Notebookcheck Logo

Breve Análise do Portátil HP Envy 13 ad065nr (i5-7200U, FHD)

O HP XPS 13. O design do marco estreito da série carro-chefe do Spectre girou até a série mainstream do Envy com resultados fantásticos. Apesar de não sem alguns sacrifícios, este é o melhor portátil Envy até à data.
HP Envy 13-ad065nr (Envy 13 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i5-7200U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Kaby Lake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 620, Análises do: 300 MHz, Memoría: 933 MHz, DDR3, 21.20.16.4599
Memória
8 GB 
, DDR3, 1066.7 MHz, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
13.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, LG Philips LGD0576, IPS, Brilhante: sim
placa mãe
Intel Kaby Lake-U iHDCP 2.2 Premium PCH
Disco rígido
SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006, 128 GB 
Placa de Som
Intel Kaby Lake-U/Y PCH - High Definition Audio
Conexões
4 USB 3.0, 2 DisplayPort, Conexões Audio: 3.5 mm combo, Card Reader: MicroSD reader, Brightness Sensor
Funcionamento em rede
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265 (a/b/g/h/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/), Bluetooth 4.2
Tamanho
altura x largura x profundidade (em mm): 14 x 305.3 x 215.7
Bateria
53.6 Wh, 6962 mAh Lítio-Polímero
Sistema Operativo
Microsoft Windows 10 Home 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: HD 720p
Características adicionais
Alto falantes: Bang & Olufsen, Quad speakers, Teclado: Chiclet, Iluminação do Teclado: sim, B&O Audio Control, 12 Meses Garantia
peso
1.252 kg, Suprimento de energia: 295 g
Preço
840 USD
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.

 

326.5 mm 226 mm 12.6 mm 1.4 kg325 mm 229 mm 10.4 mm 1.1 kg321 mm 206 mm 13.1 mm 1.3 kg305.3 mm 215.7 mm 14 mm 1.3 kg304 mm 201 mm 15 mm 1.2 kg304.1 mm 212.4 mm 14.9 mm 1.4 kg297 mm 210 mm 1 mm 5.7 g
Front: No connectivity
Front: No connectivity
Right: USB Type-C Gen. 1, USB 3.0, AC adapter
Right: USB Type-C Gen. 1, USB 3.0, AC adapter
Rear: No connectivity
Rear: No connectivity
Left: USB 3.0, 3.5 mm combo audio, USB Type-C Gen. 1, MicroSD reader
Left: USB 3.0, 3.5 mm combo audio, USB Type-C Gen. 1, MicroSD reader
SD Card Reader
average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
 
120.5 MB/s +92%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
 
107.8 MB/s +72%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
 
62.8 MB/s
maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB)
Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD)
 
252.6 MB/s +208%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
 
250.6 MB/s +206%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
 
81.9 MB/s
Networking
iperf3 transmit AX12
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
663 MBit/s +38%
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
575 MBit/s +20%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
480 MBit/s
iperf3 receive AX12
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 7265
635 MBit/s
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Killer Wireless-n/a/ac 1535 Wireless Network Adapter
525 MBit/s -17%
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Intel Dual Band Wireless-AC 8260
485 MBit/s -24%
279.2
cd/m²
272.5
cd/m²
260.5
cd/m²
292.9
cd/m²
290
cd/m²
251.9
cd/m²
277.3
cd/m²
278.6
cd/m²
229
cd/m²
Distribuição do brilho
LG Philips LGD0576 tested with X-Rite i1Pro Basic 2
Máximo: 292.9 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 270.2 cd/m² Minimum: 13.56 cd/m²
iluminação: 78 %
iluminação com acumulador: 290 cd/m²
Contraste: 906:1 (Preto: 0.32 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.8 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92
ΔE Greyscale 2.8 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
83.5% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
54.9% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.3% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
83.8% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.5% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.19
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
LG Philips LGD0576, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
CMN1374, IPS UWVA, 13.3", 1920x1080
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
APPA033, IPS, 13.3", 2560x1600
HP Envy 13-d020ng
AU Optronics AUO272D, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080
Display
-19%
4%
37%
5%
Display P3 Coverage
65.5
48.94
-25%
64.6
-1%
99.2
51%
63.7
-3%
sRGB Coverage
83.8
73.3
-13%
88.8
6%
99.9
19%
93
11%
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage
61.3
50.5
-18%
64.8
6%
87.1
42%
65.1
6%
Response Times
-33%
-56%
-41%
-42%
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% *
28 ?(14, 14)
32.8 ?(16, 16.8)
-17%
46 ?(26, 20)
-64%
42.8 ?(22.4, 20.4)
-53%
34 ?(11, 23)
-21%
Response Time Black / White *
22.4 ?(12.4, 10)
33.2 ?(10.8, 22.4)
-48%
33 ?(21, 12)
-47%
28.8 ?(14.8, 14)
-29%
24 ?(5, 19)
-7%
PWM Frequency
10200 ?(100)
208 ?(40)
-98%
Screen
-0%
0%
46%
7%
Brightness middle
290
351.2
21%
404
39%
588
103%
345
19%
Brightness
270
325
20%
382
41%
561
108%
335
24%
Brightness Distribution
78
89
14%
91
17%
92
18%
95
22%
Black Level *
0.32
0.195
39%
0.35
-9%
0.45
-41%
0.25
22%
Contrast
906
1801
99%
1154
27%
1307
44%
1380
52%
Colorchecker dE 2000 *
4.8
7.4
-54%
5.37
-12%
1.7
65%
4.94
-3%
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *
11.2
9.08
19%
9.46
16%
3.5
69%
8.85
21%
Greyscale dE 2000 *
2.8
6.71
-140%
6.44
-130%
1.9
32%
5.85
-109%
Gamma
2.19 100%
2.74 80%
2.52 87%
2.33 94%
2.25 98%
CCT
6382 102%
7222 90%
6738 96%
6738 96%
7105 91%
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998)
54.9
50.48
-8%
58
6%
77.92
42%
60
9%
Color Space (Percent of sRGB)
83.5
73.31
-12%
89
7%
99.94
20%
93
11%
Total Average (Program / Settings)
-17% / -8%
-17% / -7%
14% / 33%
-10% / -3%

