Breve Análise do Portátil HP Elitebook Folio 1040 G4 (FHD, 7820HQ)
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 295.9 cd/m²
Contraste: 1287:1 (Preto: 0.23 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.83 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 5.2 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
63% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
69% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.1% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.8% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.28
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT Chi Mei CMN14D7, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 B140HAN03_1, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 B140QAN01.5, IPS, 14", 2560x1440 | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 AUO1136, IPS, 14", 2560x1440 | Toshiba Tecra X40-D Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 14", 1920x1080 | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) IGZO IPS, 15.6", 3840x2160 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -10% | 1% | 1% | -38% | 27% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 66.8 | 61.4 -8% | 69 3% | 67.9 2% | 40.55 -39% | 89.7 34% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.1 | 85.9 -12% | 95.1 -2% | 96.8 0% | 61 -37% | 100 3% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 69 | 62.4 -10% | 69.6 1% | 70 1% | 41.89 -39% | 100 45% |
| Response Times | -13% | -16% | -12% | -7% | -64% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 34.4 ? | 41.6 ? -21% | 46.4 ? -35% | 46.4 ? -35% | 38 ? -10% | 57.2 ? -66% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 31.6 ? -5% | 28.8 ? 4% | 26.4 ? 12% | 26.8 ? 11% | 39.2 ? -31% |
| PWM Frequency | 26040 ? | 20410 ? -22% | 962 -96% | |||
| Screen | -16% | -24% | -10% | -42% | -10% | |
| Brightness middle | 295.9 | 311 5% | 327 11% | 327 11% | 283.9 -4% | 370.1 25% |
| Brightness | 287 | 288 0% | 311 8% | 316 10% | 261 -9% | 356 24% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 85 -2% | 88 1% | 87 0% | 85 -2% | 87 0% |
| Black Level * | 0.23 | 0.24 -4% | 0.25 -9% | 0.35 -52% | 0.25 -9% | 0.37 -61% |
| Contrast | 1287 | 1296 1% | 1308 2% | 934 -27% | 1136 -12% | 1000 -22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.83 | 5.5 -94% | 6.1 -116% | 4.39 -55% | 6.4 -126% | 5.3 -87% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.34 | 9 -23% | 12.2 -66% | 7.27 1% | 18.7 -155% | 9.9 -35% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 5.2 | 6.2 -19% | 8.8 -69% | 4.69 10% | 6.3 -21% | 4.6 12% |
| Gamma | 2.28 96% | 2.02 109% | 2.18 101% | 2.15 102% | 2.39 92% | 2.31 95% |
| CCT | 7056 92% | 5950 109% | 6172 105% | 7101 92% | 6511 100% | 6284 103% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 63 | 55.96 -11% | 61.56 -2% | 62.52 -1% | 38 -40% | 88.3 40% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 85.77 -12% | 94.88 -2% | 96.71 0% | 60 -38% | 100 3% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -13% /
-14% | -13% /
-18% | -7% /
-8% | -29% /
-35% | -16% /
-13% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 11.2 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 34.4 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 16.4 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 18 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 44 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is similar to the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26040 Hz | ≤ 59 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 26040 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 59 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26040 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8705 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R10 | |
| Rendering Multiple CPUs 32Bit | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Rendering Single 32Bit | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| wPrime 2.10 - 1024m | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p PL | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 10 | |
| Score | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Essentials | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Productivity | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Digital Content Creation | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 4186 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 5275 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 5161 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4043 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p PL Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Toshiba Tecra X40-D Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 84% | -7% | 56% | 39% | 47% | 9% | 99% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 394.2 | 1145 190% | 617 57% | 540 37% | 413.9 5% | 1134 188% | ||
| Copy Program MB/s | 133.7 | 467.9 250% | 348.7 161% | 411.5 208% | 106.2 -21% | 534 299% | ||
| Copy ISO MB/s | 534 | 1725 223% | 1313 146% | 1272 138% | 755 41% | 1936 263% | ||
| Score Total | 2299 | 3171 38% | 1855 -19% | 3721 62% | 3576 56% | 2810 22% | 2427 6% | 3781 64% |
