Breve Análise do Portátil HP EliteBook 830 G7: Premium para o mainstream
HP EliteBook 830 G7 (EliteBook Serie)
Processador
Intel Core i7-10810U 6 x 1.1 - 4.9 GHz, Comet Lake-U
Placa gráfica
Intel UHD Graphics 620, DDR4, 26.20.100.7985
Memória
16 GB
, Samsung DDR4-2666, 10-10-10-28, Dual-Channel
Pantalha
13.30 polegadas 16:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel 166 PPI, Chi Mei CMN13A9, IPS, Brilhante: não, 60 Hz
placa mãe
Intel Comet Lake-U PCH-LP Premium
Disco rígido
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, 512 GB
peso
1.29 kg, Suprimento de energia: 291 g
Preço
2100 USD
Links
Note: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.
Rating | Date | Model | Weight | Height | Size | Resolution | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 88.7 % v7 (old) | 09/2020 | HP EliteBook 830 G7 i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 18.1 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 87.9 % v7 (old) | 10/2019 | HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.5 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 88 % v7 (old) | 08/2020 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.3 kg | 16.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 89.4 % v7 (old) | 07/2020 | Dell Latitude 7310 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620 | 1.2 kg | 18.3 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | |
| 85.1 % v7 (old) | Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620 | 859 g | 17.9 mm | 13.30" | 1920x1080 | ||
| 84 % v7 (old) | 03/2020 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU) | 1.3 kg | 14.5 mm | 13.50" | 2256x1504 |
| Networking | |
| iperf3 transmit AX12 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331 | |
| Dell Latitude 7310 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
| iperf3 receive AX12 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dell Latitude 7310 | |
HP EliteBook 830 G7; iperf3 receive AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1386 (1329-1458)
HP EliteBook 830 G7; iperf3 transmit AX12; iperf 3.1.3: Ø984 (796-1076)
30.5 ∆E
22.6 ∆E
24.5 ∆E
25.2 ∆E
26.8 ∆E
21.8 ∆E
18 ∆E
28.3 ∆E
17.6 ∆E
23.4 ∆E
18.4 ∆E
25.8 ∆E
22.7 ∆E
21 ∆E
21.3 ∆E
15.5 ∆E
21.7 ∆E
25.7 ∆E
2.3 ∆E
11.8 ∆E
22.4 ∆E
22.1 ∆E
17.1 ∆E
9.3 ∆E
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Chi Mei CMN13A9 tested with X-Rite i1Pro 2
Máximo: 454.5 cd/m² (Nits) Médio: 435.2 cd/m² Minimum: 21.42 cd/m²iluminação: 91 %
iluminação com acumulador: 454.5 cd/m²
Contraste: 1683:1 (Preto: 0.27 cd/m²)
ΔE Color 3.12 | 0.5-29.43 Ø4.92, calibrated: 1.97
ΔE Greyscale 3.1 | 0.5-98 Ø5.2
97% sRGB (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
61.5% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
67.4% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
97.4% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
65.7% Display P3 (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.01
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 Chi Mei CMN13A9, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 M133NVFC R5, IPS LED, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Lenovo B133HAK01.1, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dell Latitude 7310 AU Optronics B133HAN, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331 Toshiba TOS508F, IPS, 13.3", 1920x1080 | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Sharp LQ135P1JX51, IPS, 13.5", 2256x1504 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display | -0% | -0% | 6% | 1% | 1% | |
| Display P3 Coverage | 65.7 | 66.1 1% | 66 0% | 71.8 9% | 66.9 2% | 65.7 0% |
| sRGB Coverage | 97.4 | 95.3 -2% | 96.2 -1% | 99.3 2% | 97.6 0% | 98.6 1% |
| AdobeRGB 1998 Coverage | 67.4 | 67.5 0% | 67.2 0% | 72.4 7% | 67.8 1% | 67.8 1% |
| Response Times | -28% | -2% | 12% | -13% | -25% | |
| Response Time Grey 50% / Grey 80% * | 46.8 ? | 44 ? 6% | 52.8 ? -13% | 40.8 ? 13% | 54.8 ? -17% | 59.2 ? -26% |
| Response Time Black / White * | 32 ? | 30 ? 6% | 29.2 ? 9% | 28.8 ? 10% | 35.6 ? -11% | 41.6 ? -30% |
