Breve Análise do Portátil HP Envy 13 ad065nr (i5-7200U, FHD)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP Spectre 13-v131ng | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 78 %
iluminação com acumulador: 290 cd/m²
Contraste: 906:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr LG Philips LGD0576, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | HP Spectre 13-v131ng CMN1374, IPS UWVA, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 APPA033, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600 | HP Envy 13-d020ng AU Optronics AUO272D, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -19% | 4% | 37% | 5% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.5 | 48.94 -25% | 64.6 -1% | 99.2 51% | 63.7 -3% |
| sRGB Coverage | 83.8 | 73.3 -13% | 88.8 6% | 99.9 19% | 93 11% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 61.3 | 50.5 -18% | 64.8 6% | 87.1 42% | 65.1 6% |
| Response Times | -33% | -56% | -41% | -42% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 28 ? | 32.8 ? -17% | 46 ? -64% | 42.8 ? -53% | 34 ? -21% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 22.4 ? | 33.2 ? -48% | 33 ? -47% | 28.8 ? -29% | 24 ? -7% |
| PWM Frequency | 10200 ? | 208 ? -98% | |||
| Screen | -0% | 0% | 46% | 7% | |
| Brightness middle | 290 | 351.2 21% | 404 39% | 588 103% | 345 19% |
| Brightness | 270 | 325 20% | 382 41% | 561 108% | 335 24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 78 | 89 14% | 91 17% | 92 18% | 95 22% |
| Black Level * | 0.32 | 0.195 39% | 0.35 -9% | 0.45 -41% | 0.25 22% |
| Contrast | 906 | 1801 99% | 1154 27% | 1307 44% | 1380 52% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.8 | 7.4 -54% | 5.37 -12% | 1.7 65% | 4.94 -3% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 11.2 | 9.08 19% | 9.46 16% | 3.5 69% | 8.85 21% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.8 | 6.71 -140% | 6.44 -130% | 1.9 32% | 5.85 -109% |
| Gamma | 2.19 100% | 2.74 80% | 2.52 87% | 2.33 94% | 2.25 98% |
| CCT | 6382 102% | 7222 90% | 6738 96% | 6738 96% | 7105 91% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 54.9 | 50.48 -8% | 58 6% | 77.92 42% | 60 9% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 83.5 | 73.31 -12% | 89 7% | 99.94 20% | 93 11% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -17% /
-8% | -17% /
-7% | 14% /
33% | -10% /
-3% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 12.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 10 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 14 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 10200 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 10200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 10200 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| HP ProBook 650 G2-T9X61ET | |
| HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| HP ProBook 650 G2-T9X61ET | |
| HP 250 G4 T6P08ES | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614 | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
| Creative Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 | |
| HP Envy 13-d020ng | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3760 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 4541 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4669 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3273 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | HP Spectre 13-v131ng Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | HP Envy 13-d020ng Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 82% | 275% | 283% | 26% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 162.9 | 390 139% | 397.9 144% | 1123 589% | 196 20% |
| Copy Program MB/s | 99.3 | 188 89% | 426 329% | 466.7 370% | 122.6 23% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 247.3 | 283.3 15% | 720 191% | 1672 576% | 252.3 2% |
| Score Total | 790 | 1607 103% | 3617 358% | 2219 181% | 984 25% |
| Score Write | 182 | 327 80% | 1115 513% | 832 357% | 325 79% |
| Score Read | 401 | 870 117% | 1654 312% | 945 136% | 439 9% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.082 | 0.035 57% | 0.026 68% | 0.031 62% | 0.051 38% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.149 | 0.055 63% | 0.042 72% | 0.036 76% | 0.145 3% |
| 4K-64 Write | 99.3 | 197.7 99% | 862 768% | 566 470% | 231.6 133% |
| 4K-64 Read | 329.5 | 723 119% | 1465 345% | 641 95% | 364.5 11% |
| 4K Write | 51.5 | 92 79% | 134.4 161% | 118.5 130% | 67.5 31% |
| 4K Read | 26.63 | 29.52 11% | 56.4 112% | 48.18 81% | 24.79 -7% |
| Seq Write | 314.5 | 372.8 19% | 1190 278% | 1476 369% | 258.1 -18% |
| Seq Read | 449.5 | 1179 162% | 1325 195% | 2556 469% | 502 12% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407 | |
| HP Pro X2 612 G1 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 | |
| Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7 | |
| Asus X302UV-FN016T | |
| Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407 | |
