Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook x360 830 G6: O conversível da HP impressiona em quase todo sentido
Os Top 10
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Multimídia
» Os Top 10 Portáteis de Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Leves para Jogos
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Acessíveis de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 Portáteis Premium de Escritório/Empresariais
» Os Top 10 dos Portáteis Workstation
» Os Top 10 Subportáteis
» Os Top 10 Ultrabooks
» Os Top 10 Conversíveis
» Os Top 10 Tablets
» Os Top 10 Smartphones
» A melhores Telas de Portáteis Analisadas Pela Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos portáteis abaixo dos 500 Euros da Notebookcheck
» Top 10 dos Portáteis abaixo dos 300 Euros
|
iluminação: 69 %
iluminação com acumulador: 601 cd/m²
Contraste: 2319:1 (Preto: 0.26 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 2.2 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.5
ΔE Greyscale 2.6 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
93.6% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
60.2% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
95.3% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
66.1% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.17
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 M133NVFC R5, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3-4QZ12ES M133NVF3 R1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 LP133WF7-SPA1, , 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 SHP14A2, , 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Display | -2% | 0% | 4% | |
Display P3 Coverage | 66.1 | 65.3 -1% | 65.2 -1% | 68.6 4% |
sRGB Coverage | 95.3 | 92.6 -3% | 97 2% | 99.6 5% |
AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.5 | 66.4 -2% | 67.3 0% | 70 4% |
Response Times | 645% | -19% | 7% | |
Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 44 ? | 34.4 ? 22% | 59.2 ? -35% | 56 ? -27% |
Response Time Black / White * | 30 ? | 23.2 ? 23% | 30.8 ? -3% | 38 ? -27% |
PWM Frequency | 952 ? | 18940 ? 1889% | 1667 ? 75% | |
Screen | -26% | -39% | -7% | |
Brightness middle | 603 | 668 11% | 319 -47% | 277.2 -54% |
Brightness | 692 | 685 -1% | 306 -56% | 263 -62% |
Brightness Distribution | 69 | 86 25% | 90 30% | 83 20% |
Black Level * | 0.26 | 0.52 -100% | 0.15 42% | 0.2 23% |
Contrast | 2319 | 1285 -45% | 2127 -8% | 1386 -40% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 2.2 | 3.5 -59% | 6.1 -177% | 2.1 5% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 7.7 | 8.3 -8% | 9.7 -26% | 5.91 23% |
Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.5 | 2.2 -47% | 1 33% | 1.03 31% |
Greyscale dE 2000 * | 2.6 | 4.2 -62% | 8.6 -231% | 3.4 -31% |
Gamma | 2.17 101% | 2.21 100% | 2.62 84% | 2.241 98% |
CCT | 6412 101% | 6207 105% | 6613 98% | 6030 108% |
Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 60.2 | 60.9 1% | 61.9 3% | 64 6% |
Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 93.6 | 92.5 -1% | 96.8 3% | 100 7% |
Total Average (Program / Settings) | 206% /
97% | -19% /
-29% | 1% /
-2% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
---|---|---|
30 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 14 ms rise | |
↘ 16 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 78 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
44 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 18.8 ms rise | |
↘ 25.2 ms fall | ||
The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 71 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). |
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
Screen flickering / PWM detected | 952 Hz | ≤ 100 % brightness setting | |
The display backlight flickers at 952 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 100 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 952 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. |
PCMark 8 | |
Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
Average of class Convertible (4435 - 5830, n=4, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3-4QZ12ES | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (2577 - 4179, n=20) | |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 | |
Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 | |
Average of class Convertible (2921 - 6089, n=4, last 2 years) | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3-4QZ12ES | |
Average Intel Core i7-8565U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3596 - 5189, n=19) | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 |
PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3196 pontos | |
PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4421 pontos | |
PCMark 10 Score | 3567 pontos | |
Ajuda |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G | Average WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | 12% | 26% | -35% | 12% | |
Write 4K | 122.8 | 120 -2% | 144.1 17% | 35.06 -71% | 130.1 ? 6% |
Read 4K | 46.89 | 43.42 -7% | 63.5 35% | 23.64 -50% | 44.1 ? -6% |
Write Seq | 1801 | 1814 1% | 1496 -17% | 1537 -15% | 2151 ? 19% |
Read Seq | 1014 | 2227 120% | 2677 164% | 1782 76% | 1295 ? 28% |
Write 4K Q32T1 | 333.7 | 391.8 17% | 357.4 7% | 100.3 -70% | 390 ? 17% |
Read 4K Q32T1 | 314.4 | 288.7 -8% | 482.3 53% | 62.7 -80% | 418 ? 33% |
Write Seq Q32T1 | 2784 | 1860 -33% | 1558 -44% | 2698 -3% | 2790 ? 0% |
Read Seq Q32T1 | 3261 | 3376 4% | 3021 -7% | 1073 -67% | 3338 ? 2% |
3DMark | |
1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Graphics | |
Average of class Convertible (2965 - 154219, n=44, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3-4QZ12ES | |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (6205 - 16400, n=225) | |
1920x1080 Fire Strike Graphics | |
Average of class Convertible (365 - 29684, n=62, last 2 years) | |
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 | |
Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 | |
Average Intel UHD Graphics 620 (557 - 2608, n=213) | |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 |
3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 8104 pontos | |
3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1025 pontos | |
Ajuda |
baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
---|---|---|---|---|
BioShock Infinite (2013) | 71.7 | 37.3 | 31.3 | 9.9 |
The Witcher 3 (2015) | 15.3 | |||
Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 71 | 44.8 | 18.9 | 17.2 |
Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 21.9 | |||
X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 25.4 | 16.4 | 14.9 |
Barulho
Ocioso |
| 28.8 / 28.8 / 32.2 dB |
Carga |
| 32.2 / 34.4 dB |
| ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min: , med: , max: Audix TM1, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 28.8 dB(A) |
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 35.1 °C / 95 F, compared to the average of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 19.6 to 60 °C for the class Convertible.