| PWM Frequency | 26600 ? | 952 ? -96% | 23810 ? -10% | 21740 ? -18% | ||
| Screen | 10% | -33% | 5% | 8% | 14% | |
| Brightness middle | 454.5 | 603 33% | 359 -21% | 332.7 -27% | 482 6% | 403.4 -11% |
| Brightness | 435 | 692 59% | 342 -21% | 329 -24% | 452 4% | 397 -9% |
| Brightness Distribution | 91 | 69 -24% | 90 -1% | 89 -2% | 91 0% | 89 -2% |
| Black Level * | 0.27 | 0.26 4% | 0.21 22% | 0.25 7% | 0.4 -48% | 0.34 -26% |
| Contrast | 1683 | 2319 38% | 1710 2% | 1331 -21% | 1205 -28% | 1186 -30% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 * | 3.12 | 2.2 29% | 6.7 -115% | 2.15 31% | 1.85 41% | 0.94 70% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 max. * | 4.85 | 7.7 -59% | 10.9 -125% | 3.89 20% | 3.08 36% | 2.92 40% |
| Colorchecker dE 2000 calibrated * | 1.97 | 1.5 24% | 1.3 34% | 1.09 45% | 1.2 39% | 0.99 50% |
| Greyscale dE 2000 * | 3.1 | 2.6 16% | 7.4 -139% | 2.5 19% | 2 35% | 0.9 71% |
| Gamma | 2.01 109% | 2.17 101% | 2.85 77% | 2.3 96% | 2.1 105% | 2.13 103% |
| CCT | 6902 94% | 6412 101% | 6309 103% | 6347 102% | 6822 95% | 6620 98% |
| Color Space (Percent of AdobeRGB 1998) | 61.5 | 60.2 -2% | 61.7 0% | 64.1 4% | 62.5 2% | 62.3 1% |
| Color Space (Percent of sRGB) | 97 | 93.6 -4% | 95.9 -1% | 99.4 2% | 97.7 1% | 98.7 2% |
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -6% /
2% | -12% /
-23% | 8% /
6% | -1% /
3% | -3% /
5% |
* ... smaller is better
Display Response Times
ℹ
Display response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times.| ↔ Response Time Black to White | ||
|---|---|---|
| 32 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 15.6 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 16.4 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 84 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (21 ms). | ||
| ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey | ||
| 46.8 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined | ↗ 24 ms rise |  |
| ↘ 22.8 ms fall | ||
| The screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers. In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 79 % of all devices are better. This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.9 ms). | ||
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)
ℹ
To dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.| Screen flickering / PWM detected | 26600 Hz | ≤ 62 % brightness setting |  |
The display backlight flickers at 26600 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) Flickering detected at a brightness setting of 62 % and below. There should be no flickering or PWM above this brightness setting. The frequency of 26600 Hz is quite high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8743 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured. | |||
HP EliteBook 830 G7 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ; high: Ø606 (598.31-772.22)
Dell XPS 13 7390 Core i7-10710U UHD Graphics 620, i7-10710U, SK Hynix PC601 NVMe 512 GB; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø886 (689.23-1062.4)
MSI Prestige 14 A10SC-009 GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, i7-10710U, Samsung SSD PM981 MZVLB1T0HALR; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø795 (774.95-1100.17)
Dell Latitude 9510 2-in-1 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Toshiba KBG40ZNS512G NVMe; CPU Multi 64Bit: Ø562 (455.14-1064.2)
Cinebench R20: CPU (Multi Core) | CPU (Single Core)
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
Cinebench R15: CPU Multi 64Bit | CPU Single 64Bit
Blender: v2.79 BMW27 CPU
7-Zip 18.03: 7z b 4 -mmt1 | 7z b 4
Geekbench 5.5: Single-Core | Multi-Core
HWBOT x265 Benchmark v2.2: 4k Preset
LibreOffice : 20 Documents To PDF
R Benchmark 2.5: Overall mean
| LibreOffice / 20 Documents To PDF | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10810U (60.6 - 68.2, n=5) | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
| Microsoft Surface Book 3 15 | |