| HP Pro X2 612 G1 | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1613 pontos | |
| 3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score | 54450 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5995 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 858 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score | 394 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 54.3 | 31 | 26.3 | 8 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 19.9 | 10.9 | ||
| Overwatch (2016) | 33.3 | 25 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.1 / 28.1 / 28.1 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.3 / 40 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.1 dB(A) | ||
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006 | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | HP Spectre 13-v131ng HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128 | Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ HD Graphics 520, 6500U, LiteOn CV1-8B512 | HP Envy 13-d020ng HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 3% | -9% | -4% | -7% | -9% | |
| off / environment * | 28.1 | 30.4 -8% | 30.2 -7% | 31.2 -11% | ||
| Idle Minimum * | 28.1 | 28.9 -3% | 30.4 -8% | 30.2 -7% | 31.2 -11% | 32.5 -16% |
| Idle Average * | 28.1 | 28.9 -3% | 30.4 -8% | 30.2 -7% | 31.2 -11% | 32.5 -16% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.1 | 28.9 -3% | 30.4 -8% | 30.2 -7% | 31.5 -12% | 32.4 -15% |
| Load Average * | 33.3 | 30.9 7% | 40 -20% | 32.9 1% | 35.7 -7% | 36 -8% |
| Load Maximum * | 40 | 33.5 16% | 40 -0% | 39.3 2% | 35.8 10% | 36.5 9% |
* ... smaller is better
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.9 °C / -7.1 F).
HP Envy 13-ad065nr audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 25% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.22 / 0.43 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.8 / 5.8 / 6.4 Watt |
| Carga |
31.3 / 31.7 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Apple SSD AP0128, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-d020ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 8% | -20% | -27% | -30% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.8 | 4.1 -46% | 3.6 -29% | 3.7 -32% | 4.2 -50% |
| Idle Average * | 5.8 | 4.2 28% | 6.4 -10% | 5.2 10% | 7.4 -28% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.4 | 5.1 20% | 9.2 -44% | 7.6 -19% | 10.1 -58% |
| Load Average * | 31.3 | 22.1 29% | 34 -9% | 41.6 -33% | 33.4 -7% |
| Load Maximum * | 31.7 | 29.4 7% | 34.4 -9% | 50.5 -59% | 34.7 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53.6 Wh | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | HP Spectre 13-v131ng i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh | Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ 6500U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh | HP Envy 13-d020ng 6200U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 10% | -41% | -10% | -23% | -33% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1487 | 1295 -13% | 718 -52% | 1028 -31% | ||
| WiFi v1.3 | 570 | 677 19% | 394 -31% | 681 19% | 472 -17% | 381 -33% |
| Load | 127 | 157 24% | 77 -39% | 78 -39% | 99 -22% |
Pro
Contra
A maior aposta do Envy mais recente é o preço inicial abaixo de $840 USD, dado que o XPS 13, Yoga 910, ou o Spectre x360 13 configurados de maneira semelhante, custarão $1000 ou mais. Se os recursos Thunderbolt 3 ou 2-em-1 não são desejáveis, então o Envy 13 é uma solução recomendável sem frescuras. É como possuir um Spectre x360 13, mas a um preço mais acessível.
Embora o novo chassi seja certamente mais portátil e visualmente atraente do que o Envy 13, a porta HDMI e o leitor SD de tamanho normal descartados, pode irritar alguns usuários. Tanto o teclado como o clickpad poderiam ter tido melhor resposta táctil e o ruído do ventilador, embora geralmente silencioso, é mais agudo do que o normal. As opções de painel mate e Iris Graphics teriam impulsionado o Envy 13 a ser um Ultrabook mais versátil, especialmente para viajantes constantes ou aqueles que exigem mais potência gráfica. Investir um par de centenas de dólares a mais no XPS 13 ou no Spectre x360 13 fornecerá aos usuários com designs mais robustos, teclados mais firmes e opções de conectividade mais versáteis. Assim, os SKUs Envy 13 de gama alta são mais difíceis de justificar, dado que o poder de processamento adicional é mínimo em comparação com a rigidez e qualidade aprimoradas dos designs do XPS 13 ou Spectre.
O Envy 13 2017 é uma melhoria quase universal em relação ao modelo 2016 com sua bateria maior, portas USB tipo-C integradas e tamanho menor e mais leve. Ainda está um pouco atrás da série XPS 13 e Spectre, mas o seu SKU mais lento ainda dá uma boa batalha contra alternativas volumosas de gama média.
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
- 08/09/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo
Price comparison