* ... smaller is better

Display Response Times

Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.
       Response Time Black to White
22.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 12.4 ms rise
↘ 10 ms fall
The screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 46 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (21 ms).
       Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey
28 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 14 ms rise
↘ 14 ms fall
The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers.
In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 34 % of all devices are better.
This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms).

Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)

To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.
Screen flickering / PWM detected 10200 Hz ≤ 100 % brightness setting

The display backlight flickers at 10200 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting.

The frequency of 10200 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering.

In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8747 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.

 
0102030405060708090100110120130140150160170180190200210220230240250260270280290300310320Tooltip
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64 Bit
Cinebench R15
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
163 Points +30%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Core i5-7360U
145 Points +16%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Core i5-7360U
140 Points +12%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
141 Points +13%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
139 Points +11%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel Core i5-7200U
129 Points +3%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
125 Points
HP ProBook 650 G2-T9X61ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
110 Points -12%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
108 Points -14%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
99 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
410 (335.35min - 409.45max) Points +31%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
383 (377min - 385max) Points +22%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Core i5-7360U
362 Points +15%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Core i5-7360U
346 Points +10%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
343 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel Core i5-7200U
321 Points +2%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
314 Points
HP ProBook 650 G2-T9X61ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
288 Points -8%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
257 Points -18%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
223 Points -29%
Cinebench R11.5
CPU Single 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
1.89 Points +30%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Core i5-7360U
1.7 Points +17%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
1.64 Points +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
1.54 Points +6%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.46 Points +1%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
1.45 Points
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
1.28 Points -12%
HP ProBook 650 G2-T9X61ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
1.26 Points -13%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
1.14 Points -21%
CPU Multi 64Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
4.55 Points +25%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
4.09 Points +13%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Core i5-7360U
3.9 Points +7%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
3.83 Points +6%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.63 Points
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel Core i5-7200U
3.58 Points -1%
HP ProBook 650 G2-T9X61ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
3.16 Points -13%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
2.81 Points -23%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
2.49 Points -31%
Cinebench R10
Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
13838 Points +27%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Core i5-7360U
12293 Points +13%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
11676 Points +7%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
11403 Points +5%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
10906 Points
HP ProBook 650 G2-T9X61ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
9798 Points -10%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
8672 Points -20%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
7580 Points -30%
Rendering Single 32Bit
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
6213 Points +26%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Core i5-7360U
5787 Points +17%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
5630 Points +14%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
5010 Points +1%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
4943 Points
HP ProBook 650 G2-T9X61ET
Intel Core i5-6200U
4387 Points -11%
HP 250 G4 T6P08ES
Intel Core i5-5200U
4134 Points -16%
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
3725 Points -25%
wPrime 2.10 - 1024m
Lenovo IdeaPad Z40-59422614
Intel Core i5-4200U
790 s * -65%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel Core i5-7200U
500 s * -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Core i5-7360U
499.7 s * -5%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017 Touchbar i5
Intel Core i5-7267U
492 s * -3%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel Core i5-7200U
477.5 s *
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
Intel Core i7-7500U
456.8 s * +4%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Core i7-7660U
438 s * +8%