| Dell XPS 15 9500 Core i5 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
* ... smaller is better
| PCMark 8 | |
| Home Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
| Dell Latitude 7310 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10810U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (3569 - 3969, n=3) | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 | |
| Work Score Accelerated v2 | |
| Dell Latitude 7310 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
| Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331 | |
| Average Intel Core i7-10810U, Intel UHD Graphics 620 (4763 - 5149, n=3) | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 | |
| HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 3569 pontos | |
| PCMark 8 Work Score Accelerated v2 | 4763 pontos | |
| PCMark 10 Score | 4185 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| DPC Latencies / LatencyMon - interrupt to process latency (max), Web, Youtube, Prime95 | |
| Dell Latitude 9510 2-in-1 | |
| Acer TravelMate P6 P614-51T-G2-72ZU | |
| Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20UGS00800 | |
| Dell XPS 13 9300 i5 FHD | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE | |
| Dell Latitude 7310 | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 | |
| Lenovo ThinkPad E14 Gen2-20T7S00W00 | |
| Asus VivoBook Flip 14 TM420IA | |
* ... smaller is better
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dell Latitude 7310 Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AS SSD | 9% | 20% | 62% | -14% | |
| Seq Read | 2081 | 2446 18% | 2714 30% | 2054 -1% | 1387 -33% |
| Seq Write | 1433 | 1319 -8% | 1374 -4% | 1575 10% | 504 -65% |
| 4K Read | 49.92 | 44.69 -10% | 51.2 3% | 52.1 4% | 42.35 -15% |
| 4K Write | 119.1 | 151.5 27% | 135.7 14% | 137.3 15% | 120 1% |
| 4K-64 Read | 585 | 603 3% | 962 64% | 618 6% | 497.4 -15% |
| 4K-64 Write | 1630 | 1410 -13% | 1420 -13% | 1317 -19% | 354.9 -78% |
| Access Time Read * | 0.043 | 0.052 -21% | 0.043 -0% | 0.044 -2% | 0.055 -28% |
| Access Time Write * | 0.097 | 0.026 73% | 0.028 71% | 0.083 14% | 0.093 4% |
| Score Read | 843 | 892 6% | 1284 52% | 876 4% | 678 -20% |
| Score Write | 1892 | 1693 -11% | 1693 -11% | 1611 -15% | 525 -72% |
| Score Total | 3149 | 2997 -5% | 3579 14% | 2927 -7% | 1520 -52% |
| Copy ISO MB/s | 2452 | 2990 22% | 2297 -6% | 764 -69% | |
| Copy Program MB/s | 72.2 | 106.5 48% | 540 648% | 256.1 255% | |
| Copy Game MB/s | 404 | 385.4 -5% | 1288 219% | 368.4 -9% | |
| CrystalDiskMark 5.2 / 6 | -13% | 3% | 6% | -32% | |
| Write 4K | 118.3 | 122.8 4% | 131.1 11% | 135.2 14% | 112.3 -5% |
| Read 4K | 60.4 | 46.89 -22% | 45.48 -25% | 50.7 -16% | 42.13 -30% |
| Write Seq | 2067 | 1801 -13% | 2042 -1% | 2155 4% | 630 -70% |
| Read Seq | 2394 | 1014 -58% | 2259 -6% | 2504 5% | 1023 -57% |
| Write 4K Q32T1 | 325.5 | 333.7 3% | 429.1 32% | 395.6 22% | 336.6 3% |
| Read 4K Q32T1 | 332.2 | 314.4 -5% | 370.7 12% | 394.5 19% | 399.6 20% |
| Write Seq Q32T1 | 2978 | 2784 -7% | 2963 -1% | 2987 0% | 821 -72% |
| Read Seq Q32T1 | 3552 | 3261 -8% | 3564 0% | 3564 0% | 2030 -43% |
| Write 4K Q8T8 | 300.6 | ||||
| Read 4K Q8T8 | 751 | ||||
| Total Average (Program / Settings) | -2% /
1% | 12% /
13% | 34% /
42% | -23% /
-20% |
* ... smaller is better
Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ
CDM 5/6 Read Seq Q32T1:
3552 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write Seq Q32T1:
2978 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K Q32T1:
332.2 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K Q32T1:
325.5 MB/s
CDM 5 Read Seq:
2394 MB/s
CDM 5 Write Seq:
2067 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Read 4K:
60.4 MB/s
CDM 5/6 Write 4K:
118.3 MB/s
Disk Throttling: DiskSpd Read Loop, Queue Depth 8
No graph data
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2176 pontos | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 9927 pontos | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1248 pontos | |
| 3DMark Time Spy Score | 497 pontos | |
