 334 ? 1% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 920 | 509 -45% | 1454 58% | 1460 59% | 3011 227% | 987 ? 7% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1723 | 545 -68% | 1726 0% | 472.5 -73% | 3520 104% | 1744 ? 1% |
| AS SSD | -28% | 77% | 20% | 167% | 1% | |
| Seq Read | 1620 | 454.5 -72% | 1581 -2% | 398.9 -75% | 2170 34% | 1423 ? -12% |
| Seq Write | 373.7 | 461 23% | 1391 272% | 884 137% | 2411 545% | 828 ? 122% |
| 4K Read | 53.8 | 30.18 -44% | 40.5 -25% | 34.54 -36% | 58.5 9% | 51.3 ? -5% |
| 4K Write | 170.3 | 71 -58% | 109.4 -36% | 82.1 -52% | 138.2 -19% | 128.9 ? -24% |
| 4K-64 Read | 321.5 | 369.6 15% | 1030 220% | 647 101% | 1671 420% | 326 ? 1% |
| 4K-64 Write | 715 | 305.5 -57% | 1278 79% | 985 38% | 1782 149% | 721 ? 1% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.081 | 0.084 -4% | 0.058 28% | 0.072 11% | 0.032 60% | 0.09003 ? -11% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.046 | 0.05 -9% | 0.037 20% | 0.047 -2% | 0.027 41% | 0.07378 ? -60% |
| Score Read | 537 | 445 -17% | 1229 129% | 721 34% | 1947 263% | 519 ? -3% |
| Score Write | 923 | 423 -54% | 1527 65% | 1155 25% | 2161 134% | 932 ? 1% |
| Score Total | 1693 | 1106 -35% | 3381 100% | 2279 35% | 5123 203% | 1708 ? 1% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 816 | 939 | 862 | 1109 ? | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 614 | 406.4 | 457 | 468 ? | ||
| Copy Game MB/s | 414.9 | 650 | 902 | 760 ? | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -34% /
-33% | 44% /
49% | 1% /
3% | 111% /
119% | 2% /
2% |
* ... smaller is better
Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8
Sequential Read:
1504 MB/s
Sequential Write:
900 MB/s
512K Read:
950 MB/s
512K Write:
904 MB/s
4K Read:
57.7 MB/s
4K Write:
145.1 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
325.9 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
394.1 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Average of class Multimedia (3505 - 60250, n=78, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (3585 - 4942, n=29) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 | |
| Average of class Multimedia (14679 - 130614, n=38, last 2 years) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (13805 - 23863, n=25) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Average of class Multimedia (1835 - 46022, n=81, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (2939 - 3885, n=29) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| 2560x1440 Time Spy Graphics | |
| Average of class Multimedia (622 - 17620, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (881 - 1169, n=22) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 5183 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 14417 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 3567 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite | |
| 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (133.9 - 212, n=14) | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (98.4 - 117.5, n=14) | |
| 1366x768 High Preset | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (84 - 100.5, n=14) | |
| 1920x1080 Ultra Preset, DX11 (DDOF) | |
| Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (32.3 - 38.1, n=14) | |
| Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 | |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark | |
| 1280x720 Lite Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (19 - 225, n=69, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (33.7 - 41, n=5) | |
| 1920x1080 Standard Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (9.75 - 162.4, n=79, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (16.4 - 19.4, n=5) | |
| 1920x1080 High Quality | |
| Average of class Multimedia (6.53 - 141.8, n=82, last 2 years) | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng | |
| Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 (9.9 - 12.2, n=4) | |
HP Envy 17-ce1004ng GeForce MX250, i7-10510U, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8: Ø10.7 (8-12)
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 166 | 116.4 | 96.3 | 37.08 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 67.6 | 38.63 | 22.42 | 12.52 |
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 112.3 | 102.9 | 77.4 | 63.1 |
| Final Fantasy XV Benchmark (2018) | 37.7 | 18.3 | 12.2 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30 / 30 / 30 dB |
| Carga |