* ... smaller is better

Cinebench R10 Shading 32Bit
8606
Cinebench R10 Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit
10906
Cinebench R10 Rendering Single 32Bit
4943
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
3.63 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
33.72 fps
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Single 64Bit
1.45 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
125 Points
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
97.7 %
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
44.64 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
314 Points
Ajuda
PCMark 8
Home Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128
4057 (4055min - 4059max) Points +8%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006
3760 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
3535 Points -6%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO
3246 Points -14%
Work Score Accelerated v2
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006
4669 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4568 Points -2%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128
4461 (4448min - 4484max) Points -4%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO
4113 Points -12%
Creative Score Accelerated v2
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128
5544 (5539min - 5549max) Points +22%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006
4541 Points
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
4211 Points -7%
HP Envy 13-d020ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO
3774 Points -17%
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2
3760 pontos
PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2
4541 pontos
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2
4669 pontos
PCMark 10 Score
3273 pontos
Ajuda
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
HP Spectre x360 13-ac033dx
Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
HP Envy 13-d020ng
Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO
AS SSD
82%
275%
283%
26%
Copy Game MB/s
162.9
390
139%
397.9
144%
1123
589%
196
20%
Copy Program MB/s
99.3
188
89%
426
329%
466.7
370%
122.6
23%
Copy ISO MB/s
247.3
283.3
15%
720
191%
1672
576%
252.3
2%
Score Total
790
1607
103%
3617
358%
2219
181%
984
25%
Score Write
182
327
80%
1115
513%
832
357%
325
79%
Score Read
401
870
117%
1654
312%
945
136%
439
9%
Access Time Write *
0.082
0.035
57%
0.026
68%
0.031
62%
0.051
38%
Access Time Read *
0.149
0.055
63%
0.042
72%
0.036
76%
0.145
3%
4K-64 Write
99.3
197.7
99%
862
768%
566
470%
231.6
133%
4K-64 Read
329.5
723
119%
1465
345%
641
95%
364.5
11%
4K Write
51.5
92
79%
134.4
161%
118.5
130%
67.5
31%
4K Read
26.63
29.52
11%
56.4
112%
48.18
81%
24.79
-7%
Seq Write
314.5
372.8
19%
1190
278%
1476
369%
258.1
-18%
Seq Read
449.5
1179
162%
1325
195%
2556
469%
502
12%

* ... smaller is better

SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1: 552 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1: 330.8 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1: 285.7 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1: 160.3 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq: 503 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq: 342.5 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K: 29.34 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K: 57.5 MB/s
3DMark 11
1280x720 Performance GPU
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U
2493 Points +69%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U
2379 (2355min - 2425max) Points +61%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
2230 Points +51%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, 6200U
1747 Points +19%
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U
1613 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
1562 Points +6%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
1474 Points
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
1410 Points -4%
HP Pro X2 612 G1
Intel HD Graphics 4200, 4012Y
744 Points -50%
1280x720 Performance Combined
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U
2193 (2057min - 2200max) Points +60%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U
2184 Points +60%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
1770 Points +29%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
1608 Points +18%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, 6200U
1572 Points +15%
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U
1567 Points +15%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
1486 Points +9%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
1368 Points
HP Pro X2 612 G1
Intel HD Graphics 4200, 4012Y
767 Points -44%
3DMark
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U
11495 (10969min - 11750max) Points +46%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U
11264 Points +43%
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U
8599 Points +9%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
8570 Points +9%
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
8385 Points +7%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
7854 Points
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, 6200U
7733 Points -2%
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
7064 Points -10%
HP Pro X2 612 G1
Intel HD Graphics 4200, 4012Y
5149 Points -34%
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics
Samsung Notebook 9 NP900X5N-X01US
NVIDIA GeForce 940MX, i7-7500U
1593 Points +70%
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U
1541 (1484min - 1547max) Points +64%
Microsoft Surface Pro (2017) i7
Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640, i7-7660U
1418 Points +51%
Asus X302UV-FN016T
NVIDIA GeForce 920MX, 6200U
1282 Points +37%
Acer Switch 5 SW512-52-5819
Intel HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U
1030 Points +10%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Yoga 2017 20JD0015US
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
1017 Points +8%
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
Intel HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U
939 Points
Acer TravelMate P449-M-7407
Intel HD Graphics 520, 6500U
825 Points -12%
HP Pro X2 612 G1
Intel HD Graphics 4200, 4012Y
539 Points -43%
3DMark 11 Performance
1613 pontos
3DMark Ice Storm Standard Score
54450 pontos
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score
5995 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Score
858 pontos
3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score
394 pontos
Ajuda
baixomédiaaltoultra
BioShock Infinite (2013) 54.3 31 26.3 8
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) 19.9 10.9
Overwatch (2016) 33.3 25