Ajuda | ||
| baixo | média | alto | ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dota 2 Reborn (2015) | 75.8 | 49.1 | 22.4 | 19.7 |
| X-Plane 11.11 (2018) | 11.9 | 10.6 | 10.1 |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10810U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 UHD Graphics 620, i7-8565U, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00 | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dell Latitude 7310 UHD Graphics 620, i7-10610U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331 UHD Graphics 620, i5-10210U, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), i5-1035G7, SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Noise | -5% | -3% | -5% | -3% | -3% | |
| off / environment * | 26.8 | 28.8 -7% | 29.3 -9% | 29 -8% | 28.5 -6% | 28.5 -6% |
| Idle Minimum * | 27.1 | 28.8 -6% | 29.3 -8% | 29 -7% | 28.5 -5% | 28.5 -5% |
| Idle Average * | 27.1 | 28.8 -6% | 29.3 -8% | 29 -7% | 28.5 -5% | 28.5 -5% |
| Idle Maximum * | 27.1 | 32.2 -19% | 29.3 -8% | 29 -7% | 28.5 -5% | 28.5 -5% |
| Load Average * | 31.4 | 32.2 -3% | 30.7 2% | 30.1 4% | 32 -2% | 28.5 9% |
| Load Maximum * | 39 | 34.4 12% | 34 13% | 41.3 -6% | 38 3% | 40.4 -4% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.4 |
* ... smaller is better
Barulho
| Ocioso |
| 27.1 / 27.1 / 27.1 dB |
| Carga |
| 31.4 / 39 dB |
 | ||
30 dB silencioso 40 dB(A) audível 50 dB(A) ruidosamente alto |
||
min:  , med:  , max:  Earthworks M23R, Arta (15 cm de distância) environment noise: 26.8 dB(A) | ||
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.4 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30.8 °C / 87 F for the devices in the class Subnotebook.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.3 °C / -6 F).
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 41 °C / 106 F, compared to the average of 35.9 °C / 97 F, ranging from 21.4 to 59 °C for the class Subnotebook.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.2 °C / 117 F, compared to the average of 39.4 °C / 103 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 27.4 °C / 81 F, compared to the device average of 30.8 °C / 87 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are cooler than skin temperature with a maximum of 31.6 °C / 88.9 F and are therefore cool to the touch.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest area of similar devices was 28.3 °C / 82.9 F (-3.3 °C / -6 F).
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)
HP EliteBook 830 G7 audio analysis
(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (80.4 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 14.5% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (12.9% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 1.6% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (2.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 4.2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (14% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 23% of all tested devices in this class were better, 6% similar, 71% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 14% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 82% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Apple MacBook 12 (Early 2016) 1.1 GHz audio analysis
(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (83.6 dB)
Bass 100 - 315 Hz
(±) | reduced bass - on average 11.3% lower than median
(±) | linearity of bass is average (14.2% delta to prev. frequency)
Mids 400 - 2000 Hz
(+) | balanced mids - only 2.4% away from median
(+) | mids are linear (5.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Highs 2 - 16 kHz
(+) | balanced highs - only 2% away from median
(+) | highs are linear (4.5% delta to prev. frequency)
Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz
(+) | overall sound is linear (10.2% difference to median)
Compared to same class
» 6% of all tested devices in this class were better, 2% similar, 92% worse
» The best had a delta of 5%, average was 19%, worst was 53%
