Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 840 G3
T9X59ET (EliteBook 840 Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-6500U 2 x 2.5 - 3.1 GHz, Skylake
Placa gráfica
Intel HD Graphics 520, Análises do: 1050 MHz, shared Memory, 20.19.15.4331
Memória
8 GB
, DDR4, 2133 MHz, Dual-Channel, ambos slots em uso
Pantalha
14.00 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, Chi Mei CMN14C0, TN LED, Brilhante: não
placa mãe
Intel Skylake-U Premium PCH
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP, 256 GB
, 164 GB livre
peso
1.58 kg, Suprimento de energia: 164 g
Preço
1695 €
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chi Mei CMN14C0 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 366 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 335.9 cd/m²iluminação: 87 %
iluminação com acumulador: 346 cd/m²
Contraste: 563:1 (Preto: 0.65 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 10.26 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.91
ΔE Greyscale 11.51 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
74% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
47% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
50.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
73.7% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
48.93% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.4
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD FHD 1920x1080 TN | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 WQHD 2560x1440 IPS Touch | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20F9003SGE FHD 1920x1080 IPS | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE WQHD 2560x1440 IPS | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 WQHD 2560x1440 IPS | Acer TravelMate P645-S-58HK FHD 1920x1080 IPS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | 35% | -15% | 37% | 36% | 30% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 48.93 | 67.2 37% | 41.65 -15% | 68.7 40% | 67.9 39% | 66.7 36% |
| sRGB Coverage | 73.7 | 95.9 30% | 61.6 -16% | 98.1 33% | 96.8 31% | 90.8 23% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 50.5 | 69.3 37% | 43.14 -15% | 70.4 39% | 70 39% | 66.5 32% |
| Response Times | -10% | -8% | 3% | -7% | ||
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 43 ? | 48 ? -12% | 42 ? 2% | 35.6 ? 17% | 46.4 ? -8% | |
| Response Time Black / White * | 25 ? | 27 ? -8% | 29.2 ? -17% | 29.2 ? -17% | 26.4 ? -6% | |
| PWM Frequency | 204 ? | 220 ? 8% | ||||
| Screen | 46% | 14% | 29% | 31% | 25% | |
| Brightness middle | 366 | 380 4% | 226 -38% | 257 -30% | 327 -11% | 331 -10% |
| Brightness | 336 | 354 5% | 211 -37% | 248 -26% | 316 -6% | 309 -8% |
| Brightness Distribution | 87 | 81 -7% | 89 2% | 94 8% | 87 0% | 82 -6% |
| Black Level * | 0.65 | 0.26 60% | 0.22 66% | 0.26 60% | 0.35 46% | 0.4 38% |
| Contrast | 563 | 1462 160% | 1027 82% | 988 75% | 934 66% | 828 47% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 10.26 | 3.11 70% | 6.44 37% | 4.59 55% | 4.39 57% | 4.07 60% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 11.51 | 4.35 62% | 5.87 49% | 6.38 45% | 4.69 59% | 4.86 58% |
| Gamma | 2.4 92% | 2.37 93% | 2.37 93% | 2.51 88% | 2.15 102% | 2.49 88% |
| CCT | 12725 51% | 6771 96% | 6856 95% | 6238 104% | 7101 92% | 6109 106% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 47 | 62 32% | 39.58 -16% | 65 38% | 62.52 33% | 59 26% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 74 | 96 30% | 61.15 -17% | 98 32% | 96.71 31% | 90.6 22% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 6.73 | 17.18 | 9.72 | 7.27 | ||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 24% /
36% | -3% /
5% | 23% /
25% | 20% /
26% | 28% /
27% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 9 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows relatively slow response rates in our tests and may be too slow for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 55 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (20.9 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 43 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 20 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 23 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 68 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.8 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 204 Hz | ≤ 90 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 204 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 90 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 204 Hz is relatively low, so sensitive users will likely notice flickering and experience eyestrain at the stated brightness setting and below. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8715 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
| Cinebench R15 | |
| CPU Single 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| Acer TravelMate P645-S-58HK | |
| CPU Multi 64Bit (sort by value) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| Acer TravelMate P645-S-58HK | |