| Score Write | 848 | 1207 42% | 737 -13% | 590 -30% | 675 -20% | 1022 21% | 879 4% | 1556 83% |
| Score Read | 979 | 1322 35% | 745 -24% | 2095 114% | 1963 101% | 1206 23% | 1049 7% | 1493 53% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.038 | 0.027 29% | 0.036 5% | 0.03 21% | 0.028 26% | 0.034 11% | 0.034 11% | 0.026 32% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.105 | 0.028 73% | 0.083 21% | 0.047 55% | 0.061 42% | 0.034 68% | 0.054 49% | 0.04 62% |
| 4K-64 Write | 662 | 905 37% | 542 -18% | 344.3 -48% | 438.4 -34% | 789 19% | 687 4% | 1262 91% |
| 4K-64 Read | 782 | 1022 31% | 568 -27% | 1858 138% | 1663 113% | 962 23% | 828 6% | 1206 54% |
| 4K Write | 100.1 | 151.1 51% | 101.5 1% | 126.6 26% | 124.8 25% | 112.2 12% | 93.8 -6% | 141.1 41% |
| 4K Read | 38.49 | 56.8 48% | 41 7% | 47.72 24% | 51.6 34% | 41.34 7% | 35.88 -7% | 51.9 35% |
| Seq Write | 863 | 1506 75% | 940 9% | 1190 38% | 1117 29% | 1207 40% | 977 13% | 1530 77% |
| Seq Read | 1585 | 2434 54% | 1360 -14% | 1839 16% | 2479 56% | 2026 28% | 1852 17% | 2342 48% |
* ... smaller is better
| 3DMark 11 | |
| 1280x720 Performance GPU | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p PL | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| 1280x720 Performance Combined | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p PL | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| 3DMark | |
| 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p PL | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| 1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p PL | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
| Toshiba Tecra X40-D | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| 1920x1080 Ice Storm Extreme Graphics | |
| Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p PL | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| 3DMark 06 Standard Score | 12419 pontos | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1980 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9244 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1102 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 2 | |
| HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470p PL | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE | |
| Ashes of the Singularity - 1280x768 low | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| Civilization VI | |
| 1024x768 Minimum Preset | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| 1366x768 Medium Preset | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 79 | 35 | 30 | |
| Ashes of the Singularity (2016) | 10 | |||
| Civilization VI (2016) | 42 | 16 |
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 28.2 / 28.2 / 28.2 dB |
| Carga |
| 33.3 / 35.3 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  BK Precision 732A (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.2 dB(A) | ||
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT HD Graphics 630, i7-7820HQ, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7500U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p PL GeForce 940MX, i7-7700HQ, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0) | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE HD Graphics 620, i5-7200U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Toshiba Tecra X40-D HD Graphics 620, i7-7600U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-7700HQ, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11 | Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB UHD Graphics 620, i5-8550U, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK) | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 GeForce MX150, i5-8550U, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP | Microsoft Surface Book 2 GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, i7-8650U, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) Radeon Pro 560, i7-7820HQ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -7% | -10% | -7% | 1% | -3% | -2% | -16% | -5% | -8% | -8% | -9% | |
| off / environment * | 28.2 | 29.3 -4% | 28.9 -2% | 28 1% | 29.1 -3% | 28 1% | 28.4 -1% | 30.5 -8% | 28.4 -1% | 29.4 -4% | 30.8 -9% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 28.2 | 29.3 -4% | 30 -6% | 28.9 -2% | 28 1% | 29.1 -3% | 28 1% | 29 -3% | 30.5 -8% | 28.4 -1% | 29.4 -4% | 31 -10% |
| Idle Average * | 28.2 | 29.3 -4% | 31.4 -11% | 28.9 -2% | 28 1% | 29.1 -3% | 28 1% | 29 -3% | 30.5 -8% | 28.4 -1% | 29.4 -4% | 31 -10% |
| Idle Maximum * | 28.2 | 32.2 -14% | 32.7 -16% | 30.1 -7% | 29.4 -4% | 29.1 -3% | 28.2 -0% | 32.2 -14% | 30.5 -8% | 28.4 -1% | 29.4 -4% | 31 -10% |
| Load Average * | 33.3 | 34.3 -3% | 34.4 -3% | 39.2 -18% | 31.4 6% | 32.6 2% | 33.2 -0% | 47.1 -41% | 32.8 2% | 41.6 -25% | 31.4 6% | 31.3 6% |
| Load Maximum * | 35.3 | 39.3 -11% | 39.5 -12% | 39.2 -11% | 34.6 2% | 37.8 -7% | 39.9 -13% | 47.1 -33% | 34.7 2% | 41.6 -18% | 49 -39% | 41.8 -18% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 52 | 36.1 | 49 |
* ... smaller is better
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41.6 °C / 107 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 48.4 °C / 119 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 22.8 °C / 73 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-0.2 °C / -0.3 F).
HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 12.4% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (13.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.2% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (11.6% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 2% of all tested devices in this class were better, 1% similar, 97% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 6% of all tested devices were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (78.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (8.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.9% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 3.8% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (6% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (16.3% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 16% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 78% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 24% of all tested devices were better, 5% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Toshiba Tecra X40-D audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (77.3 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.2% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 3.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.7% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(±) | higher highs - on average 5.6% higher than median
(+) | highs are linear (5.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (22% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 53% of all tested devices in this class were better, 9% similar, 38% worse
» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 60% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 33% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
| desligado | 0.51 / 0.85 Watt |
| Ocioso | 5.1 / 7 / 11.7 Watt |
| Carga |
41.2 / 56.9 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT i7-7820HQ, HD Graphics 630, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p PL i7-7700HQ, GeForce 940MX, Toshiba NVMe THNSF5512GPUK, , 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM961 1TB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVLW1T0), IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e, IPS, 2560x1440, 14" | Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Lite-On CX2-8B512-Q11, IGZO IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG4 NVMe (THNSN5512GPUK), IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, Samsung PM961 NVMe MZVLW512HMJP, IPS, 3840x2160, 15.6" | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, Samsung PM961 MZVLW256HEHP, IPS, 3000x2000, 13.5" | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) i7-7820HQ, Radeon Pro 560, , , 2880x1800, 15.4" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | 15% | -31% | 4% | 32% | -2% | 25% | -114% | 14% | -69% | -44% | -51% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 5.1 | 3.84 25% | 3.9 24% | 4.64 9% | 3.21 37% | 6.3 -24% | 5.2 -2% | 11.9 -133% | 3.8 25% | 11.6 -127% | 4.7 8% | 3.7 27% |
| Idle Average * | 7 | 6.3 10% | 9.4 -34% | 8.93 -28% | 6.15 12% | 9.4 -34% | 6.9 1% | 17.1 -144% | 8.4 -20% | 13.8 -97% | 10.6 -51% | 16.2 -131% |
| Idle Maximum * | 11.7 | 8.6 26% | 12.2 -4% | 9.12 22% | 6.82 42% | 10.1 14% | 7 40% | 17.3 -48% | 9.7 17% | 14.2 -21% | 12.3 -5% | 18 -54% |
| Load Average * | 41.2 | 41.9 -2% | 73.3 -78% | 42.2 -2% | 28.5 31% | 33.3 19% | 24.6 40% | 94.7 -130% | 36 13% | 67.9 -65% | 81 -97% | 58.4 -42% |
| Load Maximum * | 56.9 | 48.7 14% | 93.4 -64% | 47.3 17% | 34.5 39% | 49.5 13% | 30.1 47% | 122 -114% | 36 37% | 76.9 -35% | 100.3 -76% | 89.6 -57% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 104.8 | 59 | 97 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT i7-7820HQ, HD Graphics 630, 67 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon 2017-20HQS03P00 i7-7500U, HD Graphics 620, 57 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470p PL i7-7700HQ, GeForce 940MX, 48 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470s-20HGS00V00 i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 51 