Compared to all devices tested
» 4% of all tested devices were better, 1% similar, 95% worse
» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 25%, worst was 134%
Consumo de energia
| desligado | 0.38 / 0.6 Watt |
| Ocioso | 3.6 / 4.7 / 5.1 Watt |
| Carga |
33.3 / 70 Watt |
   
| |
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy | |
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, WDC PC SN720 SDAPNTW-1T00, IPS LED, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dell Latitude 7310 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, Samsung SSD PM981a MZVLB512HBJQ, IPS, 1920x1080, 13.3" | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDGTNG, IPS, 2256x1504, 13.5" | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power Consumption | -40% | -11% | 7% | -5% | -30% | |
| Idle Minimum * | 3.6 | 4.4 -22% | 2.9 19% | 2.7 25% | 2.8 22% | 4.4 -22% |
| Idle Average * | 4.7 | 8 -70% | 5.6 -19% | 4.4 6% | 4.9 -4% | 7.5 -60% |
| Idle Maximum * | 5.1 | 10.6 -108% | 8.9 -75% | 4.8 6% | 9 -76% | 7.8 -53% |
| Load Average * | 33.3 | 34.6 -4% | 30.1 10% | 33.4 -0% | 31.2 6% | 41.9 -26% |
| Load Maximum * | 70 | 68.2 3% | 61.3 12% | 69.7 -0% | 49.4 29% | 63.9 9% |
| Witcher 3 ultra * | 40.8 |
* ... smaller is better
| HP EliteBook 830 G7 i7-10810U, UHD Graphics 620, 53 Wh | HP EliteBook x360 830 G6 i7-8565U, UHD Graphics 620, 53 Wh | Lenovo ThinkPad X13-20T20033GE i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 48 Wh | Dell Latitude 7310 i7-10610U, UHD Graphics 620, 52 Wh | Dynabook Portege X30L-G1331 i5-10210U, UHD Graphics 620, 42 Wh | Microsoft Surface Laptop 3 13 Core i5-1035G7 i5-1035G7, Iris Plus Graphics G7 (Ice Lake 64 EU), 45 Wh | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Battery Runtime | -25% | -23% | -11% | -28% | -26% | |
| Reader / Idle | 2078 | 2246 8% | 2064 -1% | |||
| WiFi v1.3 | 692 | 586 -15% | 559 -19% | 758 10% | 500 -28% | 495 -28% |
| Load | 221 | 146 -34% | 163 -26% | 106 -52% | 112 -49% |
Pro
+ Módulos de RAM, WLAN e WWAN atualizáveis pelo usuário
+ Boa qualidade de som para o tamanho
+ Resposta confortável do teclado
+ Opção de tela de 1000 nits
+ Sem problemas de latência de DPC
+ Ótimo design do chassi
+ Opção WAN 4G LTE
+ Pequeno e portável
+ Obturador de privacidade na webcam
+ Carregamento USB-C
Contra
- Sem botões de mouse dedicados ou TrackPoint
- O desempenho da CPU poderia ser melhor
- A resposta do clickpad poderia ser mais firme
- PWM em níveis baixos de brilho
- Sem opções gráficas Intel Iris
- Sem opções 4K UHD
- Sem leitor de cartões SD
- Sem opções de cores
- Sem eSIM
Não havia motivos convincentes suficientes para atualizar do EliteBook 830 G5 para o 830 G6, mas o mais recente 830 G7 representa um salto significativo no design do chassi e portabilidade para ser uma recomendação muito mais fácil sobre qualquer um de seus predecessores. Seu teclado confortável, opções de tela super brilhante e RAM/WLAN/SSD atualizáveis pelo usuário geralmente não estão disponíveis em sistemas concorrentes desta categoria de tamanho, incluindo o ThinkPad X13 ou Dell Latitude 7310.
Embora amemos o que está aqui, também estamos desapontados ao ver alguns recursos omitidos. O TrackPoint, os botões do mouse, o leitor de cartão SD, gráficos Iris/GeForce MX, o botão híbrido de digitais/energia e sensor de proximidade não estão disponíveis, independentemente da configuração que você escolher. O desempenho da CPU continua abaixo da média o que, embora compreensível para um subportátil, não será ideal para usuários que podem querer explorar todo o potencial do processador.
O HP EliteBook 830 G7 é um subportátil empresarial de gama média que se sente como um produto de gama alta. Estão faltando alguns recursos básicos comuns em portáteis empresariais tradicionais, mas compensa as omissões com sua construção rígida, facilidade de manutenção, tela brilhante e excelente experiência de digitação.
HP EliteBook 830 G7
- 09/19/2020 v7 (old)
Allen Ngo
Subnotebook - Médio equilibrado
Price comparison
