Deutsch
English
Español
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
Polski
Русский
Türkçe
Svenska
Chinese
MagyarBreve Análise do Portátil HP Envy 13-ad006ng (i7-7500U, MX150)
| SD Card Reader | |
| average JPG Copy Test (av. of 3 runs) | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| maximum AS SSD Seq Read Test (1GB) | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng (Toshiba Exceria Pro SDXC 64 GB UHS-II) | |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 83 %
iluminação com acumulador: 281 cd/m²
Contraste: 1222:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 4.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.93
ΔE Greyscale 6.63 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
86% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
56% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63.1% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
86.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 1.85
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng BOE070E, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-ad065nr LG Philips LGD0576, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 9360 FHD i5 Sharp SHP1449 LQ133M1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB LG Philips LP133WF4-SPB1 (LGD04EF), , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP AU Optronics AUO272D, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung LTN133HL09-M01, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -3% | -21% | -3% | -8% | 6% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.8 | 65.5 -2% | 48.94 -27% | 65.3 -2% | 64.2 -4% | 66 -1% |
| sRGB Coverage | 86.3 | 83.8 -3% | 73.3 -15% | 82.9 -4% | 65.3 -24% | 95.5 11% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 63.1 | 61.3 -3% | 50.5 -20% | 60.6 -4% | 65.3 3% | 67.8 7% |
| Response Times | 331% | 14% | 8% | -11% | -27% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 48 ? | 28 ? 42% | 32.8 ? 32% | 45 ? 6% | 40 ? 17% | 49 ? -2% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 22.4 ? 30% | 33.2 ? -4% | 29 ? 9% | 22 ? 31% | 27 ? 16% |
| PWM Frequency | 1000 ? | 10200 ? 920% | 200 ? -80% | 50 ? -95% | ||
| Screen | -4% | 4% | 4% | 6% | 18% | |
| Brightness middle | 281 | 290 3% | 351.2 25% | 343 22% | 358 27% | 347 23% |
| Brightness | 264 | 270 2% | 325 23% | 306 16% | 347 31% | 334 27% |
| Brightness Distribution | 83 | 78 -6% | 89 7% | 81 -2% | 87 5% | 80 -4% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.32 -39% | 0.195 15% | 0.3 -30% | 0.26 -13% | 0.27 -17% |
| Contrast | 1222 | 906 -26% | 1801 47% | 1143 -6% | 1377 13% | 1285 5% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 4.83 | 4.8 1% | 7.4 -53% | 4.73 2% | 5.22 -8% | 3.29 32% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 8.89 | 11.2 -26% | 9.08 -2% | 9.05 -2% | 9.19 -3% | 4.69 47% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 6.63 | 2.8 58% | 6.71 -1% | 3.29 50% | 6.69 -1% | 3.62 45% |
| Gamma | 1.85 119% | 2.19 100% | 2.74 80% | 2.36 93% | 2.35 94% | 2.23 99% |
| CCT | 6794 96% | 6382 102% | 7222 90% | 6437 101% | 6745 96% | 7307 89% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 56 | 54.9 -2% | 50.48 -10% | 54 -4% | 59 5% | 62 11% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 86 | 83.5 -3% | 73.31 -15% | 83 -3% | 91 6% | 95 10% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 108% /
59% | -1% /
0% | 3% /
3% | -4% /
0% | -1% /
7% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 17 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 15 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 48 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 23 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 25 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 80 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 1000 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 1000 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 1000 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8774 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| PCMark 10 - Score | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3773 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4900 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 3282 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256 | Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN) | HP Envy 13-ad065nr SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006 | Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 193% | 40% | 14% | |||
| Read Seq | 1019 | 1577 55% | 1209 19% | 489.4 -52% | ||
| Write Seq | 195.4 | 1472 653% | 314 61% | 431.6 121% | ||
| Read 512 | 735 | 1165 59% | 356.7 -51% | |||
| Write 512 | 172.3 | 1244 622% | 389.1 126% | |||
| Read 4k | 34.5 | 54.8 59% | 43.4 26% | 26.68 -23% | ||
| Write 4k | 109.4 | 121.5 11% | 153.4 40% | 88.7 -19% | ||
| Read 4k QD32 | 494.6 | 407.5 -18% | 487.6 -1% | 246.3 -50% | ||
| Write 4k QD32 | 161.3 | 321.4 99% | 312.2 94% | 251.5 56% | ||
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -26% | 12% | ||||
| Write 4K | 155.7 | 57.5 -63% | 121.5 -22% | |||
| Read 4K | 26.5 | 29.34 11% | 24.92 -6% | |||
| Write Seq | 312.3 | 342.5 10% | 345 10% | |||
| Read Seq | 928 | 503 -46% | 1313 41% | |||
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 208.7 | 160.3 -23% | 346.1 66% | |||
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 478.8 | 285.7 -40% | 389.4 -19% | |||
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 305.1 | 330.8 8% | 334.7 10% | |||
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 1601 | 552 -66% | 1840 15% | |||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 193% /
193% | 40% /
40% | 14% /
14% | -26% /
-26% | 12% /
12% |
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 3588 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9800 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 2528 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| The Witcher 3 - 1366x768 Medium Graphics & Postprocessing | |
| Dell XPS 15 2017 9560 (7300HQ, Full-HD) | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP | |
| BioShock Infinite - 1366x768 High Preset | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng | |
| Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 | |
| Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U | |
| Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP | |
| HP Envy 13-ad065nr | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 173.9 | 94 | 79 | 29.72 |
| Company of Heroes 2 (2013) | 46.46 | 38.73 | 27.87 | 9.9 |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 45.13 | 27.64 | 14.47 | 9 |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 60 | 34.06 | 17 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 30.5 / 30.5 / 30.5 dB |
| Carga |
| 37.3 / 34.2 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 30.5 dB(A) | ||
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 36.1 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 281 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 33.4 °C / 92 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.4 °C / 72 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(±) Playing The Witcher 3, the average temperature for the upper side is 35 °C / 95 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 30.6 °C / 87.1 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-2.3 °C / -4.2 F).