| 36.4 / 36.5 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 33.9 °C / 93 F, compared to the average of 31.3 °C / 88 F for the devices in the class Multimedia.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 36.9 °C / 98 F, ranging from 21.1 to 71 °C for the class Multimedia.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 39.3 °C / 103 F, compared to the average of 39.2 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 25.4 °C / 78 F, compared to the device average of 31.3 °C / 88 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.1 °C / 88 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.8 °C / 83.8 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP Envy 17-ce1004ng audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.9% away from median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (12.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.4% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 39% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 18%, worst was 45%
Compared to all devices tested
» 37% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 55% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.5 / 0.8 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.6 / 8.5 / 10.4 Watt |
| Carga |
52.6 / 61 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, Intel SSD 660p SSDPEKNW512G8, IPS, 1920x1080, 17.3" | LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM871b MZNLN256HAJQ, IPS, 2560x1600, 17" | Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10, WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, Samsung PM981a MZVLB1T0HBLR, IPS, 1920x1080, 15.6" | Average NVIDIA GeForce MX250 | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 23% | -23% | 19% | -20% | -6% | -53% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.6 | 2.7 25% | 2.9 19% | 4.2 -17% | 4.2 -17% | 4.1 ? -14% | 6.54 ? -82% |
| Idle Average * | 8.5 | 8.1 5% | 5.3 38% | 6.8 20% | 7.8 8% | 7.91 ? 7% | 11.3 ? -33% |
| Idle Maximum * | 10.4 | 10.2 2% | 10.7 -3% | 7 33% | 10.2 2% | 10.4 ? -0% | 13.3 ? -28% |
| Load Average * | 52.6 | 32.7 38% | 78 -48% | 36.5 31% | 73.6 -40% | 58.6 ? -11% | 70.7 ? -34% |
| Load Maximum * | 61 | 34.8 43% | 135 -121% | 44 28% | 92.7 -52% | 68.9 ? -13% | 116.1 ? -90% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 87 | 37.9 | 75 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Envy 17-ce1004ng i7-10510U, GeForce MX250, 52 Wh | LG Gram 17Z990-R.AAS7U1 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 72 Wh | Acer Aspire 7 A715-74G-50U5 i5-9300H, GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile, 58.7 Wh | Dell Inspiron 15 5000 5585 R7 3700U, Vega 10, 42 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad S540-15IWL 81SW0015GE i7-8565U, GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, 70 Wh | Average of class Multimedia | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 101% | 129% | 11% | 62% | 56% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1020 | 2085 104% | 856 -16% | 1168 ? 15% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 241 | 713 196% | 553 129% | 421 75% | 526 118% | 640 ? 166% |
| Load | 111 | 113 2% | 81 -27% | 117 5% | 97.1 ? -13% | |
| Witcher 3 ultra | 63 | 76.3 ? |
Pro
+ Bons dispositivos de entrada
+ Desempenho de GPU acima da média
+ Wi-Fi 6 abordo
+ Design resistente
Contra
- Desmontagem frustrante
- Tela de baixo contraste
- Bleeding da iluminação de fundo perceptível
- Desempenho insuficiente da CPU
- Curta duração da bateria
Veredicto - Um bom portátil multimídia que poderia oferecer mais
O Envy 17-ce1002ng demonstrou ser um portátil multimídia sólido durante nossos testes. O dispositivo possui um design robusto e fino em alumínio, surpreendentemente elegante para uma máquina de 17 polegadas. A HP também o equipou com dispositivos de entrada satisfatórios, enquanto o dispositivo pode fazer pleno uso de seu chip gráfico dedicado.
No entanto, o desempenho não é tão otimista. Esperávamos muito mais do Core i7-10510U aqui, pois o Envy 17 deveria ter um chassi grande o suficiente para esfriá-lo adequadamente. O processador Comet Lake-U não oferece vantagens sobre seus antecessores Whiskey Lake, o que é uma pena. Da mesma forma, enquanto somos fãs do acabamento antirreflexo que a HP aplicou na tela IPS brilhante, ela é muito escura e desbotada. Pior ainda, nossa unidade de teste sofre de um notável “bleeding" da luz de fundo.
O HP Envy 17 é um bom substituto de desktops, mas oferece apenas um desempenho insignificante melhor do que muitos portáteis de 13 polegadas.
As opções limitadas de manutenção também nos decepcionaram, com a HP continuando a dificultar a remoção da tampa inferior. Quem sabe o que está fazendo não deve ter nenhum problema, mas esconder os parafusos sob uma tira de borracha fina parece excessivo. Por fim, o novo Envy 17 tem uma duração de bateria terrível, outra falha que nos deixou cambaleando. No geral, o HP Envy 17-ce1002ng é um bom candidato se você estiver procurando por um substituto de desktop, mas existem opções melhores por aí que oferecem muito mais do que o portátil HP.
HP Envy 17-ce1004ng
- 11/05/2019 v7 (old)
Mike Wobker
Multimedia - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