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad T470-20HD002HGE i5-7200U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 6300U, HD Graphics 520, 45.6 Wh | Toshiba Tecra X40-D i7-7600U, HD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Dell XPS 15 9560 (i7-7700HQ, UHD) i7-7700HQ, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 97 Wh | Lenovo Yoga 720-13IKB i5-8550U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | HP Spectre x360 15t-bl100 i5-8550U, GeForce MX150, 79.2 Wh | Microsoft Surface Book 2 i7-8650U, GeForce GTX 1050 Mobile, 75 Wh | Apple MacBook Pro 15 2017 (2.9 GHz, 560) i7-7820HQ, Radeon Pro 560, Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -6% | -45% | -27% | -10% | -26% | -17% | -22% | -30% | -4% | 36% | -14% | |
| Reader / Idle | 1349 | 1252 -7% | 737 -45% | 787 -42% | 530 -61% | 876 -35% | 831 -38% | 934 -31% | 1469 9% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 665 | 496 -25% | 417 -37% | 438 -34% | 309 -54% | 357 -46% | 434 -35% | 466 -30% | 511 -23% | 663 0% | 677 2% | |
| Load | 96 | 110 15% | 93 -3% | 110 15% | 131 36% | 126 31% | 103 7% | 136 42% | 190 98% | 67 -30% | ||
| WiFi | 304 | |||||||||||
| Witcher 3 ultra | 230 | 76 |
Pro
Contra
O HP EliteBook 1040 G4 aloja componentes poderosos em um belo chassi. A opção para uma CPU quad-core de 45 W pode ser uma benção para os profissionais que precisam de mais energia do que o oferecido pelos chips dual-core de 15 W tipicamente usados em portáteis empresariais. Os alto-falantes são fantásticos e perfeitamente ajustados para teleconferências, e a bateria pode literalmente durar o dia inteiro e carregar muito rapidamente. A HP se propus fazer o portátil "guerreiro da estrada" e conseguiu... quase.
É desconcertante que um portátil voltado para chamadas e videoconferências de Skype tenha uma webcam tão medíocre, por exemplo. Além disso, a luz de fundo da tela é desigual nas configurações mais altas; os cantos inferiores são mais escuros do que os cantos superiores, o que pode ser uma distração para os usuários mais exigentes. O teclado também é apenas médio e está aquém das ofertas mais satisfatórias no mercado. Finalmente, a ausência de uma GPU dedicada, mesmo uma de baixa potência, é uma oportunidade perdida. O Core i7-7820HQ parece um pouco desperdiçado sem mais potência gráfica para apoiá-lo.
A outra coisa ruim é o Kaby Lake-R. Os novos chips da 8ª geração trazem quatro núcleos para a linha de CPU de 15 W, oferecendo potência similar em um design muito mais energeticamente eficiente. A arquitetura ainda é muito nova para uma comparação definitiva, mas o Kaby Lake-R provavelmente poderá atingir um nível de desempenho similar com muito menos produção de calor e ainda menos pressão sobre a duração da bateria.
Então, como o Elitebook Folio 1040 G4 se compara a outros portáteis empresariais de 14 polegadas como o X1 Carbon e linhas Latitude ? Não há dúvida de que a HP atualmente traz o aparelho mais potente neste mercado. O quad-core i7-7820HQ está a milhas de vantagem dos concorrentes. No entanto, esta liderança provavelmente terminará quando a Dell e a Lenovo lançarem versões atualizadas de suas máquinas com o quad-cores silicon de 8va geração da Intel. O 1040 G4 provavelmente ainda será mais poderoso, mas esta potência virá a um custo de duração de bateria comparativamente mais baixa.
Além disso, os concorrentes da Lenovo e Dell oferecem opções de manutenção muito melhores e os melhores teclados da classe. Estas são duas áreas em que o 1040 G4 se compromete. Os potenciais compradores terão de considerar quanto poder de processamento eles realmente precisam e determinar se esse empurrão extra vale algumas falhas em outras áreas. Dito isto, o 1040 G4 não é uma má máquina nestes aspectos; simplesmente fica aquém da sua concorrência.
Se você é um viajante frequente que gasta uma quantidade significativa de tempo em teleconferências e precisa de um poder computacional importante, o HP Elitebook 1040 G4 é uma boa escolha. Você pode querer investir em uma webcam dedicada.
HP Elitebook 1040 G4-2XU40UT
- 12/26/2017 v6 (old)
Sam Medley
Price comparison