Barulho

Ocioso
28.1 / 28.1 / 28.1 dB
Carga
33.3 / 40 dB
  red to green bar
 
 
30 dB
silencioso
40 dB(A)
audível
50 dB(A)
ruidosamente alto
 
min: dark, med: mid, max: light   BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância)   environment noise: 28.1 dB(A)
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
Iris Plus Graphics 640, i5-7360U, Apple SSD AP0128
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ
HD Graphics 520, 6500U, LiteOn CV1-8B512
HP Envy 13-d020ng
HD Graphics 520, 6200U, Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO
Noise
3%
-9%
-4%
-7%
-9%
off / environment *
28.1
30.4
-8%
30.2
-7%
31.2
-11%
Idle Minimum *
28.1
28.9
-3%
30.4
-8%
30.2
-7%
31.2
-11%
32.5
-16%
Idle Average *
28.1
28.9
-3%
30.4
-8%
30.2
-7%
31.2
-11%
32.5
-16%
Idle Maximum *
28.1
28.9
-3%
30.4
-8%
30.2
-7%
31.5
-12%
32.4
-15%
Load Average *
33.3
30.9
7%
40
-20%
32.9
1%
35.7
-7%
36
-8%
Load Maximum *
40
33.5
16%
40
-0%
39.3
2%
35.8
10%
36.5
9%

* ... smaller is better

Carga Máxima
 38 °C48 °C36.2 °C 
 35.8 °C41.8 °C35.2 °C 
 32.2 °C31 °C32 °C 
Máximo: 48 °C
Médio: 36.7 °C
34.8 °C42 °C35 °C
33.6 °C38.6 °C34 °C
32.4 °C33.4 °C32.2 °C
Máximo: 42 °C
Médio: 35.1 °C
alimentação elétrica  42.6 °C | Temperatura do quarto 24 °C | Fluke 62 Mini IR Thermometer
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.7 °C / 98 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(-) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 48 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.1 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature as a maximum (32.2 °C / 90 F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.9 °C / -7.1 F).
dB(A) 0102030405060708090Deep BassMiddle BassHigh BassLower RangeMidsHigher MidsLower HighsMid HighsUpper HighsSuper Highs2035.639.82532.735.13134.535.44032.833.5503433.96332.933.38031.232.4100303212530.230.116028.233.120027.239.825027.845.331526.751.340025.957.750025.259.26302560.680024.663.9100024.163.2125023.963.6160023.866200023.764.1250023.663.5315023.459.7400023.656.5500023.361630023.559.6800023.557.71000023.559.31250023.460.91600023.554.7SPL36.174.1N2.632.8median 23.9median 59.3Delta1.58.235.335.132.931.831.83236.535.132.428.93328.936.328.848.32761.52752.924.860.92462.822.763.32269.521.267.82174.82075.919.472.718.97117.770.117.86917.671.817.668.117.671.417.673.717.670.417.571.617.671.617.669.617.459.717.583.630.662.51.5median 69.6median 17.84.72.4hearing rangehide median Pink NoiseHP Envy 13-ad065nrApple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz
HP Envy 13-ad065nr audio analysis

(-) | not very loud speakers (66 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 20.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (23.7% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 79% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 17% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 68% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 26% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis

(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%

Consumo de energia
desligadodarklight 0.22 / 0.43 Watt
Ociosodarkmidlight 2.8 / 5.8 / 6.4 Watt
Carga midlight 31.3 / 31.7 Watt
 color bar
Key: min: dark, med: mid, max: light        Metrahit Energy
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS UWVA, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, Apple SSD AP0128, IPS, 2560x1600, 13.3"
HP Envy 13-d020ng
6200U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung MZRPC256HADR-000SO, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3"
Power Consumption
8%
-20%
-27%
-30%
Idle Minimum *
2.8
4.1
-46%
3.6
-29%
3.7
-32%
4.2
-50%
Idle Average *
5.8
4.2
28%
6.4
-10%
5.2
10%
7.4
-28%
Idle Maximum *
6.4
5.1
20%
9.2
-44%
7.6
-19%
10.1
-58%
Load Average *
31.3
22.1
29%
34
-9%
41.6
-33%
33.4
-7%
Load Maximum *
31.7
29.4
7%
34.4
-9%
50.5
-59%
34.7
-9%