| PCMark 8 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| Acer TravelMate P645-S-58HK | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 (sort by value) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| Acer TravelMate P645-S-58HK | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3231 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4275 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM851 M.2 2280 256GB | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512) | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Acer TravelMate P645-S-58HK HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3256GD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CrystalDiskMark 3.0 | 18% | 285% | 246% | 10% | |
| Read Seq | 497.8 | 518 4% | 1778 257% | 1649 231% | 506 2% |
| Write Seq | 241.4 | 300.7 25% | 1530 534% | 1265 424% | 343.2 42% |
| Read 4k | 27.02 | 36.32 34% | 51.3 90% | 53.3 97% | 28.73 6% |
| Write 4k | 82.6 | 110.9 34% | 139.3 69% | 159.9 94% | 66.4 -20% |
| Read 512 | 396 | 470.8 19% | 1339 238% | 1252 216% | 336.8 -15% |
| Write 512 | 241.8 | 214 -11% | 1506 523% | 1244 414% | 346.8 43% |
| AS SSD | 7% | 202% | 223% | -2% | |
| Seq Read | 505 | 495.5 -2% | 2039 304% | 1839 264% | 502 -1% |
| Seq Write | 231.6 | 283.7 22% | 1407 508% | 1190 414% | 324.6 40% |
| 4K Read | 25.24 | 30.91 22% | 45.41 80% | 47.72 89% | 31.82 26% |
| 4K Write | 72.4 | 85.1 18% | 114.4 58% | 126.6 75% | 58 -20% |
| 4K-64 Read | 362 | 336.1 -7% | 968 167% | 1858 413% | 194.7 -46% |
| 4K-64 Write | 190.6 | 170 -11% | 366 92% | 344.3 81% | 169.2 -11% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | 13% /
12% | 244% /
243% | 235% /
234% | 4% /
4% |
Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP
Sequential Read:
497.8 MB/s
Sequential Write:
241.4 MB/s
512K Read:
396 MB/s
512K Write:
241.8 MB/s
4K Read:
27.02 MB/s
4K Write:
82.6 MB/s
4K QD32 Read:
388.5 MB/s
4K QD32 Write:
242.8 MB/s
| 3DMark 11 - 1280x720 Performance (sort by value) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| Acer TravelMate P645-S-58HK | |
| 3DMark - 1280x720 Cloud Gate Standard Score (sort by value) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T450s-20BWS1UT00 | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| Acer TravelMate P645-S-58HK | |
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 1468 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 5346 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 751 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| BioShock Infinite - 1280x720 Very Low Preset (sort by value) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| Dell XPS 13 2016 i7 256GB QHD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| The Witcher 3 - 1024x768 Low Graphics & Postprocessing (sort by value) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1024x768 Lowest Preset (sort by value) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| Dell Latitude 14 E5470 | |
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BioShock Infinite (2013) | 44 | 22.6 | 18.5 | |
| The Witcher 3 (2015) | 8.3 | 6.1 | ||
| Rise of the Tomb Raider (2016) | 10.9 | 8 |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM851 M.2 2280 256GB | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512) | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Acer TravelMate P645-S-58HK HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3256GD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | 6% | 6% | 8% | 6% | |
| off / environment * | 31.2 | 31.2 -0% | 29.2 6% | 29.1 7% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 31.2 | 31.2 -0% | 29.2 6% | 29.1 7% | 29.6 5% |
| Idle Average * | 32.1 | 31.2 3% | 29.2 9% | 29.1 9% | 29.6 8% |
| Idle Maximum * | 33.1 | 31.2 6% | 29.2 12% | 29.1 12% | 30.2 9% |
| Load Average * | 36.2 | 31.9 12% | 33.7 7% | 32.6 10% | 35.6 2% |
| Load Maximum * | 37.8 | 31.9 16% | 38.5 -2% | 37.8 -0% | 35.9 5% |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 31.2 / 32.1 / 33.1 dB |
| DVD |
| 0 / dB |
| Carga |
| 36.2 / 37.8 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Audix TM1 Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 31.2 dB(A) | ||
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM851 M.2 2280 256GB | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512) | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Acer TravelMate P645-S-58HK HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3256GD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Heat | 1% | -9% | -21% | -12% | |
| Maximum Upper Side * | 37 | 38.2 -3% | 40.8 -10% | 43.2 -17% | 41.6 -12% |
| Maximum Bottom * | 37.1 | 36.5 2% | 40.3 -9% | 47.1 -27% | 41.7 -12% |
| Idle Upper Side * | 25.3 | 25.1 1% | 27.6 -9% | 30.5 -21% | 30.6 -21% |
| Idle Bottom * | 26.6 | 25.8 3% | 28.7 -8% | 31.5 -18% | 27.5 -3% |
* ... smaller is better
(+) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 31.3 °C / 88 F, compared to the average of 29.5 °C / 85 F for the devices in the class Office.