(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 43.3 °C / 110 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.8 °C / 77 F, compared to the device average of 30.3 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 28 °C / 82.4 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.1 °C / 82.6 F (+0.1 °C / 0.2 F).
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (75.2 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 16.7% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (11.4% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 4.1% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.3% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (18.8% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 41% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 40% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 53% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (74.1 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(-) | nearly no bass - on average 15.8% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.6% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(±) | higher mids - on average 6.5% higher than median
(±) | linearity of mids is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2.8% away from median
(±) | linearity of highs is average (11% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (24% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 71% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 6%, average was 21%, worst was 57%
Compared to all devices tested
» 69% of all tested devices were better, 7% similar, 24% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
desligado | 0.41 / 0.79 Watt |
Ocioso | 4.4 / 8 / 10.6 Watt |
Carga |
34.6 / 68.2 Watt |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy |
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB512HAJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, Intel SSD Pro 7600p SSDPEKKF512G8L, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, Toshiba XG6 KXG60ZNV512G, IPS, 1920x1080, 14" | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Power Consumption | 8% | 6% | 25% | |
Idle Minimum * | 4.4 | 3.4 23% | 3.46 21% | 2.6 41% |
Idle Average * | 8 | 7.6 5% | 5.88 26% | 4.3 46% |
Idle Maximum * | 10.6 | 11.5 -8% | 9.12 14% | 5.5 48% |
Load Average * | 34.6 | 35.4 -2% | 45.6 -32% | 32 8% |
Load Maximum * | 68.2 | 51.9 24% | 65.9 3% | 78.8 -16% |
* ... smaller is better
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 53 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 1030 G3 45X96UT i7-8650U, UHD Graphics 620, 56.2 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga-20NQS05R00 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 50 Wh | Dell Latitude 7400 2-in-1 i7-8665U, UHD Graphics 620, 78 Wh | Average of class Convertible | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Battery Runtime | 1% | -20% | 25% | 0% | |
H.264 | 640 | 600 -6% | 773 ? 21% | ||
WiFi v1.3 | 586 | 589 1% | 492 -16% | 732 25% | 594 ? 1% |
Load | 146 | 91 -38% | 114.9 ? -21% |
Pro
Contra
Com o EliteBook x360 830 G6, a HP criou um portátil conversível excelente para usuários empresariais. O recurso central deste modelo certamente é a tela táctil SureView extremamente brilhante e mate, que infelizmente não atinge os prometidos 1000 cd/m² - mas ainda é extremamente brilhante com 700 cd/m². Além da tela, a HP mal comete erros: O chassi de alumínio é muito robusto e bem feito, os dispositivos de entrada são confortáveis, o EliteBook 830 possui uma infinidade de portas e recursos de segurança e, com os dois slots de RAM, o portátil compacto da HP é bastante atualizável. Os alto-falantes são comparativamente bons, o portátil HP não esquenta e a duração da bateria é ótima. Notável também é a longa garantia.
No entanto, o HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 não está livre de problemas. Por exemplo, o desempenho da CPU é pior em comparação com os concorrentes. Além disso, temos que reclamar d ruído da bobina. O HP EliteBook também possui um leitor de cartões (micro) SD e um TrackPoint. Estranhamente, a caneta bloqueia as portas USB C quando é montada no chassi. Por fim, acreditamos que a estabilidade dos ângulos de visão da tela deveria ser melhor quando o SureView estiver desativado. A perda de brilho é muito aparente.
Rico em recursos combinado com qualidade premium: É isso que o HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 oferece.
Em suma, o HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 é uma excelente opção, não apenas para usuários empresariais, mas também para consumidores que desejam um cavalo de trabalho confiável. Ele está muito bem equipado para competir com o Lenovo ThinkPad X390 Yoga.
HP EliteBook x360 830 G6
- 09/30/2019 v7 (old)
Benjamin Herzig