HP Envy 13-ad006ng audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (70.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 27.6% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (9.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.1% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (3.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (20.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 61% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 30% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 48% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 43% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U audio analysis
(-) | not very loud speakers (66.8 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(+) | good bass - only 4.5% away from median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (14.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 10% similar, 50% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 28% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 64% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.46 / 0.52 Watt |
| Ocioso | 2.8 / 5.8 / 7.7 Watt |
| Carga |
48 / 48 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng i7-7500U, GeForce MX150, Toshiba NVMe THNSN5256GPUK, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Envy 13-ad065nr i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, SanDisk X400 SD8SN8U-128G-1006, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Micron SSD 1100 (MTFDDAV256TBN), IPS, LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG5 KXG50ZNV256G, IGZO IPS, 3200x1800, 13.3" | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, Samsung PM951 NVMe MZVLV256, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 17% | -10% | 2% | 0% | -10% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 2.8 | 2.8 -0% | 3.6 -29% | 3.5 -25% | 4.1 -46% | 4 -43% |
| Idle Average * | 5.8 | 5.8 -0% | 7.4 -28% | 6.6 -14% | 5.8 -0% | 6.6 -14% |
| Idle Maximum * | 7.7 | 6.4 17% | 8.7 -13% | 7.5 3% | 6 22% | 7.4 4% |
| Load Average * | 48 | 31.3 35% | 43 10% | 34.7 28% | 42.5 11% | 41.7 13% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 35 | |||||
| Load Maximum * | 48 | 31.7 34% | 42 12% | 39.6 17% | 41.4 14% | 52.4 -9% |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Envy 13-ad006ng i7-7500U, GeForce MX150, 51 Wh | HP Envy 13-ad065nr i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 53.6 Wh | Lenovo IdeaPad 710S Plus-13IKB i7-7500U, GeForce 940MX, 46 Wh | Asus Zenbook UX310UA-FC347T iGP i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Dell XPS 13 i7-8550U i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 60 Wh | Xiaomi Mi Notebook Air 13.3 2016 6200U, GeForce 940MX, 40 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | 22% | -35% | -0% | 17% | -22% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1198 | 1487 24% | 468 -61% | 966 -19% | 1108 -8% | 718 -40% |
| H.264 | 476 | 416 -13% | 423 -11% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 425 | 570 34% | 338 -20% | 577 36% | 589 39% | 389 -8% |
| Load | 118 | 127 8% | 89 -25% | 112 -5% | 143 21% | 83 -30% |
Pro
Contra
O Envy 13 da HP é um Ultrabook convencional de 13,3 polegadas projetado para competir com o Dell XPS 13 - também com o seu preço. No que diz respeito a esse objetivo elevado, o Envy fica para trás.
Há uma coisa que o XPS 13 não oferece: uma GPU dedicada. Essa é uma vantagem clara para a HP, dado que o MX150 será um fator decisivo para muitos clientes. O Envy faz muitas coisas muito bem: a qualidade de construção é excelente e o chassi é - graças aos marcos finos - muito compacto e atraente. O sistema de resfriamento também é muito capaz e tudo está bem quando se trata do nível de ruído e das temperaturas. A tela tem sua parcela de fraquezas, mas subjetivamente, parece muito boa, é muito nítida e oferece um bom contraste.
Entretanto, o brilho da tela não está no nível da concorrência. O que piora as coisas aqui é o fato de que não existe uma opção de painel mate, o que restringe a adequação para o uso em exteriores um pouco - um verdadeiro problema, considerando este é um subportátil. A seleção das portas também é inferior: gostaríamos de incluir a inclusão de HDMI, um slot de cartão SD de tamanho completo e o Thunderbolt 3. Não ficamos muito satisfeitos com o touchpad do Envy 13-ad065nr e nosso descontentamento continua aqui, dado que o teclado de vidro faz um barulho notável. Outra desvantagem potencial do sistema de alto desempenho é o fato de que o afogamento térmico ocorre durante o teste de estresse. Este afogamento poderia ocorrer potencialmente durante o uso regular também.
Às vezes, o original é simplesmente melhor: não podemos realmente apresentar motivos suficientes para recomendar o HP Envy 13 sobre o Dell XPS 13.
Apesar dessas falhas, o Envy 13 não é um portátil ruim. Além do preço ligeiramente mais baixo e da GPU dedicada, simplesmente não encontramos muitos argumentos para o Envy. O Dell XPS é superior e melhor quando se trata das portas físicas, do brilho da tela e da duração da bateria. Nossa configuração também já está desatualizada - um sucessor com Core i7-8550U já está disponível. Por esse motivo, não podemos realmente recomendar a nossa versão específica. Os usuários interessados no Envy 13 devem procurar um modelo com os mais novos componentes de hardware.
HP Envy 13-ad006ng
-
10/17/2017 v6 (old)
Benjamin Herzig
Price comparison