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-0.2 °C / -0.3 F).
(+) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 34.3 °C / 94 F, ranging from 21.2 to 62.5 °C for the class Office.
(+) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 37.1 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of 36.8 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 29.5 °C / 85 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 27.8 °C / 82 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(±) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 27.6 °C / 81.7 F (-0.2 °C / -0.3 F).
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD HD Graphics 520, 6500U, Samsung SSD PM851 256 GB MZNTE256HMHP | Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD PM851 M.2 2280 256GB | Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE HD Graphics 520, 6600U, Samsung SSD SM951a 512GB M.2 PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe (MZVKV512) | HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 HD Graphics 520, 6300U, Samsung SM951 MZVPV256HDGL m.2 PCI-e | Acer TravelMate P645-S-58HK HD Graphics 5500, 5200U, Kingston RBU-SNS8100S3256GD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -26% | -19% | -47% | -1% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.8 | 5.1 -34% | 3.8 -0% | 6.3 -66% | 3.2 16% |
| Idle Average * | 6.3 | 8.5 -35% | 7.1 -13% | 9.4 -49% | 6.3 -0% |
| Idle Maximum * | 6.8 | 10.1 -49% | 7.8 -15% | 10.1 -49% | 8.6 -26% |
| Load Average * | 34.4 | 35.2 -2% | 36.3 -6% | 33.3 3% | 30.3 12% |
| Load Maximum * | 28.3 | 31 -10% | 46 -63% | 49.5 -75% | 30.4 -7% |
* ... smaller is better
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.36 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.8 / 6.3 / 6.8 Watt |
| Carga |
34.4 / 28.3 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| Battery Runtime | |
| Reader / Idle (sort by value) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| Acer TravelMate P645-S-58HK | |
| WiFi v1.3 (sort by value) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| Acer TravelMate P645-S-58HK | |
| Load (sort by value) | |
| HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD | |
| Dell Latitude 14 7000 Series E7470 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad T460s-20FA003GGE | |
| HP EliteBook Folio 1040 G3 | |
| Acer TravelMate P645-S-58HK | |
Pro
+ Chassi resistente
+ Boa qualidade de construção
+ Excelentes dispositivos de entrada
+ Bom desempenho de aplicativos
+ Longas durações da bateria
+ Slot M.2 livre
+ Preparado para um modem LTE/3G
+ 3 anos de garantiay
Contra
- Tela de contraste baixo com ângulos de visão limitados
Infelizmente, a HP não apresenta uma configuração balanceada que justificaria o alto preço sugerido. Evidentemente é um aparelho ambicioso, mas em nossa opinião, o painel TN com seus ângulos de visão limitados, contraste pobre e baixa precisão das cores, não é uma boa opção para esta faixa de preços, o qual também se reflete na pontuação. O Latitude E7470 conseguiu uma pontuação de tela de 86%, apesar da tela táctil refletiva, e o HP 840 G3 consegue "apenas" 82%. A webcam também é muito ruim e a conectividade também não é tão boa. Todas estas coisas são o motivo de porquê o aparelho empresarial 840 G3 perde uma muito boa pontuação e deve viver com o segundo lugar, atrás do Latitude E7470.
O EliteBook definitivamente não é um portátil ruim, que é apoiado pelos itens em nossa lista de pros. As durações da bateria, as opções de docking, a capacidade de atualização, excelentes dispositivos de entrada e obviamente muito desempenho – muitos aspectos positivos do portátil de 14-polegadas. A versão 3K do 840 G3 com 2560x1440 pixels pode ser um candidato para uma avaliação muito boa, porque o fabricante usa um painel IPS sem tela táctil (WQHD-UWVA).
Os maiores rivais com um preço similar são o Latitude 14 7000 da Série E7470 (avaliação 89%) e o ThinkPad T460s (avaliação 91%). Ambos os portáteis de 14-polegadas podem ser configurados de forma abrangente. A Dell e a Lenovo já usam paineis IPS para seus modelos FHD, o qual é uma grande vantagem sobre o 840 G3. O Latitude E7470 e ThinkPad T460s não têm um slot para SATA de 2,5-polegadas, portanto, o 840 G3 é o único aparelho que pode ser equipado com um HDD/SSD SATA, além do SSD M.2.
Esta é uma versão reduzida da análise original. Você pode ler a análise completa em inglês aqui.
HP EliteBook 840 G3 T9X59ET#ABD
- 04/18/2016 v5.1 (old)
Sebastian Jentsch
Office - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