* ... smaller is better

Tempo de Execução da Bateria
Ocioso (sem WLAN, min brilho)
24h 47min
WiFi Websurfing
9h 30min
Carga (máximo brilho)
2h 07min
HP Envy 13-ad065nr
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53.6 Wh
Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5
i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 60 Wh
HP Spectre 13-v131ng
i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 38 Wh
Apple MacBook Pro 13 2017
i5-7360U, Iris Plus Graphics 640, 54.5 Wh
Acer Aspire S 13 S5-371-71QZ
6500U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh
HP Envy 13-d020ng
6200U, HD Graphics 520, 45 Wh
Battery Runtime
10%
-41%
-10%
-23%
-33%
Reader / Idle
1487
1295
-13%
718
-52%
1028
-31%
WiFi v1.3
570
677
19%
394
-31%
681
19%
472
-17%
381
-33%
Load
127
157
24%
77
-39%
78
-39%
99
-22%

Pro

+ Tela nítida com ótimas cores e contraste
+ Componentes com opção de manutenção; SSD atualizável
+ Chassi de alumínio mate visualmente atraente
+ Opções de tela FHD e UHD 4K
+ Duas portas USB Type-C, leitor de MicroSD
+ Sem afogamentos maiores sob uso intenso
+ Design fino e leve
+ Muito silencioso até mesmo sob carga pesada de trabalho
+ Qualidade do som respeitável
+ Longa duração da bateria

Contra

- Desempenho abaixo do esperado da GPU HD Graphics 620
- Sem opção de tela mate; tela muito refletiva
- Trackpad esponjoso; resposta muito fraca das teclas
- Sem Intel Iris ou opções gráficas GeForce
- Sem Thunderbolt 3 ou leitor SD de tamanho normal
- Distribuição do brilho abaixo da média
- A base pode ranger e se deformar ligeiramente
- Visibilidade em exteriores abaixo da média
- Superfícies esquentam muito rapidamente
- Tampa suscetível a flexões
- Ruído da ventoinha de alta frequência
- RAM DDR3 soldada
In review: HP Envy 13-ad065nr
In review: HP Envy 13-ad065nr

A maior aposta do Envy mais recente é o preço inicial abaixo de $840 USD, dado que o XPS 13, Yoga 910, ou o Spectre x360 13 configurados de maneira semelhante, custarão $1000 ou mais. Se os recursos Thunderbolt 3 ou 2-em-1 não são desejáveis, então o Envy 13 é uma solução recomendável sem frescuras. É como possuir um Spectre x360 13, mas a um preço mais acessível.

Embora o novo chassi seja certamente mais portátil e visualmente atraente do que o Envy 13, a porta HDMI e o leitor SD de tamanho normal descartados, pode irritar alguns usuários. Tanto o teclado como o clickpad poderiam ter tido melhor resposta táctil e o ruído do ventilador, embora geralmente silencioso, é mais agudo do que o normal. As opções de painel mate e Iris Graphics teriam impulsionado o Envy 13 a ser um Ultrabook mais versátil, especialmente para viajantes constantes ou aqueles que exigem mais potência gráfica. Investir um par de centenas de dólares a mais no XPS 13 ou no Spectre x360 13 fornecerá aos usuários com designs mais robustos, teclados mais firmes e opções de conectividade mais versáteis. Assim, os SKUs Envy 13 de gama alta são mais difíceis de justificar, dado que o poder de processamento adicional é mínimo em comparação com a rigidez e qualidade aprimoradas dos designs do XPS 13 ou Spectre.

O Envy 13 2017 é uma melhoria quase universal em relação ao modelo 2016 com sua bateria maior, portas USB tipo-C integradas e tamanho menor e mais leve. Ainda está um pouco atrás da série XPS 13 e Spectre, mas o seu SKU mais lento ainda dá uma boa batalha contra alternativas volumosas de gama média.

HP Envy 13-ad065nr - 08/09/2017 v6 (old)
Allen Ngo

Acabamento
83 /  98 → 85%
Teclado
67%
Mouse
81%
Conectividade
59 / 80 → 73%
Peso
72 / 35-78 → 86%
Bateria
92%
Pantalha
82%
Desempenho do jogos
57 / 68 → 84%
Desempenho da aplicação
86 / 87 → 98%
Temperatura
90 / 91 → 99%
Ruído
95%
Audio
70 / 91 → 77%
Médio
78%
85%
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado

Price comparison

Please share our article, every link counts!
> Análises e revisões de portáteis e celulares > Análises > Análises > Breve Análise do Portátil HP Envy 13 ad065nr (i5-7200U, FHD)
Allen Ngo, 2017-08-15 (Update: 2017-08-25)